logo
Why Every Global Leader Manages Multiple Cultures At Once

Why Every Global Leader Manages Multiple Cultures At Once

Forbes04-04-2025

Tom Roberts, Founder of Cranberry Leadership . Coaching global leaders to adapt, lead, and thrive globally. getty
Most global leaders think they're adapting to one new culture, but in reality, they're constantly balancing multiple cultural forces at the same time.
These forces include:
• Home Country Culture: The leadership instincts shaped by upbringing and career.
• Host Country Culture: The expectations of the local team.
• Headquarters Culture: Corporate norms, decision-making structures and expectations.
• Other Influencing Cultures: The leadership style of their boss, peer groups and key stakeholders.
Many leaders face even greater complexity, managing multiple markets and teams simultaneously. Understanding and anticipating this complexity is what separates struggling expat leaders from those who thrive. Alejandro's Exhausting Mornings
Alejandro, an Argentinian member of our Expat Advisory Group, faced a daily cultural balancing act. In the early morning, he would have a call with his South American team, who were high-energy, relationship-driven and open to debate. At 9 a.m., he'd meet with the Japanese affiliate, who was formal, structured and showed disagreement indirectly. At 10 a.m., he would have a discussion with the Chinese team—fast-moving, hierarchical and verbal. At noon, he'd check in with his American boss, based in the company's German headquarters.
By midday, Alejandro had navigated the expectations of six distinct cultural influences: Argentina, South America as a regional bloc, Japan, China, the U.S. and Germany. Each required different communication and leadership approaches, making alignment a daily challenge. Misreading signals—such as assuming Japanese silence meant agreement—had already led to delayed decisions and growing frustration with his boss. The Science Of Intercultural Triangulation
This challenge isn't abstract. Leadership frameworks such as Geert Hofstede's Dimensions and Erin Meyer's Culture Map help explain why these dynamics exist and how they impact leadership effectiveness.
For example, using Alejandro's experience, let's consider the concept of 'power distance' (who makes decisions) based on broad, generalized cultural dynamics:
• South America: Leadership is respected, but open debate is normal.
• Japan: High power distance, but consensus building is essential.
• China: Hierarchical and fast-moving. Leaders are expected to decide quickly.
A leadership approach that works in one region may be ineffective—or even disruptive—in another.
Now let's consider how different cultures create alignment:
• South America: Passionate debate signals engagement.
• Japan: Silence and nodding mean 'I hear you,' not necessarily agreement.
• China: A nod may mean alignment—or just politeness. Frustration may arise if you don't decide quickly. Speed and context matter.
By noon, Alejandro was unsure whether his teams were actually aligned or just eager to move on. Meanwhile, his boss grew increasingly frustrated with the lack of clarity. Understanding how different cultures express alignment would have saved Alejandro from costly miscommunication. Three Common Traps In Intercultural Leadership
Failing to recognize these dynamics leads to three common pitfalls: The One-Size-Fits-All Mistake
This is assuming one leadership style works everywhere. For example, Alejandro used South American debate tactics in Japan only to find that silence wasn't agreement, it was discomfort. The Constant Code-Switching Burnout
Over-adapting to every audience, however, can cause you to lose your personal leadership instincts. In Alejandro's case, constantly adjusting drained his energy and left him second-guessing his leadership presence. Misaligned Expectations Across Cultures
Aligning with each group individually can create unintended conflicts between groups. For example, after prioritizing consensus building in Japan, Alejandro's Chinese team saw him as hesitant and indecisive. Intercultural Triangulation: A Strategy To Avoid Miscommunication
Great global leaders don't just react to cultural differences. They map, anticipate and balance them strategically—what I refer to as 'intercultural triangulation.' Here's how: 1. Map Cultural Forces Before They Affect You
Don't wait for tensions to arise. Use Hofstede's Dimensions or Meyer's Culture Map to compare cultural tendencies in your key markets, including your home country, host country, headquarters, your boss's culture and key regional markets.
Overlay these insights to spot gaps in leadership expectations, communication styles and decision-making norms. Awareness is 50% of the solution. 2. Share Your Triangulation Map With Teams Early
In your first meetings, distribute copies of your team's unique cultural situation map. Then openly discuss cultural gaps and set alignment expectations. When cultural challenges are acknowledged early, they become shared problems rather than unspoken frustrations. 3. Build A Core Leadership Approach, Then Flex On The Edges
Instead of constantly adjusting, define a leadership style that works across cultures. Alejandro could have decided to keep a consistent approach for framing decisions while adapting how he gained buy-in based on cultural norms. This would ensure clarity while maintaining flexibility. 4. Elect Cultural Guides To Help Decode Signals
Engage trusted local colleagues to interpret disagreements and unspoken concerns. Rather than assuming silence meant agreement for the Japanese affiliate, Alejandro could work with a local colleague to confirm alignment after meetings—avoiding costly miscommunication. Bringing It All Together
Global leaders don't fail due to a lack of skill. They struggle because they assume they're adapting to one culture when, in reality, they're managing multiple. Exceptional leaders anticipate, map and balance cultural differences—turning cultural friction into an advantage.
If you're leading globally, assume you're balancing multiple cultures—not just one. The leaders who get this right define a strategy for triangulation.
In my next article, I'll take this further by exploring how leaders build trust in cultures where authority, influence and credibility don't transfer automatically.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Institutions own 29% of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd (KLSE:KOSSAN) shares but private companies control 36% of the company
Institutions own 29% of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd (KLSE:KOSSAN) shares but private companies control 36% of the company

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Institutions own 29% of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd (KLSE:KOSSAN) shares but private companies control 36% of the company

The considerable ownership by private companies in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 53% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders Insiders own 14% of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd (KLSE:KOSSAN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 36% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). Meanwhile, institutions make up 29% of the company's shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. See our latest analysis for Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Kossan Holdings (M) Sdn Bhd is the largest shareholder with 35% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.7% and 5.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Kuang Sia Lim directly holds 2.8% of the total shares outstanding. Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 53% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful RM608m stake in this RM4.3b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 36%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd , and understanding them should be part of your investment process. If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

Morning Bid: So, it's a framework for a deal, maybe?
Morning Bid: So, it's a framework for a deal, maybe?

