logo
Dismay in Nunavut as daughter in Inuit identity fraud case goes public with her story

Dismay in Nunavut as daughter in Inuit identity fraud case goes public with her story

CBC4 hours ago

A year after her mother was sentenced to prison for defrauding Inuit organizations to help pay for her education, an Ontario woman went public for the first time about the case — and Jordan Archer's story has again stirred up anger and frustration among Inuit.
Archer, formerly Nadya Gill, spoke to the Toronto Star earlier this month about her mother Karima Manji's admission of guilt and conviction in a Nunavut courtroom last year, and how the case derailed Archer's own life and career.
Archer's story has aroused little sympathy in Nunavut, however, where many Inuit feel she and her twin sister Amira Gill still owe them an apology. The two sisters had originally been charged along with their mother, but the charges against the twins were ultimately dropped in early 2024 when Manji pleaded guilty and took "full responsibility for the matters at hand."
Manji was sentenced to three years in prison last summer after admitting to defrauding Inuit organizations of more than $158,000 for her twin daughters' education. Manji had claimed she adopted her daughters from an Inuk woman, Kitty Noah.
The Toronto Star story describes Archer as a first-generation Canadian, and Manji as an immigrant from Tanzania who had lived for a brief time in Nunavut. Archer's father, it says, is British and the family has no Inuit or Indigenous background.
In the story, Archer said since the case was first reported she has "abandoned" her law career, lost a contract to play in a professional soccer league, and now works part time at a hockey rink.
Archer told the Toronto Star she was unaware of her mother's fraudulent claims to secure her scholarship money. She feels she's paid an unfair price for something she said she had no knowledge of.
She also said she never claimed to be Inuk by blood. She said her mother presented her with an Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. (NTI) enrolment card at the age of 17, telling the sisters they were eligible to receive the cards, which were for Inuit beneficiaries, because of a connection Manji had had with an Inuit family from Iqaluit.
Archer told the Star she had "no idea" her mother was using the NTI cards to secure tens of thousands of dollars in scholarships for her, though she knew the cards allow the card-holders to receive benefits. She said her mother controlled many of her life decisions, including all her applications, finances and logistics.
CBC News reached out to Archer, along with her mother and sister, several times since 2023, but received no response. In April, Archer refused an interview with CBC News to tell her story.
Noah Noah, son of the late Kitty Noah, said he wasn't interested in speaking with the Toronto Star about Archer's story. He feels she's been unreasonably portrayed as a victim.
"I'm disappointed, I mean, to say the least. To play the victim in all this, it just is… it's not right," he said from his home outside Iqaluit.
"[The sisters] should have been held accountable. I mean, I still believe that."
Asked if he has any sympathy for Archer's current situation, Noah said he doesn't.
"I mean, what they did was wrong, and in every sense of the word," he said.
"So not being able to use what she had stolen [Inuit identities] is just, I think, the way it was supposed to work out."
'A lot of throwing her mother under the bus'
Crystal Semaganis, who is Plains Cree from the Little Pine First Nation in Saskatchewan, has been following the story since it broke in 2023. The Indigenous activist, who now lives in northern Ontario, shared her frustration with the Toronto Star article about Archer earlier this month in a Facebook post that has since been widely shared.
"With this recent article, there was a lot of deflection, a lot of throwing her mother under the bus kind of thing, and not taking any responsibility," Semaganis said.
"You know, it didn't shine a light on the actual problem. It totally glossed it over, and it was a total diversion to what the actual issue is."
To Semaganis, the issue is about exploitation and theft from people who are already disadvantaged.
"First Nations, Inuit and Metis populations are marginalized in this community across this nation and we have very limited resources, especially for the North," she said.
"You know, my youngest son is Inuk, and I've lived in Nunavut. So I know first hand the disparity that exists between settler communities and Indigenous communities."
Semaganis said it's time for Archer to accept some responsibility and apologize.
"The truthful way forward would be to say, 'I did this, this is wrong. Let me make reparations.' But that hasn't happened yet."
'Genuine' apology needed, MP says
Nunavut NDP MP Lori Idlout also finds Archer's claims hard to swallow. She said she finds it "quite unbelievable" Archer was duped by her mother.
"As much as I want to be compassionate towards her, she sounds like she's a smart young lady and to hear the excuses that she gave about trusting her mother, it is quite difficult for me to believe her story."
Idlout said Manji's actions "definitely caused harm" because that scholarship money was intended for Inuit, who are already "robbed" of many opportunities because of barriers they face in accessing education.
"It's triggering as well, because as Inuit, we are given so many barriers to be successful. It's so hard to complete high school. It's hard to go to university. It is so hard to access scholarships," she said.
"To see how NTI's system was manipulated, when we feel like it's already challenging enough, it is quite harmful."
Idlout believes Archer should do her part and learn more about Inuit history.
"We still have intergenerational trauma from residential schools, from dog slaughters. These are very difficult experiences that we're still being forced to experience through intergenerational trauma," Idlout said.
"If she genuinely cares about what impact she had on Inuit, I think she should do her research, learn more about Inuit and give that genuine apology."
James Eetoolook, who decades ago was involved in negotiating the Nunavut Agreement, the largest land claim settlement in Canada which led to the creation of Nunavut, remembers the hard work and sacrifices many Inuit leaders had to make during the decades-long process.
"They had to be away two weeks at a time, sometimes more than that. And if you start doing it every month, it took a toll in a lot of ways," Eetoolook recalled. "But the end results are still there, in the implementation today."
But Eetoolook said one of the biggest sacrifices Inuit had to make in order to get the Nunavut Agreement was the much-debated extinguishment clause: surrendering their Aboriginal rights to lands and water.
Speaking from his home in Taloyoak, Nunavut, Eetoolook said Inuit have seen their rights taken away in many ways over the years.
Speaking of Manji's fraud case, he said people are "always look for loopholes."
"They used vulnerable people to gain Inuit status to get funding for their education, for their personal upgrade … and I think that that is wrong," he said.
Noah Noah agrees. He was pleased last year when Manji was sentenced to three years in prison, but he still wants her daughters to take some responsibility as well.
"I mean, an apology would be, at a minimum, a good thing."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Killing of Hamilton man Erixon Kabera raises questions about policing and oversight
Killing of Hamilton man Erixon Kabera raises questions about policing and oversight

