logo
Illegal Drug Manufacturers Cook Up Fake Studies to Promote Dangerous Gas Station Heroin Products as Safe

Illegal Drug Manufacturers Cook Up Fake Studies to Promote Dangerous Gas Station Heroin Products as Safe

Pilot study of 7 and Pseudo in dogs commissioned by leading manufacturer illuminates significant public health concerns with synthetic drugs
The Stop Gas Station Heroin coalition reviewed the beagle study commissioned by CBD American Shaman, a Missouri-based company that reports generating the majority of its revenue from the sale of '7' products in over 200 retail locations, to evaluate the effects of escalating oral doses of their formulations of 7 (semi-synthetic 7-hydroxymitragynine), and Pseudo (semi-synthetic mitragynine pseudoindoxyl).
Commissioned to support an Investigational New Drug (IND) submission, the study's clear conflicts of interest are as alarming as its findings. Consider that CBD American Shaman, the sponsor of the research, has falsely marketed and sold these products as dietary supplements since 2022. Moreover, the study was released by the Holistic Alternative Recovery Trust (HART), an advocacy group comprised of members with a vested interest in 7-OH products.
This study raises serious concerns about the safety of 7 and Pseudo products, especially with regard to CBD American Shaman's marketed 'serving size' of 7.5 mg per serving, or half a tablet. More concerning is that in reality users consume significantly greater amounts of these products, and misuse risks include tolerance and addiction.
Critically, the study's findings suggest that doses of more than 0.3 mg exceed a conservative threshold for human safety. This figure is based on adverse effects observed in dogs at 10 mg doses, scaled to a human-equivalent dose using FDA-recommended methods.
In other words, CBD American Shaman's marketed serving size is more than 25 times greater than what could be considered reasonably safe based on the study's own preclinical data, and many more times greater if measured against normal consumption of these products.
Lastly, what HART is ignoring, irrespective of the science they put forward, is that 7 and Pseudo have been chemically formulated and put into the market with the intent to cure, treat and mitigate disease; that is in relation to chronic pain, and opioid use disorder. Despite marketing their products as natural botanicals, they are producing unapproved new pharmaceutical drugs, which is illegal.
In order to protect Americans, they should be conducting rigorous peer reviewed science that is published in a journal and vetted as a part of a robust IND submission that proves the efficacy and safety of 7 and Pseudo in comparison to the prescription drugs they are attempting to mimic. Without this critical research and approval from the FDA for prescribed use of 7 and Pseudo, these products should not be on the market.
The study's design, results, and implications are expanded upon below:
The original study design sought to give 10, 20, 40 mg of 7-OH or mitragynine psuedoindoxyl twice daily for 7 days for beagles ranging from 8–10.2 kg. However, at the lowest dose of 10 mg, a Serious Adverse Event (SAE) occurred causing the study to be halted).
What does this mean?
After the SAE, the sponsor adjusted its protocol to 1/10 of the original doses (1, 2, 4 mg per day in dogs), which is 1/20 of the daily dose. However, even at doses at 1 mg, 2 mg and 4 mg per day, adverse events (AEs) were still 2.5–2.7x more common than placebo. Specific AEs include GI disturbances, including blood and mucus in feces. All episodes of drooling appeared in dogs only after the daily dose was escalated to 4 mg.
What does this mean?
Missing pieces in research design and unfinished reports:
The presented study of 7 and Pseudo in dogs was incomplete, missing key safety endpoints, and inappropriately designed to assess safe use of the test articles. Some of these are described below
In Summary
The study is incomplete, shows significant public health risk with these products, and it doesn't justify extrapolating to humans to establish the safety of 7 or Pseudo, especially when:
Final Thoughts
What HART is ignoring, irrespective of the science they put forward, is that 7 and Pseudo have been chemically formulated and put into the market with the intent to cure, treat and mitigate disease — namely chronic pain and opioid use disorder. They have intentionally produced a novel drug and are currently marketing it without FDA approval, which is a clear violation of federal law. They should be doing more science as a part of a robust Investigational New Drug (IND) and New Drug Application (NDA) submission that not only proves the efficacy and safety of 7 and Pseudo but also shows that they are better than the drugs they seek to replace (Oxycontin, Percocet, etc.). Until such time that they have done this and gained approval from the FDA for prescribed use of 7 and Pseudo, these products should not be on the market, and should certainly not be available for $6 a pill at your local smoke shop or convenience store.
To learn more about Stop Gas Station Heroin and its mission, navigate to stopgasstationheroin.com.
Sources
[1] Human Equivalent Dose (HED) = Animal Equivalent Dose (AED) x 0.54. This is based on conversion mentioned in study design and also standard dose conversion.
About Stop Gas Station Heroin
Stop Gas Station Heroin is a national coalition that aims to educate consumers about harmful synthetic drugs and advocate for smart regulation that distinguishes between legitimate, natural botanicals and dangerous, synthetic drugs, combined with enforcement of current federal laws around unapproved drugs. To learn more, navigate to stopgasstationheroin.com.
Media Contact
Colby Wilson
[email protected]
###
SOURCE: Stop Gas Station Heroin
Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire
https://app.eznewswire.com/news/fake-studies-gas-station-heroin-safety-claims
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unlocking Oncology's Future: 3 Trending Cancer Biotech Stocks with ‘Strong Buy' Ratings
Unlocking Oncology's Future: 3 Trending Cancer Biotech Stocks with ‘Strong Buy' Ratings

