
Killing of Hamilton man Erixon Kabera raises questions about policing and oversight
The Special Investigations Unit's (SIU) decision not to charge two Hamilton police officers who killed Erixon Kabera in November was not surprising to some experts, who are raising concerns over the police response and limits of the SIU's mandate.
Dave Shellnutt, a lawyer who has represented people in cases where police force was used, told CBC Hamilton the officers who responded to the scene appeared to be either "inexperienced or unprepared," while a former police officer also questioned why more units weren't dispatched to the scene.
Kabera was killed in November after two Hamilton Police Service (HPS) officers fired 24 shots at him, striking him eight times. The SIU report clearing the officers was released on June 6.
According to the SIU, Kabera was holding a replica firearm resembling a semi-automatic pistol, which he pointed at officers. SIU director Joseph Martino said the officers did not commit a criminal offence.
The report doesn't mention Kabera, referring to him as "the complainant."
"The officers honestly believed they were looking at an actual gun in the complainant's possession. Though mistaken, their misapprehension was a reasonable one," said Martino in the report.
Officers put 'the whole building at risk:' lawyer
CBC spoke with several experts who were not involved directly with the case, asking them to review the SIU report. They included a lawyer, a police oversight researcher and a former police officer.
The SIU report said after Kabera pointed the replica at police in his apartment hallway, one officer fired eight rounds while backing away and fell, losing her gun, according to the report. Kabera kept walking forward. Then the second officer shot six to eight more rounds, while Kabera "remained unfazed."
The second officer also fell. The first officer fired her Taser at Kabera, which the report says, did not affect him, and he continued to advance toward the officers. The second officer fired seven to eight shots after replacing his magazine, that's when Kabera "collapsed and landed on his back."
"In that hail of gunfire, they hit [Kabera], and miraculously they don't hit or injure anybody else," said Shellnutt, the lawyer, adding the gunfire "put the entire building at risk."
Wilfrid Laurier University public safety assistant professor, Jen Magnus, who is also a former Calgary police officer and Grande Prairie Police Service instructor, told CBC Hamilton it's hard to know from the report how the officers themselves feel about their actions.
"I'm sure no one's harder on themselves than these two officers, just judging what they did and the decisions they made that day," she said. "It's just a horrible experience for everyone involved."
Magnus said in her view, the officers acted appropriately under pressure, but questioned how the police response was handled.
According to the SIU report, police were initially called to the building where Kabera lived on Main Street W. when a neighbour called the non-emergency police line to report a man with a gun had been at their front door 15 minutes prior.
Magnus said "any mention" of a potential firearm requires at least two police units, and a high-risk response, especially in an apartment building, where "multiple people who could be potentially at risk."
A sergeant on shift should be the one making that call, said Magnus.
She said when reading the report, she questioned if there was a lack of police capacity or if the call came in at a shift change. The HPS employs over 800 police officers, she noted, adding she would "hope there's enough to back someone up at a call like that."
Decision to clear officers aligns with SIU history
Danielle McNabb, a Brock University political science assistant professor who studies policing and police oversight said she "wasn't surprised" by the decision, as it is "very rare for the SIU to lay charges."
McNabb's 2024 study found that between 2017 and 2020, 27 firearm deaths were investigated by the SIU, resulting in no charges. The SIU charged 3.4 per cent of cases during that time.
McNabb said the report suggests Kabera may have been experiencing mental health issues, which is closely linked to higher and excessive use of force by police.
According to Shellnutt, in order to lay charges, the SIU needs to prove that there was criminal intent "beyond a reasonable doubt."
"If [the evidence] is to be believed … probably criminal culpability doesn't arise here," Shellnutt said.
After the SIU decision was announced, Kabera's family said, through their lawyers, they were "disappointed" with the findings and are "considering legal options."
Shellnutt said the family could still "launch a civil claim" against police and issue a complaint to the Law Enforcement Complaint Agency.
