
Pratt & Whitney workers entering third week of strike while preparing to lose health care
As the historic Pratt & Whitney strike enters its third week, the union president called workers 'organized and determined' despite the fact that they will soon lose access to their health care plans.
The union members began picketing in East Hartford and Middletown on May 5, a day after overwhelmingly rejecting the jet-engine maker's final contract offer and setting up a historic bargaining showdown not seen at the company in decades. The contract dispute covers about 3,000 hourly workers and members of IAM Local 700 and Local 1746.
As the strike enters its third week, Wayne McCarthy, president of IAM Union Local 700, said workers will not backing down until they receive job security and a fair contract.
Workers are set to lose their health care coverage on Monday, a blow that McCarthy acknowledged would be hard on families. But McCarthy noted that Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz and State Sen. Matt Lesser, D-Middletown, reached out to him on Saturday and announced that workers will be eligible to apply for health care coverage under Access Health CT, the state's health insurance marketplace.
'Our state officials have been tremendous and very helpful,' McCarthy said. 'We are now eligible to get better coverage than COBRA from Access Health. This is very helpful for us ,and we plan on holding an information Zoom call on the 20th and an enrollment period starting on the 21st. Later in the week, we will be holding another information session in Middletown.'
Pete Caruso, a union hall monitor with IAM Union Local 700, said the announcement that workers can now access the state's health insurance marketplace is 'welcome news' after days of worrying over the loss of health coverage.
'This is a massive support for us, it's one less thing we have to worry about' Caruso said. 'We're already concerned about our jobs and careers, so one less thing to worry about is really huge for us. So it's good news all the way around. We have had tremendous support from our local officials.'
McCarthy has called the strike 'ultra modern' in its approach. He said workers are using social media and group chats to organize and distribute information. He said technology has allowed workers to stay united and combat misinformation. The Union Local 700 president said he has received compliments from retired workers on how organized this strike has been entering its third week.
'I have retirees who come down to the line and say they have never seen a group this united and focused in their life,' McCarthy said. 'These are people that worked at Pratt for 40-plus years. They went through the 1985 strike and the 2001 strike, and everyone is just amazed at the sense of unity here in 2025.'
But despite successes, McCarthy acknowledges that some workers may begin to feel the pain of not receiving a paycheck. The company has told employees that workers will forfeit their benefits and pay while striking. Since receiving that letter, employees say the company has not sent out any communications. The last paycheck for many workers was on May 8.
'Some people may be reaching a point where they have a financial concern, so we communicated out yesterday that we have the ability to take a loan out of our 401K,' McCarthy said. 'The payments are suspended until the strike is over. If the strike ends soon, workers can just send the money back. There's no tax penalty and no payment required until we return to work. Some people are now using this option to cover bills or expenses.'
Union members say the biggest issues separating them are employment security, marked by worries about jobs migrating to areas of the country where it is cheaper to do business; pension and retirement benefits; and concerns about wages keeping up with inflation.
Some picketing workers said the erosion in health benefits, marked by higher premiums and deductibles, essentially erased the pay increases offered by the company. According to Pratt, the proposed pay increase was a general wage increase of 4% immediately, 3.5% in 2026 and 3% in 2027.
Despite some hardships caused by the lack of pay and benefits, Caruso said workers 'remain united as ever' and determined to secure long lasting job security and a fair contract for workers.
Pratt & Whitney launches new missive on CT strike. Company says it's 'committed to this state'
'There is a lot of passion right now, the general consensus we are all saying to the company is 'see you June' or at least until after Memorial Day,' Caruso said.
'Between the age group that was already ready to retire and a bunch of the young guys, everyone is fairly in line with this. A lot of our workers already had planned for this. We don't know exactly what's gong to happen, but we're very much on the same page.'
Pratt & Whitney told the Courant they have no new updates but look forward to resuming negotiations.
'Our local workforce is among the highest compensated in the region and the industry — our offer built on that foundation. We look forward to resuming negotiations for a mutually beneficial new contract that continues to secure these high paying, high-skilled manufacturing jobs here in Connecticut,' a spokesperson with Pratt & Whitney told the Courant.
Stephen Underwood can be reached at sunderwood@courant.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
20 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Revokes Biden-Era Rule on Emergency Abortions in Hospitals
The Trump administration rescinded guidance put in place by former President Joe Biden that directed US hospitals to provide abortions on an emergency basis when they're medically necessary to stabilize patients. The guideline was established in July 2022 under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, just weeks after the US Supreme Court overturned the Roe v. Wade decision that protected national abortion rights. It was enacted under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services after women reported being turned away from hospitals while facing serious pregnancy complications, including severe bleeding.