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unlocking Oncology's Future: 3 Trending Cancer Biotech Stocks with ‘Strong Buy' Ratings

Cancer remains one of the most relentless challenges in modern medicine. In 2025, over 2 million new cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in the United States. More than 618,000 people will die from the disease, which is equivalent to about 1,700 deaths each day. The scale of this health crisis is driving substantial investments and innovation in cancer research and treatment. As a result, the global oncology market is projected to reach $208.9 billion in revenue by 2025, with forecasts suggesting it could surpass $900 billion by 2034. This growth is fueled by increased cancer incidence, advances in precision and immunotherapy drugs, and billions of dollars in new partnerships and funding, such as Bristol-Myers Squibb's (BMY) recent $11 billion stake in next-generation cancer therapies. More News from Barchart Warren Buffett Warns Inflation Turns Business Into 'The Upside-Down World of Alice in Wonderland' But Weeds Out 'Bad Businesses' Why GOOGL Stock May Be the Market's Next Big Winner Alphabet Posts Lower Free Cash Flow and FCF Margins - Is GOOGL Stock Overvalued? Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else. High-potential cancer specialists like Elicio Therapeutics (ELTX), Cellectis (CLLS), and Autolus Therapeutics (AUTL) are earning coveted 'Strong Buy' analyst ratings. Despite this recognition, each remains well below large-cap valuations, which leaves ample room for sharp upside if upcoming clinical and regulatory catalysts play out in their favor. Could one of these under-the-radar biotech firms deliver the next big breakthrough in cancer treatment — and major upside for investors? Let's dive into these three cancer biotech stocks now. Elicio Therapeutics Elicio Therapeutics (ELTX) is a clinical-stage biotech pioneering immunotherapies for solid tumors, with a market capitalization of $158 million. ELTX has posted a YTD gain of 92.7%, and is up 102.6% over the past 52 weeks. Its price-book ratio stands at an elevated 17.6x, well above the sector median of 2.47x. Elicio's lead asset, ELI-002 7P, is advancing through the pivotal Phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial targeting pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), with a critical interim analysis focused on disease-free survival slated for Q3 2025. This interim analysis is a key milestone for the company, particularly for its potential impact on PDAC. Ahead of this readout, H.C. Wainwright analyst Robert Burns reiterated a 'Buy' rating on shares and maintained his $13 price target. Elicio reported Q1 2025 R&D expenses of $7.8 million, a slight increase from $7.6 million in Q1 2024, tied primarily to the ongoing Phase 2 AMPLIFY-7P trial. General and administrative expenses grew to $3 million, up from $2.7 million due to higher personnel costs. The Q1 2025 net loss narrowed to $11.2 million, compared to $11.8 million in the same quarter last year, with a net loss per share improving to $0.87 from $1.15. Notably, ELTX augmented its financial position in Q2 by securing a $10 million senior secured note, extending its operational runway into early 2026 and granting the company flexibility for near-term initiatives. Analyst sentiment skews highly bullish as the two surveyed analysts assign ELTX a 'Strong Buy' rating, with an average price target of $12.50. This places the upside potential at approximately 26% from current levels. Cellectis Cellectis (CLLS) is a clinical-stage biotech company specializing in gene-edited cell therapies with a market capitalization of approximately $140 million. The stock has gained 60% in the year to date, and shares are up 25.2% in the past 52 weeks. Cellectis has a price-sales ratio of 2.26x, below the sector median of 3.6x, and a price-book ratio of 0.96x, significantly under the sector median of 2.47x, suggesting potential undervaluation relative to its peers. CLLS reported solid results for Q1 2025, with consolidated revenues and other income rising to $12 million from $6.5 million a year prior. This increase mainly stems from $5.9 million recognized under the AstraZeneca Joint Research Collaboration Agreement (AZ JRCA). Its cash reserves stood at $246 million as of March 31, 2025, projected to sustain operations well into the second half of 2027, providing ample runway for ongoing development. Research and development expenses slightly decreased to $21.9 million compared to the previous year, reflecting efficient management despite continued investment in pipeline advancement and manufacturing capabilities in Paris and Raleigh. Strategically, Cellectis' partnership with AstraZeneca is a cornerstone of its growth story. AstraZeneca's $140 million investment enhances Cellectis' financial footing and grants AstraZeneca exclusive rights to 25 genetic targets, with options to develop up to 10 candidate products. So far this collaboration is advancing two CAR-T programs aimed at hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Analyst sentiment is unanimously bullish, with the five surveyed analysts assigning Cellectis a consensus 'Strong Buy' rating. The average price target of $5.60 implies compelling upside of approximately 91% from the current share price. Autolus Therapeutics Autolus Therapeutics (AUTL) develops advanced autologous CAR-T cell therapies for blood cancers, with a market capitalization of $670 million. The stock is up 8.7% year-to-date, but down 45% over the past 52 weeks. Its price-sales ratio of 69.4xx is markedly above the sector's 3.54x median, while its 1.89x price-book ratio remains below group averages of 2.47x. In Q1 2025, Autolus reported $9 million in net product revenue, driven largely by the commercial rollout of AUCATZYL (Obe-cel), its lead CAR-T therapy, across 39 fully activated U.S. centers. Patient access continues to grow, capturing coverage for roughly 90% of U.S. medical lives as payer uptake accelerates. Costs of sales totaled $18 million, including delivered but as-yet-unrecognized product tied to deferred revenue and royalty obligations, a natural part of early stage commercial launches. Research and development expenses dropped to $26.7 million from $30.7 million year-over-year, with much of that shift driven by the transition of manufacturing expenses to sales costs. Loss from operations widened to $65.2 million due to launch investments, and net loss reached $70.2 million or $0.26 per share. On the regulatory front, Autolus scored a critical win in July as AUCATZYL secured European approval for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. This unlocks a larger addressable market and enhances the company's global competitive position in engineered cell therapies. The analyst outlook remains unequivocally positive as the nine surveyed analysts rate AUTL a consensus 'Strong Buy,' with a mean target of $9.84, implying 285% upside potential from current levels. Conclusion With major catalysts ahead and strong analyst backing, the odds favor upward momentum as data readouts and commercial expansion play out. Given their positioning and partnerships, these three stocks could deliver outsized gains in the coming quarters, especially if results come in strong. On the date of publication, Ebube Jones did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on

