logo
Trump fast-tracks Utah uranium mine, but industry revival may wait for higher prices

Trump fast-tracks Utah uranium mine, but industry revival may wait for higher prices

Hindustan Times2 days ago

SALT LAKE CITY — In the southeastern Utah desert famous for red rock arches and canyon labyrinths, the long-dormant uranium mining industry is looking to revive under President Donald Trump.
Hundreds of abandoned uranium mines dot the West's arid landscapes, hazardous reminders of the promise and peril of nuclear power during the Cold War. Now, one mine that the Trump administration fast-tracked for regulatory approval could reopen for the first time since the 1980s.
Normally it would have taken months, if not years, for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to review plans to reopen a project like Anfield Energy's Velvet-Wood mine 35 miles south of Moab. But the bureau's regulators green-lit the project in just 11 days under a 'national energy emergency' Trump has declared that allows expedited environmental reviews for energy projects.
More permits and approvals will be needed, plus site work to get the mine operating again. And the price of uranium would have to rise enough to make domestic production financially sustainable. If that happens, it would mean revival — and jobs — to an industry that locally has been moribund since the Ronald Reagan era.
'President Trump has made it clear that our energy security is national security," Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in announcing the fast-tracking policy in April. 'These emergency procedures reflect our unwavering commitment to protecting both.'
More fast approvals appear likely. Trump's order also applies to oil, gas, coal, biofuel and hydropower projects — but not renewable energy — on federal lands.
Global uranium prices are double what they were at a low point seven years ago and, for the past year, the U.S. has banned uranium imports from Russia due to that country's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
More domestic mining would address a major imbalance. The U.S. imports about 98% of the uranium it uses to generate 30% of the world's nuclear energy. More than two-thirds of U.S. imports come from the world's top three uranium-mining countries: Canada, Australia and Kazakhstan.
Less government regulation won't spur more U.S. uranium mining by itself. The market matters. And while spot-market prices are up from several years ago, they're down about a third from their recent high in early 2024.
While some new uranium mining and processing projects have been announced, their number falls far short of a surge. That suggests prices need to rise — and stay there — for a true industry revival, said John Uhrie, a former uranium executive who now works in the cement industry.
'Until the price goes up dramatically, you're not going to be able to actually put these places into operation,' Uhrie said. 'You need significant capital on the ground.'
Still, the industry is showing new life in the Southwest.
Anfield Energy, a Canadian company, also looks to reopen the Shootaring Canyon uranium mill in southern Utah near Glen Canyon National Recreation Area. It closed in the early 1980s. A uranium mill turns raw ore into yellowcake, a powdery substance later processed elsewhere into nuclear fuel.
Anfield officials did not return messages seeking comment on plans to reopen the mill and the Velvet-Wood mine.
Energy Fuels, another Canadian company which ranks as the top U.S. uranium miner, opened the Pinyon Plain mine about 10 miles from the Grand Canyon in late 2023.
And just off U.S. 191 in southeastern Utah is a hub of the industry, Uranium Fuels' White Mesa mill, the country's only uranium mill still in operation.
These days, Moab is a desert tourism hot spot bustling with outdoor enthusiasts. But the town of 5,200 has a deeper history with uranium. Nods to Moab's post-World War II mining heyday can been spotted around town — the Atomic Hair Salon isn't just named for its blowout hairstyles.
The biggest reminder is the Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action project, a 480-acre site just outside town. The decades-long, $1 billion U.S. Department of Energy effort to haul off toxic tailings that were leaching into the Colorado River upstream from the Grand Canyon and Lake Mead should wrap up within five more years.
That mill's polluting legacy makes some Moab residents wary of restarting uranium mining and processing, especially after the Trump administration cut short their ability to weigh in on the Velvet-Wood mine plans.
'This was a process I would have been involved in,' said Sarah Fields, director of the local group Uranium Watch. 'They provided no opportunity for the public to say, 'You need to look at this, you need to look at that.'"
Grand Canyon Trust, a group critical of the Pinyon Plain mine as a danger to groundwater, points out that the U.S. nuclear industry isn't at risk of losing access to uranium.
'This is all being done under the assumption there is some energy emergency and that is just not true,' said Amber Reimondo, the group's energy director.
Hundreds of miles to the north, other nuclear energy projects point to the U.S. industry's future.
With Bill Gates' support, TerraPower is building a 345-megawatt sodium-cooled fast reactor outside Kemmerer in western Wyoming that could, in theory, meet demand for carbon-free power at lower costs and with less construction time than conventional reactor units.
Meanwhile, about 40% of uranium mined in the U.S. in 2024 came from four Wyoming 'in-situ' mines that use wells to dissolve uranium in underground deposits and pump it to the surface without having to dig big holes or send miners underground. Similar mines in Texas and Nebraska and stockpiled ore processed at White Mesa accounted for the rest.
None — as yet — came from mines in Utah.
Powering electric cars and computing technology will require more electricity in the years ahead. Nuclear power offers a zero-carbon, round-the-clock option.
Meeting the demand for nuclear fuel domestically is another matter. With prices higher, almost 700,000 pounds of yellowcake was produced in the U.S. in 2024 — up more than a dozen-fold from the year before but still far short of the 32 million pounds imported into the U.S.
Even if mining increases, it's not clear that U.S. capacity to turn the ore into fuel would keep pace, said Uhrie, the former uranium mining executive.
"Re-establishing a viable uranium industry from soup to nuts — meaning from mining through processing to yellow cake production, to conversion, to enrichment to produce nuclear fuel — remains a huge lift," Uhrie said.
Gruver reported from Cheyenne, Wyoming.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Job Interviews Enter a Strange New World With AI That Talks Back
Job Interviews Enter a Strange New World With AI That Talks Back

