logo
How long can brands like Walmart really ‘eat the tariffs'?

How long can brands like Walmart really ‘eat the tariffs'?

Fast Company23-05-2025

Branded is a weekly column devoted to the intersection of marketing, business, design, and culture.
Earnings season has an important new element this quarter: President Donald Trump. Wall Street is hungry for clarity from big consumer brands about the impact tariffs may have on prices—and thus inflation. But Trump has been making it clear what his administration believes companies should do to the prices they charge shoppers: nothing.
'EAT THE TARIFFS,' he berated Walmart recently, after the big-box giant indicated during an earnings call that price increases might be in the offing. 'Given the magnitude of the tariffs,' CEO Doug McMillon said, 'we aren't able to absorb all the pressure, given the reality of narrow retail margins.' Trump's blunt rejoinder on social media waved that away, insisting Walmart need 'not charge valued customers ANYTHING' extra in response to the tariffs, adding: 'I'll be watching, and so will your customers!!!' (Walmart reported quarterly revenue of about $165 billion, up 2.5% over the same quarter last year.)
Trump has also attacked toymaker Mattel for suggesting it could move production to dodge tariff costs, as well as Amazon for reportedly considering a plan to spell out tariff cost increases to consumers.
The message seems to be getting through. This week another big-box giant, Home Depot, reported earnings—and made it clear that it claims to have no tariff-driven price increases planned. 'We don't see broad-based price increases for our customers at all going forward,' CEO Billy Bastek said in an earnings call. Target also reported earnings, and while its CEO acknowledged tariff pressure, he called price hikes 'the very last resort.' Even Walmart has since sounded a somewhat conciliatory note: 'We have always worked to keep our prices as low as possible and we won't stop,' the company said in a statement this week. 'We'll keep prices as low as we can for as long as we can, given the reality of small retail margins.'
It's unclear how long presidential jawboning can stave off retail price increases, but the apparent effort is remarkable. In the last election, Democratic candidate Kamala Harris was slammed by critics who dubiously characterized her proposal to crack down on 'price gouging' as essentially government price control. Attempting to publicly micromanage companies considering tariff-related price rises doesn't have the force of law, but it certainly seems like government marketplace meddling, aimed squarely at controlling prices.
Public companies in particular are left to thread the needle of serving shareholders by maximizing earnings and keeping investors informed of risks—while avoiding hostile publicity from the White House. Polling data suggests consumers expect further inflation, so maybe at this point of Trump's pressure campaign, it is just about who (companies or government policy) gets blamed for the trade war's inevitable impact on costs.
That said, any attempt at actually staving off tariff-sparked price increases with loud rhetoric seems doomed: A poll from insurer Allianz found that 54% of U.S. companies say they will have to raise prices to cope with tariffs. Not even Trump can bully a majority of American businesses to 'eat the tariffs.' And in fact, Home Depot's high-profile distancing from tariff price increases had some caveats. Some toolmakers have already raised prices, and Home Depot's CEO noted that one way it might avoid hikes is with less inventory: 'There are items that we have that could potentially be impacted from a tariff that, candidly, we won't have going forward.'
Of course, there is nothing surprising or unexpected about tariffs driving up prices or narrowing consumer choice. It's exactly what most economic assessments said would happen, what companies large and small have anticipated —and indeed what many of the big-box giants' leaders reportedly warned Trump would happen earlier this year. Even Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent now admits that prices are going to rise. Ultimately, these businesses will take the steps they need to, and consumers will muddle through the consequences. But perhaps, if the Trump administration's pressure campaign works, all that will happen with as little talk of tariffs as possible.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bay Area farmworkers hope for action as President Trump promises ICE reform
Bay Area farmworkers hope for action as President Trump promises ICE reform

CBS News

time22 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Bay Area farmworkers hope for action as President Trump promises ICE reform

HALF MOON BAY — In a post to Truth Social on Thursday, President Trump promised farmworkers that changes are coming to how ICE operations are conducted. Mr. Trump acknowledged in the post that people within the farming industry have stated that his administration's "aggressive policy on immigration" has led to the industry losing longtime workers, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace." "This is not good. We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!" Mr. Trump said. It's the first sign of hope for the immigrant community that has lived in fear since the raids began. Sandra Sencion is a farmworker program director with ALAS. It stands for Ayudandos Latinos a Soñar, which means helping Latinos to dream. The last few months, though, have been a nightmare for the immigrant community in Half Moon Bay. "These ICE raids are happening all around us and the fear that that could happen to us, regardless of whether you're documented or not," Sencion said. The farmworkers in Half Moon Bay worked through the pandemic and a mass shooting that killed seven people in 2023. They now worry about their families being torn apart. Sencion says they've had to do more outreach as more and more people need mental health and legal support. "We have a wait list for our mental health line and we are increasing our presence within our local farms and housing sites," she said. Some of the farms in Half Moon Bay are locking their gates so federal agents can't freely walk on their properties to take workers away. Sencion says the same is being done at the ALAS house to make sure people feel comfortable reaching out for help. She said many farmworkers have told her they just want to work to provide for their families. Now, they wait to see if Mr. Trump will make any changes to his immigration policy. "It's a message of hope to some extent to hear our president say something that is promising, but again, we're hoping that there's action behind that," Sencion said.

