Alaska Officials Push to Continue Culling Grizzly Bears to Save Caribou
Wildlife officials in Alaska are pushing back on a state supreme court decision to halt an aerial predator-control program they say is necessary to help reverse caribou declines. Less than two weeks after a court order halted the program, officials petitioned the state Board of Game for an emergency authorization Friday to continue killing bears and wolves in Western Alaska. The predator control there is part of the agency's efforts to the critically declining Mulchatna caribou herd.
Since 2012, the ADFG has been using aerial methods to remove wolves from the herd's range. In 2023, the agency expanded its predator-removal efforts to include brown and black bears. A total of 19 wolves and nearly 200 bears have been removed.
Then, Anchorage Superior Court Judge Andrew Guidi deemed the Alaska Department of Fish and Game's predator-culling management plan unconstitutional in a 10-page decision filed on March 14. Guidi found the Board of Game's approval of bear kills in the Mulchatna range violated constitutional mandates for sustainable management by failing to consider the program's impact on the bear population. He also found that the Board's action violated constitutional standards for public notice and comment.
Including 'a bear removal program on state lands substantially changed the subject matter of the proposal,' Guidi wrote in his decision. 'These changes went far beyond varying, clarifying, or altering the specific matter of the proposal addressed in the original notice. As a result, the BOG failed to adhere to mandatory due process standards.'
In response, ADFG filed its petition to the State Board of Game on March 21 seeking an emergency regulation to begin its third year of 'intensive management' in the struggling Mulchatna herd's range. Officials say that bear and wolf removal are 'critical' for the herd's continued recovery and don't negatively impact the bear and wolf populations in Western Alaska. They also argue the predator-culling program needs to continue to realize the effects of past removals.
'To be effective the MCH IM program was designed to manage large predator populations in a small, defined area at a low density for a period of time long enough to allow caribou calves to be recruited into the population and to reproduce, which is a minimum of three years,' ADFG wrote in the petition. 'The department is asking the board to find an emergency and make emergency regulations to aid in achieving the IM objectives and to provide a harvestable surplus. Not being able to remove predators from the calving grounds in the spring of 2025 further threatens the recovery of the MCH, which will also preclude subsistence hunters from being able to harvest caribou for an unknown number of years to come.
'Department-led efforts have resulted in positive growth in herd abundance and improved calf [to] cow ratios,' the peition continues. 'Not being able to conduct control efforts in the third year is detrimental to the program and will result in a loss of the improvements in calf recruitment and survival that have been realized since the department treatment began in 2023.'
Western Alaska's Mulchatna caribou herd consisted of nearly 200,000 animals in 1997 when the herd provided more than 4,700 caribou for the subsistence needs of 48 local communities. At that time the herd also provided hunting opportunities for Alaskan and non-resident hunters. The herd has since dwindled to 13,000 caribou, despite hunting being closed since 2021.
Although the Mulchatna caribou herd's declining numbers are indisputable, the cause of the population drop is up for debate. Critics of the ADFG's wolf- and bear-culling program say climate change is a key factor in falling caribou numbers. They contend that warming temperature trends have caused a dramatic habitat change, allowing woody bushes and trees to expand into tundra territory. Since caribou rely on lichen and moss to survive, the spread of woody plants across their traditional habitat has made it less suitable for supporting a thriving herd.
Critics also say diseases such as brucellosis have contributed to the decline of the Mulchatna herd — not apex predators.