Mint

time38 minutes ago

  • Mint

Job Interviews Enter a Strange New World With AI That Talks Back

(Bloomberg) -- For better or worse, the next generation of job interviews has arrived: Employers are now rolling out artificial intelligence simulating live, two-way screener calls using synthetic voices. Startups like Apriora, HeyMilo AI and Ribbon all say they're seeing swift adoption of their software for conducting real-time AI interviews over video. Job candidates converse with an AI 'recruiter' that asks follow-up questions, probes key skills and delivers structured feedback to hiring managers. The idea is to make interviewing more efficient for companies — and more accessible for applicants — without requiring recruiters to be online around the clock. You may be interested in 'A year ago this idea seemed insane,' said Arsham Ghahramani, co-founder and chief executive officer of Ribbon, a Toronto-based AI recruiting startup that recently raised $8.2 million in a funding round led by Radical Ventures. 'Now it's quite normalized.' Employers are drawn to the time savings, especially if they're hiring at high volume and running hundreds of interviews a day. And job candidates — especially those in industries like trucking and nursing, where schedules are often irregular — may appreciate the ability to interview at odd hours, even if a majority of Americans polled last year by Consumer Reports said they were uncomfortable with the idea of algorithms grading their video interviews. At Propel Impact, a Canadian social impact investing nonprofit, a shift to AI screener interviews came about because of the need to scale up the hiring process. The organization had traditionally relied on written applications and alumni-conducted interviews to assess candidates. But with plans to bring on more than 300 fellows this year, that approach quickly became unsustainable. At the same time, the rise of ChatGPT was diluting the value of written application materials. 'They were all the same,' said Cheralyn Chok, Propel's co-founder and executive director. 'Same syntax, same patterns.' Technology allowing AI to converse with job candidates on a screen has been in the works for years. Companies like HireVue pioneered one-way, asynchronous video interviews in the early 2010s and later layered on automated scoring using facial expressions and language analysis —features that drew both interest and criticism. (The visual analysis was rolled back in 2020.) But those platforms largely left the experience static: candidates talking into a screen with no interaction, leaving recorded answers for a human to dissect after the fact. It wasn't until the public release of large language models like ChatGPT in late 2022 that developers began to imagine — and build — something more dynamic. Ribbon was founded in 2023 and began selling its offering the following year. Ghahramani said the company signed nearly 400 customers in just eight months. HeyMilo and Apriora launched around the same time and also report fast growth, though each declined to share customer counts. 'The first year ChatGPT came out, recruiters weren't really down for this,' said HeyMilo CEO Sabashan Ragavan. 'But the technology has gotten a lot better as time has gone on.' Even so, the rollout hasn't been glitch-free. A handful of clips circulating on TikTok show interview bots repeating phrases or misinterpreting simple answers. One widely shared example involved an AI interviewer created by Apriora repeatedly saying the phrase 'vertical bar pilates.' Aaron Wang, Apriora's co-founder and CEO, attributed the error to a voice model misreading the term 'Pilates.' He said the issue was fixed promptly and emphasized that such cases are rare. 'We're not going to get it right every single time,' he said. 