What would happen if the Amazon rainforest dried out? This decades-long experiment has some answers
A short walk beneath the dense Amazon canopy, the forest abruptly opens up. Fallen logs are rotting, the trees grow sparser and the temperature rises in places sunlight hits the ground. This is what 24 years of severe drought looks like in the world's largest rainforest.
But this patch of degraded forest, about the size of a soccer field, is a scientific experiment. Launched in 2000 by Brazilian and British scientists, Esecaflor — short for 'Forest Drought Study Project' in Portuguese— set out to simulate a future in which the changing climate could deplete the Amazon of rainfall. It is the longest-running project of its kind in the world, and has become a source for dozens of academic articles in fields ranging from meteorology to ecology and physiology.
Understanding how drought can affect the Amazon, an area twice the size of India that crosses into several South American nations, has implications far beyond the region. The rainforest stores a massive amount of carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas that is the main driver of climate change. According to one study, the Amazon stores the equivalent of two years of global carbon emissions, which mainly come from the burning of coal, oil and gasoline. When trees are cut, or wither and die from drought, they release into the atmosphere the carbon they were storing, which accelerates global warming.
Creating drought conditions and observing the results
To mimic stress from drought, the project, located in the Caxiuana National Forest, assembled about 6,000 transparent plastic rectangular panels across one hectare (2.5 acres), diverting around 50% of the rainfall from the forest floor. They were set 1 meter above ground (3.3 ft) on the sides to 4 meters (13.1 ft) above ground in the center. The water was funneled into gutters and channeled through trenches dug around the plot's perimeter.
Next to it, an identical plot was left untouched to serve as a control. In both areas, instruments were attached to trees, placed on the ground and buried to measure soil moisture, air temperature, tree growth, sap flow and root development, among other data. Two metal towers sit above each plot.
In each tower, NASA radars measure how much water is in the plants, which helps researchers understand overall forest stress. The data is sent to the space agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, where it is processed.
'The forest initially appeared to be resistant to the drought," said Lucy Rowland, an ecology professor at the University of Exeter.
That began to change about 8 years in, however. "We saw a really big decline in biomass, big losses and mortality of the largest trees,' said Rowland.
This resulted in the loss of approximately 40% of the total weight of the vegetation and the carbon stored within it from the plot. The main findings were detailed in a study published in May in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution. It shows that during the years of vegetation loss, the rainforest shifted from a carbon sink, that is, a storer of carbon dioxide, to a carbon emitter, before eventually stabilizing.
There was one piece of good news: the decades-long drought didn't turn the rainforest into a savanna, or large grassy plain, as earlier model-based studies had predicted.
Next steps include measuring forest recovery
In November, most of the 6,000 transparent plastic covers were removed, and now scientists are observing how the forest changes. There is currently no end date for the project.
'The forest has already adapted. Now we want to understand what happens next,' said meteorologist João de Athaydes, vice coordinator of Esecaflor, a professor at the Federal University of Para and coauthor of the Nature study. 'The idea is to see whether the forest can regenerate and return to the baseline from when we started the project.'
During a visit in April, Athaydes guided Associated Press journalists through the site, which had many researchers. The area was so remote that most researchers had endured a full-day boat trip from the city of Belem, which will host the next annual U.N. climate talks later this year. During the days in the field, the scientists stayed at the Ferreira Penna Scientific Base of the Emilio Goeldi Museum, a few hundred yards (meters) from the plots.
Four teams were at work. One collected soil samples to measure root growth in the top layer. Another gathered weather data and tracking soil temperature and moisture. A third was measured vegetation moisture and sap flow. The fourt focused on plant physiology.
"We know very little about how drought influences soil processes,' said ecologist Rachel Selman, researcher at the University of Edinburgh and one of the co-authors of the Nature study, during a break.
Esecaflor's drought simulation draws some parallels with the past two years, when much of the Amazon rainforest, under the influence of El Nino and the impact of climate change, endured its most severe dry spells on record. The devastating consequences ranged from the death of dozens of river dolphins due to warming and receding waters to vast wildfires in old-growth areas.
Rowland explained that the recent El Nino brought short-term, intense impacts to the Amazon, not just through reduced rainfall but also with spikes in temperature and vapor pressure deficit, a measure of how dry the air is. In contrast, the Esecaflor experiment focused only on manipulating soil moisture to study the effects of long-term shifts in rainfall.
'But in both cases, we're seeing a loss of the forest's ability to absorb carbon,' she said. 'Instead, carbon is being released back into the atmosphere, along with the loss of forest cover.'
