With Rising Variants of COVID and Bird Flu, the Single Broad-Spectrum Antiviral NV-387 Would be the Best Partner for Preparedness, Says NanoViricides' Dr. Diwan
Nimbus, a new COVID variant, officially NB1.8.1, is displacing the LP8.1 variant that was dominant until a few weeks ago in the USA (https://www.today.com/health/coronavirus/new-covid-variant-nb181-nimbus-symptoms-rcna212304).
Nimbus has been rising globally since Spring according to WHO (https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/epp/tracking-sars-cov-2/23052025_nb.1.8.1_ire.pdf).
Nimbus causes 'razor-sharp' sore throat in some individuals, which is extremely painful and lingering for some time, in addition to the usual COVID symptoms.
Nimbus is more resistant to antibodies generated from previous vaccines, although prior vaccination or natural COVID infection is expected to still be protective in terms reduced severity compared to without such immunity according to CDC.
Nimbus is likely to be more transmissible than the previous variants. It belongs to the JN.1 subfamily of the Omicron family of SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Recently, the Influenza A H5N1 virus from a dairy worker in Michigan was found to be capable of airborne transmission in a ferret animal model [1] (https://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2025/06/05/h5n1-bird-flu-michigan-dairy-farm-airborne-spread-cdc-study/84046550007/). This genotype B3.13 (clade clade 2.3.4.4b) virus in dairy cattle causes moderate severity disease in humans. In contrast, a highly pathogenic genotype D1.1 that is circulating in birds birds has led to one critical month-long illness in Canada and one death in the US signifying the potential for high morbidity and mortality from this genotype if it spreads in humans.
Additionally, a new genotype of H5N1 in Cambodia has caused four fatalities and fifth severe infection as of today (https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/h5n1-avian-flu-infects-fifth-patient-cambodia).
NV-387, the broad-spectrum antiviral drug is expected to be effective against all of these bird flu viruses. NV-387 was found to be substantially superior to Tamiflu® (Roche, Oseltamivir), Rapivab® (Biocryst, Peramivir), as well as Xofluza (Shionogi/Roche, baloxavir) in lethal lung infection animal model of Influenza infection. All three of these existing anti-influenza drugs are known to be escaped by Influenza viruses by single point mutations in H or PB2 genes.
NV-387 was found to be substantially superior to the approved drug Remdesivir in a lethal coronavirus lung infection animal model for SARS-CoV-2.
Thus the single drug NV-387 alone can combat H5N1, Influenza as well as COVID infections.
NV-387 has completed Phase I clinical trial in healthy human subjects with no reported adverse events.
COVID as well as Influenza viruses readily escape vaccines, antibodies as they change in the field during an epidemic wave. They are also likely to escape small molecule drugs by such changes.
NV-387 takes advantage of the invariant features that these viruses use for causing infection, by mimicking heparan sulfate-like structures. No matter how much these viruses change in the field, they continue to use the heparan sulfate attachment receptors in order to cause infection. Thus it is practically impossible that the viruses may be able escape NV-387 without losing their ability infect and transmit across humans, the Company believes.
NV-387 is orally available, formulated as oral gummies that dissolve in the mouth, thus avoiding issues of inability to swallow which occurs related to sore throat, old age, as well as in young children.
NV-387, as a treatment, is designed to help actually patients with disease recover rapidly, thus limiting the viral spread as well as providing for natural infection-based immunity in the recovered patient.
'NV-387 is thus the best current choice available for a highly cost-effective pandemic preparedness development,' said Anil R. Diwan, PhD, President and Executive Chairman of the Company, adding, 'We have US-based cGMP manufacturing capabilities already set up as well.'
Of note, natural immunity, as induced by recovery from infection, is known to be superior to immunity from subunit and mRNA vaccines. One of the important reasons is that in natural infection, the immune system is subjected to all possible antigens from the entire virus, unlike just the selected antigens or antigen fragments that are present in subunit or mRNA vaccines.
Also, NV-387 can be manufactured in the USA and stockpiled readily at room temperature or refrigeration (for longer periods of time).
Unlike NV-387, vaccines or antibodies would require to be created after the virus takes hold, and they would suffer substantial loss of effectiveness within months after deployment due to changes in the virus. Additionally, vaccines require a cold chain handling. Vaccines also need to be administered to a large proportion of healthy population. There are significant logistical problems with vaccines. There is also the issue of vaccine reluctance, which is a personal choice, as it should be in a free country like the USA.
The broad-spectrum antiviral drug NV-387 was developed specifically to overcome all of these problems. In case of further spread of a severe COVID variant and also a Bird Flu variant in human populations, it will be possible to move NV-387 rapidly into Phase II clinical trial for these diseases, and then prepare for deployment early in the potential pandemic, curtailing its spread.