‘No Kings' protests are planned for North Texas. Here's how they will impact street closures
‘No Kings' protests are planned for North Texas. Here's how they will impact street closures

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘No Kings' protests are planned for North Texas. Here's how they will impact street closures

'No Kings Day' demonstrations are planned across North Texas this weekend to protest President Donald Trump and his administration's policies. On Saturday, June 14, demonstrations are planned in a number of cities in the Metroplex, including Dallas, Arlington and Fort Worth. These protests coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and a planned massive military parade in Washington, D.C. to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th birthday. Gov. Greg Abbott said he will deploy National Guard troops and Texas Department of Public Safety officers across the state to 'to uphold law and order' during the planned protests. Most of these protests are taking place in parks or other public areas. Here's what to know about any planned street closures surrounding these events. ⚡ More trending stories from our newsroom: →What's the difference between TX law enforcement and the National Guard? →Can you get in trouble for not slowing down in a work zone in Texas? →How to stay safe at Texas protests Fort Worth's 'No Kings' protest will be from noon to 2 p.m. at Burk Burnett Park (501 W. 7th St.). The city told the Star-Telegram that Downtown Fort Worth Inc., who manages the park, has permitted a First Amendment Event on the property. Separately, a Downtown Fort Worth spokesperson confirmed this with the Star-Telegram and said there are no planned street closures around the event site. If anything changes leading up to the protest, residents can receive updates from the organization by texting 'Downtown Closures' to 817-904-4255. The city said it has not received any permit applications as of Thursday afternoon for any counter-protests to the 'No Kings' demonstration. Furthermore, the city said Fort Worth police are working closely with the community and its Intelligence Fusion Center to 'monitor all activity during any peaceful protests.' There is also a 'March of Dissent' event planned for downtown Fort Worth on Saturday morning. Arlington's 'No Kings' protest will be from 10 a.m. to noon at the Arlington Sub Courthouse (700 E. Abram St.) A city spokesperson told the Star-Telegram there are no planned street closures related to the protest. Burleson: 1 p.m.-3 p.m. at 100 NW John Jones Drive Dallas: Noon to 2 p.m. at Akard Plaza, 1500 Marilla St. Denton: 11 a.m.-1 p.m. at Denton Square, 110 W. Hickory St. Flower Mound: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. at Parker Square Gazebo, 1500 Cross Timbers Road Frisco: 9:30 a.m.-11 a.m. at FM 423 (both sides) between Main/King and Stonebrook, 155 Old Newman Road McKinney: 10 a.m.-noon, on the north side of Hwy. 380, west of Hwy. 75, 2025 N. Central Expressway

Appeals court blocks ruling requiring Trump to hand National Guard back to California
Appeals court blocks ruling requiring Trump to hand National Guard back to California

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Appeals court blocks ruling requiring Trump to hand National Guard back to California

The Brief An appeals court has blocked a federal judge's ruling requiring Donald Trump to return control of the National Guard to the state of California. San Francisco judge Charles Breyer made the initial ruling Thursday, calling Trump's deployment of the National Guard unconstitutional. Another hearing in the case is scheduled for June 17. LOS ANGELES - Hours after a federal judge ruled President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard in Los Angeles was unconstitutional, an appeals court temporarily blocked the ruling Thursday night. National Guard troops have been in Los Angeles for a week after anti-ICE protests. Another hearing on the issue is scheduled for next week. What we know San Francisco federal judge Charles Breyer made the initial ruling on Thursday, June 12. In his ruling, Breyer said that Trump overstepped his power and violated the Tenth Amendment by calling in the National Guard without Newsom's consent. The order required Trump to hand control of the troops back to Newsom by noon on Friday, June 13. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked Breyer's order on Thursday night. Dig deeper Below is part of Breyer's ruling: "On June 6, 2025, the federal government initiated immigration raids across the City of Los Angeles. Protests swiftly followed, and some individuals involved in those protests were unruly and even violent. State and local law enforcement responded. The following day, President Trump ordered that members of the California National Guard be federalized, and thereupon assumed control of those forces. At this early stage of the proceedings, the Court must determine whether the President followed the congressionally mandated procedure for his actions. He did not. His actions were illegal-both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith." Prior to Thursday night's ruling, Trump took to Truth Social to blast Newsom for his handling of the weeklong anti-ICE protests: "Incompetent Gavin Newscum should have been THANKING me for the job we did in Los Angeles, rather than making sad excuses for the poor job he has done. If it weren't for me getting the National Guard into Los Angeles, it would be burning to the ground right now!" What they're saying Newsom praised Breyer's ruling, saying that the case was "a test of democracy, and today we passed the test." The other side The White House had called Breyer's order "unprecedented" and said it "puts our brave federal officials in danger." What's next The appeals court has set another hearing for June 17. The Source This report used court documents obtained by FOX 11 and information from the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store