Read Next: I Just Wanted to Go Caribou Hunting. I Didn't Expect to Tag the World-Record
The ADFG aims to restore the Mulchatna herd to between 30,000 and 80,000 caribou, which it says would sustain annual hunts of 2,400 to 8,000 animals. According to the Alaska Beacon, the emergency authorization petition is being considered by the state Board of Game during its eight-day meeting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10-05-2025
- Yahoo
State will continue killing Southwest Alaska bears despite court order calling program 'unlawful'
May 10—The state Department of Fish and Game said it will continue with a controversial predator control program in Southwest Alaska this month. The announcement was made Friday evening, two days after a Superior Court judge declined a request to block the program made by an environmental group. "The court clarified that it did not have the jurisdiction to grant a temporary restraining order against the emergency regulation, as it is a new regulatory action not covered in the current case. Consequently, the State is moving forward with the implementation of the bear removal program to aid in the recovery of the Mulchatna caribou population," wrote Patty Sullivan, communications director with the Alaska Department of Law, in an emailed statement. Wednesday's court ruling from Anchorage Superior Court Judge Christina Rankin was dealt narrowly with the issue of a temporary restraining order, but not the merits of the bear culling program itself. The decision reaffirmed an earlier Superior Court decision from March that found the program is unlawful because it was implemented without sufficient public input or scientific assessment. Not long after that decision, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game submitted a petition for an emergency order to the Board of Game to keep the program going, which the board passed. "The emergency regulation was adopted in response to findings that high bear predation is a key factor limiting caribou population growth. The Board of Game has recognized the Mulchatna caribou as important for providing a sustainable food source, thus making intensive management necessary while their numbers remain below established objectives," Sullivan wrote. Nothing in Wednesday's order from the Superior Court invalidates the earlier ruling that the program violates the state constitution, and is thus unlawful. That means that as Fish and Game fields personnel and resources to begin shooting bears from helicopters this month, there are major questions about the program's legality. "While the State seeks to address some inconsistencies in the Court's order, it is fully committed to complying with the ruling," Sullivan wrote. Since 2023, state officials have killed 180 bears, most of them brown bears, in the Mulchatna herd's calving grounds between Dillingham and Bethel. A conservation group, the Alaska Wildlife Alliance, has been suing the state since the program first came to light, claiming it was not passed without due public process and is based in science that is either partial or inaccurate. Nicole Schmitt, the alliance's executive director, said Thursday that the group was waiting to hear the state's response to Rankin's order before deciding how to proceed with litigation. "In my view, the Court's order makes it clear that if the state proceeds with the predator control program under the emergency regulations it will be inconsistent with the court's original order," Schmitt wrote Thursday in an email. "If they continue to proceed here it will, we believe, be in violation of a court order." The state estimates there are close to 15,000 caribou in the Mulchatna herd, according to its most recent assessment. That is well below the 30,000-80,000 animal objective that wildlife managers say would allow them to reopen a subsistence harvest.
Yahoo
09-05-2025
- Yahoo
Judge says Alaska bear-killing program remains void, despite emergency authorization
A brown bear walks on the tundra in Katmai National Park and Preserve on Aug. 11, 2023. Critics of the state's bear-culling program, which is aimed at boosting Mulchatna Caribou Herd numbers, say Alaska Department of Fish and Game officials have failed to adequately analyze impacts to bear populations, including impacts to bears that roam in Katmai. (Photo by F. Jimenez/National Park Service) The Alaska Department of Fish and Game does not have the right to carry out a controversial plan to kill bears this spring, at least for now, a state judge has ruled. Superior Court Judge Christina Rankin found that the department's predator control program, aimed at boosting a caribou population that has declined dramatically since the 1990s, remains unconstitutional, despite an Alaska Board of Game emergency authorization for the bear-killing to resume. Through the program, which began in the spring of 2023 after the board first authorized it in 2022, the department has killed 175 brown bears, five black bears and 19 wolves. Rankin's order, released late Wednesday, was in response to a request by the Alaska Wildlife Alliance for a restraining order barring the department from carrying out this year's predator control. The department had planned to start culling bears this weekend. A restraining order is not needed because the program is already legally invalid, under a ruling issued by Superior Court Judge Andrew Guidi on March 14, Rankin said. Neither the Department of Fish and Game's March 21 petition for an emergency nor the Board of Game's March 27 approval of the emergency changed the fact that there is an existing court ruling that the predator control program violates the constitution, Rankin said. The state has not satisfied the requirements in Guidi's order for adequate public notice and analysis of the predator control program's impact on the bear population, Rankin said. Because of that, 'the Court specifically finds that the requirements of the Order have not been met and are still binding on the State,' she said. Critics of the state's program argue that bears are not to blame for the Mulchatna Caribou Herd's decline. They point to numerous other factors, including a changing habitat in which tundra vegetation favorable to caribou has been replaced by woody plants favorable to moose. They also argue that the predator control program poses a threat to bear populations, including those that roam through Katmai National Park and Preserve. The Alaska Wildlife Alliance sued the state in 2023 to block the program, and that lawsuit resulted in Guidi's March ruling. On Thursday, the alliance counted Rankin's ruling as a victory, even though it did not result in a restraining order blocking the state's plans to start roving bears on Sunday. 