About NanoViricides
NanoViricides, Inc. (the 'Company') (www.nanoviricides.com) is a clinical stage company that is creating special purpose nanomaterials for antiviral therapy. The Company's novel nanoviricide™ class of drug candidates and the nanoviricide™ technology are based on intellectual property, technology and proprietary know-how of TheraCour Pharma, Inc. The Company has a Memorandum of Understanding with TheraCour for the development of drugs based on these technologies for all antiviral infections. The MoU does not include cancer and similar diseases that may have viral origin but require different kinds of treatments.
The Company has obtained broad, exclusive, sub-licensable, field licenses to drugs developed in several licensed fields from TheraCour Pharma, Inc. The Company's business model is based on licensing technology from TheraCour Pharma Inc. for specific application verticals of specific viruses, as established at its foundation in 2005.
Our lead drug candidate is NV-387, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug that we plan to develop as a treatment of RSV, COVID, Long COVID, Influenza, and other respiratory viral infections, as well as MPOX/Smallpox infections. Our other advanced drug candidate is NV-HHV-1 for the treatment of Shingles. The Company cannot project an exact date for filing an IND for any of its drugs because of dependence on a number of external collaborators and consultants. The Company is currently focused on advancing NV-387 into Phase II human clinical trials.
NV-CoV-2 (API NV-387) is our nanoviricide drug candidate for COVID-19 that does not encapsulate remdesivir. NV-CoV-2-R is our other drug candidate for COVID-19 that is made up of NV-387 with remdesivir encapsulated within its polymeric micelles. The Company believes that since remdesivir is already US FDA approved, our drug candidate encapsulating remdesivir is likely to be an approvable drug, if safety is comparable. Remdesivir is developed by Gilead. The Company has developed both of its own drug candidates NV-CoV-2 and NV-CoV-2-R independently.
The Company is also developing drugs against a number of viral diseases including oral and genital Herpes, viral diseases of the eye including EKC and herpes keratitis, H1N1 swine flu, H5N1 bird flu, seasonal Influenza, HIV, Hepatitis C, Rabies, Dengue fever, and Ebola virus, among others. NanoViricides' platform technology and programs are based on the TheraCour® nanomedicine technology of TheraCour, which TheraCour licenses from AllExcel. NanoViricides holds a worldwide exclusive perpetual license to this technology for several drugs with specific targeting mechanisms in perpetuity for the treatment of the following human viral diseases: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV/AIDS), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Rabies, Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV-1 and HSV-2), Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV), Influenza and Asian Bird Flu Virus, Dengue viruses, Japanese Encephalitis virus, West Nile Virus, Ebola/Marburg viruses, and certain Coronaviruses. The Company intends to obtain a license for RSV, Poxviruses, and/or Enteroviruses if the initial research is successful. As is customary, the Company must state the risk factor that the path to typical drug development of any pharmaceutical product is extremely lengthy and requires substantial capital. As with any drug development efforts by any company, there can be no assurance at this time that any of the Company's pharmaceutical candidates would show sufficient effectiveness and safety for human clinical development. Further, there can be no assurance at this time that successful results against coronavirus in our lab will lead to successful clinical trials or a successful pharmaceutical product.
This press release contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Company's current expectation regarding future events. Actual events could differ materially and substantially from those projected herein and depend on a number of factors. Certain statements in this release, and other written or oral statements made by NanoViricides, Inc. are 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond the Company's control and which could, and likely will, materially affect actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the company's expectations include, but are not limited to, those factors that are disclosed under the heading 'Risk Factors' and elsewhere in documents filed by the company from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulatory authorities. Although it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors, they may include the following: demonstration and proof of principle in preclinical trials that a nanoviricide is safe and effective; successful development of our product candidates; our ability to seek and obtain regulatory approvals, including with respect to the indications we are seeking; the successful commercialization of our product candidates; and market acceptance of our products.
The phrases 'safety', 'effectiveness' and equivalent phrases as used in this press release refer to research findings including clinical trials as the customary research usage and do not indicate evaluation of safety or effectiveness by the US FDA.
FDA refers to US Food and Drug Administration. IND application refers to 'Investigational New Drug' application. cGMP refers to current Good Manufacturing Practices. CMC refers to 'Chemistry, Manufacture, and Controls'. CHMP refers to the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, which is the European Medicines Agency's (EMA) committee responsible for human medicines. API stands for 'Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient'. WHO is the World Health Organization. R&D refers to Research and Development.
