logo
Inevitability of four-day week should be embraced, Labour MP says

Inevitability of four-day week should be embraced, Labour MP says

Yahoo11-03-2025

The 'inevitable' transition to a four-day working week should be embraced, a Labour MP has said, as he urged the Government 'not to make an enemy of progress'.
Peter Dowd said a four-day week could lead to more productivity, with employees less likely to experience burnout.
Speaking during the Employment Rights Bill report stage, the MP for Bootle accepted it would be 'challenging' but said the discussion must be had, with the move to a five-day week occurring over a century ago.
In the Commons, Mr Dowd said: 'Research from Barclays showed working hours in the UK have fallen 5% on average in the past four decades, with British workers now working 27% more hours than their German counterpart.
'Meanwhile, France, Italy, Spain, enjoyed a 10% decline in working hours. Yet despite people in this country working longer hours than our competitors or partners, as a nation we're one of the least productive in the G7, and we've got to do something about that.'
He added: '71% in that study reported reduced levels of burn-out, 54% said it was easier to balance household responsibilities, 6% found an increased ability to combine paid-work with care responsibilities, 62% reported it was easier to combine work with social life, and so on, and so on, and so on.
'So what it seeks to do is to put the issue, as I said, on the agenda, because I believe it is inevitable.
'History shows us that changes in patterns of work, working arrangements, the nature of work, and other associated issues, AI (artificial intelligence), will eventually lead to a four-day week over a period of time.
'So let's embrace the change, let's plan for the change.
'If we do want to get the country back to work, if we do want to get the country working productively, if we do want to get many millions of people without work back into work, well let's do it as progressively as we possibly can.
'Finally, if lengthening the time we're asking people to work by an extra year, two years, three years maybe in the future, the least we can do, if we're asking them to work a longer life, is to ask them to have a shorter week – what's wrong with that?
'And is that really too much to ask? I don't think so, and many more employers and employees take the same view. So let's not make an enemy of progress, why don't we just embrace it?'
Mr Dowd put forward an amendment to the Bill to set up a Working Time Council which would look at moving towards a four-day week.
He said the Council would compose of businesses, trade unions, government departments and experts on the subject.
These would advise the Secretary of State on how a transition would impact employers and employees and 'how businesses, public bodies and other organisations should approach such a transition', he said.
Mr Dowd added: 'My aim in introducing this new clause is to try and get the debate about the four-day week off the blocks. I accept that the notion is a challenging one but it's not a reason to put off the debate, the discussion has to be had.
'It's over a hundred years since the introduction of a five-day week in different industries.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand, Cambodia Agree to De-Escalate Border Standoff
Thailand, Cambodia Agree to De-Escalate Border Standoff

Bloomberg

time7 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Thailand, Cambodia Agree to De-Escalate Border Standoff

The governments of Thailand and Cambodia agreed to de-escalate a border standoff by adjusting military forces in the conflict zone, following a skirmish in late May. The decision was announced by Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra in a post on X late Sunday. The two nations will engage through the Joint Border Mechanism, with a meeting scheduled for June 14 in Cambodia's capital Phnom Penh. They also plan to hold multi-level discussions aimed at restoring normalcy in bilateral relations as soon as possible, Paetongtarn said.

Digital ID cards could be Starmer's poll tax
Digital ID cards could be Starmer's poll tax

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Digital ID cards could be Starmer's poll tax

