logo
'Alligator Alcatraz' showcases Trump's penchant for visual cruelty

'Alligator Alcatraz' showcases Trump's penchant for visual cruelty

UPI21-07-2025
An alligator floats in a channel near the new Everglades detention center, alled Alligator Alcatraz's, in Ochopee, Fla., on July 14. Photo by Cristobal Herrera Ulashkevich/EPA
The U.S. government recently announced the opening of a massive immigrant detention facility built deep within the Florida Everglades that's been dubbed "Alligator Alcatraz." White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a media briefing that "there is only one road leading in ... and the only way out is a one-way flight."
For some taking in her remarks, the moment felt dystopian. According to Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, the facility is surrounded by swamps and alligators and is equipped with more than 200 security cameras, 8,500 meters of barbed wire and a security force of 400 personnel.
Accounts from some of the first detainees at the facility have shed light on the inhumane conditions. They've described limited access to water and fresh air, saying they received only one meal a day and that the lights are on 24/7.
Apparently designed to be an immigration deterrence and a display of cruelty, Alligator Alcatraz is much more than infrastructure. It is visual policy aimed to stage terror as a message while making Trump's authoritarian and fascist politics a material reality.
Contributing to this fascist visual apparatus, AI-generated images of alligators wearing Immigration and Customs Enforcement hats have circulated widely on social media. Some have questioned whether these images were satire or state propaganda.
In a moment of growing right-wing rhetoric and support for anti-immigrant violence, understanding how visual regimes operate, and what they attempt to normalize, is important.
Surveillance and deterrence technologies used along the U.S.-Mexico border for decades were intentionally designed to restrict the movement of undocumented migrants. According to Human Rights Watch, this has resulted in more than 10,000 deaths.
Since 1994, the U.S. Border Patrol has been accused of directing migrants away from urban crossings along the southern border, intentionally funneling them into harsh and inhospitable terrain like the Sonora Desert.
The desert serves as a deterrent to prevent immigrants from reaching their destiny. American theorist Jasbir Puar's concept of debility is useful in making sense of the strategic process whereby the state works not to kill, but to weaken, as a form of slow violence that wears people down over time. The desired outcome is deterrence.
On the southern U.S. border, severe dehydration and kidney failure can be outcomes of this debilitating process, potentially resulting in disability or death.
Infrastructures of violence
Sarah Lopez, a built environment historian and migration scholar in the U.S., describes the architecture of migrant immobilization as existing on a continuum with prison design. She's highlighted the increasingly punitive conditions of immigration detention facilities, such as small dark cells or the absence of natural light.
French architect and writer Léopold Lambert explains that architecture isn't just about buildings, but about how space is used to organize and control people. He coined and developed the term weaponized architecture to describe how spaces are designed to serve the political goals of those in power.
Colonialism, capitalism and modernity are closely connected, and architecture has played a key role in making them possible. Alligator Alcatraz sits at the intersection of all three, intentionally created to invoke danger and isolation. In other words, it's cruel by design.
As Leavitt put it, the facility is "isolated and surrounded by dangerous wildlife and unforgiving terrain." The Trump administration has essentially transformed land into infrastructure and migrants into disposable threats.
Terrorizing the marginalized
State-sanctioned "unforgiving terrains" are not new, and the use of alligators to terrorize people of color isn't new either.
The grotesque history of Black children being used as "alligator bait" in Jim Crow-era imagery is well-documented.
So when Trump publicly fantasized about alligators eating immigrants trying to escape the new detention center, it came as no surprise to those familiar with the long racist visual history linking alligators to representations of Black people.
This logic is redeployed in the form of a racial terror that is made visible, marketable and even humorous in mainstream political discourse.
Visuality and migration
"Visuality" is a key term in the field of visual and cultural studies, originally coined by Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle and reintroduced in the early 2000s by American cultural theorist Nicholas Mirzoeff. It can be understood as the socially, historically and culturally constructed ways of seeing and understanding the visual world.
Visual systems have historically been used to justify western imperial and colonial rule by controlling how people see and understand the world.
While Alligator Alcatraz is a brand-new detention facility, it draws from a longer visual and spatial history of domination.
The AI-generated images of alligators wearing ICE hats can be seen as part of a broader visual system that makes racialized violence seem normal, justified and even funny. In this absurd transformation, the alligator is reimagined as a legitimate symbol of border enforcement.
Migrant death by water
The spectacle of Alligator Alcatraz, with its swampy inhospitable landscape, cannot be divorced from the long visual history of migrant death by water that's relied on the circulation of images to provoke outrage -- and sometimes state action.
Examples include the iconic image of Aylan Kurdi, the Syrian child whose lifeless body washed ashore in Turkey in 2015, and the devastating photo of Oscar Alberto Martínez Ramírez and his 2-year-old daughter who both drowned crossing the Rio Grande in 2019.
These images sparked global concern, but they also reinforced the idea that migrant lives only matter when they end in death -- as if borders only become visible when they cause deaths.
Alligator Alcatraz was built in eight days. The fact that a detention camp - or what some have called a concentration camp -- can be assembled almost overnight, while basic human needs like clean drinking water or emergency warning systems go unmet for years, speaks volumes about where political will and government priorities lie.
Marycarmen Lara Villanueva is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Social Justice Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. The views and opinions in this commentary are solely those of the author.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kremlin urges caution with nuclear rhetoric after Trump's submarine order
Kremlin urges caution with nuclear rhetoric after Trump's submarine order