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Inside the terrifying island where only soldiers and scientists are allowed to visit
This deadly island is swarming with 4,000 of the world's most lethal snakes and is deemed so dangerous that visiting it was been banned by the Brazilian government. Ilha de Queimada Grande sits 20 miles (32 km) off the coast of Sao Paolo, and is home to the golden lancehead viper. Understandably nicknamed 'Snake Island', the piece of land 4.6 million square feet (430,000 square metres) in size is the only place on Earth where Bothrops insularis, also known as the golden lancehead viper, is known to inhabit. The island is devoid of almost any human visitors, expect for a few scientists who are granted permission to study the snakes each year. It is also visited on occasion by the Brazilian navy, who tend to the autonomous lighthouse that was built back in 1909 before scampering clear. The island has come to be known as Snake Island with it being claimed there is one snake for every square metre. And it's also thought that poachers have been known to visit the island and claim a golden lancehead viper for their own, with their price fetching as high as £17,500 ($30,000) on the black market. The viper has been been evolving in isolation since rising sea levels cut the island off from the mainland 11,000 years ago, leaving the snakes on the island with limited sources of food. Migrating birds became the viper's main prey but the problem was, though, that most venoms take a while to act - sometimes as much as a few days. By the time the snake's venom killed the birds they would have moved elsewhere, so instead the snakes evolved an incredibly strong venom that can kill prey almost instantly. It is five times more potent than other snakes and can even melt human flesh. In humans, the bite from a golden lancehead viper carried a seven per cent chance of death. And before the island was deemed off-limits there were several stories of people succumbing to the deadly predators. One story tells of a fisherman who lost power in the engines of his boat. After drifting to the island he ventured inland, unaware of the terrors that lay in wait. When his boat was eventually discovered, he was found dead in a pool of blood covered in snake bites. The island has come to be known as Snake Island with it being claimed there is one snake for every square metr Another story is of the last lighthouse keeper to inhabit the island with his family. Rumour has it they ran in terror when snakes crawled in through their windows; their bodies were later found scattered across the island. The name of the island itself tells of its troubled history. Ilha de Queimada Grande roughly translates as 'the island of the slash-and-burn fire', so-called because of a failed attempt to develop a banana plantation on it. However, in the last 15 years the population of snakes on the island as reduced by as much as 15 per cent, due to a combination of vegetation removal and disease. And on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List the snakes are currently listed as critically endangered. With thousands of snakes remaining, however, it's probably still not the ideal holiday destination.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘People think prison is for rehabilitation. It is all lies': could community service work better than jail?
The baby calls out, reaching towards a metal detector security gate. 'Mama, mama,' she says. A prison officer waves her through. It's visiting time at El Buen Pastor prison, Colombia's largest detention centre for women. Behind the black door, half a dozen women wait anxiously. Dressed in her best clothes, the mother folds herself around the child. Inside, the prison is crumbling. Black mould creeps up the walls; broken windows have been replaced with plastic sheets. Inmates say five to six people share cells built for two. 'It is terrible here,' says inmate Daniela Martinez. 'The conditions are horrible. Once you enter, you lose hope.' Colombia's female prison population has increased more than fivefold since 1991, largely driven by drug laws that disproportionately punish women. More than a third are imprisoned for drug-related crimes; many are minor players in the trafficking chain. The nation – which produces most of the world's cocaine – has long been plagued by the drug trade, which has fuelled organised crime and conflict and continues to flourish. Now Colombia's president, Gustavo Petro, is attempting a new approach – pivoting from punishment to rehabilitation. 'Colombia has been the best student of the global drug regime, and done pretty much everything we were told to do for decades,' says Laura Gil, Colombia's ambassador-at-large for global drug policy. 'Yet today, we have record production, record consumption and record narco trafficking. 'We need to put people at the forefront instead of prisons at the forefront,' she adds. A key reform is the Public Utility law, introduced in March 2023, to allow incarcerated women who are heads of their household and serving sentences under eight years to complete community service instead. It is granted primarily to women convicted of drug trafficking. At El Buen Pastor prison, Colombia's minister of justice Ángela María Buitrago Ruiz says a significant portion of female inmates are poor and from rural areas – where they are vulnerable to the cartels. 'Many of the women here have suffered from marginality. Although in many cases they have trafficked drugs, in many cases they also did not know what they were smuggling,' she says. 'We need to change the system. We need to protect women.' Inmate Martinez was sentenced to five years and four months after 10 kilos of marijuana was found in her home. 'I was tricked. I was asked to keep hold of it for someone, and then two hours later the police came,' she says. 