Forest stadium expansion given green light
A major revamp of Nottingham Forest's stadium has been approved.
The plans will see the existing Peter Taylor Stand demolished and replaced with a 10,000-seater stand, increasing the City Ground's overall capacity to 35,000.
Advertisement
Full planning permission was granted unanimously by Rushcliffe Borough Council's planning committee on Thursday evening, subject to a range of conditions.
In a statement, the club said it was "delighted" at the decision.
"We look forward to working closely with our partners on the next steps and will provide a further update in due course," it said.
The Peter Taylor Stand is set to be demolished and replaced [Reuters]
Plans for an expansion were first unveiled in 2019, and outline planning permission was initially granted in 2022, but the project has since encountered a number of complications.
Council documents published last week said the "extended passage of time" meant the application required "fresh consideration".
Advertisement
Construction was originally expected to cost about £94m, but an estimate from January 2025 indicates this has risen to £130m.
The latest report, however, states the development is expected to boost the local economy by an extra £13m a year and create hundreds of jobs.
As a condition of the planning permission, Forest will be required to make contributions to local infrastructure - what is known as a section 106 agreement.
These include paying just over £1m to improve local bus services, £150,000 to upgrade the A60/Cattle Market Road junction, and £200,000 for cycle improvements along Lady Bay Bridge.
Advertisement
The club is also set to enter into a legal agreement with Nottingham Rowing Club to replace its Britannia boathouse, which is set to be demolished as part of the plans.
Replacement facilities will have to be in place before any demolition work takes place, but it was stated during the committee meeting that a location for the new boathouse has not yet been identified.
The club has also been given outline planning permission to build up to 170 flats next to the stadium, but this element will need further consideration at a later date.
The plans for the new stand and the flats were "de-coupled" earlier this year, so that the two do not depend on one another to get planning consent.
Advertisement
Taking into account the structural roof trusses, the new stand will be approximately 38m (124ft) high, making it the tallest stand at the City Ground.
Neil Clarke, leader of Rushcliffe Borough Council, said: "Forest play such an important role in the community.
"We are proud they call Rushcliffe home. It's heartening we can support them with their aspirations."
A number of objections to the development were raised by local councillors and residents, including increased congestion in the area on matchdays and a lack of parking provision.
Councillor Penny Gowland told the meeting the area "grinds to a halt" when Forest play in midweek.
Advertisement
"Bus services collapse, so a 45-minute commute takes two hours. Bus routes are diverted as they can't get along roads due to appalling parking. People in wheelchairs are stuck at home," she said.
The committee report states 2,538 letters of support from the general public were received, along with 116 letters of objection.
The approval paves the way for the club to buy the freehold of the land which the City Ground sits upon.
Last year, Forest's then-chairman said the club could relocate away from the ground because of a dispute with Nottingham City Council over the rent the club pays.
Advertisement
The local authority has since agreed to sell the land, but the club previously said any decision to buy the freehold would be "entirely conditional" on it being granted planning permission for the stadium expansion.
No date has been set for construction to start, but planning rules mean it will have to begin within three years of a final decision being signed.
Forest owner Evangelos Marinakis has previously said he eventually hopes to increase the ground's capacity to 50,000.
[BBC]
Analysis
By Hugh Casswell, BBC Nottingham political reporter
If you're a Forest fan, you may be asking yourself two things - why has this taken so long, and why have they had to go through it all twice?
Advertisement
It's worth noting there is a big difference between the outline planning permission the scheme had before and the full planning permission it has now.
It's also an incredibly complex project which has needed all sorts of technical adjustments as well a lot of haggling over those section 106 agreements.
But in a funny sort of way, part of the answer may also lie in Forest's success on the pitch.
Having spent three years in the Premier League and secured European football since the plans were first considered, the club clearly now has even bigger ambitions.
Those ambitions prompted the question - why pump hundreds of millions of pounds into redeveloping a site where the lease will run out in the coming years?
Advertisement
That triggered the very public row with the City Council last year, and while that row now seems to have been resolved, it was just one factor of many which combined to slow everything down.