One officer declined to be interviewed
One of the two officers involved in the killing of Kabera declined to be interviewed, but released her notes. The other officer was interviewed but didn't release his notes.
The SIU also interviewed several witnesses, reviewed calls, police radio recordings, forensic and physical evidence and a coroner's report.
McNabb said it's not uncommon in SIU investigations for officers to exercise that right, but found in most cases between 2017 and 2020, it was most common for officers to fully comply with the investigation.
Shellnutt said the lack of cooperation can be "incredibly frustrating" for families, and said while this is a legal right in any criminal investigation, as public servants, police should be held to a "different bar."
Magnus said she's torn on the matter, but she agrees that officers should be interviewed when they've had a few days to process the events that unfolded.
Officers are taught to 'shoot to stop the threat'
Magnus said in situations like this, police are taught to prioritize hostages' or innocent civilians' lives, then their own, then the suspect's.
"We were always taught … that you shoot to stop the threat," she said.
"If you have to reload and keep shooting, that's what you have to do."
Magnus, who's also done research on understanding trauma, said in moments of high stress, people can experience what is called auditory exclusion.
"Officers feel that they've maybe only shot twice, and not realize that they emptied their entire magazine," she said.
The SIU report says after the first round of shots, the second officer thought Kabera was the first to shoot, not knowing the gun was a replica.
"An honest but mistaken belief in the highly charged atmosphere that prevailed," read the report.
One of the officers also suffered a graze wound to the back of his head, initially thought he was hit, as he reported through a radio.
Magnus said although more mental health units are needed in many police responses, the presence of the replica meant this situation didn't offer that opportunity.
How the SIU could change
Shellnutt said the SIU can acknowledge mistakes in police conduct in its reports, even when not criminal, but that was not done in this case.
"I think mistakes were made and quite obviously," he said.
Following the release of the report, CBC Hamilton asked the SIU if it had concerns about the police response sent to the scene. It said "the entirety of the SIU's position on the incident is reflected in the report."
McNabb said the SIU's current mandate is "very narrow," and a broader one could help enhance public trust.
She pointed at some things she thinks the SIU did well in this case, including the 200-day wait for the report's release, longer than the SIU's 120-day target, but shorter than the average, which is closer to 300 days.
McNabb also said the rarity of criminal charges makes the public distrust the SIU.
"Doing more proactive community engagement [to ensure] that the public understands how they function, I think that would help," she said.
McNabb said that's just one step in what would take a long time to rebuild trust, especially with Indigenous and racialized communities.
She said data shows Black and Indigenous people are more likely to face police violence, and while there's no SIU data on race, studies in other jurisdictions "have found racial disparity."
She also said a broader mandate where the SIU can also evaluate police misconduct could also help.
"When the choice is simply to lay criminal charges or not … the public can feel unsatisfied with that. That there's not an institutional response," she said.
"The police force is not compelled to sort of look internally to see, 'is there something at a systemic level that we should be doing differently in these types of encounters?'"
HPS will now conduct its own investigation. A report will be submitted to the Hamilton police board within 90 days and published on the board's website after review.
A coroner's inquest — a public hearing where a jury hears the details around a death and makes recommendations aimed at preventing more deaths — will also take place, a spokesperson told CBC Hamilton previously.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
21 minutes ago
- CBC
B.C. police watchdog calls hearing into officers' 'racist, sexist' WhatsApp group
British Columbia's police complaint commissioner says he's called a public hearing to probe misconduct allegations against three current and three former Nelson, B.C., police officers over alleged racist, sexist and inappropriate comments made in a private WhatsApp chat group. Prabhu Rajan says the allegations "go to the heart of public trust in policing" and the public hearing will also delve into a constitutional challenge filed in court last year by five of the subject officers. A notice of public hearing from Rajan's office says the court case hasn't moved forward since it was filed in August 2024, and a retired judge appointed as an adjudicator will have the power under B.C.'s Police Act "to decide all necessary questions of fact and law ... including constitutional challenges." The notice says the alleged misconduct dates back to March 2019, when the officers were members of a group chat where they shared "racist, sexist, or other discriminatory or inappropriate content." It says a police discipline authority in February 2023 found that the officers "appeared to have committed discreditable conduct" by participating in the group chat, but Rajan says the case hasn't been resolved due to delays related to the legal challenge. The notice says no dates for the public hearing have been set, but it "will start on the earliest practicable date." "Important issues are at stake in this case," the notice says. "Indeed, increasing attention is being paid across Canada and elsewhere to whether police or other professionals commit misconduct if they post or engage with discriminatory or otherwise inappropriate content in chat groups they consider to be private."


