Israel stands condemned, but why has it taken so long?
https://arab.news/rudk8
Since the EU's recent decision to initiate a review of Israel's compliance with its obligations under international law in the EU-Israel Association Agreement, and after the UK suspended trade talks with Israel and the leaders of Canada, France, and the UK issued a joint statement condemning the expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza, hundreds of Palestinians have been killed in Gaza in Israeli military operations.
In one incident, nine siblings of the same family were killed, and the war is still raging. So, forgive me if I find it difficult to get too excited about these latest diplomatic maneuvers to stop the senseless bloodshed, especially as this approach is still toothless, with no work on any time frame for introducing tangible measures.
It is also the case that the argument 'better late than never' hardly holds water. Yes, if those baby-steps are the start of a concerted international effort to bring the war to an end, they will become immensely valuable, but there is much doubt about how effective they will be — and if they are not, what those countries intend to do.
There is also the painful and lingering question: What has taken them so long? After all, every single day of delay in stopping the war has resulted in the deaths of many dozens of people, sometimes up to 100 a day, most of them noncombatants. In late May, nine of the 10 children of Dr. Alaa Al-Najjar and her husband Dr. Hamid were killed in an Israeli airstrike while she was on duty in the Nasser medical hospital. Only Hamid and one of their children survived, although both were badly injured.
How could anyone remain indifferent in the face of such a tragedy, and one that could have been avoided, had the terms of the ceasefire agreed in January been adhered to? This is just one case of an entire family or a large part of them being wiped out in this war. If this heartbreaking tragedy does not move the world sufficiently to ensure that the Israeli government stops this war, what will?
All the alarm bells regarding how Israel would conduct the war in Gaza were ringing from the first week of the conflict. Without taking anything away from the genuine anger at what Hamas inflicted on Oct. 7, the wish for revenge, and not only against those who carried out the attack, but against the entire population of Gaza, was instantly apparent. The unsubstantiated claim that every person in Gaza was complicit in the massacre should have been a warning sign.
Moreover, between a government that failed to defend its people with horrendous consequences and would not admit to that failure, and senior Cabinet ministers who harbor messianic fantasies of expelling the Palestinians from Gaza, annexing the Strip and rebuilding settlements there, the likelihood of a proportionate response was always close to nil. Hence, it should not have taken the EU, UK, and Canada 19 long and blood-soaked months to figure this out.
Every single day of delay has resulted in the deaths of dozens of people.
Yossi Mekelberg
Part of the explanation for the lack of will on the part of those who have suddenly found their voice in the past week or two and described what some Israeli ministers are suggesting will be the next stage in the war in Gaza as 'extremist,' 'dangerous' and 'monstrous' is that their working assumption has been that only Washington can make a difference, and that at best they could only play a supporting role. This has been more a case of relinquishing responsibility and avoiding friction, with Israel particularly, in the hope that either the US would use its influence to end the war, or the conflict would just run its course.
This has proved to be misguided. In the immediate aftermath of Oct. 7, most of the world, and with good reason, showed its support for Israel's collective pain and trauma. However, at the same time it was irresponsible and shortsighted to give an extreme right-wing government led by a populist leader who happens also to be on trial for corruption, and whose sole interest is political survival at any cost, a blank check to respond to the massacre.
For Europe, including the UK, what happens in the region is consequential and can have an immediate impact, whether it affects energy security, trade routes, radicalization within their own societies, or threatens a refugee crisis. Notwithstanding Europe's declared commitment to ensure human rights, Brussels also underestimates the enormous economic, diplomatic, and social power it has over Israel, not to harm its security, but to do the exact opposite: to save the country from itself when it is being governed by a reckless government. Moreover, at least some European powers should feel a moral and historical obligation for being the root cause of this conflict and for letting it fester for so long.
It is nothing short of shocking that only in the past two weeks have there been some signs of concerted effort in Europe, out of despair at being unable to talk any sense into the Israeli government, or to stop the war and allow adequate humanitarian aid to enter the enclave. The EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas explained the reason for its review of the association agreement that gives Israel many economic and scientific advantages as being the 'catastrophic' situation in Gaza, with Israel 'potentially' in breach of its commitments to human rights in the agreement.
In the UK Parliament, David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said that the suspension of trade talks was a response to both the prevention of humanitarian aid reaching Gaza, and Israel's intention, as stated by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, to 'cleanse' the enclave, with resident Palestinians 'being relocated to third countries.' And, out of character, Germany, which traditionally refrains from criticizing Israel, has felt that it can no longer stand on the sidelines, with its new Chancellor Friedrich Merz declaring that to cause such suffering to the civilian population 'can no longer be justified as a fight against Hamas terrorism.'
