logo
How the British Red Cross tried to blow the whistle about conditions inside crisis-hit migrant detention centres

How the British Red Cross tried to blow the whistle about conditions inside crisis-hit migrant detention centres

Independent18-05-2025

The Home Office failed to act on grave warnings from the British Red Cross about an unfolding crisis at two immigration centres despite employing them to support migrants at the sites and report back, newly released documents reveal.
The documents – that the Home Office took over two years to release – raise questions about officials' handling of Western Jet Foil migrant processing centre in Dover and Manston centre in Kent in the autumn of 2022.
Emails, performance reports and letters sent by the Red Cross to senior Home Office officials between September and November 2022 – disclosed to the Independent under freedom of information (FOI) laws –show how the charity raised 'deeply troubling observations' at the two sites and tried to get the Home Office to act.
Among the issues raised were the confiscation of crucial medication, concerns about migrants' access to urgent medical care, and people being housed in leaking tents without adequate sleeping provisions.
Red Cross staff were on site at both centres in the autumn of 2022, when a humanitarian crisis began. Manston became severely overcrowded, with refugees unable to access healthcare and forced to sleep on damp and mouldy wooden flooring.
As conditions spiralled out of control, the Home Office came under increasing pressure from MPs, unions and the media to act. The Kent site, which was designed to hold up to 1,600 people, was housing 4,000 at the end of October 2022. On 19th November, a detainee died.
After weeks of delay, on 22nd November, the government announced that Manston had been emptied.
This period coincided with the tumultuous 49-day Liz Truss premiership. The home secretary at the time, Suella Braverman, was forced to resign for using her personal email on 19 October, resulting in Grant Shapps taking up the position for six days, until Ms Braverman returned on 25 October when Rishi Sunak became prime minister.
Documents show that the security situation became so concerning that the Red Cross decided to withdraw completely from Western Jet Foil, a smaller processing site that can house up to 250 migrants. Just two weeks after this, far-right extremist Andrew Leak firebombed the facility and later killed himself at a nearby petrol station.
Red Cross staff also attempted to contact the Home Office's whistleblowing email address in late October but received a response saying the service would not accept 'correspondence from an external source'.
An inquiry into the crisis at Manston processing centre is underway to establish what went wrong and why, though it is not clear whether this probe will cover Western Jet Foil.
The Red Cross programme, named the Channel Crossing pilot, was launched on 8 August 2022, with teams aiming to be at either Western Jet Foil or Manston sites for a few days each week. They would provide humanitarian support to the migrants on site, escalate problems to the contractors and Home Office, and regularly give feedback to civil servants about what was happening.
Both sites were being used as temporary holding facilities for small boat migrants who had just arrived in the UK. At the time, migrants should only have been held at these sites for no more than 24 hours.
By early September, the Red Cross teams were identifying concerns about Manston and Western Jet Foil and relaying these back to the Home Office, documents show. They pressed for the Home Office to provide better translation services at the sites, and to screen migrants for medical issues and vulnerabilities such as signs of modern slavery.
They told officials that clarity was needed to determine how migrants could get urgent medical care, and explained that some asylum seekers had had crucial medication confiscated.
They reported that staff at the site were making regular jokes about guessing the ages of young migrants, and there was widespread use of glance age assessments, the charity reported.
Later that month, the charity asked that the Home Office provide people with things to do, such as colouring books, magazines or toys to help dispel tensions and boredom at Manston, and they asked for more bed rolls and blankets so that people could sleep.
Conditions were getting worse and in late September the charity continued to press for action, concerned that people were being held far beyond the 24-hour limit at Manston. Numbers had now started to exceed capacity as more migrants arrived and weren't moved out.
In a brief sent on 30 September, the Red Cross noted that the medical unit at Manston was being overwhelmed, with skin rashes and respiratory issues affecting more and more people.
'Conditions were generally poor with no dedicated accommodation; limited access to medical care; sanitary provisions, fresh air or good quality food. Staff we spoke to were well aware of the poor conditions with many expressing frustration that more wasn't being done to make immediate improvements', the report said.
The team had particular worries about block 10, a unit holding 50 or so families in two medium-sized halls. The buildings were mouldy, damp and poorly ventilated, the charity reported, and had no heating. Clean clothes, underwear and sanitary products were running low, people were complaining of respiratory problems and headaches, and were sleeping on the floor without blankets, the brief warned.
By early October, news about what was happening at Manston started filtering out, with the Prison Officers Association raising the alarm on the 6th. Their statement likened the situation 'to a pressure cooker coming to the boil with a jammed release valve'.
Emails reveal that the day before this statement was issued, Red Cross staff were pushing for an urgent meeting with Home Office directors to address their concerns and to seek assurances that action was being taken to deal with the situation.
On 10 October, Red Cross teams at Western Jet Foil were reporting significant numbers of new arrivals, with staff tired and shouting at refugees. Tents had been put up overnight to increase capacity, some were leaking, and not all had sleeping mats.