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Killing of Hamilton man Erixon Kabera raises questions about policing and oversight

The Special Investigations Unit's (SIU) decision not to charge two Hamilton police officers who killed Erixon Kabera in November was not surprising to some experts, who are raising concerns over the police response and limits of the SIU's mandate. Dave Shellnutt, a lawyer who has represented people in cases where police force was used, told CBC Hamilton the officers who responded to the scene appeared to be either "inexperienced or unprepared," while a former police officer also questioned why more units weren't dispatched to the scene. Kabera was killed in November after two Hamilton Police Service (HPS) officers fired 24 shots at him, striking him eight times. The SIU report clearing the officers was released on June 6. According to the SIU, Kabera was holding a replica firearm resembling a semi-automatic pistol, which he pointed at officers. SIU director Joseph Martino said the officers did not commit a criminal offence. The report doesn't mention Kabera, referring to him as "the complainant." "The officers honestly believed they were looking at an actual gun in the complainant's possession. Though mistaken, their misapprehension was a reasonable one," said Martino in the report. Officers put 'the whole building at risk:' lawyer CBC spoke with several experts who were not involved directly with the case, asking them to review the SIU report. They included a lawyer, a police oversight researcher and a former police officer. The SIU report said after Kabera pointed the replica at police in his apartment hallway, one officer fired eight rounds while backing away and fell, losing her gun, according to the report. Kabera kept walking forward. Then the second officer shot six to eight more rounds, while Kabera "remained unfazed." The second officer also fell. The first officer fired her Taser at Kabera, which the report says, did not affect him, and he continued to advance toward the officers. The second officer fired seven to eight shots after replacing his magazine, that's when Kabera "collapsed and landed on his back." "In that hail of gunfire, they hit [Kabera], and miraculously they don't hit or injure anybody else," said Shellnutt, the lawyer, adding the gunfire "put the entire building at risk." Wilfrid Laurier University public safety assistant professor, Jen Magnus, who is also a former Calgary police officer and Grande Prairie Police Service instructor, told CBC Hamilton it's hard to know from the report how the officers themselves feel about their actions. "I'm sure no one's harder on themselves than these two officers, just judging what they did and the decisions they made that day," she said. "It's just a horrible experience for everyone involved." Magnus said in her view, the officers acted appropriately under pressure, but questioned how the police response was handled. According to the SIU report, police were initially called to the building where Kabera lived on Main Street W. when a neighbour called the non-emergency police line to report a man with a gun had been at their front door 15 minutes prior. Magnus said "any mention" of a potential firearm requires at least two police units, and a high-risk response, especially in an apartment building, where "multiple people who could be potentially at risk." A sergeant on shift should be the one making that call, said Magnus. She said when reading the report, she questioned if there was a lack of police capacity or if the call came in at a shift change. The HPS employs over 800 police officers, she noted, adding she would "hope there's enough to back someone up at a call like that." Decision to clear officers aligns with SIU history Danielle McNabb, a Brock University political science assistant professor who studies policing and police oversight said she "wasn't surprised" by the decision, as it is "very rare for the SIU to lay charges." McNabb's 2024 study found that between 2017 and 2020, 27 firearm deaths were investigated by the SIU, resulting in no charges. The SIU charged 3.4 per cent of cases during that time. McNabb said the report suggests Kabera may have been experiencing mental health issues, which is closely linked to higher and excessive use of force by police. According to Shellnutt, in order to lay charges, the SIU needs to prove that there was criminal intent "beyond a reasonable doubt." "If [the evidence] is to be believed … probably criminal culpability