Declarations and statements aside, reviewing agreements and suspending talks are not going to change Israel's course of action. At this juncture in the war, as it once more deploys massive forces on the border and inside Gaza, and with the government's ill intentions out in the open, Europe, the UK, and Canada will have to go beyond 'suspending' and 'reviewing.' If they do, it might also serve as a wake-up call for more Israelis to take to the streets and stop this murderous madness by its government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asharq Al-Awsat
23 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Saudi Foreign Minister Arrives in Kuwait to Participate in GCC Ministerial Meeting
Saudi Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prince Faisal bin Farhan bin Abdullah, arrived in Kuwait to participate in the 164th Ministerial Meeting of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), the Saudi Press Agency said on Monday. The Minister was received at Kuwait International Airport by Kuwaiti Minister of Foreign Affairs, Abdullah Ali Al-Yahya, and Saudi Ambassador to Kuwait, Prince Sultan bin Saad bin Khaled. The Ministerial Meeting of the GCC is scheduled to discuss ways to promote joint GCC action, developments in regional and international arenas, and efforts made in this regard.
Asharq Al-Awsat
23 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Sharaa in First Interview with Jewish Newspaper: Stable Syria Will Not be Built Through Speeches, Slogans
Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa broke all barriers that surrounded ousted President Bashar al-Assad, when he spoke last week about his responsibilities and about Syria's domestic and foreign policy. He is direct in addressing taboo issues that were previously tackled with slogans in public and a different reality under the table, such as Syria's relationship with Israel and the latter's occupation of Syrian territory. Legacy of Assad Regime The last barrier Sharaa broke was an interview he made with a Jewish newspaper, the first since assuming power six months ago. The article, written by Jonathan Bass, was published by the Jewish Journal on May 28. 'Many Syrians see Sharaa not as a revolutionary but as a restorer, someone capable of stitching together a nation fatigued by war and fractured by identity. It is perhaps his very ordinariness, his refusal to play the strongman, despite his extremist former life, that makes him a man of the hour,' the Journal wrote. Bass said the Syrian President carries himself with quiet conviction. 'Sharaa is soft-spoken, but every word lands with deliberation. There is no triumph in his voice, only urgency,' he wrote. In the interview, Sharaa said, 'We have inherited more than ruins,' he said. 'We've inherited trauma, mistrust, and fatigue. But we have also inherited hope. Fragile, yes, but real.' For decades, Syria was ruled by a regime that confused loyalty with silence, coexistence with hate, and stability with suppression. The Assad dynasty, first Hafez and then Bashar, ruled with an iron grip, using fear and executions to cement control, while the country's institutions withered and dissent turned deadly. Bass said Sharaa is clear-eyed about the legacy he inherits. 'It would be dishonest to speak of a clean slate,' Sharaa said. 'The past is present, in the eyes of every person, on every street, in every family. But our duty now is not to repeat it. Not even as a softer version. We must create something entirely new.' Trust of Syrians According to Bass, Sharaa's early moves have been cautious, yet deeply symbolic. 'He has ordered the release of political prisoners, initiated dialogue with opposition groups once exiled or silenced, and pledged to reform Syria's notorious security apparatus,' he wrote at the Jewish Journal. 'His vision is that of a vibrant, multicultural, and pluralistic society. He supports the right of return for all Syrians whose assets were seized under the Assad regime,' Bass added. 'To uncover the truth behind Syria's mass graves, Sharaa recognizes the need for partnership with the United States to provide forensic technology and equipment, from establishing DNA databases to securing cooperation from those responsible for past atrocities,' the journalist wrote. Sharaa told the Journal, 'If I am the only one speaking, then Syria has learned nothing. We are inviting all voices to the table, secular, religious, tribal, academic, rural, and urban. The state must listen now more than it commands.' But will people trust again? Will they believe the promises of a government that rises from the ashes of dictatorship? 'I don't ask for trust,' he replied. 'I ask for patience and for scrutiny. Hold me accountable. Hold this process accountable. That is how trust will come.' When Bass asked the president what Syrians most need right now, he answered without hesitation: 'Dignity through work. Peace through purpose.' In towns emptied by war and villages still scarred by conflict, the cry is not for politics but for normalcy, the chance to rebuild homes, raise children, and earn a living in peace. Sharaa knows this, Bass wrote. He is pushing for emergency economic programs focused on job creation in agriculture, manufacturing, construction, and public services. 'It's not about ideology anymore,' Sharaa told the Journal. 'It's about giving people a reason to stay, a reason to live, and a reason to believe.' The Syrian President said, 'Every young man with a job is one less soul at risk of radicalization. Every child in school is a vote for the future.' He then emphasized partnerships with regional investors, microenterprise grants for returnees, and vocational training for youth who have known nothing but war. 