A report about a visit to Western Jet Foil on 12 October reveals that Red Cross staff were told by the Border Force commander that up to 1,000 people were expected to attempt the Channel crossing that day as the weather was looking good. This was on top of the 325 people already being processed at Western Jet Foil.
Red Cross staff found that around 100 adult men were being held in the main holding area on benches or sitting on the floor, with some exhibiting 'a state of agitation'.
At 1pm that day, immigration officers asked the Red Cross to vacate their on-site office so that they could undertake age assessments of the migrants. The report of the day continued: 'The only option offered was an internal office within the holding area where 50 male detainees were shouting, acting aggressively towards security staff and jumping up and down on wooden benches. This was totally unsuitable'.
Describing the conditions, the Red Cross brief said: 'Many of the detainees were in poor health with obvious lung infections and previously some BRC staff have reported flea/ insect bites. The presence of such numbers of confused, frustrated and in some cases, aggressive male detainees was very intimidating. There was a palpable air of unease among Border Force and Interforce security staff as more detainees arrived for processing and tempers were obviously short.'
At 1.30pm, the team decided to leave due to the 'inherent potential dangers of the site' - and suspended their in-person work at the site two days later.
A day after the Western Jet Foil visit, the Red Cross's director of refugee support sent a formal letter to three senior Home Office officials demanding urgent action at the Kent and Dover sites, in light of the department's failure to act on the charity's fortnightly reports.
The letter was sent as a follow-up to a meeting between the Red Cross and senior Home Office officials on the 11th.
The letter listed the team's 'deeply troubling observations' from their time at Manston and Western Jet Foil, warned that the government was at risk of breaching the Human Rights Act, and said they were likely detaining people unlawfully.
It was also accompanied by a letter sent by the Red Cross's legal department to the Home Office's legal department.
Despite an acknowledgment from the Clandestine Threats commander Dan O'Mahoney and attempts to arrange a further meeting, the Red Cross would not receive a formal response to their concerns for two weeks - two days after Manston was cleared of asylum seekers and the crisis had abated.
Among other concerns, the letter reported that staff were refusing to let people sleep when there were high arrival numbers, were removing individuals to isolation buses as a form of punishment, and acting rudely or insensitively towards migrants.
A week after the Red Cross sent the ultimatum letter, it emerged publicly that some migrants at Manston had been diagnosed with diphtheria, a contagious infection that affects the skin, nose and throat.
On receiving no substantial response to their 13th October letter, the Red Cross tried to whistleblow about their concerns and contacted the internal Home Office whistleblowing email address on 27th October.
A response from the whistleblowing email address on 9th November said that it would not accept 'correspondence from an external source'.
As officials rushed to ease the overcrowding, a group of 11 asylum seekers were left at a central London station without accommodation after being taken out of Manston. The Home Office said at the time that they believed the migrants had accommodation with friends or family available to them.
Now battling accusations that she had ignored legal advice and blocked plans to use hotels to ease the overcrowding at Manston, Ms Braverman arrived at the immigration centre in a Chinook helicopter on 3rd November.
She also visited Western Jet Foil, which was by this point reeling from a firebomb attack.
Having exhausted all avenues for escalation, on 11th November, chief executive of the Red Cross Mike Adamson wrote to senior Home Office officials, requesting urgent action once more.
The Red Cross finally got a formal response from Mr O'Mahoney on 24 November where he admitted that the 'situation at Western Jet Foil and Manston has been really challenging over the last four months'. He explained: 'We have been in a situation where the inflow of arrivals has outstripped the capability to move people into onward accommodation. This has presented us with real logistical issues.'
Alex Fraser, British Red Cross UK director for refugee support, said: 'In 2022, the British Red Cross was asked by the Home Office to run a local pilot to provide humanitarian support to some of the men, women and children who had made the dangerous journey to cross the Channel in a small boat.
'We were extremely concerned about the humanitarian situation at Western Jet Foil and Manston and we made this clear at the time. No one should experience overcrowded accommodation that puts them at risk of disease and potentially being detained unlawfully. We know from our work supporting people in similar temporary accommodation what a damaging impact it can have on them.
'The serious problems at these two sites are indicative of the wider issues facing the asylum system. We need a more efficient, compassionate asylum system – one that treats people with humanity, dignity and processes their claims fairly.'
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'The home secretary acted on the advice she was given to establish an independent inquiry into events at the Manston Short-Term Holding Facility between June and November 2022, in line with the commitments made by her predecessors, and on the terms agreed through the subsequent legal process.
"That inquiry will now proceed, and we are supporting it fully. It would be inappropriate to comment further whilst it is ongoing.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Immigration is the biggest burden on NHS, say Labour voters
Immigration is the biggest burden on NHS, say Labour voters