Contact:
NanoViricides, Inc.
info@nanoviricides.com
Public Relations Contact:
ir@nanoviricides.com
[1] Brock N, Pulit-Penaloza JA, Belser JA, et al. Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Isolated from Dairy Farm Worker, Michigan, USA. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2025;31(6):1253-1256. doi:10.3201/eid3106.250386.
SOURCE: NanoViricides, Inc.
View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Natera pursues ctDNA assay approval after Phase III victory
Natera's Signatera assay has been found to accurately predict if a patient with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) will benefit from adjuvant cancer immunotherapy, Tecentriq (atezolizumab) post-surgery in a Phase III trial. Top-line results of the IMvigor011 study (NCT04660344) revealed that patients given Roche's Tecentriq after testing positive through the in vitro companion diagnostic (IVD) experienced significant improvements in both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Meanwhile, a preliminary analysis found that patients who remained Signatera-negative post-operation had positive outcomes without adjuvant treatment, with 88% of patients being disease-free 18 months after surgery. This is the first Phase III study in this indication to use a personalised approach to treatment guided by the presence of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), a key biomarker of molecular residual disease (MRD) – which is often associated with an increased risk of relapse. According to the study's principal investigator, Professor Thomas Powles, the results of the IMvigor011 trial could 'open the door for a new treatment paradigm' in MIBC, helping physicians to more accurately determine if adjuvant treatment is necessary by monitoring the presence of cancer on a molecular level. This contrast could mark a step up from the previous standard of care (SoC) disease-monitoring techniques such as imaging and bladder endoscopy, which can often at times miss early-stage recurrence events due to their inability to detect MRD in patients. Following the trial's positive outcome, Natera is finalising its premarket approval application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Signatera's use as a companion diagnostic. If given the go-ahead, Signatera could prevent patients who have no detectable MRD from enduring potentially severe immune-related side effects commonly associated with PD-L1 blockers such as Tecentriq. It would also allow physicians to prescribe treatment in the early stages of relapse. This is welcome news for the company, as Signatera was previously turned down by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for use in the National Health Service (NHS) as a routine MRD test for solid tumours in 2022. This was due to the lack of clinical evidence to support its use when assessing its cost-benefit ratio. The development also follows Natera's involvement in one of the largest false advertising verdicts in history, which saw Guardant Health claim $292.5m – including $175.5m in punitive damages – from the company after it falsely advertised the benefits of Signatera over Guardant's MRD assay, Guardant Reveal. "Natera pursues ctDNA assay approval after Phase III victory " was originally created and published by Medical Device Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Credible scientists can't hold up Kennedy's charade for much longer
How much longer can responsible people work for President Trump's Department of Health and Human Services under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.? That question arises every time Kennedy pulls funding for vaccine research or purges respected scientists at the Centers for Disease Control, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force or the Food and Drug Administration. For a while, it looked like even vaccine critics weren't safe in the Trump administration. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Vinay Prasad established his reputation as a contrarian, expressing reservations about pediatric vaccination and several common mitigation measures. It was thus no surprise when he was appointed director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, which covers vaccine policy. Prasad didn't last three months on the job. He resigned abruptly in late July following attacks by right-wing figures such as Laura Loomer, who labeled him a 'progressive leftist saboteur.' A Health and Human Services statement cited Prasad's desire to spend more time with his family. It has been widely reported, however, that Trump himself forced Prasad's departure, despite the objection of FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary. In another abrupt move, only 10 days later, Prasad abruptly returned to the FDA, evidently at Makary's request but otherwise without explanation. While some of Prasad's views remain quite controversial among many highly regarded physicians and scientists, it is certainly reassuring to see Loomer's malign influence diminished at the FDA. Nonetheless, Kennedy is still in charge of the entire department, and it is likely only a matter of time until he resumes appointing resolute anti-vaxxers, if not widely discredited would-be 'scientists,' to key committees. Makary and Prasad, and other well-credentialed scientists, no doubt believe they can overcome Kennedy's destabilization of medical research, while still contributing to public health. Maybe they are right, and the wisest course is to hold on as long as possible, trying to do good. After all, there is no telling who would replace them. On the other hand, it seems inevitable that Kennedy's pronouncements will increasingly become intolerable. Some CDC employees already worry that the recent deadly attack on their building in Atlanta was motivated by 'RFK Jr's lies about vax safety and CDC scientists.' Meanwhile, Trump has announced that political appointees will soon take over scientific research grant approval, displacing actual