doesn't arise here," Shellnutt said. After the SIU decision was announced, Kabera's family said, through their lawyers, they were "disappointed" with the findings and are "considering legal options." Shellnutt said the family could still "launch a civil claim" against police and issue a complaint to the Law Enforcement Complaint Agency. One officer declined to be interviewed One of the two officers involved in the killing of Kabera declined to be interviewed, but released her notes. The other officer was interviewed but didn't release his notes. The SIU also interviewed several witnesses, reviewed calls, police radio recordings, forensic and physical evidence and a coroner's report. McNabb said it's not uncommon in SIU investigations for officers to exercise that right, but found in most cases between 2017 and 2020, it was most common for officers to fully comply with the investigation. Shellnutt said the lack of cooperation can be "incredibly frustrating" for families, and said while this is a legal right in any criminal investigation, as public servants, police should be held to a "different bar." Magnus said she's torn on the matter, but she agrees that officers should be interviewed when they've had a few days to process the events that unfolded. Officers are taught to 'shoot to stop the threat' Magnus said in situations like this, police are taught to prioritize hostages' or innocent civilians' lives, then their own, then the suspect's. "We were always taught … that you shoot to stop the threat," she said. "If you have to reload and keep shooting, that's what you have to do." Magnus, who's also done research on understanding trauma, said in moments of high stress, people can experience what is called auditory exclusion. "Officers feel that they've maybe only shot twice, and not realize that they emptied their entire magazine," she said. The SIU report says after the first round of shots, the second officer thought Kabera was the first to shoot, not knowing the gun was a replica. "An honest but mistaken belief in the highly charged atmosphere that prevailed," read the report. One of the officers also suffered a graze wound to the back of his head, initially thought he was hit, as he reported through a radio. Magnus said although more mental health units are needed in many police responses, the presence of the replica meant this situation didn't offer that opportunity. How the SIU could change Shellnutt said the SIU can acknowledge mistakes in police conduct in its reports, even when not criminal, but that was not done in this case. "I think mistakes were made and quite obviously," he said. Following the release of the report, CBC Hamilton asked the SIU if it had concerns about the police response sent to the scene. It said "the entirety of the SIU's position on the incident is reflected in the report." McNabb said the SIU's current mandate is "very narrow," and a broader one could help enhance public trust. She pointed at some things she thinks the SIU did well in this case, including the 200-day wait for the report's release, longer than the SIU's 120-day target, but shorter than the average, which is closer to 300 days. McNabb also said the rarity of criminal charges makes the public distrust the SIU. "Doing more proactive community engagement [to ensure] that the public understands how they function, I think that would help," she said. McNabb said that's just one step in what would take a long time to rebuild trust, especially with Indigenous and racialized communities. She said data shows Black and Indigenous people are more likely to face police violence, and while there's no SIU data on race, studies in other jurisdictions "have found racial disparity." She also said a broader mandate where the SIU can also evaluate police misconduct could also help. "When the choice is simply to lay criminal charges or not … the public can feel unsatisfied with that. That there's not an institutional response," she said. "The police force is not compelled to sort of look internally to see, 'is there something at a systemic level that we should be doing differently in these types of encounters?'" HPS will now conduct its own investigation. A report will be submitted to the Hamilton police board within 90 days and published on the board's website after review. A coroner's inquest — a public hearing where a jury hears the details around a death and makes recommendations aimed at preventing more deaths — will also take place, a spokesperson told CBC Hamilton previously.

