Inside rare 1950s Cold War bunker built to detect impending nuclear attack – and it could be yours for £20,000
The property was one a 'vital part' of Britain's defences
LIVE HISTORY Inside rare 1950s Cold War bunker built to detect impending nuclear attack – and it could be yours for £20,000
THE inside of a rare 1950s Cold War bunker - built to detect impending nuclear attacks - has been revealed.
Buried 15ft underground in the Norfolk countryside, the former Royal Observer Corps (ROC) dugout was once part of a huge network of posts up and down the country.
8
The bunker was part of an early warning system to detect impending nuclear attack
Credit: SWNS
8
It consists of two rooms - and would have been kitted out with basic furniture
Credit: SWNS
8
The bunker contains an odd jumble of historic knick-knacks
Credit: SWNS
And now, the bizarre slice of history, consisting of two rooms, has hit the market - and could be yours for just £20,000.
The bunker was built in 1957 in Dersingham, a quaint village in the west of the county - part of an early warning system to detect possible attacks and calculate their fallout.
It was manned by trained uniformed volunteers from the 1950s through to 1991, when the last posts were closed and either demolished or sold off.
Most remaining posts are in a derelict condition - marking this one as a particularly rare find.
A metal ladder leads you down 15 feet into the bunker - which has two compartments.
The smaller one contained the toilet, while the larger one was used for observation and sleeping.
While in use, it would have been kitted out with standardised furniture in the form of canvas chairs, a folding table, shelf, cupboard and a pair of metal-framed bunk beds.
Three vital pieces of equipment would also have been housed here: the Fixed Survey Meter, the Bomb Power Indicator and the Ground Zero Indicator.
As well as the bunker, the site also features a concrete hut above ground.
The Class A Orlitt hut first emerged in key locations around the country to allow the ROC to monitor and assess possible attacks by aircraft.
Living in One of the World's Smallest Apartments
Each hut was designed to house three observers, with each volunteer tasked with specific duties.
The hut, together with the bunker, were built in response to the heightened threat of nuclear war back in 1957.
Mark Upston, of East Anglian Auction House, said: "This is truly a special opportunity for those who are drawn to properties with historical significance.
"This post was once a vital part of our defences and will be a treasured asset to a buyer keen on preserving our past."
The bunker will be auctioned on May 8 with a £20,000 guide price.
It comes after another unusual property also hit the market - this time for the rather greater price of £3.5 million.
The impressive estate near Cardiff came complete with three kitchens, an orchard, stables - and even its own football pitch.
But it came with a warning: not only was it right next to the A4232 - it was also just 0.8 miles from the M4.
8
A metal ladder leads you down 15 feet underground
Credit: SWNS
8
The bunker is located in the quaint village of Dersingham, Norfolk
Credit: SWNS
8
It was formerly operated by the Royal Observer Corps (ROC)
Credit: SWNS
8
The property also features a concrete Class A Orlitt hut above ground
Credit: SWNS
8
Three observers frequented the hut to monitor and assess possible attacks by aircraft
Credit: SWNS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Yes we should stand firm, but let's not make Russia our implacable foe
It is always dangerous to confuse leaders with countries since all of the former are mortal. Trump is not America. Netanyahu is not Israel. Putin is not Russia. In every case, the channels have to be kept open to a different future, rather than entrenched in assumptions of mutual assured hostility. Indeed, Russia offers the best possible example of that. Somehow, out of the Cold War madness, it produced Mikhail Gorbachev who saw that the system he presided over was unsustainable. That opened the way to co-existence and I feel fortunate to have lived through that interlude in history. At the moment, such reconciliation seems a pious hope. The objectives of the strategic defence review, with talk of 'immediate and pressing danger' are pretty Russia-specific. The threat may no longer be of Soviet hordes appearing with snow on their boots, but the message is much the same. Read more by Brian Wilson It is difficult to dissent from the premises on which this rhetoric is based. Vladimir Putin's actions in Ukraine are deplorable with