New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Rescinds Biden Policy Requiring Hospitals to Provide Emergency Abortions
The Trump administration announced on Tuesday that it had revoked a Biden administration requirement that hospitals provide emergency abortions to women whose health is in peril, including in states where abortion is restricted or banned. The move by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, a branch of the department led by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., was not a surprise. But it added to growing confusion around emergency care and abortions since June 2022, when the Supreme Court rescinded the national right to abortion by overturning Roe v. Wade. 'It basically gives a bright green light to hospitals in red states to turn away pregnant women who are in peril,' Lawrence O. Gostin, a health law expert at Georgetown University, said of the Trump administration's move. The administration did not explicitly tell hospitals that they were free to turn away women seeking abortions in medical emergencies. Its policy statement said hospitals would still be subject to a federal law requiring them to provide reproductive health care in emergency situations. But it did not explain exactly what that meant. Mr. Gostin and other experts said the murky policy could have dire consequences for pregnant women by discouraging doctors from performing emergency abortions in states where abortions are banned or restricted. 'We've already seen since the overturn of Roe that uncertainty and confusion tends to mean physicians are unwilling to intervene, and the more unwilling physicians are to intervene, the more risk there is in pregnancy,' said Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California-Davis and a historian of the American abortion debate. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration rolls back guidance specifying that ERs must offer abortion care when necessary
The US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services said Tuesday that they were rescinding 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures. The previous guidance from the Biden administration does not 'reflect the policy of this Administration,' according to an announcement of the policy change. CMS added that it will continue to enforce the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, known as EMTALA, and it specified that the policy included 'identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.' However, it remains unclear exactly what the change will mean for emergency care, particularly in states with highly restrictive abortion laws. EMTALA requires all US hospitals that have received Medicare money — essentially nearly all of them — to screen everyone who comes into their emergency rooms to determine whether the person has an emergency medical condition without regard for their ability to pay for services. The 1986 law also requires hospitals, to the best of their ability, to stabilize anyone who has an emergency medical condition or to transfer them to another facility that has that capacity. The hospitals must also treat these patients 'until the emergency medical condition is resolved or stabilized.' Pregnant people were singled out in 1989, after reports that some hospitals were refusing to care for uninsured women in labor. Congress expanded EMTALA to specify that it included people who were pregnant and having contractions. In 2021, the Biden administration released the Reinforcement of EMTALA Obligation, which says it is a doctor's duty to provide stabilizing treatment that 'preempts any directly conflicting state law or mandated that might otherwise prohibit or prevent such treatment,' although it did not specify whether an abortion had to be provided. In July 2022, weeks after the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that gave pregnant people a constitutional right to an abortion, the Biden administration's guidance further clarified that EMTALA included the need to perform stabilization abortion care if it is medically necessary to treat an emergency medical condition. If a state law banned abortion and did not include an exception for the life or health of the pregnant person, that law was preempted by the federal statute. After Roe was overturned, several states passed highly restrictive abortion bans. Thirteen have total abortion bans, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization focused on sexual and reproductive health that supports abortion rights. Twenty-eight states have abortion bans based on gestational duration: seven ban it at or before 18 weeks' gestation, and 21 states ban abortion at some point after 18 weeks. Idaho has one of the more restrictive laws, making it a felony to perform an abortion at any stage of pregnancy unless it was necessary to save the life of a pregnant person. In 2024, the US Supreme Court formally dismissed an appeal over Idaho's strict abortion ban. The decision was interpreted as meaning that pregnant people should be able to access an abortion in a medical emergency under EMTALA, but experts said that in reality, pregnant people were still being denied care. Some doctors even advised pregnant patients to buy life flight insurance in case they had an emergency complication that the doctors could not treat and the patient had to be flown out of state. In March, the Trump administration took a major step in support of states with abortion bans when it dropped a Biden-era lawsuit against Idaho that sought to protect abortion access in medical emergencies. Tuesday's announcement from CMS says the agency will 'work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.' The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, a professional organization that represents the majority of practitioners in the United States, was critical of the move. 'Rescinding guidance clarifying protections for the care of pregnant people experiencing emergencies is a poor decision that will undoubtedly endanger the lives and health of pregnant women, who are already facing difficulties accessing needed abortion care during obstetrical complications,' Molly Meegan, the group's chief legal officer and general counsel, said in an email Tuesday. She said the announcement will 'deepen confusion' about when emergency care is legal and exacerbate 'overwhelming barriers to care' for people across the US. 'Abortion is an essential part of medical care, and EMTALA protections should be afforded to all patients in need of emergency care, including abortion,' Meegan said. The ACLU, Democracy Forward and the National Women's Law Center, organizations that have advocated for pregnant people's right to an abortion, were also critical of the new decision, characterizing it as 'caving to its anti-abortion allies' and saying it's a reversal of Trump's campaign pledge that he wouldn't interfere with abortion access. 'The Trump administration cannot simply erase four decades of law protecting patients' lives with the stroke of a pen,' Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, said in a statement. No matter where a person lives in the United States, Kolbi-Molinas said, they should have access to emergency care, and the ACLU will 'use every lever we have to keep President Trump and his administration from endangering our health and lives.' Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women's Law Center, called the administration hypocritical for its push for a new American 'baby boom' while making a decision that the group says will put people's lives at risk. 'To be clear: this action doesn't change hospitals' legal obligations, but it does add to the fear, confusion, and dangerous delays patients and providers have faced since the fall of Roe v. Wade,' Graves said in a statement.