'The Superior court ruled that the existing predator control program was unlawful, which means that the State poached almost 200 bears over the past few years, including dozens of cubs, from planes and helicopters,' Nicole Schmitt, the organization's executive director, said in a statement. 'Instead of remedying those legalities, the State and the Board tried to skirt the public process again. We're grateful the Court saw this process for what it was: an attempt to run-around a Court order without meaningful engagement from the public.' In their petition to the Board of Game for emergency authorization, state officials argued that they were under a time crunch to remove bears from the caribou herd's range. The bear culling has to be conducted during the spring and early summer, the time when caribou are giving birth to calves on which the bears might prey, department officials argued in their petition and at the March Board of Game meeting. But Rankin, in a hearing Tuesday, expressed skepticism about the justification for the emergency finding. She peppered Kimberly Del Frate, an assistant attorney general for the state, with questions about how the emergency action would not be seen as an end run around Guidi's ruling. 'I know it's a hard fact, but you need to just admit it: The emergency was created because you lost with Judge Guidi. You wouldn't have needed to do it if you didn't have this decision,' Rankin told Del Frate. Department of Fish and Game officials did not provide information Thursday on their plans now for predator control in the Mulchatna area. The department was still evaluating Rankin's decision, a spokesperson said. Joe Geldhof, one of the attorneys representing the organization, said he fears that state officials will carry out their predatory control program in defiance of the ruling. He and fellow attorney Joel Bennett, a former Board of Game member, see parallels with the Trump administration's defiance of court rulings. To try to bolster the case against the bear-killing program – and potentially give Rankin legal grounds to issue a restraining order against the Department of Fish and Game — Geldhof and Bennett on Wednesday filed an amended complaint that adds the Board of Game's emergency authorization to the list of state actions that they want to overturn. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
24-03-2025
- Yahoo
Alaska Officials Push to Continue Culling Grizzly Bears to Save Caribou
Wildlife officials in Alaska are pushing back on a state supreme court decision to halt an aerial predator-control program they say is necessary to help reverse caribou declines. Less than two weeks after a court order halted the program, officials petitioned the state Board of Game for an emergency authorization Friday to continue killing bears and wolves in Western Alaska. The predator control there is part of the agency's efforts to the critically declining Mulchatna caribou herd. Since 2012, the ADFG has been using aerial methods to remove wolves from the herd's range. In 2023, the agency expanded its predator-removal efforts to include brown and black bears. A total of 19 wolves and nearly 200 bears have been removed. Then, Anchorage Superior Court Judge Andrew Guidi deemed the Alaska Department of Fish and Game's predator-culling management plan unconstitutional in a 10-page decision filed on March 14. Guidi found the Board of Game's approval of bear kills in the Mulchatna range violated constitutional mandates for sustainable management by failing to consider the program's impact on the bear population. He also found that the Board's action violated constitutional standards for public notice and comment. Including 'a bear removal program on state lands substantially changed the subject matter of the proposal,' Guidi wrote in his decision. 'These changes went far beyond varying, clarifying, or altering the specific matter of the proposal addressed in the original notice. As a result, the BOG failed to adhere to mandatory due process standards.' In response, ADFG filed its petition to the State Board of Game on March 21 seeking an emergency regulation to begin its third year of 'intensive management' in the struggling Mulchatna herd's range. Officials say that bear and wolf removal are 'critical' for the herd's continued recovery and don't negatively impact the bear and wolf populations in Western Alaska. They also argue the predator-culling program needs to continue to realize the effects of past removals. 'To be effective the MCH IM program was designed to manage large predator populations in a small, defined area at a low density for a period of time long enough to allow caribou calves to be recruited into the population and to reproduce, which is a minimum of three years,' ADFG wrote in the petition. 'The department is asking the board to find an emergency and make emergency regulations to aid in achieving the IM objectives and to provide a harvestable surplus. Not being able to remove predators from the calving grounds in the spring of 2025 further threatens the recovery of the MCH, which will also preclude subsistence hunters from being able to harvest caribou for an unknown number of years to come. 'Department-led efforts have resulted in positive growth in herd abundance and improved calf [to] cow ratios,' the peition continues. 'Not being able to conduct control efforts in the third year is detrimental to the program and will result in a loss of the improvements in calf recruitment and survival that have been realized since the department treatment began in 2023.' Western Alaska's Mulchatna caribou herd consisted of nearly 200,000 animals in 1997 when the herd provided more than 4,700 caribou for the subsistence needs of 48 local communities. At that time the herd also provided hunting opportunities for Alaskan and non-resident hunters. The herd has since dwindled to 13,000 caribou, despite hunting being closed since 2021. Although the Mulchatna caribou herd's declining numbers are indisputable, the cause of the population drop is up for debate. Critics of the ADFG's wolf- and bear-culling program say climate change is a key factor in falling caribou numbers. They contend that warming temperature trends have caused a dramatic habitat change, allowing woody bushes and trees to expand into tundra territory. Since caribou rely on lichen and moss to survive, the spread of woody plants across their traditional habitat has made it less suitable for supporting a thriving herd. Critics also say diseases such as brucellosis have contributed to the decline of the Mulchatna herd — not apex predators. Read Next: I Just Wanted to Go Caribou Hunting. I Didn't Expect to Tag the World-Record The ADFG aims to restore the Mulchatna herd to between 30,000 and 80,000 caribou, which it says would sustain annual hunts of 2,400 to 8,000 animals. According to the Alaska Beacon, the emergency authorization petition is being considered by the state Board of Game during its eight-day meeting.