no guarantee that he will stop there. Cyber attacks and destruction of energy infrastructure are among the new weapons of war in which Russia is prominent. On these grounds alone, it seems prudent to enhance our defensive capacity, which quickly translates into more money. Three per cent of our national wealth does not sound unreasonable, so long as it is spent on the right priorities. If the rest of Europe is doing it, then so should we. There is a difference, however, between sensible preparedness and an entrenched state of mind which refuses to recognise the perspective of the assumed enemy or prioritise diplomacy over polarisation. If nobody in government is recognising mistakes of the past, then they are missing a large part of this story. One of my Russian memories was created on a very specific date: August 17, 1998. As Trade Minister, I was in St Petersburg to open what was billed as the largest-ever UK trade show in Russia. Unfortunately, nobody came, apart from schoolchildren to pick up the freebies at the deserted exhibition stands. For it was also the day that the rouble collapsed. At that moment, the Russian economy was apparently in a state of terminal crisis. Under the Yeltsin regime, corruption had been rampant, state assets were stolen wholesale and vast sums were finding their way into western banks while Russia's coffers ran dry and the poor paid the price. Far from being treated as the criminals they undoubtedly were, the newly-minted Russian oligarchs and their ostentatious wealth were welcomed with open arms in the West. On the basis that it took a thief to catch many thieves, Vladimir Putin stepped into that void and, in what seemed a miraculously short time, restored economic order. In short, the West treated the break-up of the Soviet Union as an opportunity to be exploited rather than a very fragile new reality to be nurtured with care and respect. That was also the approach taken on foreign policy with an immediate push to extend the boundaries of the EU, and more significantly, Nato, as close as possible to the borders of Russia when it might have been prudent to apply a little more circumspection. This is an impossibly complex subject to be definitive on. The rights of former Soviet republics to seek collective security had to be balanced against Russia's fears of encirclement. As Putin's reign in the Kremlin continued, it became increasingly likely that he would exploit the latter whenever the occasion demanded. I saw some of this behaviour in negotiations over routes for pipelines which would carry oil and gas out of the former Soviet republics to the West. Short of having CIA stamped on their foreheads, it could not have been more obvious that some of those involved certainly did not have Russia's interests at heart – or indeed have any regard for them at all. There was far too much interference in what Russia still regarded as its own rightful sphere of influence. The more that perspective was disregarded, the more likely it became that nationalist sentiments would come into play, under a leader who knew exactly how to exploit them. Ukraine was always likely to be in that front line. In 1954, when dissent was not encouraged, Crimea was transferred from one Soviet republic (Russia) to another (Ukraine), which flew in the face of prior history. Once the Gorbachev genie was out of the bottle, Russian hostility to this arrangement soon emerged. Diplomacy might have forestalled the potential for trouble. Mikhail Gorbachev (Image: PA) In an upheaval as traumatic as the break-up of the Soviet Union, it was inevitable that not all the borders of new states which emerged would be clear-cut. Continuous international support for resolving these incipient conflicts peacefully, without becoming partisans in them, might have saved a lot of subsequent trouble and without a war based on what Kruschev and the Supreme Soviet decided for whatever reason in 1954. None of this in any way excuses the war that Putin has prosecuted in Ukraine though it might imply that negotiation is the only route to a solution. Neither does it call into question the need to defend our own population against the ambitions of any potential foe. The danger is that, around that objective, narratives are created from which it then becomes difficult to escape. We should be sure they are being written with due regard to past history and also future potential for peaceful co-existence. Brian Wilson is a former Labour Party politician. He was MP for Cunninghame North from 1987 until 2005 and served as a Minister of State from 1997 to 2003.