[BBC]
Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Related internet links
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Liverpool star already filled with REGRET after leaving
Leaving a club like Liverpool is one of the boldest calls a player can make. Regardless of what state the team happens to be in, you know that the Reds are England's most successful team. Of course, a player might want to go somewhere else for a number of different reasons, with the most common being that they aren't getting enough playing time, which is perfectly reasonable. 🔴 Shop the LFC 2025/26 adidas home range Shop the LFC Store 🚨2025/26 LFC x adidas range🚨 LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! Some others may have reached the point in their career where they aren't quite cutting at the level that the club expects from them, so a move where the intensity isn't quite as high makes more sense. But you will occasionally find a couple of players that look at the few clubs that sit alongside the Reds as Europe's elite and feel like they need to prove they can succeed at a 'higher' level. Trent Alexander-Arnold went down this route this summer, and so far it hasn't worked out well. Trent regretting his Madrid move already? Of course, we must caveat this article with context that the season hasn't properly started yet, the English right-back has only played pre-season and Club World Cup matches for Los Blancos so far. But even though he's spent such a limited amount of time at Real Madrid, the Spanish media have already started to come for him, making bold claims about his ability before assessing him properly. Spanish journalist Guille Uzquiano spoke to the media organisation El Partidazo de COPE on Tuesday night and gave his thoughts on Trent's time in Spain so far, and it was a pretty brutal assessment. He said: "He still seems shy. The best Carvajal is better than the best Arnold" Straight away, the caveat should be that Daniel Carvajal is 33 years old, while Trent is 26, so the comparison doesn't really feel fair, but if we're talking about their abilities right now, then a whole new context is applied, since the Spaniard is recovering from an ACL injury picked up last year. Trent's been in the camp for just two months and while the two right-backs will be looking to compete with each other throughout the season, to have already reached a conclusion about which is better, before a ball has been kicked in the 2025/26 La Liga campaign, feels very presumptuous. Liverpool fans had attempted to warn Trent about what might happen but the full-back was smitten and any attempt to convince him to remain on Merseyside was never going to change his mind. Once he was revealed as a new Galactico, he read out his speech in fluent Spanish, which suggested that his mind was only on one thing, despite him claiming he was committed to Liverpool. As such, this has all been brought on him by himself and why Liverpool fans might have sympathy for him, then player made his choice and knew exactly what kind of environment he was joining. Despite how displeasing his exit was, we wish him all the best. And given the scrutiny that he's under already, it appears as though he'll need all the positivity he can get if he is to succeed at Madrid.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Liverpool star already filled with REGRET after leaving
Leaving a club like Liverpool is one of the boldest calls a player can make. Regardless of what state the team happens to be in, you know that the Reds are England's most successful team. Of course, a player might want to go somewhere else for a number of different reasons, with the most common being that they aren't getting enough playing time, which is perfectly reasonable. 🔴 Shop the LFC 2025/26 adidas home range Shop the LFC Store 🚨2025/26 LFC x adidas range🚨 LFC x adidas Shop the home range today! LFC x adidas Shop the goalkeeper range today LFC x adidas Shop the new adidas range today! Some others may have reached the point in their career where they aren't quite cutting at the level that the club expects from them, so a move where the intensity isn't quite as high makes more sense. But you will occasionally find a couple of players that look at the few clubs that sit alongside the Reds as Europe's elite and feel like they need to prove they can succeed at a 'higher' level. Trent Alexander-Arnold went down this route this summer, and so far it hasn't worked out well. Trent regretting his Madrid move already? Of course, we must caveat this article with context that the season hasn't properly started yet, the English right-back has only played pre-season and Club World Cup matches for Los Blancos so far. But even though he's spent such a limited amount of time at Real Madrid, the Spanish media have already started to come for him, making bold claims about his ability before assessing him properly. Spanish journalist Guille Uzquiano spoke to the media organisation El Partidazo de COPE on Tuesday night and gave his thoughts on Trent's time in Spain so far, and it was a pretty brutal assessment. He said: "He still seems shy. The best Carvajal is better than the best Arnold" Straight away, the caveat should be that Daniel Carvajal is 33 years old, while Trent is 26, so the comparison doesn't really feel fair, but if we're talking about their abilities right now, then a whole new context is applied, since the Spaniard is recovering from an ACL injury picked up last year. Trent's been in the camp for just two months and while the two right-backs will be looking to compete with each other throughout the season, to have already reached a conclusion about which is better, before a ball has been kicked in the 2025/26 La Liga campaign, feels very presumptuous. Liverpool fans had attempted to warn Trent about what might happen but the full-back was smitten and any attempt to convince him to remain on Merseyside was never going to change his mind. Once he was revealed as a new Galactico, he read out his speech in fluent Spanish, which suggested that his mind was only on one thing, despite him claiming he was committed to Liverpool. As such, this has all been brought on him by himself and why Liverpool fans might have sympathy for him, then player made his choice and knew exactly what kind of environment he was joining. Despite how displeasing his exit was, we wish him all the best. And given the scrutiny that he's under already, it appears as though he'll need all the positivity he can get if he is to succeed at Madrid.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New wedding venue in South Craven will be a welcome boost to the local economy