'The incident rate is well under 0.001%.' Chok said Propel Impact had also seen minor glitches, though it was unclear whether they stemmed from Ribbon itself or a candidate's Wi-Fi connection. In those cases, the applicant was able to simply restart. Braden Dennis, who has used chatbot technology to interview candidates for his AI-powered investment research startup FinChat, noted that AI sometimes struggles when candidates ask specific follow-up questions. 'It is definitely a very one-sided conversation,' he said. 'Especially when the candidate asks questions about the role. Those can be tricky to field from the AI.' Startups providing the technology emphasized their approach to monitoring and support. HeyMilo maintains a 24/7 support team and automated alerts to detect issues like dropped connections or failed follow-ups. 'Technology can fail,' Ragavan said, 'but we've built systems to catch those corner cases.' Ribbon has a similar protocol. Any time a candidate clicks a support button, an alert is triggered that notifies the CEO. 'Interviews are high stakes,' Ghahramani said. 'We take those issues really seriously.' And while the videos of glitches are a bad look for the sector, Ghahramani said he sees the TikToks making fun of the tools as a sign the technology is entering the mainstream. Candidates applying to FinChat, which uses Ribbon for its screener interviews, are notified up front that they'll be speaking to an AI and that the team is aware it may feel impersonal. 'We let them know when we send them the link to complete it that we know it is a bit dystopian and takes the 'human' out of human resources,' Dennis said. 'That part is not lost on us.' Still, he said, the asynchronous format helps widen the talent pool and ensures strong applicants aren't missed. 'We have had a few folks drop out of the running once I sent them the AI link,' Dennis said. 'At the end of the day, we are an AI company as well, so if that is a strong deterrent then that's OK.' Propel Impact prepares candidates by communicating openly about its reasons for using AI in interviews, while hosting information sessions led by humans to maintain a sense of connection with candidates. 'As long as companies continue to offer human touch points along the way, these tools are going to be seen far more frequently,' Chok said. Regulators have taken notice. While AI interview tools in theory promise transparency and fairness, they could soon face more scrutiny over how they score candidates — and whether they reinforce bias at scale. Illinois now requires companies to disclose whether AI is analyzing interview videos and to get candidates' consent, and New York City mandates annual bias audits for any automated hiring tools used by local employers. Though AI interviewing technology is mainly being used for initial screenings, Ribbon's Ghahramani said 15% of the interviews on its platform now happen beyond the screening stage, up from just 1% a few months ago. This suggests customers are using the technology in new ways. Some employers are experimenting with AI interviews in which they can collect compensation expectations or feedback on the interview process — potentially awkward conversations that some candidates, and hiring managers, may prefer to see delegated to a bot. In a few cases, AI interviews are being used for technical evaluations or even to replace second-round interviews with a human. 'You can actually compress stages,' said Wang. 'That first AI conversation can cover everything from 'Are you authorized to work here?' to fairly technical, domain-specific questions.' Even as AI handles more of the hiring process, most companies selling the technology still view it as a tool for gathering information, not making the final call. 'We don't believe that AI should be making the hiring decision,' Ragavan said. 'It should just collect data to support that decision.' (Updates sixth paragraph to clarify HireVue uses language analysis, and to note it removed facial analysis in 2020.) More stories like this are available on

India eyes retaliation as US rejects WTO notice
India eyes retaliation as US rejects WTO notice

