James Webb telescope finds 'totally unexpected' ancient galaxy that defies theory
An ancient galactic lighthouse is shining through the fog of the early universe, new James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations reveal.
Researchers discovered bright ultraviolet (UV) light coming from an ancient, distant galaxy. The findings, published March 26 in the journal Nature, suggest that the universe's first stars modified their surroundings even earlier than expected.
Shortly after the Big Bang, the universe was a soup of protons, neutrons and electrons. As the universe cooled, the protons and neutrons combined to form positively charged hydrogen ions, which then attracted negatively charged electrons to create a fog of neutral hydrogen atoms. This fog absorbed light with short wavelengths, such as UV light, blocking it from reaching farther into the universe.
But as the first stars and galaxies formed, they emitted enough UV light to knock the electrons back off the hydrogen atoms, allowing UV light out once again. Though this "Era of Reionization" is thought to have ended about a billion years after the Big Bang, scientists still aren't sure exactly when the first stars formed — or when the Era of Reionization began.
Related: James Webb telescope reveals 'cosmic tornado' in best detail ever — and finds part of it is not what it seems
The new findings could help narrow down that starting point. Using JWST, researchers observed an ancient galaxy known as JADES-GS-z13-1. The galaxy is so far from Earth that we're observing it as it appeared just 330 million years after the Big Bang.
In the JWST data, the scientists spotted bright light at a specific wavelength known as the Lyman-alpha emission, which is produced by hydrogen. Though the light started out as ultraviolet, the universe's expansion over more than 13 billion years has stretched it out into the infrared region, making it visible to JWST's sensors.
For the Lyman-alpha emission to reach Earth today, JADES-GS-z13-1 must have ionized enough of the hydrogen gas around it to allow the UV light to escape — something scientists hadn't expected so early in the universe's development.
"GS-z13-1 is seen when the universe was only 330 million years old, yet it shows a surprisingly clear, telltale signature of Lyman-alpha emission that can only be seen once the surrounding fog has fully lifted," study co-author Roberto Maiolino, an astrophysicist at the University of Cambridge, said in a statement. "This result was totally unexpected by theories of early galaxy formation and has caught astronomers by surprise."
RELATED STORIES
—James Webb telescope discovers 2 of the oldest galaxies in the universe
—James Webb telescope reveals 3 possible 'dark stars' — galaxy-sized objects powered by invisible dark matter
—'I was astonished': Ancient galaxy discovered by James Webb telescope contains the oldest oxygen scientists have ever seen
Researchers still don't know what produced the Lyman-alpha radiation in JADES-GS-z13-1. The light might come from extremely hot and massive early stars, or it might be produced by an early supermassive black hole.
"We really shouldn't have found a galaxy like this, given our understanding of the way the universe has evolved," study co-author Kevin Hainline, an astronomer at the University of Arizona, said in the statement. "We could think of the early universe as shrouded with a thick fog that would make it exceedingly difficult to find even powerful lighthouses peeking through, yet here we see the beam of light from this galaxy piercing the veil."
"This fascinating emission line has huge ramifications for how and when the universe reionized," Hainline concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Did 'primordial' black holes born right after the Big Bang help our universe's 1st stars form?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. New research suggests that primordial black holes created during the Big Bang could have played a major role in forming the universe's first stars. The findings could help to assess how suitable primordial black holes are as candidates for dark matter, the universe's most mysterious "stuff." But the study team isn't sure yet whether these black holes helped star formation, acting as "cosmic midwives" by ferrying matter to sites of stellar birth, or if they acted to suppress starbirth! The role primordial black holes played in the formation of so-called "Population III (POP III) stars" ( a confusing name for the first generation of stars) all depends on what masses these hypothetical original black holes have. "We investigated how primordial black holes — ancient black holes that may have formed in the very early universe — could have influenced the birth of the first stars," team member Stefano Profumo of the University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC) told "Using advanced computer simulations, we found that, depending on their mass and abundance, these black holes could either speed up or delay the formation of the first stars." Profumo added that, in some cases, primordial black holes likely acted like "cosmic seeds," helping matter clump together earlier than expected. However, in other scenarios, Profumo and colleagues found that these black holes could have disrupted gas clouds, actually preventing stars from forming promptly. Primordial black holes: Friend or foe to star formation? Primordial black holes are thought to have formed as a result of density fluctuations in matter in the early universe. This is quite different from the origin of so-called stellar-mass black holes, which are created when massive stars collapse and erupt in supernovas at the end of their lives. This means that primordial black holes didn't have to wait for the first generation of stars to live and die before they could be created. Also, it doesn't place the same kinds of mass limits on primordial black