logo
'Alligator Alcatraz' showcases Trump's penchant for visual cruelty

'Alligator Alcatraz' showcases Trump's penchant for visual cruelty

UPI2 days ago
An alligator floats in a channel near the new Everglades detention center, alled Alligator Alcatraz's, in Ochopee, Fla., on July 14. Photo by Cristobal Herrera Ulashkevich/EPA
The U.S. government recently announced the opening of a massive immigrant detention facility built deep within the Florida Everglades that's been dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a media briefing that "there is only one road leading in ... and the only way out is a one-way flight."
For some taking in her remarks, the moment felt dystopian. According to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, the facility is surrounded by swamps and alligators and is equipped with more than 200 security cameras, 8,500 meters of barbed wire and a security force of 400 personnel.
Accounts from some of the first detainees at the facility have shed light on the inhumane conditions. They've described limited access to water and fresh air, saying they received only one meal a day and that the lights are on 24/7.
Apparently designed to be an immigration deterrence and a display of cruelty, Alligator Alcatraz is much more than infrastructure. It is visual policy aimed to stage terror as a message while making Trump's authoritarian and fascist politics a material reality.
Contributing to this fascist visual apparatus, AI-generated images of alligators wearing Immigration and Customs Enforcement hats have circulated widely on social media. Some have questioned whether these images were satire or state propaganda.
In a moment of growing right-wing rhetoric and support for anti-immigrant violence, understanding how visual regimes operate, and what they attempt to normalize, is important.
Surveillance and deterrence technologies used along the U.S.-Mexico border for decades were intentionally designed to restrict the movement of undocumented migrants. According to Human Rights Watch, this has resulted in more than 10,000 deaths.
Since 1994, the U.S. Border Patrol has been accused of directing migrants away from urban crossings along the southern border, intentionally funneling them into harsh and inhospitable terrain like the Sonora Desert.
The desert serves as a deterrent to prevent immigrants from reaching their destiny. American theorist Jasbir Puar's concept of debility is useful in making sense of the strategic process whereby the state works not to kill, but to weaken, as a form of slow violence that wears people down over time. The desired outcome is deterrence.
On the southern U.S. border, severe dehydration and kidney failure can be outcomes of this debilitating process, potentially resulting in disability or death.
Infrastructures of violence
Sarah Lopez, a built environment historian and migration scholar in the U.S., describes the architecture of migrant immobilization as existing on a continuum with prison design. She's highlighted the increasingly punitive conditions of immigration detention facilities, such as small dark cells or the absence of natural light.
French architect and writer Léopold Lambert explains that architecture isn't just about buildings, but about how space is used to organize and control people. He coined and developed the term weaponized architecture to describe how spaces are designed to serve the political goals of those in power.
Colonialism, capitalism and modernity are closely connected, and architecture has played a key role in making them possible. Alligator Alcatraz sits at the intersection of all three, intentionally created to invoke danger and isolation. In other words, it's cruel by design.
As Leavitt put it, the facility is "isolated and surrounded by dangerous wildlife and unforgiving terrain." The Trump administration has essentially transformed land into infrastructure and migrants into disposable threats.
Terrorizing the marginalized
State-sanctioned "unforgiving terrains" are not new, and the use of alligators to terrorize people of color isn't new either.
The grotesque history of Black children being used as "alligator bait" in Jim Crow-era imagery is well-documented.
So when Trump publicly fantasized about alligators eating immigrants trying to escape the new detention center, it came as no surprise to those familiar with the long racist visual history linking alligators to representations of Black people.
This logic is redeployed in the form of a racial terror that is made visible, marketable and even humorous in mainstream political discourse.
Visuality and migration
"Visuality" is a key term in the field of visual and cultural studies, originally coined by Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle and reintroduced in the early 2000s by American cultural theorist Nicholas Mirzoeff. It can be understood as the socially, historically and culturally constructed ways of seeing and understanding the visual world.
Visual systems have historically been used to justify western imperial and colonial rule by controlling how people see and understand the world.
While Alligator Alcatraz is a brand-new detention facility, it draws from a longer visual and spatial history of domination.
The AI-generated images of alligators wearing ICE hats can be seen as part of a broader visual system that makes racialized violence seem normal, justified and even funny. In this absurd transformation, the alligator is reimagined as a legitimate symbol of border enforcement.
Migrant death by water
The spectacle of Alligator Alcatraz, with its swampy inhospitable landscape, cannot be divorced from the long visual history of migrant death by water that's relied on the circulation of images to provoke outrage -- and sometimes state action.
Examples include the iconic image of Aylan Kurdi, the Syrian child whose lifeless body washed ashore in Turkey in 2015, and the devastating photo of Oscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez and his 2-year-old daughter who both drowned crossing the Rio Grande in 2019.
These images sparked global concern, but they also reinforced the idea that migrant lives only matter when they end in death -- as if borders only become visible when they cause deaths.
Alligator Alcatraz was built in eight days. The fact that a detention camp - or what some have called a concentration camp -- can be assembled almost overnight, while basic human needs like clean drinking water or emergency warning systems go unmet for years, speaks volumes about where political will and government priorities lie.
Marycarmen Lara Villanueva is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Social Justice Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dallas-area ICE arrests of noncriminals skyrocketed
Dallas-area ICE arrests of noncriminals skyrocketed