'A stable Syria will not be built through speeches or slogans, it will be built through action: in the marketplace, in classrooms, on farms, and in workshops. We will rebuild supply chains. Syria will return as a hub for trade and commerce.' Relations with Israel Bass wrote there's a deeper insight behind Sharaa's economic vision: after a generation of loss, Syrians are tired of conflict. They crave peace, not just the absence of war, but the presence of opportunity. In one of the more delicate parts of our conversation, Sharaa addressed Syria's future relationship with Israel - a subject that has haunted the region since 1948 and intensified with each airstrike, covert operation, and accusation of proxy warfare. 'I want to be clear,' Sharaa said. 'The era of endless tit-for-tat bombings must end. No nation prospers when its skies are filled with fear. The reality is, we have common enemies, and we can play a major role in regional security.' He expressed a desire to return to the spirit of the 1974 Disengagement Agreement not merely as a ceasefire line, but as the foundation for mutual restraint and protection of civilians, especially the Druze communities in southern Syria and the Golan Heights. 'Syria's Druze are not pawns,' he said. 'They are citizens, deeply rooted, historically loyal, and deserving of every protection under the law. Their safety is non-negotiable.' While he stopped short of proposing immediate normalization, Sharaa signaled openness to future talks grounded in international law and sovereignty. Trump: Man of Peace Perhaps most notably, Sharaa voiced a bold diplomatic overture: his desire to sit down directly with former US President Donald Trump, Bass wrote. 'However the media portrays him,' Sharaa said, 'I see him as a man of peace. We've both been shot at by the same enemy. Trump understands leverage, strength, and outcomes. Syria needs an honest broker who can reset the conversation. If there is a possibility of alignment that helps bring stability to the region - and security to the US and its allies- I am ready to have that conversation. He is the only man capable of fixing this region, bringing us together, one brick at a time.' Commenting on Sharaa's statement, Bass said it was 'striking', not just for its candor, but for what it implied: the new Syria is not afraid to make unconventional moves in pursuit of peace and recognition. Sharaa does not sugarcoat Syria's challenges: more than a million dead in mass graves, 12 million displaced, an economy on life support, sanctions still in place, and rival militias entrenched in the north. 'This is not a fairy tale,' he said. 'It is a recovery. And recoveries are painful.'
Asharq Al-Awsat
23 minutes ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Kuwait Calls on International Community to Ensure Syria's Security, Stability
Kuwait reaffirmed on Sunday its commitment to bolstering international efforts to guarantee Syria's security and stability, while preserving its sovereignty and territorial integrity. This came during an official round of talks between Sheikh Mishal Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, the Emir of Kuwait, and Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa. The discussions were also attended by Kuwait's Crown Prince Sheikh Sabah Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Sabah, Prime Minister Sheikh Ahmad Abdullah Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah, and Minister of the Amiri Diwan Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah. Kuwait marks the Syrian president's seventh stop in the Arab world and ninth internationally since taking office in January 2025, following the ouster of former President Bashar al-Assad on December 8, 2024. According to Minister Mohammad Abdullah Al-Mubarak Al-Sabah, the talks highlighted 'the deep-rooted fraternal ties between the two countries and peoples, and ways to support and enhance them in all fields.' The two sides reviewed the situation in Syria and reaffirmed the importance of bolstering international efforts to ensure the country's security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. The discussions also covered key regional and international developments, and ways to support unified Arab action. Additionally, Kuwait's First Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister Sheikh Fahd Yousef Saud Al-Sabah, along with Foreign Minister Abdullah Ali Al-Yahya, held extended talks with Al-Sharaa and Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shibani to explore mechanisms for enhancing cooperation and coordination between Kuwait and Syria. During his visit, Al-Sharaa also met with several Kuwaiti business leaders to discuss development projects and investment opportunities in Syria. He also held a meeting with members of the Syrian expatriate community in Kuwait. Damascus is seeking to strengthen ties with Arab and Western leaders in the aftermath of Assad's fall, hoping that the lifting of economic sanctions and an influx of Gulf aid and investments will help rebuild the war-torn nation. On Saturday, Saudi Arabia's foreign minister announced that the Kingdom, in coordination with Qatar, would provide financial support for Syrian state employees. A joint statement from Saudi Arabia and Qatar noted that this financial assistance would be distributed over three months. This initiative followed a previous contribution by both countries in April, which helped Syria pay off around $15 million in arrears owed to the World Bank. The Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development has extended 28 loans to Syria, totaling 333 million Kuwaiti dinars (approximately $1.085 billion). Kuwait also hosts a large Syrian community estimated at around 200,000 people.
