Rugby world's support for boy with cancer
A nine-year-old boy who was diagnosed with cancer has received an outpouring of love and support from the rugby world.
Sam, from Biddulph, Staffordshire, was diagnosed with lymphoblastic leukaemia in January and has been undergoing chemotherapy.
Advertisement
Due to his illness and the treatment, the youngster had to stop playing for his beloved Congleton Rugby Club, temporarily giving up a sport he always wanted to be a part of.
After news of his diagnosis spread, and with a little help from family friends, international players started to learn of Sam's story and began sending him video messages.
They include Ollie Lawrence, Finn Russell, Marcus Smith, Danny Care and Sam Burgess, after whom Sam was named, his father Chris said.
"It was amazing just to watch his face light up and see that," he told BBC Radio Stoke.
Ollie Lawrence, left, was one of the players who sent a video message to Sam [Reuters]
Chris said players' response had helped the family, adding the first weeks since Sam's diagnosis were "chaos".
Advertisement
"It's just been a continuous whirlpool of different things that have been happening and things we've got to go through," he added.
"It's been a bit of a rollercoaster to say the least."
Sam has just gone through his first round of chemotherapy, his dad said, and he has lost a lot of weight in the process.
But despite "going through hell", Sam was said to be in a "better space" than he was previously, eating better and laughing with his sister.
"He's one of these lads who's extremely jovial and happy, cracking jokes and making fun of people all the time, in a good way," his dad added.
'Origin story'
As well as the video messages, Sam was also invited to watch two games at Wakefield Trinity and meet the players.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Sale Sharks invited him to a training session, where he spent much of the day among the players.
Chris said Sam was treating his current struggle as his "origin story", adding: "This is him becoming that superhero at rugby."
Family, friends and Congleton Rugby Club have also raised thousands of pounds in Sam's name, with the money going towards Ronald McDonald House Charities, Young Lives Vs Cancer, Birmingham Children's Hospital and University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust Charity.
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
More on this story
Related internet links
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jake Paul furiously quits Piers Morgan interview after fat-shaming host
Jake Paul let his emotions get the best of him during Thursday's interview with Piers Morgan, ultimately storming off the virtual call in anger. The YouTuber-turned-professional boxer, 28, spoke with the British host on Piers Morgan Uncensored ahead of his Saturday bout against Julio César Chávez Jr. In a teaser clip of the interview shared on YouTube, Morgan, 60, appeared to goad Paul by suggesting that the only 'proper boxer' he's ever fought was Tommy Fury — 'and he beat you.' 'I think the problem here, Piers, is that you think your opinion matters,' Paul hit back. Piers further argued that had Paul fought Mike Tyson in his prime, he wouldn't have 'lasted 10 seconds.' 'This is not a joke. I'm knocking out the best of the best,' the influencer argued, before fat-shaming Piers, saying: 'You versus going to the gym. You're still a fatass.' 'I mean, [Mexican boxer] Canelo Álvarez says that he would potentially kill you,' Piers added. Paul responded angrily, calling Álvarez, 34, a '5'8 little peon.' 'People don't realize I'm a real killer. I really f***ing do this s***,' he said. Elsewhere in the full-length interview, Piers admitted that he thought Paul was 'a great influencer and great YouTuber,' but questioned Paul's abilities in the ring. "You're still a fat ass!"Jake Paul fat-shames Piers Morgan before rage quitting his interview in tonight's Uncensored - dropping at 10pm (5pm ET).SUBSCRIBE: | @jakepaul — Piers Morgan Uncensored (@PiersUncensored) June 26, 2025 Paul didn't take the criticism well, telling off Piers. 'Oh, I'm just taking your audience to sell pay-per-views. I don't give a f*** about your show, dumbass,' he said in exasperation. 'This is a f***ing business enterprise. Buy the pay per view on Saturday, June 28, me versus Julio César Chávez Jr. Thank you, tune in everybody!' Once Paul hung up on the call, Piers said: 'Cheers Jake, really enjoyed that, and good luck to Julio – knock him out for all of us, will you?' Paul's fight with Chávez Jr. marks his first of the year. The match comes seven months after he defeated Tyson, 58, by a unanimous decision. Should he beat Chávez Jr., he could very well earn a ranking, Mauricio Sulaiman, chairman of the World Boxing Council, told Action Network this week. 'We do have a rankings committee, but I believe he has done enough. He has received all the backlash for several years; if he beats Julio César Chávez Jr., I think that puts him in a different position,' Sulaiman said.


Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
A Psychologist Reveals The Profession With The Highest Infidelity Rates
Healthcare professions might create stressful conditions that can fuel infidelity. Does this mean no ... More medical worker can be trusted in love? Here's the objective answer. No one ever wants to be cheated on. In fact, the fear of infidelity often drives us to panic and seek answers — who does it, why they do it and how to prevent it — so that we never have to face that kind of pain in our relationships. In our search for answers and self-protection, we'll look for patterns that can tell us which kind of person is most likely to cheat on us. But when these patterns turn into unproven generalizations, it can be dangerous. In 2018, Ashley Madison, a controversial dating service for those who are already married or in relationships, asked over 1000 users what they did for a living. Among women using the site for extra-marital affairs, the most commonly reported profession was working in medicine, with 23% of users working as doctors or nurses. 5% of male users also worked in medicine. 'A combination of long hours of potential stress mixed with a natural reaction to stress just might be the reason these women in the medical profession seek out an affair,' suggests Isabella Mise, Director of Communications at Ashley Madison. More recently in 2025, another extra-marital dating service from the UK, called Illicit Encounters, appears to have reaffirmed this finding, reporting that nurses make up the largest proportion of female users on their website. Many are questioning the truth and weight behind these claims, considering that these reports are based on users who chose to use these sites for affairs, and do not represent the entire industry of healthcare workers. Sure, some nurses might cheat. But are all nurses prone to cheating? To avoid giving in to misconceptions and stereotypes, it's essential to look at the evidence objectively. Could Nurses Be More Prone To Cheating? Healthcare workers often have to manage long and unpredictable work hours, high-stress situations and the emotional weight of their work, which can cause grief, exhaustion, anxiety and severe mental and physical burnout. A 2017 study published in the Journal of Clinical Nursing assessed the levels of burnout in nursing home caregivers in France, and found that 40% of participants struggled with caregiver burnout. Often, the tendency to cheat has been attributed to the stressful nature of such work. In a 2021 study of over 360 doctors and nurses, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, researchers found that 21% of participants were either currently in or had been in an unfaithful relationship in the past, and over 80% of such individuals were doctors. Interestingly, in contrast to the trope of adulterous female nurses, researchers found that men in the study were almost five times more likely to cheat than women, with men also being more likely to engage in sex in the doctor's room while on duty. Work hours also seemed to play a role in this pattern. People who worked on the nighttime emergency schedule were almost 18 times more likely to be unfaithful to their partners than those who worked part-time. Participants blamed the demands of their job, including having to spend time away from home for many hours and needing to release their stress. They also admitted that because of their work, it was easier to justify their absence at home, and likely easier to cover up their infidelity. However, it's essential to remember that correlation is not causation. While their occupation may have created conditions that tested them, the choice to be unfaithful was still deeply personal. Could professions like healthcare create conditions that facilitate infidelity? Certainly. Does being a part of that profession inevitably and directly cause infidelity? Absolutely not. Who Really Cheats? Here are some of the most salient reasons why people cheat, that have much more to do with themselves, than what profession they're in: Regardless of the context, infidelity ultimately appears to be the result of deep internal conflict, rather than external temptation. Rather than focusing on what a person who cheats does for work, it's time to start paying attention to the fact that they haven't necessarily done the inner work to bring open communication, vulnerability and honesty to their relationships. Wondering if you might ever be driven to cheat on your partner? Take the science-backed Propensity Towards Infidelity Scale to learn more.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Forest stadium expansion given green light