A NEWLY approved wedding venue at a remote working farm in South Craven will be a welcome boost to the local economy, said councillors. The family company behind the farming diversity scheme at Warley Wise Farm, Cowling, were also praised by councillors for having the confidence to invest in the area and generate jobs. North Yorkshire Council's Skipton and Ripon area planning committee heard at its meeting in Skipton that the fire damaged farmhouse was currently being restored while the plan was to convert and enlarge a traditional and no longer needed agricultural building at the site to a wedding venue for the holding of around 30 events a year with up to 100 guests per wedding and 120 for receptions. The new modern extension will include an entrance foyer, a bar and DJ area, a reception and buffet space, kitchen, office and storeroom as well as toilets, including accessible facilities. On the first floor there will be a photo suite and access to a roof terrace and outside, parking for 36 vehicles with space for the manoeuvring of mini-buses ferrying guests to and from the site. Ward councillor Andy Brown welcomed positive sides of the scheme, saying there were some 'brilliant sustainability initiatives' which were 'top of the range' rather than 'paying lip service' such as attenuation ponds for wildlife and planting, but said he had concerns about increased traffic on narrow country roads, shared by local residents and why he had asked for the application to go to the planning committee. He also welcomed the bringing back into use buildings at the site, but added he believed it was not a true 'diversification project', that farming was 'not the main driver' at the farm and he was not convinced there was call for another wedding venue in the area and that it would simply move jobs and business from one place to another. But his attempt to go against officer recommendation and refuse the 'well intentioned' application, with alternative development at the site, failed to gain support with others, including the committee chair Cllr Nathan Hull who said it would enhance the local economy and that the applicants should be commended for bringing it forward. Cllr David Ireton said the position close to the Lancashire border suggested that a lot of the business would come from cross the border where there were larger conurbations. "I am not convinced that this won't be an increase in the economics of North Yorkshire," he said. Referring to the modern extension, he compared it to a modern 'totally acceptable' accommodation block at Ampleforth College. "Yes, it is in an open landscape, but most of the buildings are there. Do we want to see it deteriorate further or do we want to pass something with a different extension to it, which I think would be an improvement." Cllr Nick Brown said he lived very close to a wedding venue and it was very quiet, and pointed out the applicant behind the Cowling proposal had clearly done his sums and would not be going ahead if they didn't add up. "If that's good for the Craven area, then I am very happy for the Craven area; whether its the employment of two or three people or more that is at a time when unemployment is going up. Anything that supports business has to be welcomed." He added it was a lovely site, with lovely views. "If we are looking for economic development, this should be welcomed and we should welcome derelict buildings being done up." Cllr Hull said he understood concerns about the extension he understood concerns that some of the materials 'might not be in keeping' but said it was a 'nuanced world' of solar panels and air source heat pumps all kinds of un-traditional fixtures. "I think everyone is happy to have these things on site even though they appear alien to what was there 50 or 100 years ago. The materials proposed for the extension are subtle and minimalistic to say the least and are to the side of the building. "As for economic gain, I think we are in a time when people are having more lavish and larger weddings even if the number of weddings is actually falling and there is very much a need for this kind of venues. I don't buy into the argument that we are just relocating one set of jobs from one location to another, what we are trying to do is build up North Yorkshire and I think this would enhance the local economy. "We should commend (the applicant) for having the confidence and the bravery to go forward and put their money into something and try and make something of their plans." Cllr Hull refused to include a condition put forward by Cllr Andy Brown that guest numbers be limited to 100 and the number of events to 50 per year. "I would be dead against that, if someone is running a successful business then more power to their arm. If they can generate more events, that would sustain the local economy and sustain a local family who want to keep generations in this area, I would be 100 per cent against that." Earlier, applicant, Michael Drakard, applicant, said: "This is not some corporate entity that's trying to drive monthly or annual targets, this is a family run business and it is our hope to create something really special." He said they had worked very hard to keep the traditional element of buildings at the site. That meant the re-use of stone slate, found in the old milking parlour, and cobbles hidden under a 'foot of muck' and the preservation of arches and windows. They had however moved away from the traditional with the way the business itself which would make use of solar powered electricity and triple glazed windows. The current use of the land for sheep will continue and while it will not be registered as organic, no pesticides will be used at the farm, said Mr Drakard. Tom Warren, agent for the applicants, said there would be 36 parking spaces at the site with mini-buses bringing event guests in and returning them to local guest houses and hotels in the area. There were no plans for marquees at the farm and there would be no outside music or fireworks and no winter weddings as 'no one can access (the site) in icy conditions'.