'I was a mule.' Patricia Cortes, 23, is one of those who released under the scheme. She was freed on 17 September 2024, 11 months after she was first incarcerated for conspiracy to commit a crime, drug trafficking, manufacturing, or possession of narcotics. Cortes says that she had been photographed alongside her mother, who had started selling narcotics to escape poverty. 'Her motivation was our household needs: she had eight children, five of whom were minors, and my father had left,' she says. 'She needed the money.' Cortes says women bear the brunt of Colombia's drug crisis, with many coerced. In the prison chapel, the justice minister plays a video of an inmate leaving El Buen Pastor under the scheme. 'Please help us and give us women who are heads of household a second chance,' she says; the inmates watching cheer in response. 'People think and say that prison is where people are rehabilitated and educated, but it is all lies. In prison, everything is denied,' says Cortes, who gave birth to her son in jail. 'Many people leave prison worse than when they entered.' Only 143 women have been released so far – 99 of whom were charged with drug offences – despite the availability of more than 2,600 community service spaces. The justice ministry blames 'conservative judges' for stalling progress, while civil society leaders say the definition of 'marginality' has caused difficulties in court. 'We don't have high hopes for being released,' says Martinez. 'We are more useful outside than inside; here all we do is waste time. But we have seen how many of the requests have been denied.' Beyond the Public Utility law, Petro launched a 10-year drug policy in October that proposes to change the narrative around psychoactive substances, prioritise rural development, reduce coca crops, and help small farmers transition to the legal economy. In March, the Colombian government also led a historic resolution at the UN commission on narcotic drugs to suggest reforms for the existing 60-year-old system. Civil society leaders have criticised Petro's 10-year plan as lacking strategy. It also comes amid a deteriorating security situation that has left tens of thousands displaced, and prevents access to key coca cultivation sites. Local people, too, wonder if the policies go far enough. In a Bogotá neighbourhood long scarred by the drug trade, people say the root of the issue is poor education. 'There are no opportunities for children to get an education here,' says Monica Urbina, 39. 'They turn to drugs at 13, thinking it will give them a solution to their problem. Then they join the gangs. A lot of young people from our neighbourhoods are in jail or dead. The government needs to fix the schools first.' Martinez, who is applying for release under the Public Utility law, agrees that more action is needed. 'Drugs affect everything in this country – families, economy, work, social life,' she says. 'The government needs to work harder to break the chain.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
How the little-known ‘dark roof' lobby may be making US cities hotter
It began with a lobbyist's pitch. Tennessee representative Rusty Grills says the lobbyist proposed a simple idea: repeal the state's requirement for reflective roofs on many commercial buildings. In late March, Grills and his fellow lawmakers voted to eliminate the rule, scrapping a measure meant to save energy, lower temperatures and protect Tennesseans from extreme heat. Grills, a Republican, told Floodlight that he introduced the bill to give consumers more choice. It was another win for a well-organized lobbying campaign led by manufacturers of dark roofing materials. Industry representatives called the rollback in Tennessee a needed correction as more of the state moved into a hotter climate zone, expanding the reach of the state's cool-roof rule. Critics called it dangerous and 'deceptive'. 'The new law will lead to higher energy costs and greater heat-related illnesses and deaths,' state representative Harold Love and the Rev. Jon Robinson said in a statement. It will, critics warned, make Nashville, Memphis, and other cities hotter – particularly in underserved Black and Latino communities, where many struggle to pay their utility bills. Similar lobbying has played out in Denver, Baltimore and at the national level. Industry groups have questioned the decades-old science behind cool roofs, downplayed the benefits and warned of reduced choice and unintended consequences. 'A one-size-fits-all approach doesn't consider climate variation across different regions,' wrote Ellen Thorp, the executive director of the EPDM Roofing Association, a DC-based national group which represents an industry built primarily on dark materials. But the weight of the scientific evidence is clear: on hot days, light-colored roofs can stay more than 50 degrees cooler than dark ones, helping cut energy use, curb greenhouse gas emissions and reduce heat-related illnesses and deaths. One recent study found that reflective roofs could have saved the lives of more than 240 people who died in London's 2018 heatwave. At least eight states – and more than a dozen cities in other states – have adopted cool-roof requirements, according to the Smart Surfaces Coalition, a national group of public health and environmental groups that promote reflective roofs, trees and other solutions to make cities healthier. Industry representatives lobbied successfully in recent months against expanding cool roof recommendations in national professional energy efficiency codes – the standards that many cities and states use to set building regulations. The stakes are high. As global temperatures rise and heat waves grow more deadly, the roofs over our heads have become battlefields in a consequential climate war. It's happening as the Trump administration and Congress move to derail measures designed to make appliances and buildings more energy efficient. The principle is simple: light-colored roofs reflect sunlight, so buildings stay cooler. Dark ones absorb heat, driving up temperatures inside buildings and in the surrounding air. Roofs comprise up to one-fourth of the surface area of major US cities, researchers say, so the color of roofs can make a big difference in urban areas. Just how hot can dark roofs get? 