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Kremlin urges caution with nuclear rhetoric after Trump's submarine order

By Dmitry Antonov MOSCOW (Reuters) -The Kremlin said on Monday that everyone should be careful about nuclear rhetoric, in its first response to a statement by U.S. President Donald Trump that he had ordered a repositioning of U.S. nuclear submarines. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov played down the significance of Trump's announcement last Friday that he had ordered two subs to be moved to "the appropriate regions" in response to remarks from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev about the risk of war between the nuclear-armed adversaries. "In this case, it is obvious that American submarines are already on combat duty. This is an ongoing process, that's the first thing," Peskov told reporters. "But in general, of course, we would not want to get involved in such a controversy and would not want to comment on it in any way," he added. "Of course, we believe that everyone should be very, very careful with nuclear rhetoric." Peskov said that Russia did not see Trump's statement as marking an escalation in nuclear tension. "We do not believe that we are talking about any escalation now. It is clear that very complex, very sensitive issues are being discussed, which, of course, are perceived very emotionally by many people," he said. Peskov declined to answer directly when asked whether the Kremlin had tried to warn Medvedev to tone down his online altercation with Trump. "Listen, in every country, members of the leadership... have different points of view on events that are taking place, different attitudes. There are people who are very, very tough-minded in the United States of America and in European countries, so this is always the case," he said. "But the main thing, of course, is the position of President (Vladimir) Putin," he said. "You know that in our country, foreign policy is formulated by the head of state, that is, President Putin." Solve the daily Crossword

America is finally waking up to Trump's cruelty toward immigrants
America is finally waking up to Trump's cruelty toward immigrants