In March 1990, shops and cars in Covent Garden were set ablaze in the worst rioting the capital had seen for a century. Few things had angered the public like the new community charge. But something else happened too, which has been largely forgotten. Councils saw their revenue crash, as millions of names disappeared from the voter rolls. Now Sir Keir Starmer's favourite think tank has proposed what could turn out to be his very own poll tax. 'BritCard' is the name for a new digital ID app advanced by Labour Together, the think tank once run by Morgan McSweeney, who is now Starmer's chief of staff. The demand 'papers, please!' is not popular with voters, so to make it more palatable BritCard comes wrapped in the language of civic nationalism, serving as a cure for illegal immigration. The app and proposed wallet will be rebranded BritCard, to give us a nice warm, fuzzy feeling. We will love it so much that they believe it will morph into a full-blown digital ID system, acting as 'a familiar feature of daily life for everyone in the country'. But there are two serious problems here, and they are set on a collision course. First, BritCard will be mandatory, so we will be forced to use it or go off-grid entirely. Second – and this should alarm us all – Labour Together proposes that BritCard will use the Government's One Login digital identity service, which is mentioned 13 times in the proposal. This has become an expensive and sprawling Government IT project that has engaged hundreds of contractors, and cost taxpayers over £300m. What we know about it is very troubling – concerns have been raised about the security of the project at the deepest levels of the state. When we create a One Login account, it hoovers up our personal identification documents. This ID becomes the key that unlocks other government services, so an insecure system has serious consequences. It not only puts individuals at risk of identity theft and impersonation, but also makes defrauding the Government much easier. A fake ID can get you a long way. Phishing gangs accessed the records of 100,000 taxpayers, HMRC officials admitted last week, and used the IDs to steal an estimated £47m. An ID system like One Login is where criminal gangs would go first, and BritCard will forcibly enrol you into it. The Telegraph has reported the concerns of senior risk and cybersecurity staff working on One Login in some detail. The system was being accessed and modified by staff and contractors without the required level of security. Parts of the system were being developed in Romania, a fact that had eluded top management at the Government Digital Service (GDS). 'It's Horizon all over again,' one global security expert told this newspaper in April, referring to the notorious Post Office computer system. Of the 39 requirements in the National Cybersecurity Centre's cybersecurity checklist list CAF, One Login still only meets 21. But instead of taking the warnings seriously, One Login's senior management at GDS turned on the messengers who had brought them the bad news, dispersing the independent risk and cybersecurity team that first raised the issues. One Login's management subsequently began to mark their own homework. And earlier this year, a 'red team' exercise revealed how easily the system could be captured by hostile parties. The penetration test confirmed that intruders could breeze right in and take control of One Login without anyone noticing. Now recall GDS's own words – made in a business case that it refuses to release to the public – that an insecure One Login would empower 'hostile actors seeking to disrupt national infrastructure', with 'severe consequences for a large number of people'. As for Labour Together's proposition that a digital ID will help magically fix mass immigration, technology is not really the problem. Asylum seekers are already issued with a compulsory ID, but that doesn't stop them from melting into the underground economy, where the ID is never checked. And undocumented arrivals can gain a valid identity from the Home Office because it is promiscuously issuing credentials to undocumented migrants, taking at face value that they are who they say they are. Going digital won't fix either. Labour Together also thinks the public will rally around a digital ID app. 'Our polling revealed extremely strong public support for using a digital identity system for a range of use cases,' argues Labour Together. But only some. Polling by YouGov finds that around a fifth of UK consumers would not be comfortable with having an internationally recognised digital ID card or wallet like BritCard. Fewer than half, or 44pc, want a government ID that stores their biometric data, according to a survey for British payments processor History doesn't repeat itself exactly, but it can rhyme. In 1990, millions went off-grid to avoid a hated new tax. Of course, it is very difficult to disappear today. But millions of us will face a profound moral choice similar to one that voters faced in 1990, as both the poll tax and digital ID were made compulsory. Must I expose myself to criminals and identity theft, or do I refuse to go along with this government scheme? Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Unifor members at DHL Express Canada locked out after refusing to accept concessions
Unifor members at DHL Express Canada locked out after refusing to accept concessions

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Unifor members at DHL Express Canada locked out after refusing to accept concessions

TORONTO, June 8, 2025 /CNW/ - Unifor members at DHL Express Canada were locked out by their employer after midnight on June 8, after the workers refused to accept concessions put forth by the company. "We will not stand by while DHL locks out our members across the country and threatens to use scabs in an attempt to pressure our members to take concessions. Our members deserve respect and a fair contract," said Unifor National President Lana Payne. "We expect DHL to abide by the law on the books, passed unanimously by Parliament, which will come fully into force later this month. A law that bans the use of replacement works in a legal dispute. It is reprehensible that this company thinks they can bust our members' right to fair and free collective bargaining by using scab labour." Some concessions the company is pushing include change driver pay system resulting in a loss of money, driving 100 km. to get to their routes or pick up their freight with no compensation. Other concessions involve proposing language that will allow the company to refuse accommodation, laying off employees, and proposing reducing drivers' daily guarantee. The company has also rerouted pickups across the whole country while reducing pay for owner operators. Hours before the deadline, the employer added numerous new proposals and concessions. The union's bargaining priorities remain improving working conditions—including access to clean and secure washrooms—securing fair wages, addressing surveillance and automation issues and recognition and respect for workers. The company filed its intention to lock out workers on June 4 – four days before the deadline to reach an agreement. "By imposing a lockout, DHL is choosing confrontation over negotiation," said Unifor Quebec Director Daniel Cloutier. "This is a serious decision that deprives dedicated workers of their livelihoods. But let's be clear: our members will not be intimidated. They are united, standing strong, and determined to obtain the respect and working conditions they deserve." Unifor DHL members voted 97% for strike action if necessary last month. Unifor represents over 2,100 DHL Express Canada workers who as truck drivers, couriers, warehouse and clerical workers across Canada, at Locals 114 in British Columbia, 700 in Quebec, 755 in Manitoba and Saskatchewan, 4005 in Nova Scotia, 4457 in Ontario and members in DHL Alberta. Unifor's legal department sent a letter to DHL, cautioning them of hiring scabs –– as anti-scab legislation, which the union campaigned diligently for, is set to come in on June 20. The union firmly believes the timing of the lockout notice is tied to the incoming legislation. The German-based parcel delivery giant's annual profit is roughly $3.3 billion Euro ($4.6 billion CDN) and revenue from its significant and growing North American enterprise is worth approximately ($9.4 billion CDN). And yet, the employer is demanding changes and concessions to working conditions that will negatively affect the pay of Unifor DHL members. Customers in Canada will likely be affected if they use other couriers, including UPS and Loomis, because of integrated contracts with other freight companies. DHL Express Canada has 50,000 customers, including Temu, SHEIN, Lululemon and Siemens Canada. The labour dispute could also potentially cause major disruptions to the Canadian Grand Prix in Montreal, June 13 to 15, due to DHL's responsibility for transporting Formula One vehicles. Unifor is Canada's largest union in the private sector, representing 320,000 workers in every major area of the economy. The union advocates for all working people and their rights, fights for equality and social justice in Canada and abroad, and strives to create progressive change for a better future. SOURCE Unifor View original content to download multimedia: Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store