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Morning Bid: So, it's a framework for a deal, maybe?

(Reuters) -A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Wayne Cole. So, apparently, they have the concept of a plan for a proposal on a framework for a deal to break the latest U.S.-China trade impasse. Which was only needed because President Trump sent that tweet claiming Beijing had broken the old deal. This deal now needs to be approved by Trump and Chairman Xi, and then implemented. At least the Chinese side thought the talks were "rational", which was a step forward. Details were scant, though the U.S. team did claim that it would resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets. What Beijing got in return was not yet clear. Neither was it clear whether this truce would last any longer than the last one, which might be why the early market response was less than enthusiastic. U.S. and European stock futures were all down between 0.2% and 0.6%, and Asian shares modestly firmer. There is still the small matter of whether the April 2 levies are actually legal, with a federal appeals court allowing the tariffs to remain in effect while it reviews a lower court decision blocking them. The dollar and Treasuries were little changed as the U.S. CPI looms later in the day and any upside surprise would fan stagflationary fears, to the detriment of both markets. Analysts assume lower energy prices will keep the headline rise to 0.2%, while the core is seen up 0.3%. Attention will be on whether tariffs show up in goods prices, though the full impact is likely to appear from June onwards. Measures of volatility suggest investors really aren't prepared for a high number, so anything in line will be a relief. Treasuries also have a 10-year auction to weather, with the focus on the share taken by indirect bidders which include foreign central banks. The latter took a hefty 71% of the May sale, while primary dealers got just 8.9%. A repeat performance would be warmly welcomed. Key developments that could influence markets on Wednesday: * ECB wage tracker. Appearances by ECB council membersGabriel Makhlouf; Piero Cipollone; Philip Lane and Claudia Buch;policymaker Yiannis Stournaras * British finance minister Rachel Reeves releases spendingreview * U.S. CPI data for May (By Wayne Cole; Editing by Christopher Cushing) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Temu, Shein pivot to Europe to bypass US tariffs
Temu, Shein pivot to Europe to bypass US tariffs

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Temu, Shein pivot to Europe to bypass US tariffs

Chinese-founded budget e-commerce platforms Temu and Shein have been increasing their presence in European markets as their sales decline sharply in the United States. Consumer spending on Temu in the US fell by approximately 36% in May compared to the previous year, while Shein's spending dropped by 13%, according to data from Consumer Edge. Despite this growth opportunity in Europe, experts warn that both companies face mounting regulatory scrutiny similar to that encountered in the US. As US tariffs and trade policies have taken effect—such as the May end to a small-package tariff exemption and new duties as high as 54%—Temu and Shein have shifted their strategy towards European countries. Consumer Edge's data indicates that consumer spending on these platforms grew significantly in Europe in May, with Temu's sales rising by 63% in the EU and 38% in the UK year-over-year. Shein also saw increases of 19% in the EU and 42% in the UK. France, Europe's second-largest economy, emerged as a key market, especially for Temu. This European growth has been accompanied by increased advertising investments and efforts to expand warehouse capacity. Both companies are experimenting with localised business models to better adapt to the region's consumer preferences. However, Europe enforces stricter regulations on product safety, consumer protection, and competition, which require additional compliance and transparency efforts. Despite their expansion, Temu and Shein face intensifying regulatory challenges in Europe. The European Union is preparing to introduce a two-euro flat customs fee on low-value packages from online marketplaces, which previously entered duty-free. Industry experts describe this move as a strategic effort to regulate the rapid growth of ultra-cheap cross-border e-commerce and foresee significant impacts on the platforms' operations over the coming years. Further regulatory pressure comes from consumer advocacy groups and government bodies. The pan-European organisation BEUC has filed complaints against both companies, accusing them of employing deceptive marketing tactics known as 'dark patterns' that encourage overconsumption. The European Commission is also investigating Shein's adherence to EU consumer protection laws. Meanwhile, France is considering legislation specifically targeting ultra-cheap fast fashion products for their environmental impact. Beyond commercial regulations, Temu and Shein face scrutiny over labour practices and human rights compliance. US authorities have challenged Temu over alleged breaches of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which bans imports made with forced labour from China's Xinjiang region. Europe is advancing stricter oversight through the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, requiring companies to address human rights abuses and environmental impacts within their supply chains. Analysts highlight that the rising global protectionism and differing standards on labour and sustainability are significant factors behind the growing regulatory hurdles. While Europe presents valuable growth opportunities, compliance with these evolving legal frameworks will be crucial for Temu and Shein's continued expansion in the region. Navigate the shifting tariff landscape with real-time data and market-leading analysis. Request a free demo for GlobalData's Strategic Intelligence . "Temu, Shein pivot to Europe to bypass US tariffs" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store