CTV News
31 minutes ago
- CTV News
5 Toronto speed cameras vandalized this week, police say
Toronto City Councillor Anthony Perruzza says speed cameras are not changing the behaviour of drivers and wants to see more visible markings in school zones. Toronto City Councillor Anthony Perruzza says speed cameras are not changing the behaviour of drivers and wants to see more visible markings in school zones. Five of Toronto's Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) cameras were vandalized since Tuesday, police said on Thursday, as city councillors debated how to improve the program and make it 'fairer' for drivers. The latest incidents happened at five locations — including Sheppard Avenue East west of Don Mills Road, The East Mall near Faludon Court, Pharmacy Avenue near Sherwood and Galworthy Avenues, and McCowan Road south of Sandhurst Circle, Toronto police confirmed to CTV News Toronto. The city said in a statement that it 'is aware that several pole-mounted Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) cameras were vandalized in recent days and is working with its vendor on solutions to prevent future incidents of vandalism.' The city added that tampering with or damaging the devices would allow dangerous speeding to continue and undermine the safety of all road users. News of the vandalism came on the same day that Humber River–Black Creek Coun. Anthony Perruzza announced his intention to ask city council to temporarily halt issuing tickets from the city's cameras while staff review the program. Earlier this month, Vaughan announced it would suspend its own camera enforcement program until at least September, just months after it began issuing tickets. It said that the decision was made in response to rollout concerns from residents and an influx of calls related to people disputing tickets. In Toronto, where the number of speed cameras doubled to 150 earlier this year, the program has drawn repeated vandalism and generated roughly $40 million in fines last year. 'These cameras are becoming speed traps that have no meaningful impact on slowing down communities,' Perruzza told CP24 on Thursday morning. 'Often, drivers are unaware that this camera exists here, and responsible drivers are ticketed despite traveling at speeds close to the posted limits. I'm hearing from many residents that they feel unfairly penalized.' However, during Thursday evening's council meeting, Perruzza moved a different motion asking council to instead direct staff to review the issuance of penalties and work with the processing centre to 'to ensure tickets are dispensed fairly and clearly.' His motion was defeated. Mayor's motion passes Meanwhile, Mayor Olivia Chow introduced a motion that she said was aimed at making the ASE program 'fairer for drivers.' Her motion, which was approved, will direct staff to install larger, more visible and clearer signs where the cameras are deployed. 'Frankly, we don't want speed cameras to issue any tickets at all. The goal is to keep our roads safe and ensure people follow speed limits, especially in community safety zones which are near schools,' Chow said in a statement. Her motion will also request staff to prioritize projects that improve safety in school and community zones when allocating funds generated by the ASE program. Toronto's speed enforcement program was launched in 2020 under former Mayor John Tory and has grown significantly in scope since then, with three times as many cameras. Councillor Anthony Perruzza says speed cameras have become 'speed traps' As part of the program, cameras are rotated through Community Safety As part of the program, cameras are rotated through Community Safety Zones and signage is posted to alert drivers to the presence of the cameras. A study conducted by researchers with The Hospital for Sick Children and Toronto Metropolitan University in 2022 found that there has been an overall 45 per cent reduction in the proportion of drivers exceeding the speed limit in areas where the cameras are operational. City officials have also pointed out that the program is intended to change driver behaviour over time and is not about generating revenue. Perruzza has disputed whether it is accomplishing that goal. 'What we really want people to do is slow down, be more cognizant of their environment,' he told CP24 Thursday morning. 