scientists, i n order to 'advance the President's policy priorities.' At some point in the degradation of science, there must be a line that ethical administrators will not cross. There is no single answer to whether an official should stay or withdraw from a compromising position, but history does provide cautionary tales. In 1854, a Massachusetts judge named Edward Loring reached a sincere but tragic decision. I described the events in my book, ' Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial.' Late that spring, a fugitive from slavery named Anthony Burns, was arrested in Boston and brought before Loring, a federal commissioner under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, as well as judge of the Massachusetts Probate Court. Burns's arrest sparked mass protests in Boston, where anti-slavery sentiment was strong. Many Bostonians called upon Loring to resign from the federal commissioner's position. As a probate judge, he administered the estates of widows and orphans, which required compassion, and it was intolerable for him to be involved in the heartless business of slave-hunting. Loring took the criticism to heart, responding with a published statement. 'It is said that the statute is so cruel and wicked that it should not be executed by good men,' he wrote. But that would create a paradox. If humane judges were all to resign, 'then into what hands should its administration fall? Will those who call the statute merciless commit it to a merciless judge?' Although he had deep misgivings about the Fugitive Slave Act, Loring believed he had a duty to preside. Otherwise, judging would 'be confined to those who are reckless of that right in others, or ignorant or careless of the means given for its legal defense, or dishonest in their use.' Those who wish this, Loring continued, 'are more cruel and wicked than the statute, for they would strip from the fugitive the best security and every alleviation the statute leaves them.' Despite his protestations, Loring ruled in favor of the slaveholder, holding that it was required under the law. He sent Burns to Virginia in chains, where he was starved and abused. Burns's supporters, meanwhile, demonstrated the true meaning of humanity by raising funds to obtain his freedom. Burns returned to Boston and later studied theology at Oberlin College, no thanks to Loring. It turned out that a 'good judge,' as Loring believed himself, could not honorably enforce a pitiless law in a racist regime. He was dismissed from the Harvard Law School faculty, and the Massachusetts legislature removed him from the Probate Court. Loring is remembered today, if at all, as an enabler of slavery. Perhaps health officials are currently echoing Loring's lament. 'If I resign, someone very bad will take my place.' But sometimes, complicity is complicity.
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
Centerline Biomedical Appoints Jim Dillon President and Chief Executive Officer
CLEVELAND--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug 18, 2025-- Centerline Biomedical, Inc. ('Centerline'), an innovative leader in cardiovascular navigation and visualization systems, announced the appointment of Jim Dillon as President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and a member of its board of directors. He will assume his responsibilities on August 18, 2025. Mr. Dillon succeeds Gulam Khan, who has served as CEO since October 2022. Mr. Khan led Centerline Biomedical through a period of portfolio development. During his tenure, Centerline Biomedical developed, received 510(k) clearance, and commercialized its second-generation devices and appreciable software advances. We appreciate Gulam's significant contributions. 'It is an honor to join Centerline at such a pivotal stage. The IOPS platform is poised for scaled growth and I am grateful to have the opportunity to lead the company as it continues to innovate such remarkable technology for patients and care givers,' said Mr. Dillon. 'With decades of med tech industry leadership, Jim brings deep cardiovascular sector experience leading portfolio innovation, operational alignment, and strategic financing for med tech companies,' said Todd Schwarzinger, Centerline's Chairman. 'Jim has a strong track record of driving commercial growth through category creation and market penetration and we are excited to have him leading Centerline.' Mr. Dillon has previously served as President and CEO for cardiovascular innovation companies; BiVACOR, BioVentrix, Reprieve Cardiovascular and Renal Guard Solutions. To learn more about the IOPS platform, visit About Centerline Biomedical Founded in 2015, Centerline Biomedical, Inc. is headquartered in Cleveland, Ohio. The company's commercially available platform, IOPS® (Intra-Operative Positioning System), enables improved visualization and device navigation, while protecting patient and healthcare provider exposure from the harmful effects of fluoroscopic X-ray radiation during standard interventions. The company is a Cleveland Clinic Innovations spin-off investing in commercialization and development of technology to improve image guidance and reduce the need for fluoroscopic x-ray during transcatheter procedures. IOPS is indicated for use in the peripheral, aortic and aortic side branch vasculature. The IOPS platform consists of a mobile cart powered by proprietary visualization software and intelligent, sensorized IOPS catheters and guidewires. Visit for more information. View source version on CONTACT: For inquiries, please contact: Patty Burns, SVP Marketing Centerline Biomedical, Inc. Email:[email protected] KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA OHIO INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CARDIOLOGY SOFTWARE RADIOLOGY HEALTH MEDICAL DEVICES HOSPITALS HEALTH TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY SOURCE: Centerline Biomedical, Inc. Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 08/18/2025 11:00 AM/DISC: 08/18/2025 11:00 AM