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Moment police dog sinks teeth into snivelling thug after he brutally attacked woman in street robbery
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THIS is the moment a police dog sank its teeth into a squealing thug after he attacked a woman in the street. Leslie Sedgewick followed the lone woman before ambushing her from behind as she walked to work in Middlesbrough. 4 Leslie Sedgewick was filmed squealing as a police dog stopped him Credit: SWNS The 44-year-old then punched and kicked her to the ground before stealing her mobile during the attack. She managed to flee the horror and alert police after suffering a suspected broken nose and a chipped tooth. Footage shows PC Lee Whitehouse arrive on the scene with police dog Kira following the December 20 robbery. The cop told Sedgewick to stop but he instead fled to nearby garages where he was tackled by PD Kira. Bodycam shows the thug squealing in terror as the dog keeps a grip on his arm. At one point, he pathetically squeals: "I'm sorry!" Police later discovered Sedgwick had changed his clothes and dumped the woman's stolen items at a house nearby. He has now been jailed for four years and five months after he pleaded guilty to robbery. The victim told Teesside Crown Court how she had to hide her horror injuries from her child "so she didn't see and ask what had happened to me". She also revealed she was "petrified" during the attack and did not know if she was "going to die". The woman added: "I am constantly in fear that I don't know who is around me or what they are capable of doing." Detective Constable Pierce Ditchburn said: "This was a terrifying attack on a lone woman early in the morning, just a few days before Christmas. "Leslie Sedgewick targeted the woman for her mobile phone and has been attempting to steal a bike in the moments leading up to this attack. "No one should ever have to be afraid to go anywhere alone. "I'm pleased that Sedgewick is now behind bars, and hope that this justice can help provide some comfort to the victim in this case." 4 Sedgewick had attacked a lone woman in the street Credit: SWNS 4 He attempted to flee but was cornered by PD Kira Credit: SWNS
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Top 20 most annoying passenger habits revealed including ‘complaining about driving' & ‘getting directions wrong'
Scroll down to see the full list Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) COMPLAINING, blocking the mirrors and reaching for the invisible brake are among the most frustrating passenger behaviours. A study of 2,000 drivers revealed throwing wrappers around the car and fiddling with the radio were other top 20 pet peeves when ferrying people from A to B. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 A snoozing passenger is among drivers' pet hates Credit: SWNS Along with watching loud videos on their phone, popping their feet on the dashboard and shouting out warnings about cars pulling out in front to make sure they have seen them. It also emerged 17 per cent of women think their partner's an annoying passenger and 'backseat driver', despite 69 per cent of men claiming they're a good one. As a result, 43 per cent of couples admitted their car trips regularly end in arguments, with 19 per cent then not speaking for a period of time. But 62 per cent of men prefer taking the driver's seat in a relationship, with 45 per cent thinking they are a better driver than their partner, and 42 per cent saying they like to be in control. Although 32 per cent of men admit this changes when they want to have a drink and encourage their partner to be designated driver. Marc Pell, managing director for Tempcover, a temporary insurance provider which commissioned the research and is now taking bookings for the world's first Passenger lessons from PSM Driving School, said: 'There's never been formal guidance on how to be a good passenger, and that can lead to real tension, especially between couples. 'But we're hoping some passenger lessons will help people rethink their passenger habits and improve the in-car dynamic. 'Our research shows that in many relationships, men do most of the driving but this is a way to flip the usual driving roles - letting a partner take the wheel so they can learn to be a princely co-pilot, letting go and discovering the joy of being chauffeured.' Other passenger frustrations revealed by the poll included having loud phone conversations (31 per cent) and being inaccurate with directions (25 per cent). While 25 per cent also have to bite their tongue when passengers actively touch the steering wheel, or other car parts. Shock moment drunk Fiat 500 driver smashes into car and flips over during dangerous overtake on quiet residential street Of the men who prefer to be behind the wheel when going somewhere with their partner, 15 per cent don't like their partner's driving. And for 20 per cent of men, they do the driving as part of their agreed-upon couple 'chore split', according to the figures. The study also revealed that the impact of a bad passenger results in 42 per cent of women feeling on edge, while 19 per cent said it gives them anxiety about getting behind the wheel again. While two thirds (63 per cent) of women find backseat drivers patronising. Paul Middleton, owner and driving instructor at PSM Driving School, said: "Poor passenger etiquette can really knock a driver's confidence - especially in relationships. 'From backseat driving to constant complaints, it's often the little habits that make journeys more stressful than they need to be. 'We're excited to offer lessons from our professional driving instructors, helping people unlearn unhelpful behaviours and become passengers who support, not stress out the person behind the wheel.' Top 20 most annoying passenger habits revealed in new study 1. Making a mess 2. Throwing food wrappers on the floor 3. Complaining about the driving 4. Shouting out warnings to the driver 5. Putting feet on the dashboard 6. Blocking the mirrors 7. Telling the driver to go faster or slower 8. Eating crumbly, loud or smelly food without my permission 9. Screaming/ gasping if they think the driver is late braking / hasn't seen something 10. Changing the song/ radio station without asking 11. Changing the volume of the radio without asking 12. Talking on the phone loudly 13. Watching loud videos on their phone 14. Adjusting the temperature in the car without asking 15. Getting directions wrong 16. Touching steering wheel/other car parts 17. Talking about what they would have done differently 18. Stepping on the invisible brake on their side of the car 19. Opening/closing the window 20. Clutching onto their seatbelt/ seat/ handle with their eyes closed
