English court bars jailed Russian tycoon from appealing in Transneft case
MOSCOW, June 5 (Reuters) - The English Court of Appeal has refused jailed Russian tycoon Ziyavudin Magomedov permission to appeal against a decision that threw out his $14 billion lawsuit against Russian oil pipeline monopoly Transneft and other firms, the company said.
Magomedov sued the company and several others at London's High Court, alleging his 2018 arrest on embezzlement charges prompted a Russian state-supported scheme to strip him of his holdings in valuable port operators.
In January, Transneft, as well as U.S. private equity firm TPG (TPG.O), opens new tab and other companies, won their bid to block Magomedov's London lawsuit.
Transneft said late on Wednesday that the English Court of Appeal denied Magomedov permission to appeal the ruling.
"It is clear from the English process that there are massive losses which Mr Magomedov has suffered as a result of wrongdoing against him. He will continue to seek justice and a fair outcome wherever he can," a spokesperson for Magomedov said.
Magomedov once controlled an empire ranging from port logistics to oil and gas through his Summa Group conglomerate, which he founded with his brother Magomed.
But the brothers were arrested on embezzlement and organised crime charges in one of the most high-profile prosecutions of its kind in years.
Magomedov was sentenced to 19 years in jail in 2022. He says the charges against him are unfounded and unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Houston Trial Attorney Will Moye Secures $37.9 Million Verdict in Zero-Offer Case Against 3M, Just One Day After Helping Defeat Texas Tort Reform Bill
HOUSTON, TX, June 6, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- In a victory for Texas plaintiffs and community safety, Will Moye, opens new tab, founding attorney of Moye Law Firm, opens new tab secured a $37.9 million jury verdict Tuesday in a case where 3M offered nothing to settle. The win came just one day after Moye helped defeat Senate Bill 30, opens new tab (SB 30), a controversial tort reform measure, opens new tab aimed at capping civil jury awards and limiting Texans' access to full compensation. 'This was a week where truth prevailed at the Capitol and in the courtroom. We warned the legislature that SB 30 would silence victims and their families. And on Monday, that bill died. On Tuesday, a Harris County jury sent a $37.9 million message that justice still matters in Texas,' Moye said. Moye tried the case alongside Robert Kwok and Ryan Loya of Kwok Daniel, LLP. The jury found 3M and its subsidiary Teledyne Detcon responsible for selling and servicing a gas detection system that catastrophically failed during the January 2020 explosion at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing. The blast killed three people, injured many more, and destroyed hundreds of homes in Houston's Spring Branch neighborhood. Trial evidence showed that a 3M technician had falsely certified the system as operational, despite critical alarms and sensors never being properly connected. Before trial, 3M refused to offer even a nominal settlement. Instead, the company insisted it bore no responsibility and urged the jury to assign all blame to Watson Grinding, which filed for bankruptcy shortly after the explosion. At one point during trial, a 3M attorney asked one of the plaintiffs, a 50-year-old Latina housekeeper whose home and health were destroyed, why she had not 'just driven for Uber' to recover financially. 'That kind of corporate arrogance is exactly why we go to trial. They didn't take the case seriously. Thankfully, the jury did,' Moye said. With five years of pre-judgment interest, the total judgment is expected to exceed $40 million. Frequently Asked Questions Who is Will Moye? Will Moye, opens new tab is a veteran Houston trial attorney with more than two decades of courtroom experience. He previously defended some of the world's largest corporations before founding his own plaintiffs-only law firm in 2024. What is the Watson Grinding explosion case? The January 24, 2020 explosion at Watson Grinding and Manufacturing in Spring Branch killed three people and destroyed a residential neighborhood. Moye helped prove that 3M and Teledyne Detcon failed to properly install or test a gas detection system that could have prevented the blast. What was the verdict? A Harris County jury awarded $37.9 million to five plaintiffs. With pre-judgment interest, the award will exceed $40 million. Why is this verdict significant? The verdict coincided with the death of SB 30, Texas legislation aimed at reducing large jury awards. Will Moye played a direct role in defeating the bill and securing justice for his clients—all in the same week. About Will Moye and Moye Law Firm Will Moye, opens new tab is a courtroom-tested trial attorney with over 25 years of experience representing both plaintiffs and defendants. Before founding Moye Law Firm, opens new tab, he spent his career defending some of the nation's largest energy companies, manufacturers, and insurers, giving him a rare, strategic understanding of how powerful corporations assess and fight legal claims. Today, Moye uses that insider knowledge, opens new tab to fight for individuals and families, opens new tab catastrophically harmed by explosions, workplace safety failures, defective products, and corporate negligence. He has tried high-stakes cases across Texas, from major metropolitan areas like Harris and Travis Counties to smaller rural venues, earning a reputation for tough, strategic, and compassionate advocacy. Moye is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), one of the most prestigious organizations in the legal profession, reserved for experienced trial lawyers who exhibit high personal character, integrity, and proficiency in trial advocacy. He founded Moye Law Firm in 2024. Headquartered in Houston, it is a plaintiffs-only trial firm dedicated exclusively to catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death litigation. The firm's mission is simple: to deliver fearless, strategic, and personalized representation to those whose lives have been shattered by preventable disasters. The firm's attorneys bring over 80 years of combined courtroom experience, including significant backgrounds as former defense counsel for major corporations. Their unique perspectives enables the firm to anticipate defense strategies and build powerful, winning cases on behalf of injured clients. Their primary practice areas include: For more information, visit opens new tab. Media Contact Amanda Orramanda@ ### SOURCE: Moye Law Firm Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire
BBC News
30 minutes ago
- BBC News
Newton Aycliffe man jailed for kidnap and intent to rape teenager
A man who kidnapped a girl with the intention of raping her has been jailed for 11 well as kidnap, Matthew Hindhaugh had also pleaded guilty to assaulting and intentionally strangling the teenager in Crown Court heard that the 22-year-old, of Rowan Place in Newton Aycliffe, had also admitted possessing a samurai sword and making indecent images of children. Durham Police said Hindhaugh claimed he was trying to help the girl who he said had fallen over and hurt her face, but that "overwhelming CCTV evidence and witness statements proved otherwise". The victim said her attacker had punched her in the face before putting his hands over her mouth and telling her to be then forced her into his house and on to his bed where he held her down and started to unzip his described the girl as "quick-thinking" after she told Hindhaugh she would not tell anyone what had happened if he let her then escaped leaving a shoe behind. 'Chastity belt' Det Supt Peter Carr said the victim's bravery was "nothing short of extraordinary"."Not only did her resilience and quick-thinking actions manage to get her to safety, but she managed to prevent Hindhaugh from causing harm to anyone else," he said. "He is an extremely dangerous predator, whose actions were abhorrent that night."When arrested Hindhaugh was wearing a chastity belt which he told officers was to try and stop his sexual admitted eight charges including kidnap with the intention to commit rape, assault causing actual bodily harm and intentional strangulation, all committed on 27 also pleaded guilty to three counts of making indecent images of children, including 171 in the most serious category, between May 2015 and September 2024. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Liberty loses bid to bring legal action against equalities body
Human rights group Liberty has lost a bid to bring legal action against the equalities watchdog over its consultation in the wake of the Supreme Court's ruling on gender. The UK's highest court ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex, after a challenge against the Scottish Government by campaign group For Women Scotland. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is consulting on proposed amendments to part of its guidance, after interim guidance was published last month related to trans people's use of certain spaces including toilets and participation in sports following the judgment. The commission increased the length of time for feedback from an original proposal of two weeks to six weeks, but campaign group Liberty said that it should be at least 12 weeks, claiming the current period would be 'wholly insufficient' and unlawful. Liberty made a bid to bring a legal challenge over the length of the consultation, but in a decision on Friday afternoon Mr Justice Swift said it was not arguable. In his ruling, Mr Justice Swift said: 'There is no 12-week rule. The requirements of fairness are measured in specifics and context is important.' 'I am not satisfied that it is arguable that the six-week consultation period that the EHRC has chosen to use is unfair,' he added. At the hearing on Friday, Sarah Hannett KC, for Liberty, said in written submissions that the Supreme Court's decision 'has altered the landscape radically and suddenly' and potentially changes the way trans people access single-sex spaces and services. The barrister said this included some businesses preventing trans women from using female toilets and trans men from using male toilets, as well as British Transport Police updating its policy on strip searches, which have caused 'understandable distress to trans people'. Ms Hannett said a six-week consultation period would be unlawful because the EHRC has not given 'sufficient time' for consultees to give 'intelligent consideration and an intelligent response'. She told the London court: 'There is a desire amongst the bigger trans organisations to assist the smaller trans organisations in responding… That is something that is going to take some time.' Later in her written submissions, the barrister described the trans community as 'particularly vulnerable and currently subject to intense scrutiny and frequent harassment'. Ms Hannett added: 'There is evidence of distrust of both consultation processes and the commission within the community.' Lawyers for the EHRC said the legal challenge should not go ahead and that six weeks was 'adequate'. James Goudie KC, for the commission, told the hearing there is 'no magic at all in 12 weeks'. He said in written submissions: 'Guidance consistent with the Supreme Court's decision has become urgently needed. The law as declared by the Supreme Court is not to come in at some future point. 'It applies now, and has been applying for some time.' The barrister later said that misinformation had been spreading about the judgment, adding that it was 'stoking what was already an often heated and divisive debate about gender in society'. He continued: 'The longer it takes for EHRC to issue final guidance in the form of the code, the greater the opportunity for misinformation and disinformation to take hold, to the detriment of persons with different protected characteristics.' Mr Goudie also said that there was a previous 12-week consultation on the guidance at large starting in October 2024. Following the ruling, EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner said the commission's approach 'has been fair and appropriate throughout'. She continued: 'Our six-week consultation period represents a balance between gathering comprehensive stakeholder input and addressing the urgent need for clarity. We're particularly encouraged by the thousands of consultation responses already received and look forward to further meaningful engagement through the rest of the process. 'The current climate of legal uncertainty and widespread misinformation serves nobody – particularly those with protected characteristics who rightly expect clarity about their rights. A swift resolution to this uncertainty will benefit everyone, including trans people.'