Deion Sanders says he had bladder cancer but will coach Colorado Buffaloes this season
Deion Sanders says he had bladder cancer but will coach Colorado Buffaloes this season

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Deion Sanders says he had bladder cancer but will coach Colorado Buffaloes this season

BOULDER, Colo. (AP) — Colorado coach Deion Sanders disclosed Monday that he was diagnosed with an aggressive form of bladder cancer but after surgery his oncologist considered him cured. Dr. Janet Kukreja, the director of urologic oncology at the CU Cancer Center/UCHealth University of Colorado hospital, said Sanders had his bladder removed as part of the surgical plan. Sanders plans to oversee the Buffaloes this season as he enters his third season at Colorado. Sanders, who turns 58 next month, spoke to the media on the eve of fall camp. He brought his medical team with him to discuss his diagnosis. The charismatic coach returned to campus last week and announced on social media, 'Back and Feeling Great!' He's missed football camps in Boulder this summer amid reports that he's been ill. ___ AP college football: and

Cutting back on red meat? Here are other expert-approved sources of iron.
Cutting back on red meat? Here are other expert-approved sources of iron.

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cutting back on red meat? Here are other expert-approved sources of iron.

Iron is a vital mineral that supports bodily functions, but getting it from red meat can also come with some negative health effects. For example, research has shown eating more than one serving of red meat per week is associated with a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes. A study from earlier this year also found processed red meats are linked to increased risk of diseases, including cancer and dementia. And yet, a survey from Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital last year found nearly a third of Americans could have undiagnosed iron deficiency, which can cause symptoms including fatigue, palpitations, headaches, brain fog and restless legs. So how can you get the recommended dietary allowance of iron — about 8 milligrams for adult males and 18 milligrams for adult females — per day? Even if you're skipping red meat, there are plenty of iron-rich foods to add to your plate, registered dietitian nutritionist Meggie Connelly told CBS News. Best sources of iron other than red meat Connelly's suggestions for plant-based iron sources include: LentilsBeansTofuPumpkin seedsSpinach Certain seafoods are also great choices, she added, including: OystersClams Sardines Qianzhi Jiang, a registered dietitian and owner of The Nutrition Changer, said another important source of iron in the United States if fortified breads and cereals. According to the National Institutes of Health, about half of dietary iron comes from bread, cereal and other grain products in the U.S. Iron found in plant-based sources like nuts and beans, however, need to be transformed before our bodies can absorb it, Jiang explained, adding it's best to pair plant-based iron with vitamin C-rich foods to boost absorption. Still worried you're not getting enough iron? Supplements are another option to consider after consulting your doctor, experts said. "Supplements should be viewed as supplemental sources of vitamins and minerals. We should prioritize meeting nutritional goals from natural food sources," Jiang said. "This helps us get the most benefits of all sorts of nutrients while minimizing the risk of overconsumption." "The Wizard of Oz" as you've never seen it before Latest details on Walmart mass stabbing attack suspect New memo outlines plans for Qatari plane donated for Air Force One use Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store