Axios

time8 minutes ago

  • Axios

Dallas-area ICE arrests of noncriminals skyrocketed

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests of people without criminal charges or convictions in the Dallas area soared in June, per data compiled by the Deportation Data Project. Why it matters: The surge follows a national trend that coincides with the Trump administration's decision on May 21 to triple ICE's arrest quota. By the numbers: In January, ICE agents arrested 1,085 total people in the Dallas Field Office region, which includes North Texas, the Texas Panhandle and Oklahoma. As of June 26 — the most recent data available — the monthly arrest figure increased 59% to 1,726. Zoom in: The monthly share of Dallas-area ICE detainees without criminal charges or convictions more than doubled, from 197 in January (18% of all arrests) to 524 (30%) in June. The big picture: Nationwide, people without criminal charges or convictions made up an average of 47% of daily ICE arrests in early June, up from about 21% in early May, before the quota increase. The other side: "The media continues to peddle this FALSE narrative that ICE is not targeting criminal illegal aliens," Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to Axios. McLaughlin added that 70% of ICE arrests were for immigrants with criminal convictions or pending charges, but did not elaborate on that figure. Between the lines: " ICE has the authority to arrest immigrants who are suspected of violating immigration laws, regardless of criminal history," writes Austin Kocher, research assistant professor at Syracuse University's S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications and immigration expert, in an analysis of the new data. "Nevertheless, the administration has gone to great lengths in the press and on social media to emphasize the criminality of people they are arresting. Both things can be true, of course."

Teacher Detained by ICE After 'Overstaying Visa'
Teacher Detained by ICE After 'Overstaying Visa'

Newsweek

time8 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Teacher Detained by ICE After 'Overstaying Visa'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have apprehended a teacher who allegedly overstayed his visa. Fernando Alves-Rocha, a 45-year-old citizen of Brazil, was arrested in Monroe, Washington, according to ICE Seattle. "We are aware that one of our employees appears to have been detained by ICE," the Lake Washington School District said in a statement reported by Fox13 Seattle. "We have been in contact with the employee to provide appropriate employment documentation. Due to privacy considerations, we are limited in what we can share, but we are monitoring the situation closely." Newsweek has contacted ICE and the school district for comment outside of office hours. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement Baltimore briefing on January 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. An Immigration and Customs Enforcement Baltimore briefing on January 27, 2025, in Silver Spring, Md. Alex Brandon/AP Why It Matters The Trump administration is enacting plans to carry out what it calls the largest deportation operation in U.S. history as part of the Republicans' hard-line immigration agenda. What To Know Alves-Rocha managed the theater department at Juanita High School, per Fox13 Seattle. He originally entered the U.S. in 2018 on a tourist visa, which he overstayed, according to a post on X by ICE Seattle. Fernando Alves-Rocha, 45, is a citizen of Brazil arrested by @EROSeattle in Monroe, WA. Alves entered the U.S. in 2018 under a tourist visa which he overstayed, and is wanted by law enforcement authorities in Brazil for theft. He'll be detained by ICE pending removal proceedings. — ICE Seattle (@EROSeattle) July 22, 2025 His attorney, Adolfo Ojeda, told KIRO Newsradio that Alves-Rocha applied for asylum after his tourist visa expired in 2018. According to Ojeda, Alves-Rocha currently holds a valid work visa. Alves-Rocha is also wanted by Brazilian law enforcement on theft charges, ICE Seattle said in its post. He is currently in ICE custody pending removal proceedings, the post added. What People Are Saying Representative Suzan DelBene's office said in a statement on Tuesday, according to Fox13 Seattle: "Congresswoman DelBene is aware of the arrest of Fernando Rocha by ICE earlier this week. We have been in contact with Mr. Rocha's attorney, Lake Washington School District, and state Sen. Dhingra, and are hopeful this situation will quickly resolve itself in court. We will continue to follow the case closely. Donald Trump promised to go after the worst of the worst, but his administration's heavy-handed tactics in many cases ignore people's constitutional rights and the rule of law." State Senator Manka Dhingra said in a statement, per Fox13 Seattle: "We wanted to make sure we are protecting people's due process rights. Given what is happening nationally about people with legal status basically being taken off our streets by masked individuals, I wanted to make sure he was connected to the right resources." What Happens Next? Alves-Rocha's attorney said he has a bond hearing scheduled for July 29, according to MyNorthwest.