Hamilton police use of force remains disproportionate with Black and Middle Eastern people, data shows
Hamilton police use of force remains disproportionate with Black and Middle Eastern people, data shows

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Hamilton police use of force remains disproportionate with Black and Middle Eastern people, data shows

Social Sharing Black and Middle Eastern people in Hamilton continue to be overrepresented in use-of-force incidents recorded by the Ontario city's police service. The statistics, which were submitted to the police board on Thursday, mark the fifth straight year that Black individuals are disproportionately represented. The inclusion of race-based data started being published in 2020 as part of an Ontario government mandate, to expose any racial biases or stereotyping within police services. When force is used, police report the person's race based on their perception of their race. Kojo Damptey, a McMaster University sessional instructor and PhD student, and colleagues examine use-of-force data from across Ontario. In the case of Hamilton police, community members have been expressing concern about disproportionate use of force even before police have been publishing the data, said Damptey. "Every year, the results are the same, but we never get any changes." Damptey spoke to CBC Hamilton following a session last week at the David Braley Centre downtown, but before the police board meeting Thursday. At the session June 17, Staff Sgt. Ryan Hashimoto acknowledged the history of community concerns. "These patterns are not new and neither are the calls for action." In 2023, he said, "it became increasingly clear that reporting data wasn't enough. We needed to do more with what it was that we were learning." Hashimoto pointed to the work of the police's Community Advisory Panel as a step in the right direction. The 10-member panel formed in 2024 in an effort to promote equity and address systemic racism in policing. It makes non-binding recommendations to Hamilton police, and has reviewed police data and practices such as the use-of-force training given to officers CBC Hamilton asked police for examples of actions the service has taken as a result of learning from race-based data. In an email, spokesperson Jackie Penman said that once police have analyzed the data, they'll "engage with the community" before eventually creating recommendations. "When there's a problem, there should be a list of actions," Damptey said, adding recommendations alone — which police can choose not to implement — aren't good enough. Statistics based on officers' perceptions of race For this year's report, police measured racial disparities in use of force against two different benchmarks: population and enforcement. (Police say 1.5 is considered a significant disparity for both.) The population benchmark — based on how often a group shows up in use-of-force data, compared to how large that group is in the general population — is good at highlighting broad disparities, but also includes people who never come into contact with police, the service said. Individuals perceived by officers to be Black accounted for 16 per cent of use-of-force subjects in 2024 — with Black people making up five per cent of Hamilton's population, the disproportionality index for them is 3.2. For people who police perceived to be Middle Eastern, who make up four per cent of the city's population, the disparity index is 2. The enforcement benchmark compares the racial makeup of people involved in use-of-force incidents to those who were arrested or apprehended by police. By that metric, the disparity index for people perceived to be Black is 1.2; for people perceived to be Middle Eastern, it's 1.7. Police said people perceived to be East and Southeast Asian had a disproportionality index of 3.9 using this method, but the sample size was small, and "nearly half" the incidents occurred when police were involved in "warrant-focused enforcement projects," which "contributed to the elevated rates of force following police contact for this group," the report said. Overall, police said, the enforcement benchmark allows for a more precise comparison of treatment by police. On June 17, Natalie Stravens, co-chair of the Community Advisory Panel, spoke to the need for further analysis of use-of-force data. "At the end of the day, we don't know why, we don't know how. And there's no, 'What now?' that comes out of it." Panel member Juanita Parent cautioned that the data is based on officers' perceptions of subjects' races, which is an imperfect measure. For example, she said, people in her Indigenous community are often assumed to be white and may be logged as such, skewing Indigenous representation in the data. However, Parent said, it would not be "feasible" for officers to ask someone how they identify while also trying to de-escalate a situation. With grants from the University of Toronto, Damptey and his team at McMaster analyzed 2023 use-of-force data from the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), and forces in Barrie, Brantford, Durham Region, Guelph, Halton Region, Hamilton, London, Niagara Region, Ottawa, Peel Region, Sault St. Marie, Thunder Bay, Toronto, Waterloo Region, Windsor and York Region. The team started publishing their findings in June and will continue through July. Consistently, Damptey has found Black, racialized and Indigenous communities overrepresented in use-of-force data, he said. For example, about 29 per cent of people the OPP used force against were Black or Indigenous. In Toronto, 33 per cent of individuals police used force against were Black males. "Tell me how … in all these cities, Black and racialized people are overrepresented," Damptey said. "That's