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

India eyes retaliation as US rejects WTO notice

The US has rejected India's May 9 notice at the World Trade Organization that proposed retaliatory action against Washington imposing steep import tariffs on steel and aluminium and said its actions were not safeguard measures, which is why it would not hold any discussion with New Delhi on the matter, people in the know said on Sunday. Under the current circumstances, India may retaliate by proportionately suspending concessions given to American imports (for example almonds and walnuts) and levy higher customs duties on metals coming from the US, said the people cited above, requesting anonymity. The Indian notice was against the US's February 10 decision to impose 25% levies on all imports of steel and aluminium effective from March 12. Now, the matter has been aggravated further as the Trump administration on May 30 doubled tariffs on the metals to 50% effective from June 4, citing national security. Against the US measure to hike import duties on steel and aluminium to safeguard American metal industries, India on May 9 formally notified WTO that it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' granted to the US 'after the expiration of 30 days from the date of this notification', which would be June 8. Reacting to India's notice, the United States on May 22 informed WTO that India's proposed retaliation was not consistent with the multilateral trade rules. Washington said the US tariffs on metals were 'not safeguard' measures. 'Accordingly, there is no basis for India's proposal to suspend concessions or other obligations under Article 8.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards with respect to these measures,' it said in its latest communication to WTO. On grounds that the tariffs are not safeguard measures, the US also declined to discuss and resolve the dispute with India, leaving the ball in New Delhi's court. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the American communication to the multilateral body added. While India's commerce ministry did not respond to a query on this matter, people in the know said India may retaliate unless the US agrees to a preferential treatment for India on these metals under the ongoing talks for an early deal (first tranche) within the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Both countries are making efforts to conclude an early harvest deal by this month and a negotiating team from the US is expected to visit India this week, they said. Experts said high tariffs on steel and aluminium by the US are of critical importance to India. 'For India, the consequences are direct. In FY25, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' said Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) founder and former Indian Trade Service officer Ajay Srivastava. 'India has already issued a formal notice at the WTO signalling its intention to impose retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response to the earlier steel tariffs. With (President Donald) Trump now doubling the tariffs, it remains to be seen whether India will carry out the retaliation, by increasing tariffs on certain US exports within a month,' he added. Hindustan Times reported on May 14 about India proposing to levy retaliatory import duties on American goods proportionately in response to the United States' imposing safeguard tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium. 'The safeguard measures would affect US$ 7.6 billion imports into the United States of the relevant products originating in India, on which the duty collection would be US$ 1.91 billion. Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States,' India's May 9 notice to WTO said. The US, however, maintained at WTO that its tariffs on steel and aluminium are based on national security considerations and not 'safeguard measures' as claimed by India. 'Such disputes at WTO are common and routine. Without an effective appellate body at the multilateral forum, disputes have no real significance,' one of the persons mentioned above said. The second person said this is a vexed issue. The previous Joe Biden administration in 2018 had imposed a 25% tariff on certain steel and a 10% levy on aluminium items on grounds of national security. That was retaliated to by India in June 2019 when it imposed customs duties on 28 US products such as almonds and walnuts, besides filing a complaint at WTO. Later, the two sides, however, decided to resolve the dispute amicably through mutually agreed solutions (MAS). Under the agreement in June 2023, the US agreed to grant market access to steel and aluminium products under the exclusion process of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act 1962 and India agreed to remove the additional duty (retaliatory tariffs) on certain American products. MAS is a mechanism under WTO where its members can resolve disputes amicably without going through the formal process of a settlement mechanism.

‘They are jealous': Boulder attack suspect before throwing Molotov cocktails at pro-Israel group
‘They are jealous': Boulder attack suspect before throwing Molotov cocktails at pro-Israel group

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘They are jealous': Boulder attack suspect before throwing Molotov cocktails at pro-Israel group

A video of the alleged Boulder attack suspect mouthing at a group of pro-Israeli demonstrators and locals at Pearl Street, holding a couple of Molotov cocktail-like bottles in his hand, has surfaced on social media. This comes as police officials confirmed that a man tried 'burning people down' in the Colorado city on Sunday. Several conservative X influencers, including Trump ally Laura Loomer, claimed that the person has been identified as Mohamad Soliman. However, authorities are yet to confirm these details. In a video shared on X, platform formerly known as Twitter, the alleged suspect can be heard arguing with a bunch of locals. At one point, he can be heard saying, 'I can, I can.' After a woman tries to talk to him, he points to a group to say, 'They're jealous.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store