The plans will increase the City Ground's capacity to 35,000 [PA Media] A major revamp of Nottingham Forest's stadium has been approved. The plans will see the existing Peter Taylor Stand demolished and replaced with a 10,000-seater stand, increasing the City Ground's overall capacity to 35,000. Advertisement Full planning permission was granted unanimously by Rushcliffe Borough Council's planning committee on Thursday evening, subject to a range of conditions. In a statement, the club said it was "delighted" at the decision. "We look forward to working closely with our partners on the next steps and will provide a further update in due course," it said. The Peter Taylor Stand is set to be demolished and replaced [Reuters] Plans for an expansion were first unveiled in 2019, and outline planning permission was initially granted in 2022, but the project has since encountered a number of complications. Council documents published last week said the "extended passage of time" meant the application required "fresh consideration". Advertisement Construction was originally expected to cost about £94m, but an estimate from January 2025 indicates this has risen to £130m. The latest report, however, states the development is expected to boost the local economy by an extra £13m a year and create hundreds of jobs. As a condition of the planning permission, Forest will be required to make contributions to local infrastructure - what is known as a section 106 agreement. These include paying just over £1m to improve local bus services, £150,000 to upgrade the A60/Cattle Market Road junction, and £200,000 for cycle improvements along Lady Bay Bridge. Advertisement The club is also set to enter into a legal agreement with Nottingham Rowing Club to replace its Britannia boathouse, which is set to be demolished as part of the plans. Replacement facilities will have to be in place before any demolition work takes place, but it was stated during the committee meeting that a location for the new boathouse has not yet been identified. The club has also been given outline planning permission to build up to 170 flats next to the stadium, but this element will need further consideration at a later date. The plans for the new stand and the flats were "de-coupled" earlier this year, so that the two do not depend on one another to get planning consent. Advertisement Taking into account the structural roof trusses, the new stand will be approximately 38m (124ft) high, making it the tallest stand at the City Ground. Neil Clarke, leader of Rushcliffe Borough Council, said: "Forest play such an important role in the community. "We are proud they call Rushcliffe home. It's heartening we can support them with their aspirations." A number of objections to the development were raised by local councillors and residents, including increased congestion in the area on matchdays and a lack of parking provision. Councillor Penny Gowland told the meeting the area "grinds to a halt" when Forest play in midweek. Advertisement "Bus services collapse, so a 45-minute commute takes two hours. Bus routes are diverted as they can't get along roads due to appalling parking. People in wheelchairs are stuck at home," she said. The committee report states 2,538 letters of support from the general public were received, along with 116 letters of objection. The approval paves the way for the club to buy the freehold of the land which the City Ground sits upon. Last year, Forest's then-chairman said the club could relocate away from the ground because of a dispute with Nottingham City Council over the rent the club pays. Advertisement The local authority has since agreed to sell the land, but the club previously said any decision to buy the freehold would be "entirely conditional" on it being granted planning permission for the stadium expansion. No date has been set for construction to start, but planning rules mean it will have to begin within three years of a final decision being signed. Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis has previously said he eventually hopes to increase the ground's capacity to 50,000. [BBC] Analysis By Hugh Casswell, BBC Nottingham political reporter If you're a Forest fan, you may be asking yourself two things - why has this taken so long, and why have they had to go through it all twice? Advertisement It's worth noting there is a big difference between the outline planning permission the scheme had before and the full planning permission it has now. It's also an incredibly complex project which has needed all sorts of technical adjustments as well a lot of haggling over those section 106 agreements. But in a funny sort of way, part of the answer may also lie in Forest's success on the pitch. Having spent three years in the Premier League and secured European football since the plans were first considered, the club clearly now has even bigger ambitions. Those ambitions prompted the question - why pump hundreds of millions of pounds into redeveloping a site where the lease will run out in the coming years? Advertisement That triggered the very public row with the City Council last year, and while that row now seems to have been resolved, it was just one factor of many which combined to slow everything down. [BBC] Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@ or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210. More on this story Related internet links