holes that exist for stellar-mass black holes, as the former are created directly from early cosmic material rather than from collapsing stars, which can only be so massive. However, because primordial black holes are yet to be discovered, there isn't much else scientists can firmly say about them. Profumo explained how primordial black holes could play a role in star formation. "Massive primordial black holes can serve as powerful gravitational centers. In the early universe, they could have pulled in gas and dark matter more quickly, jump-starting the formation of small galaxies and stars," he said. "This could explain how some of the earliest galaxies we now see — thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) — managed to form so surprisingly fast after the Big Bang." However, primordial black holes must have a certain mass to play a positive role in star birth, according to the team's simulations, which were performed using a software package called GIZMO, running the hydrodynamics of the universe's initial gas and dust. "To boost early star formation in the way we observed, the black holes would need to be quite massive — about a thousand to ten thousand times the mass of our sun," Profumo said. "At those sizes, and in the right numbers, they'd have a noticeable effect on how quickly the first stars formed." More massive primordial black holes would do this by causing density fluctuations in matter to increase. This would create more so-called dark matter haloes, vast clusters of this mysterious form of matter within which the building blocks of stars and galaxies could gather en masse. If there are too many of these massive primordial black holes, however, then stars and galaxies would form too fast, thus not reflecting our picture of the early universe. But the team found that primordial black holes with masses smaller than around 100 times that of the sun wouldn't increase density fluctuations. Instead, the team's simulations indicated that, if there were enough of these less massive primordial black holes, the influence of their gravity would generate tidal forces within vast clouds of gas and heat them. This is problematic for star formation, because stellar bodies are born when cold and over-dense clumps of gas and dust collapse under the influence of their own gravity. The more low-mass primordial black holes in the early universe, the more gas is heated and the more star formation is stunted. Thus, this is a really Goldilocks situation. To assist in star formation, the masses and population sizes of primordial black holes need to be "just right." Further investigation of these competing scenarios could tell scientists more about dark matter. Primordial black holes and dark matter Dark matter is so problematic to scientists because, despite accounting for about 85% of the matter in the universe, it remains effectively invisible. That means everything we see — stars, planets, moons, asteroids, comets, each other, and so forth — accounts for just 15% of the stuff in the universe. Scientists can gather that dark matter isn't made up of particles like electrons, protons, and neutrons, which compose the atoms of "normal" matter, because those particles interact with light, and whatever dark matter is doesn't. This has spurred a search for particles beyond the standard model of particle physics. The fact that this hunt has turned up empty has kept primordial black holes in the frame as dark matter suspects. "This research tells us that if primordial black holes do make up some or all of the dark matter, they can't just have any mass or be present in any amount," Profumo said. "If there are too many, or if they're too massive, they would cause the first stars to form much too early — before we see any signs of them. "On the other hand, if they're too small and too abundant, they can get in the way of star formation. This gives us a new way to rule out certain black hole scenarios for dark matter." Of course, primordial black holes remain hypothetical. Barring the detection of these Big Bang-generated black holes, there are other ways that astronomers could find evidence supporting the team's theory about their role in early star formation. "The effects we studied would show up during what's called the cosmic dawn — roughly 100 to 200 million years after the Big Bang. In some of our most extreme scenarios, star formation could start as early as 15 million years after the Big Bang — much earlier than traditional models suggest," Profumo said. "If telescopes like JWST or future instruments can find galaxies or stars forming very, very early in the universe, that would support the idea that something like primordial black holes helped cosmic structures form faster than usual." Related Stories: — A 'primordial' black hole may zoom through our solar system every decade — Primordial black holes may flood the universe. Could one hit Earth? — Tiny black holes left over from the Big Bang may be prime dark matter suspects The next step for the team is to move beyond the assumption that all primordial black holes would have the same masses. "Most theories suggest a mix of masses, and we want to model that more realistically," Profumo said. "We're also planning to improve the physical modeling of star formation, and to simulate larger patches of the early universe to understand how primordial black holes might have influenced not just the first stars but also the formation of early galaxies." The team's research is available as a preprint on the paper repository arXiv. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
New study says the 'one-set rule' could help you build more muscle in the gym (while doing less) — here's how