what we call systemic racism." General use-of-force data shows rise in 2024 Hamilton's 2024 race-based use-of-force data was presented alongside the service's annual use-of-force report on June 17. The two used to be part of the same report, but were separated this year due to the "complexity" of the race-based data, Penman told CBC Hamilton in an email. There were 303 cases in which Hamilton police used force last year, the report found, a roughly 13 per cent increase compared to 265 in 2023. Overall, the rate of use-of-force incidents per 100,000 public interactions increased in 2024, from 0.12 per cent to 0.15 per cent, while the total number of use of public interactions declined year over year. The 303 incidents involved 455 people. "Altogether, this trend suggests that, although officers engaged in fewer interactions with the public compared to previous years, the proportion of those interactions that involved the use of force was higher," the report said. Police chief links more force to weapons calls Police largely attributed this to a 39 per cent increase in weapons-related calls, from 69 in 2023 to 96 in 2024. At the information session, police Chief Frank Bergen said 2024 saw "a huge spike in shootings" compared to 2023. The report said 310 use-of-force incidents, representing 68 per cent of cases, involved a subject that police perceived as armed. In 71 per cent of those cases, the perceived weapon was a gun. The report does not include whether subjects were or were not actually armed. In a letter to the police services board following the report's release, Lyndon George, director of the Hamilton Anti-Racism Resource Centre, requested that police collect and publish data specifying what, if any, weapons that subjects have when officers use force against them. "Without this level of detail, the public is unable to assess the proportionality and necessity of force used in each incident," said George. Trainer says police 'always' try to de-escalate Use of force encompasses a range of actions, which include drawing or pointing a firearm or taser, physically coming into contact with a subject or firing a weapon, the report said. It notes subjects were injured in 11 per cent of cases. "Every single police officer in every single situation we're called to is always trying to de-escalate the situation and bring about a resolution that keeps it from getting worse," Insp. Darren Murphy said at the June information session. In 81 per cent of cases, the report said, police used de-escalation tactics — such as talking to the subject, or creating distance between officers and subjects — before using force. Murphy, whose division oversees use-of-force training and who was a trainer himself, said every time an officer uses force, it's logged and reviewed several times, first by the police service and then by the province. Generally, he said, he expects officers to draw weapons if they think subjects are armed. WATCH | Over 100 rally to demand justice for Erixon Kabera after SIU cleared officers in his death: Over 100 people rally to demand justice for Erixon Kabera after SIU cleared officers who killed him 2 days ago Duration 3:41 There were eight times in 2024 when an officer fired a weapon, the report said. Of those, it noted, seven involved euthanizing injured animals. Though the report does not name him, Erixon Kabera was the person in the other incident, involving two officers who shot and killed him in his west Hamilton apartment building in November. The police watchdog report clearing the officers was released on June 6. According to Ontario's Special Investigations Unit, Kabera was holding a replica firearm resembling a semi-automatic pistol that he pointed at officers. After the June 17 presentation, Ameil Joseph, a social work professor at McMaster, told police it was disrespectful that Kabera's death was referenced on the same page as euthanizing animals. He also said community members should have been given the reports sooner to give them more time to read and formulate questions. "None of that feels like trust and respect," he said. On Thursday afternoon, the police board was scheduled to discuss the reports in more detail and hear delegations from several community members.

Toronto casino faces $350k fine after impromptu after-party on gaming floor
Toronto casino faces $350k fine after impromptu after-party on gaming floor

Globe and Mail

time2 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Toronto casino faces $350k fine after impromptu after-party on gaming floor

Ontario's alcohol and gaming regulator says a Toronto casino is facing a $350,000 fine after a performer hosted an impromptu party on the gaming floor following a concert marked by 'widespread intoxication, disorderly behaviour' and numerous incidents. The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario says the Great Canadian Casino Resort Toronto was handed the penalty after allowing an after-party to take place on the casino floor before dawn on Sept. 27. The commission says an electronic dance music event was hosted in the theatre next to the casino and saw alleged assaults, drug overdoses and acts of public indecency. It alleges casino management approved an unscheduled request for a performing artist to host an after-party on the gaming floor with more than 400 guests, without any prior risk assessment or planning. The commission says the casino's security was unable to control the floor, with witnesses reporting that an attendee was climbing onto slot machines. It says the penalty addresses the casino's 'critical failures' in reporting the incidents, employee training and managing disturbances. It says the casino has 15 days to appeal the decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store