
Lagarde's master plan to vanquish the dollar
Despite the tough talk about slapping 50pc tariffs on the EU, Donald Trump has given Brussels a golden opportunity.
After years of disappointment, false hope and crises, the euro could at last wrest international dominance away from the dollar to become a – and possibly the – global reserve currency of choice.
Or so Christine Lagarde hopes. The president of the European Central Bank (ECB) set out her master plan last week to at long last fulfil the dream of leading the financial world.
'Moments of change can also be moments of opportunity. The ongoing changes create the opening for a 'global euro moment',' she said in a speech in Berlin, in which she retold the story of the pound losing its dominance a century ago amid the rise of the US dollar.
'This is a prime opportunity for Europe to take greater control of its own destiny.'
The opportunity to which she refers is the rise of Trump and the shattering of the old order. The dollar has been the default currency for global trade for decades, with contracts, assets and deals all priced and conducted in the greenback.
But the US president's decision to slap tariffs on allies and foes alike has shaken faith in this way of working.
'Multilateral cooperation is being replaced by zero-sum thinking and bilateral power plays. Openness is giving way to protectionism,' Lagarde said. 'There is even uncertainty about the cornerstone of the system: the dominant role of the US dollar.'
Controlling Europe's destiny
Dean Turner, economist at UBS, says the dollar's share of foreign currency reserves has been falling for years, and recent events should push more funds into euros 'at the margins'. This is already happening: the single currency has risen by 9pc against the dollar since Trump took office.
The dollar slid again on Monday as China accused the US of violating the deal struck between the world's two largest economies in Switzerland last month.
The latest spat highlighted international fears over America's position and sent the greenback down 0.7pc against the euro. It left the single currency trading at more than $1.14, close to its highest level for more than three years.
'Given the high degree of policy uncertainty, investors will continue to reassess their dollar exposure, and that is going to benefit currencies like the euro,' Turner says. 'The euro is the most liquid alternative to the dollar.'
Traditionally, the US benefits from what is known as an 'exorbitant privilege' in financial markets. Seen as the safest haven by investors, any time the going gets tough, global cash flows into America. It helps the government finance its vast deficits, and funds businesses and households too.
Lagarde wants a slice of the action. A bigger role for the euro would lower borrowing costs, boost Europe's economies, insulate the Continent from volatile financial markets and 'protect Europe from sanctions or other coercive measures', as she put it.
The ECB chief said: 'It would allow Europe to better control its own destiny.'
Making it happen is easier said than done. While Trump has reviled many global investors, that is not enough on its own to push cash into Europe. The bloc needs to become more appealing too.
Lagarde's prescription for turning this short-term gain into long-term dominance includes the eurozone taking the lead in geopolitics – both in global trade and in military terms – and developing deeper capital markets to give investors more to invest in.
More political unity, which breeds stability, is also required.
Distant dreams
None of these goals are straightforward.
Take the idea of stepping up to the plate militarily. Europe has certainly been prompted into promising to spend more on defence by the war in Ukraine. Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, has pledged to spend as much as 5pc of German GDP on defence, with as much as €1 trillion (£840bn) of infrastructure and military spending on the way in the coming years.
Yet a defence spending spree does not by itself create a new military superpower, says Michael Every, global strategist at Rabobank.
'Just saying you are going to spend a lot of money on the military doesn't give you a military – it takes decades of investment to build one up,' he says, noting that Europe also relies on imported energy and other critical resources, which leaves it vulnerable.
A shift in mindset is also required. America's status was also built on its willingness to act as the world's policeman, not just a capability to defend its own borders, says Bilal Hafeez, chief executive at MacroHive.
'Defence helped the dollar become a reserve currency. The US provided military support for foreign countries – they underwrote Japan's defence, and as a result the Japanese bought Treasuries and got into the dollar system,' he says.
'Is Europe willing to provide military support for non-European countries?'
The other planks of Lagarde's master plan also seem distant dreams.
An extra trillion euros of German borrowing means an extra trillion euros of high-quality assets for global investors to buy, which is appealing. But the commitment also draws attention to the weakness of eurozone capital markets.
While the US has a vast, deep market for its $36 trillion (£27 trillion) national debt, the eurozone is split into member states with different levels of borrowing and risks. Few jointly issued bonds exist in Europe, so it is not a direct alternative to the big, liquid American market.
Changing that would require German taxpayers to underwrite French, Italian or Greek debt. They are understandably reluctant.
Uncomfortable consequences
It is not even obvious that becoming the world's reserve currency would be beneficial for all of the eurozone.
'There are consequences to being the world's reserve currency,' says Turner. 'It would put a premium on the euro, that means the euro goes up against other currencies.
'When you're an economy that is still heavily dependent on exports, that is going to make life quite challenging for some members of the eurozone.
'Part of the success of the German export model over the last 20-odd years has been the fact it has had a relatively cheap currency through a significant period of that.'
That is part of the reason Trump is unhappy with the status quo.
'America is walking away from that traditional role because it comes with higher asset prices, which means greater socioeconomic polarisation, and deindustrialisation via higher trade deficits,' says Every.
'Tell me how a net-exporting European economy is going to benefit by switching to be a net importer? It won't. To make consumers out of Germans rather than car producers is not something which anyone in Germany wants to do.'