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Immigration is the biggest burden on NHS, say Labour voters

Labour voters now believe immigration is the biggest burden on the NHS. Britons who backed Sir Keir Starmer's party at the general election last year think high levels of immigration are having more of an effect on the health service than the ageing population. A poll of 2,000 Labour supporters by Merlin Strategy also found that one in five Labour voters would now consider casting their ballots for Reform UK. It comes as Nigel Farage's party continues to enjoy a comfortable opinion poll lead after promising to effectively freeze non-essential migration and put an end to illegal Channel crossings. Research carried out on May 24 asked people who voted Labour in 2024 which of five factors they believed was 'the biggest burden' on the NHS. Some 24 per cent said high levels of immigration, with 22 per cent saying the mental health crisis. Thirteen per cent said a lack of social care provisions, while 12 per cent blamed junk food and obesity. A further 10 per cent said the biggest burden was people vaping. The remaining 19 per cent did not pick an option or said they did not know. Sir Keir said in a major speech last month that record levels of net migration to Britain in recent years had placed a heavy strain on the country's public services. Maxwell Marlow, the director of public affairs at the Adam Smith Institute, which commissioned the poll, said: 'It is clear that the British people have felt the impact of mass immigration on healthcare. 'Unless the government moves quickly, urging immigrants to purchase private health care as a requirement for any visa other than tourism, then they will continue to hold the Government accountable for the very rapid deterioration in their access to healthcare.' Sir Keir has been criticised for a lack of vision during his first year in office, with only 51 per cent of Labour voters saying the Government was prioritising issues that mattered to them. More than one in four (28 per cent) now regretted voting Labour and more than one in five (22 per cent) were now considering whether to vote for Reform at the next election. Two in five respondents (40 per cent) said they approved of Mr Farage, while 41 per cent disapproved. Scarlett Maguire, the director of Merlin Strategy, said: 'Labour voters are clear that they want to see action on cost of living, healthcare, and immigration. 'The Government needs to show that it is in tune with these priorities and that it understands what matters to their core voters.' Merlin Strategy also conducted a focus group in Runcorn and Helsby, one of the safest Labour seats at the 2024 election, before the party lost the seat to Reform by six votes at last month's by-election. Respondents said Sir Keir's Government was 'afraid of upsetting people', while another member of the group said: 'I don't think they give a toss about us.' The group were also unconvinced by the timing of Sir Keir's plans to clamp down on tobacco and vapes, which have banned disposable vapes and will raise the smoking age by one year, every year. 'How is that really relatable to the working person?' one member asked, adding that it was 'just something shiny to put in the media'.