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

America is finally waking up to Trump's cruelty toward immigrants

Americans are still firmly behind President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, but it appears that at least some of them are getting cold feet as his brutal tactics come into view. The spectacle of masked agents smashing car windows, detaining folks with no court hearings and deporting some of them to dangerous countries like El Salvador and South Sudan is starting to splinter public support. The reality is jarring, and for a growing number of Americans, it's becoming too much to stomach. I just wish more of them would see it now before more people get swept under Trump's indiscriminate campaign against migrants – legal or not. Let's start with the numbers. A recent Wall Street Journal poll found that 62% of voters still support deporting undocumented immigrants, and just over half approve of Trump's overall handling of immigration. But beneath that top-line support is mounting discomfort. Most Americans say Trump administration is going too far Nearly 6 in 10 Americans opposed deporting people without court hearings or legal review. Independents, a key voting bloc, are especially critical. Most say the administration has gone too far, specifically when it comes to detaining and deporting individuals who've never had a chance to see a judge. The policy of offloading migrants to third-world countries – even countries that they are not from – should strike many more as not just impractical, but also fundamentally un-American. This tells us something important and gives me a bit of hope. Americans want stronger border security, but enough of them aren't ready to abandon due process. They might have begun to reject the spectacle of lawlessness cloaked in the language of 'law and order.' Yet, cheers persist, which is why we must never stop speaking up. The slow public reaction and the applause for harsh enforcement reveal a darker side of the American psyche – a creeping comfort with dehumanization, a willingness to look away from suffering as long as it happens to 'others,' in this case, to migrants whom MAGA wants out of the United States at any cost. Trump has normalized cruelty toward immigrants Nobody denies that the United States has the right and responsibility to protect its borders and deport those living here illegally. Trump didn't invent mass deportations. Every president before him has done it. Democrat Barack Obama, for instance, deported more than 3 million during his presidency. But Trump has done something different – he's normalized cruelty, weaponized it and stripped away even the pretense of procedural justice. What's more disturbing is how far federal agents have gone under Trump's orders. Opinion: Republicans in Congress head home to angry voters. So much for summer break. Americans have watched as Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in full tactical gear raid workplaces, pull people from their cars and drag individuals off the streets. Even a sitting U.S. senator, Alex Padilla of California, was tackled to the ground on national television simply for demanding answers. Legal residents and even U.S. citizens are being swept up, too. Due process isn't just being denied – it's being erased. A legal resident with cancer isn't getting care Arizona Democratic U.S. Reps. Greg Stanton and Yassamin Ansari are sounding the alarm about inhumane conditions in immigration detention centers. But even as elected officials, they've been barred from inspecting facilities like the Eloy Detention Center in Florence, Arizona, where horror stories are emerging. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. One of those cases involves a green cardholder who has lived in the U.S. for two decades and is now battling leukemia while detained, according to Ansari. Ansari told reporters that the woman has lost 55 pounds, is in severe pain and is not receiving adequate – or any – pain medication. If they can do this to a legal resident with cancer, and keep members of Congress from even entering the facility, what can't they do? And where is the collective outrage? Why isn't the public speaking louder and showing more than slow discomfort in recent polling? Opinion: Trump keeps brutalizing immigrants because he's failing at everything else If more people like Joe Rogan spoke up, things could change Blame that in part on the fragmented media landscape. The country is not just divided politically, but it's divided informationally, too. Many Trump supporters tune in to outlets and influencers that amplify the administration's narrative – painting ICE raids as righteous missions to capture "the worst of the worst.' The reality on the ground tells a different story. When they see that reality, they begin to wonder. Like Trump supporter Joe Rogan, who is finally questioning Trump's immigration crackdown. "It's insane,' the podcaster recently said. "Not cartel members, not gang members, not drug dealers – just construction workers. ... Gardeners.' "Like, really?' Rogan asked. That shifting narrative in the MAGA media landscape – from a one-dimensional tale of criminals to the undeniable truth of working-class migrants being ripped from their families – just might be starting to enter the national consciousness. I bet if more Americans like Rogan pay attention and speak up about what's really happening under Trump, the cheers will stop. Elvia Díaz is editorial page editor for The Arizona Republic and azcentral, where this column originally published. Follow her on X, (formerly Twitter): @elviadiaz1 You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Trump's use of ICE on immigrants may chill his popularity | Opinion

The EPA wants to ditch climate-change rules. That's bad for humans and automakers
The EPA wants to ditch climate-change rules. That's bad for humans and automakers

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The EPA wants to ditch climate-change rules. That's bad for humans and automakers