Science Agency Staffers Speak Out about Trump Administration's Actions
Science Agency Staffers Speak Out about Trump Administration's Actions

Scientific American

time38 minutes ago

  • Scientific American

Science Agency Staffers Speak Out about Trump Administration's Actions

The federal government is full of scientists who lend their expertise to key decisions about our food, medicines, environment, health care, and more. But as the first six months of President Donald Trump's second term have unfolded, these scientists say they have found themselves as pawns in what they call a strongly antiscience administration. Some are speaking out publicly. Several hundred staffers at the National Institutes of Health, the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA have banded together to write to their leaders and other government officials. The resulting letters, published by the nonprofit organization Stand Up for Science, decry deep cuts at the agencies and changing priorities that belie their traditional missions and go far beyond the shifts that typically occur under new presidents. (A fourth letter, made public late July 22 by the New York Times, was written by National Science Foundation staffers to Representative Zoe Lofgren, senior Democrat on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, calls on the committee to defend NSF citing similar complaints.) 'As an administrator, you carry out the policy of the president; that's always been so, and that is [so] today,' says Christine Todd Whitman, who served as administrator of the EPA under then president George W. Bush. 'But the policy has never been the dismantling of the agency.' Now, she and the letters' authors fear, it is. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. The EPA staffers' letter, which they call a 'Declaration of Dissent,' highlights five key concerns about how Administrator Lee Zeldin has been running the agency. Officials are 'undermining public trust..., ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters..., reversing EPA's progress in America's most vulnerable communities..., dismantling the Office of Research and Development [and] promoting a culture of fear,' the staffers write. The second point— ignoring scientific consensus to benefit polluters —is a particular concern for Amelia Hertzberg, an environmental protection specialist who worked at the EPA's Environmental Justice Office until she and the rest of that office were placed on leave in February. 'The EPA was founded with a mission to protect human health and the environment, regardless of its effect on industry,' she says. The EPA works with companies to ensure its policies are reasonable, she notes, and companies receive broader support from other government agencies. Hertzberg also highlights the administration's circumvention of established protocols for reducing staffing. 'If you want to have a reduction in force, that's fine,' she says. 'Let's do it legally; let's do it according to procedure.' Another signer of the EPA letter is Michael Pasqua, a life scientist and program manager for the EPA's safe drinking water efforts in Wisconsin. He says he has been particularly upset by changes at the agency's Office of Research and Development, which is being slashed to one third of its staff and folded into the administrator's office. 'This is the science that everything is based off of,' Pasqua says of the Office of Research and Development's work. Now, he fears, researchers will be pressured into arriving at findings that match the administrator's priorities. 'They are turning science into this subjective cultural conversation that doesn't really make any sense,' he says. Pasqua says he just wants to be able to focus on his work: supporting Wisconsin's effort to ensure residents have access to safe, clean drinking water. The state, he says, is still facing challenges from its historically heavy use of nitrate chemicals in agriculture, even as it has been among the first to quantify and begin addressing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances PFAS, or 'forever chemicals,' in drinking water. 'I thought I would be helping people,' he says of his decision to join the EPA. The EPA did not return Scientific American 's request for comment on the letter. After the letter was published, the agency put about 140 employees who signed it on administrative leave. 'It was an act of courage to develop and sign on to this letter, knowing that signatories would likely be sidelined or even worse,' said Gina McCarthy, who served as administrator of the EPA under then president Barack Obama, in a statement to Scientific American. The most recent of the three letters was sent to NASA's interim administrator Sean Duffy. Its signers are particularly afraid of retaliation, says one current employee, who signed the letter but asked to remain anonymous in this article. This NASA employee has been worried for a while. 