Reform on course to win next election
Reform on course to win next election

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Reform on course to win next election

Reform UK is now on course to win an outright majority at the next general election, a new poll suggests, with more than a third of voters saying they intend to back Nigel Farage's party. The Ipsos opinion poll puts Reform on 34 per cent, nine points ahead of Labour on 25 per cent, with the Conservatives a distant third on 15 per cent. It is the highest level of support for Reform shown by any poll to date, and would almost certainly be sufficient to give Mr Farage a comfortable overall majority in Parliament. Mr Farage told The Telegraph: 'This poll shows Reform can and will win the next general election.' Analysis by The Telegraph suggests that if the poll result was reproduced in the 2029 election, Reform could win in excess of 400 seats, giving the party a majority of almost 200 and making Mr Farage prime minister. The Tories could be reduced to fewer than 10 seats with Labour on around 140, losing some 270 of the seats they currently hold. However, national opinion polls are notoriously difficult to translate into seat numbers because voting percentages in individual constituencies can vary hugely from the overall average. The poll contains further evidence of the collapse in support for Labour, which is now at levels not seen since October 2019, when Boris Johnson was at the height of his popularity. Sir Keir Starmer is shown to be the least popular prime minister at this stage of his term in office since Ipsos began compiling such records almost half a century ago. Just 19 per cent of respondents said they were satisfied with the job he is doing, with 73 per cent dissatisfied. Only Gordon Brown (22 per cent satisfied) has come close to such levels of unpopularity after 11 months in office. For comparison, 68 per cent of people were satisfied with Sir Tony Blair at the same stage, while Sir John Major satisfied 54 per cent of people and Baroness Thatcher 43 per cent. The news is no better for the Tories, whose support, at 15 per cent, is the lowest since Ipsos's records began in 1976. Just 29 per cent of 2024 voters are satisfied with the job Tory leader Kemi Badenoch is doing, a figure which drops to 11 per cent when all voters are taken into account. The Ipsos survey of 1,180 people reflected the growing likelihood that Reform will be helped by a splintering of the vote among other parties, with the LibDems taking 11 per cent of the votes and the Greens 9 per cent, suggesting that other parties will struggle to win many seats. A Reform UK source said: 'This is big Reform majority territory.' Both the Conservatives and Labour have lost the support of half of those who voted for them in 2024, with the Tories losing 48 per cent of their voters and Labour 54 per cent. Most of the Tory defectors (37 per cent of the 2024 total) have switched to Reform, while Labour has lost 12 per cent of its 2024 vote to Reform and another 13 per cent split between the LibDems and Greens. In contrast, Reform has retained the backing of 95 per cent of those who voted for the party last year. Gideon Skinner, senior director of UK politics at Ipsos, said: 'The last year has indeed been a long time in politics, with our first voting intention poll since the election showing just how much the political landscape has transformed since then. 'Reform UK has continued to build on its success, helped by high levels of enthusiasm among its own support and among working class voters in particular, and taking votes from both Labour and especially the Conservatives, who show little sign of recovery.' He added: 'The disappointment with Labour is clear, even among those who voted for the party in 2024. 'We know from Ipsos research how difficult it has been to shift entrenched public pessimism over the cost of living, immigration, and the state of public services, and so far, Britons do not think Labour is delivering the tangible change they were hoping for in 2024. 'This is reflected in satisfaction ratings for the Government and Prime Minister that are well below the average we usually see coming up to a one-year anniversary. Indeed, they look remarkably similar to the poor ratings received by Gordon Brown in 2008 after the financial crash.' Surveys were carried out between May 29 and June 4, before Zia Yusuf resigned as Reform's chairman and subsequently returned to the party, and before Rachel Reeves announced her controversial spending review. The poll marks the relaunch of Ipsos's Political Monitor survey, which uses an online panel of voters selected using random probability sampling. Letters are sent to randomly selected addresses inviting the recipients to join an online panel, and the results from those who agree to take part are adjusted to take account of the adult population profile on age, gender, ethnicity, employment and other factors. The poll also gathered information on who Reform's supporters are. Six in ten are aged under 50; more than half (53 per cent) are in the lower social classes known as C2, D and E and 42 per cent are non-graduates. More than a quarter of people who did not bother to vote in 2024 now say they would turn out and vote for Reform.