Traffic near the intersection of Interstate 270 and Interstate 495 in Maryland with high-occupancy lane. | Maryland Matters I'm old enough to remember the days before the federal government regulated auto tailpipe emissions, a time when the air was stinky and Los Angeles was enveloped in perpetual smog. My first car was one of those pollution machines, a used 1968 Buick Gran Sport that gulped a gallon of poisonous, leaded gasoline every 14 miles or so. It was a different time, one that the Trump administration seemingly is trying to bring back. In what could be one of the most far-reaching deregulatory moves in U.S. history, the Environmental Protection Agency wants to stop regulating greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks long considered by most scientists to be significant contributors to climate change. 'With this proposal, the Trump EPA is proposing to end 16 years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers,' EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said at a Kenworth heavy truck dealership in Indianapolis on July 29. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Zeldin said the administration plans to overturn a landmark 2009 finding by the Obama administration that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are pollutants the agency can regulate under the Clean Air Act. That determination is known as the 'endangerment finding' and was the basis for strict tailpipe emission rules enacted by the Biden administration that would have required about half of new vehicles sold in the U.S. being electric or plug-in hybrids by 2030. Automakers also must meet certain fuel economy standards, which were stiffened by Biden. But Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in June the Trump administration is planning to roll back the Biden standards, calling them 'illegal.' And under the One Big Beautiful Bill, the tax and spending bill approved by Congress on July 3, automakers won't have to pay fines for not meeting fuel economy standards for the past three years. It's a big gift to automakers that pay hundreds of millions of dollars a year to the federal government for not meeting the fuel economy standards. But it will likely sting electric carmaker Tesla, which has made billions of dollars over the years selling regulatory credits to other carmakers. Environmental groups expressed outrage over the EPA's intent to deep-six climate rules. 'As Americans reel from deadly floods and heat waves, the Trump administration is trying to argue that the emissions turbocharging these disasters are not a threat,' said Christy Goldfuss, executive director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'It boggles the mind and endangers the nation's safety and welfare.' Environmental groups have vowed to sue the EPA over the proposed climate rules rollback, possibly delaying any implementation for years. Even Detroit's automakers were muffled in their response to the EPA's move to ditch carbon dioxide rules. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an association representing dozens of automakers and suppliers including General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Stellantis N.A., did not issue a statement about the EPA's groundbreaking announcement on its website. That might be because some top auto executives have acknowledged climate change is real and their products are contributing to it. GM CEO Mary Barra has said electric cars are a key element in the automaker's long-range plan to have 'zero crashes, zero emissions, zero congestion. It's the North Star that guides everything we do.' Ford Motor Executive Chairman Bill Ford has supported the Paris Climate Accord, which seeks to reduce carbon dioxide levels associated with climate change. Ford Motor also has pledged to be carbon neutral across its vehicles, facilities and suppliers by 2050. Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress are doing their best to torpedo those efforts by conducting an all-out war against electric vehicles. They're ending the $7,500 tax credit to purchase EVs on September 30. And they're eliminating tax credits for home EV charging stations, a move slated to take effect next June. Trump's chaotic implementation of tariffs also is being used as a weapon in his war against EVs. The Commerce Department last month slapped a 93.5% tariff on Chinese graphite, a critical ingredient in manufacturing EV batteries. China supplies nearly all the high-grade graphite Tesla and other automakers need to make batteries. But the Commerce Department says China is 'dumping' graphite into the U.S. at prices lower than in its home market. Some experts say the tariff could add $1,000 or more to the price of an EV battery, another huge disincentive for consumers to buy EVs. Trump's widespread tariffs on cars, trucks and parts are hammering Detroit automakers' bottom lines, potentially hurting their ability to adequately invest in new technologies to compete with Chinese automakers that are rapidly gobbling up the global EV market. Ford and Stellantis cited the impacts of tariffs in the companies' net losses for the second quarter of the year. Combined, the Detroit Three have paid more than $2 billion in tariffs so far this year. Trump longs to return to an America he remembers growing up before the federal government started regulating the auto industry. I'm nostalgic, as well, for my '68 Gran Sport. But that muscle car is an anachronism best suited for events like the Woodward Dream Cruise. And besides, today's quick-accelerating EVs could blow its doors off.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store