Lagarde sees a chance for a 'global euro moment'. But to realise her vision, she has to convince a lot of people in the eurozone to do a lot of work first – and that's before she even has a shot at convincing the rest of the world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Glasgow Times
20 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
US and Europe trade negotiators discuss tariffs in Paris
The European Union's top trade negotiator, Maros Sefcovic, met on Wednesday with his American counterpart, US trade representative Jamieson Greer, on the sidelines of a meeting of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 'We're advancing in the right direction at pace,' Mr Sefcovic said at a news conference. He said ongoing technical meetings between EU and US negotiators in Washington would be soon followed by a video conference between himself and Mr Greer to then 'assess the progress and charter the way forward'. Brussels and Washington are unlikely to reach a substantive trade agreement in Paris. The issues dividing them are too difficult to resolve quickly. US President Donald Trump regularly criticises America's persistent trade deficit with the European Union, which was a record 161 billion dollars (£119 billion)last year, according to the US Commerce Department. Mr Trump blames the gap between what the US sells and what it buys from Europe on unfair trade practices and often singles out for criticism the EU's 10% tax on imported cars. America's was 2.5% until Mr Trump raised it to 25% in April. The EU has argued its purchases of US services, especially in the technology sector, all but overcome the deficit. After the Trump administration's surprise tariffs last week on steel rattled global markets and complicated the ongoing, wider tariff negotiations between Brussels and Washington, the EU on Monday said it is preparing 'countermeasures' against the US. The EU has offered the US a 'zero for zero' deal in which both sides end tariffs on industrial goods, including cars. Mr Trump has rejected that idea, but EU officials say it is still on the table. US trade representative Jamieson Greer (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) The EU could buy more liquefied natural gas and defence items from the US, and lower duties on cars, but it is not likely to budge on calls to scrap the value added tax, which is akin to a sales tax, or open up the EU to American beef. 'We still have a few weeks to have this discussion and negotiation,' French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said in Paris on Wednesday ahead of the OECD meeting. 'If the discussion and negotiation do not succeed, Europe is capable of having countermeasures on American products and services as well.' Greta Peisch, who was general counsel for the US trade representative in the Biden administration, said the zero-for-zero proposal could provide a way to make progress if the Trump administration 'is looking for a reason not to impose tariffs on the EU'. But Ms Peisch, now a partner at the Wiley Rein law firm, added: 'How motivated is the US to come to a deal with the EU?' Mr Trump, after all, has longstanding grievances and complaints about EU trade practices. One target of his ire is the value-added tax. Mr Trump and his advisers consider VATs unfair protectionism because they are levied on US products. But VATs are set at a national level, not by the EU, and apply to domestic and imported products alike, so they have not traditionally been considered a trade barrier. There is little chance governments will overhaul their tax systems to appease Mr Trump. Likewise, the Europeans are likely to balk at US demands to scrap food and safety regulations that Washington views as trade barriers. These include bans on hormone-raised beef, chlorinated chicken and genetically modified foods. 'When you start talking about chickens or GMOs or automobile safety standards, you're talking about the ways countries choose to regulate their economies,' Ms Peisch said. 'We think that's protectionist. They think it's keeping their citizens healthy … It's been a sore point for 60 years.'


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Criminals access HMRC records of 100,000 taxpayers
The records of up to 100,000 taxpayers have been accessed by organised criminals following an attack on HMRC. The tax authority is thought to have lost £47 million as a result of the breach last year, with officials telling MPs that 0.2 per cent of PAYE taxpayers with personal accounts were affected – representing about 100,000 people, according to Business and Accountancy Daily. The raid comes after HMRC pushed millions of workers to file their tax returns online as part of its Making Tax Digital scheme. Officials told the Treasury committee that the incident was 'not a cyber attack' but instead took the form of multiple phishing attacks 'designed to extract money' from the tax authority, carried out by several organised crime gangs over an extended period last year. However, on its website, the taxman confirmed it had only just started writing to affected taxpayers, with letters set to arrive between now and June 25. The news came to light on the same day that HMRC's phone lines were hit by a system outage, which meant only those using the specific phone number in the letters to phishing victims were able to call the organisation. Those affected have been told they do not need to take any action and HMRC has said it has locked down any accounts impacted by the breach and deleted log-in credentials. HMRC had told public to beware phishing Phishing attacks occur when a criminal tricks a victim into disclosing personal details, often by pretending to be a trusted figure such as a police officer or HMRC worker. HMRC warned the public as recently as January, ahead of the tax return deadline, to be on alert for phishing texts which often included phrases such as 'you have an outstanding tax refund' along with a link to 'claim' it. HMRC has been repeatedly criticised for rushing to shift customers online. In January this year, MPs on the public accounts committee said the organisation had 'willingly allowed its phone services to fail' to force taxpayers to use the internet. Average wait times for taxpayers using the telephone helpline jumped to 23 minutes in the first 11 months of 2023-24, according to a National Audit Office report, up from five minutes in 2018-19. HMRC announced last month that it would no longer process requests for self-assessment refunds over the phone or via webchat due to a rise in suspected fraud. In the past, the tax authority has formally disciplined staff for failing to protect taxpayer data. HMRC sacked 40 members of staff for breaches of data security and issued written warnings to 95 in 2020-21, according to figures obtained by The Telegraph in 2021. An HMRC spokesman said on Wednesday: 'We've acted to protect customers after identifying attempts to access a very small minority of tax accounts, and we're working with other law enforcement agencies both in the UK and overseas to bring those responsible to justice. 'This was not a cyber-attack – it involved criminals using personal information from phishing activity or data obtained elsewhere to try to claim money from HMRC. 'We're writing to those customers affected to reassure them we've secured their accounts and that they haven't lost any money.'


NBC News
32 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump and Putin discuss war with Ukraine and Iran's nuclear program in call
President Trump posted on social media that he had a call with Russian President Vladimir Putin and that the two of them discussed the ongoing war with Ukraine and Iran's nuclear 4, 2025