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. If you're anything like me, gym motivation comes and goes, and sometimes, no matter what conversation you have with yourself, it just isn't happening. Well, I might have found a fix. From now on, whenever you're debating whether or not to do that workout or lift those barbells or dumbbells, think this: just one set. That's it, just one set. New research published in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise has made a fascinating discovery, and it's that a single-set routine could save time and still build muscle, even when transitioning from higher-volume workouts. Here's everything you need to know about the 'one-set rule,' and why it works, according to researchers. What is the study? Researchers took 42 young men and women who were already resistance-trained, and assigned them to one of two groups: the first group trained to failure on all exercises, while the other worked at a submaximal effort, meaning they had roughly two reps 'in reserve' for the same exercises. All participants performed one set of nine different exercises focusing on all major muscle groups each session. They did this twice per week for eight weeks. Researchers then measured muscle thickness in the biceps and triceps brachii and quadriceps, and looked at muscular strength, power and endurance markers. What are the results? The results showed that both groups benefitted from 'appreciable gains in most of the assessed outcomes," and several measures of hypertrophy (muscle growth) favored the all-out effort group. However, increases in strength and local muscular endurance were similar between groups. The next time you head to the gym, you could perform just one set of each exercise twice per week and still benefit. The study concluded that single-set routines can be time-efficient and still promote modest muscular adaptations, although this was an assessment on trained individuals only. That said, even if participants had transitioned from higher-volume programs, it was still effective. What does it all mean? Training toward failure and prioritizing intensity rather than volume (high sets or reps) is where muscle adaptations can occur. Even just one set per exercise can help you build muscle and power, so long as you work with intensity close to failure. However, results didn't show the same for strength or local muscle endurance in this case. The next time you head to the gym, you could perform just one set of each exercise twice per week and still benefit. Training to failure in this case favored slightly better muscle growth, but both groups still benefited significantly overall, and strength outcomes were similar. Remember, the experiment targeted the whole body and main muscle groups, but by keeping it minimal, sessions were still short and time-efficient. Just think of intensity and ensure you're lifting toward failure rather than keeping reps in reserve. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide Forget running and swimming — study finds this sport adds 10 years to your life New study reveals cycling can reduce dementia risk by 88% Work out less and get better results — a new study says this is exactly how
Medscape
9 hours ago
- Medscape
Fish Bone or Cancer? 80-Year-Old's Perforation Case
Key Takeaways An 80-year-old man presented with progressive lower left-quadrant abdominal pain. Imaging studies identified a mass adjacent to the sigmoid colon, with features suggestive of an abscess, although no definitive foreign body was detected preoperatively. Surgical exploration revealed a sigmoid colon perforation associated with a sharp foreign object, which was later confirmed to be a fish bone. Histopathological examination revealed an inflammatory response without evidence of malignancy. The case reported by Daniel Herrera Hernández, MD, and colleagues from the Hospital General Regional No. 1 Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Tijuana, Mexico, highlighted a rare cause of intestinal perforation. The Patient and His History The patient had a medical history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension. There was no prior surgical history or screening colonoscopy. He reported a 12-day history of lower left-quadrant abdominal pain, progressively worsening to become intolerable, prompting emergency admission. Findings and Diagnosis On presentation, the patient was stable but exhibited abdominal distension and tenderness on palpation of the left hemiabdomen, without signs of peritoneal irritation. Laboratory tests showed leucocytosis of 20,800/μL (4000-11,000), neutrophils at 65.1% (40%-70%) of total leukocytes, and a serum creatinine of 1.0 mg/dL (0.6-1.2). Abdominal and pelvic CT scans revealed a mass adjacent to the descending colon with peripheral enhancement dependent on the colonic wall, extending into the muscular layer, suggestive of an abscess, as well as a small radio-opaque object in the middle of the phlegmon, supportive of a foreign body. Adjacent fat stranding and free fluid were observed in the left iliac fossa. The patient underwent exploratory laparotomy, revealing a colonic perforation at the sigmoid colon with firm adhesions to the abdominal wall. A sharpened foreign body, approximately 2 cm in length, was found at the adhesion site, which was the cause of the perforation. No diverticula were identified in the colon. Left hemicolectomy with transverse colon terminal colostomy was performed. Postoperative recovery was uneventful under antibiotic therapy with meropenem and metabolic management. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 with clinical improvement. The histopathology report indicated chronic inflammation with no evidence of malignancy. Discussion 'Intestinal perforation by a fish bone in the colon is a rare complication that poses diagnostic challenges. It requires a high index of suspicion from surgeons or emergency physicians. In patients with risk factors, such perforations can resemble tumours with abscess formation or perforation secondary to malignancy,' the authors wrote. This story was translated from Univadis Germany.