European puppy-smuggling gangs targeted by Government
European puppy-smuggling gangs targeted by Government

Telegraph

time28 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

European puppy-smuggling gangs targeted by Government

European puppy-smuggling gangs are being targeted by new legislation capping the number and age of dogs that can cross the border into Britain. The Government-backed private members' bill will close loopholes that were exploited by the gangsters before Brexit, when the UK was a member of the EU pet passport system. The UK is expected to rejoin the EU passport for dogs, cats and ferrets scheme as part of Sir Keir Starmer's reset deal with Brussels. 'We would urge the Government to ensure that the UK-EU agreement does not have a negative impact on the measures included within the Bill,' warned Claire Calder of Dogs Trust. The passport was abused by criminals, many from Eastern Europe. They used forgeries or corrupt vets signing the travel documents without the proper checks to bring hundreds of thousands of poorly treated puppies into Britain. The Government insists the Bill, which has its third reading on July 3, will prevent a surge in puppy smuggling after the UK rejoins the scheme. Dr Danny Chambers, a Liberal Democrat MP and vet, said: 'So long as my Animal Welfare Bill continues to enjoy broad cross-party support and we get it passed into law, then when combined with pet passports, I'm fully confident the government will have the necessary powers to properly crack down on puppy smuggling.' The Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill raises the minimum age for commercially imported puppies and kittens from 15 weeks to six months. It gives the Government powers to ban the import of heavily pregnant and mutilated dogs and cats. It cuts the number of dogs, cats and ferrets that can be brought into Britain to five per vehicle or three per foot or air passenger. Currently there is a five animal limit per person, rather than per vehicle. A Government spokesman said rejoining the pet passport scheme would make taking pets on holiday easier and cheaper and that the Bill 'will end puppy smuggling'. Senior Tories in Boris Johnson's government hailed Brexit as an opportunity to end puppy smuggling, but a bill to curb the illegal imports was shelved in 2023. The trade has continued even though Brexit meant far more stringent and costly health checks and paperwork requirements to move animals between the EU and UK. The number of pets involved in 'non-commercial' moves to the UK rose from 100,000 in 2011 to more than 320,000 in 2023, raising concerns that puppy smuggling was rife. The EU is working on new legislation to improve minimum common standards for breeding and keeping cats and dogs and to improve cross-border traceability. But there were warnings this week that it won't stop European 'puppy mills' because it does not cover breeders with three litters or fewer. Animal rights campaigners say that it is about 80 per cent of all breeders and that just one unregulated breeder can produce 100 puppies over one animal's lifetime. The RSPCA said it hoped the UK would be back in the EU pet passport scheme by the summer, but added that proper border enforcement was vital. 'Whilst the Government supported Bill raising the minimum age for puppy imports to six months will help enormously tackle the illegal puppy trade, it must be backed up with well-funded enforcement controls,' said David Bowles, of the RSPCA. Northern Irish politicians this week warned that the region could become a back door into the UK for puppy smugglers because of its Brexit deal, which keeps the border with EU member Ireland invisible. Ulster Unionist Party MLA Robbie Butler said of the Bill: ' What we risk doing here is creating an alternative route where animals are brought legally into the Republic, then re-registered, and quietly moved across the border into Northern Ireland and on to Great Britain without triggering enforcement.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store