'You want to change behavior and the way the cameras are out there now; it's not doing that.' He argued that too many cameras operate with little warning or visibility. It should be noted that under provincial legislation, signage warning drivers about the presence of cameras in a new location must go up 90 days before they can begin issuing tickets. 'We need to have visible markings. People need to know that this is a school zone, that there is a camera here, and that if you exceed the posted speed limit, you are going to get a fine. But it needs to be clear. It needs to be visible,' he said. The ASE program has also faced its share of challenges. One notable location at Parkside drive, issued roughly 66,000 tickets since 2022. But it's been cut down numerous times in recent months, adding to the city's ongoing fight against vandals. Parkside Drive speed camera A damaged Parkside Drive speed camera is pictured in Toronto on Saturday, Nov. 30, 2024. (CP24) Already, the city has logged more than 325 vandalism incidents involving its ASE cameras in 2025. John Tory defends the program Former mayor John Tory, speaking on NewsTalk 1010 Thursday morning, defended the cameras' role in making streets safer. 'I launched this program because of the incredible number of deaths and serious injuries that resulted from speeding,' he said. John Tory doesn't have plans to run for Toronto mayor, but says he has 'a lot to think about' John Tory doesn't have plans to run for Toronto mayor, but says he has 'a lot to think about' 'I said at the time, and I would say it again today, I don't care if those cameras take in one cent of revenue. The notion this is some kind of revenue grab is ridiculous, because the only thing that triggers a fine to be paid is if somebody speeds.' Meanwhile, Barbara Gray, Toronto's general manager of transportation services, told reporters the program is a 'critical piece' of the Vision Zero (program). 'The automated speed enforcement program is a critical piece of Vision Zero. People get killed and seriously injured related to speed,' she said. 'Automated enforcement gives us a much broader reach city wide to remind people that speeding is not what they need to be doing.' 'In my mind, our complement of speed enforcement cameras and red light cameras is exactly where it needs to be.' Flexibility versus enforcement Coun. Shelley Carroll, representing Don Valley North, said the program was never intended to be about making money. 'People talk about flexibility. Well, this isn't meant to be a cash grab. It's meant to change behavior, which means the amount of revenue from it should be going down every year as well, and we'd be happy to have it going down,' Carroll said. 'But if you want to add flexibility, if you want to add technology for every add to the program to make everyone perfectly happy, you're adding a need for human resources to run the program.' Since 2016, the city has gradually increased its investment in Vision Zero to support its road safety efforts. The 2025 council-approved budget of $99.1 million — $31.7 million in capital and $67.4 million in operating — marking the largest annual investment for the program since its launch.


CTV News
32 minutes ago
- CTV News
Regina police report decrease in crimes against people, property in May
WATCH: Crime statistics, pension policy, and contact interviews were some topics discussed at Thursday's Police Board of Commissioners meeting. Regina Police Board of Commissioners met Thursday morning and reported a decrease in certain crimes in the city throughout the month of May. According to a report from the meeting, crimes against people and property saw an overall decrease of 15 per cent in May. Regina police said assaults were down 24 per cent, robberies dropped 10 per cent and breaking and entering saw a 33 per cent decline in May. Overdose concerns However, over the past few weeks Regina police have partnered up with the Saskatchewan Health Authority reacting to a local increase in overdoses throughout the first half of June. That included 54 in one week. 'There might be a drug that's in the community right now that has increased toxicity over what we are regularly seeing, based on the number of calls for assistance that we are receiving,' Acting Chief of Police Lorilee Davies said. 'So, we work with Sask. health just to put out an alert so that people in the community understand what's happening in real time and then can make maybe safer choices in terms of their usage of those narcotics so that we aren't having more overdoses,' Davies said. An overdose alert was issued for Regina on June 12 and was scheduled to last until June 19.