'I'm someone who has been pretty heavily involved with diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility groups around NASA, so once the executive orders getting rid of those were issued and then very quickly implemented, that's when I knew that the destruction was coming our way,' they say. Although all three agencies are facing dramatic changes, the details look different, and each letter speaks to those individual circumstances. The NASA letter, for example, is heavily shaped by the way human spaceflight disasters, such as the Challenger and Columbia tragedies, have become baked into the agency's culture—the letter calls out by name astronauts who have died in the line of duty. NASA staffers also highlight, in particular, the move by the Trump administration to cancel more than a dozen healthy spacecraft that have been conducting extended operations—old missions that now require a minuscule budget but still return valuable science data. 'Once we hit the off switch, there's no on switch,' the NASA employee says of the proposed mission cancellations, noting that some spacecraft are designed to be destroyed at the end of their life. 'There's just no coming back from that.' (NASA also did not return Scientific American 's request for comment on the letter.) The NIH employees' letter, dubbed the 'Bethesda Declaration,' was published first, in early June, and has seen perhaps the most open reception. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya met with 38 staffers who signed on to the letter on July 21. 'I felt there was a lot of empathy, there was some engaged discussion. I didn't really hear a strong plan for change,' one attendee said during a rally following the meeting. 'We're going in the wrong direction, and there has been irreparable harm done. But there's still time to right the ship.' —Ian Morgan, molecular biologist and postdoctoral fellow, NIH Before the meeting, Bhattacharya had hinted at openness to discussion within the agency. 'The Bethesda Declaration has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months, including the continuing support of the NIH for international collaboration,' he said in a statement provided to Scientific American. 'Nevertheless, respectful dissent in science is productive. We all want the NIH to succeed.' Like the other letters, the Bethesda Declaration highlights key concerns about the agency's activities under the second Trump administration. In it, employees complain that the NIH has been forced to 'politicize research by halting high-quality, peer-reviewed grants and contracts..., interrupt global collaboration..., undermine peer review..., enact a blanket 15% cap on indirect costs,' which hinders funded research, and 'fire essential NIH staff.' Ian Morgan, a molecular biologist and postdoctoral fellow at the NIH's National Institute of General Medical Sciences, who studies antimicrobial resistance, says that the months since Trump took office have been difficult. 'Everything was shut down,' he says. 'We weren't allowed to communicate outside with our collaborators; we weren't allowed to order any supplies to do our work; we weren't able to do any new research.' Morgan, who has worked for the NIH on and off for more than a decade, was able to reprioritize his work to focus on writing up existing findings. Still, he says, he was struck by the havoc wreaked on the research conducted within the agency and upset by reports from clinic staff who had to let patients know they would no longer be able to receive treatment at NIH facilities. 'We're going in the wrong direction, and there has been irreparable harm done,' Morgan says of changes made in the past months that drove him to sign the letter. 'But there's still time to right the ship.' In a statement to Scientific American, an NIH spokesperson responded to each concern included in the letter, saying that the agency's 'funding decisions must be based on the merit of provable and testable hypotheses, not ideological narratives.' In addition, the statement said that 'legitimate international collaborations' have not been stopped—that the agency is merely trying to understand where money is going—and that the concerns about peer review are a 'misunderstanding' as the agency focuses on 'enhancing the transparency, rigor, and reproducibility of NIH-funded research.' The statement also pointed to other funders that cap overhead costs at 15 percent and said that the agency is 'reviewing each case of termination to ensure appropriateness,' reversing these decisions as it sees fit. 'Still, as NIH priorities evolve, so must our staffing model to ensure alignment with our central mission and being good stewards of taxpayer dollars.' Morgan, Hertzberg and Pasqua all say their fundamental goal in speaking out is to ensure they can continue doing what they believe is important work that benefits people across the U.S. 'I hope the general public understands that what we're doing, we're doing for them,' Pasqua says. 'If you drink water and you breathe air, we're trying to protect you.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store