'You can physically burn your hands on these roofs,' said Bill Updike, who used to install solar panels and now works for the Smart Surfaces Coalition. Study after study has confirmed the benefits of light-colored roofs. They save energy, lower air conditioning bills and reduce city temperatures. They help prevent heat-related illnesses. And they typically cost no more than dark roofs. A study by the US Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory found that a cool roof on a home in central California saved 20% in annual energy costs. In a three-story rowhouse in Baltimore, Owen Henry discovered what a difference a cool roof can make. Living in a part of the city with few trees – and where summer temperatures often climb into the 90s – Henry wanted to trim his power bills and stay cooler while working in his third-floor office. So in 2023, he used $100 worth of white reflective roof paint to coat his roof. Henry said he and his wife immediately saw the indoor temperature drop. They reduced their electricity use – by 24%. Known for its durability, a black synthetic rubber known as EPDM once dominated commercial roofing. But in recent years it has been surpassed by TPO, a plastic single-ply material which is typically white and is better suited to meet the growing demand for reflective roofs. Leading EPDM manufacturers – including Johns Manville, Carlisle SynTec and Elevate, a division of the Swiss multinational company Holcim – also make reflective roofing materials. But they have fought against regulations that threaten to further diminish their market share. In an emailed response to Floodlight's questions, Thorp argued that many of the studies cited to support cool roof mandates leave out important factors, such as local climate variations, roof type, tree canopy and insulation thickness. And she pointed to a recent study by Harvard researchers who concluded that white roofs and pavements may reduce precipitation, causing temperatures to unexpectedly increase in surrounding regions. But Haider Taha, a leading expert on urban heat, identified flaws in the Harvard study, stating: 'The study's conclusions fail to provide actionable insights for urban cooling strategies or policymaking.' When Baltimore debated a cool roof ordinance in 2022, Thorp's group and the Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) lobbied hard against it, arguing that dark roofs are the most efficient choice in 'northern climates like Baltimore'. In cold climates, industry representatives note, cool roofs can lead to higher winter heating bills. 'Current research does not support the adoption of cool roofs as a measure that will achieve improved energy efficiency or reduced urban heat island,' Thorp wrote in a letter to one council member. Multiple studies show otherwise. They've concluded that reflective roofs do save energy and cool cities by easing the 'urban heat island effect' – the extra heat that gets trapped in many city neighborhoods because buildings and pavement soak up the sun. Researchers have also found that even in most cold North American climates, the energy savings from cool roofs during warmer months outweighs any added heating costs in the winter. Despite the opposition, Baltimore passed a cool-roof ordinance in 2023. Opponents of cool roof requirements like Baltimore's say they oversimplify a complex issue. In an email to Floodlight, ARMA executive vice-president Reed Hitchcock said such rules aren't a 'magic bullet'. He encouraged regulators to consider a 'whole building approach' – one that weighs insulation, shading and climate in addition to roof color to preserve design flexibility and consumer choice. Henry, the Baltimore homeowner, said he thinks the city's ordinance will help all residents. 'Phooey to any manufacturer that's going to try and stop us from maintaining our community and making it a pleasant place to live,' he said. Elsewhere, the industry's lobbyists have notched victories. They lobbied successfully to water down a cool-roof ordinance in Denver and to block stricter standards by the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) – a professional organization that creates model standards for city and state regulations. The current ASHRAE standard recommends reflective roofs on commercial buildings in US climate zones 1, 2 and 3 — the country's hottest regions. Those include most of the south, Hawaii, almost all of Texas, areas along the Mexican border and most of California. Said Thorp in a recent interview, 'We've been able to stop all of those … mandates from creeping into climate zone 4 and 5.' Another group headed by Thorp – the Coalition for Sustainable Roofing – worked with the lobbyist to propose the bill that eliminated Tennessee's cool-roof requirement. That rule once applied to commercial buildings in just 14 of the state's 95 counties, but an update to climate maps in 2021 expanded the requirements to 20 more counties, including its most populous urban area – Nashville. Brian Spear, a homeowner in Tempe, Arizona, has lived in the Phoenix area since the 1980s, back when there were fewer than 30 days a year when the temperature reached 110F. Last year, there were 70 of those days – the highest on record — followed only by 2023, when there were 55 days of 110F plus. These days, summer mornings start out scorching, he says, 'and I feel like if you go outside between 10am and 4pm, it's dangerous.' Spear says he'll soon replace the aging roof on an Airbnb home that he owns. After weighing the usual concerns – cost and aesthetics – he has chosen a surface that he believes will help rather than harm: a gray metal roof with a reflective coating. 'If someone told me you couldn't put a dark roof on your house … I'd understand,' he said. 'I'm all about it being for the common good.' Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that partners with local and national outlets to investigate the powerful interests stalling climate action. Read the full version of this story here
