Chief Justice Roberts: Don't blame judges for applying the law
In a public conversation with the chief judge of the Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Roberts did not discuss any of those decisions, which included a big win for President Donald Trump in his fights with judges who have blocked his policies.
Instead, the chief justice was asked how he deals with criticism.
More: Called out by Trump for how he leads the Supreme Court, John Roberts is fine keeping a low profile
Roberts says he keeps in mind that each case has a winner and a loser - and the loser is not going to like the outcome.
"You'd like it to be informed criticism, but it's usually not," he said. "They're naturally focusing on the bottom line: who won and who lost. You need to appreciate that that's just the nature of what you do."
More: Trump wins again. Conservatives like Amy Coney Barrett again. Supreme Court takeaways
Sometimes, however, the criticism comes not from the party that lost, but from other justices.
In writing the conservative majority's opinion that judges went too far when they blocked Trump's changes to birthright citizenship from going into effect everywhere in the country, Justice Amy Coney Barrett had some strong words about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.
"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barret wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."
More: Trump Republicans lash out at Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett as a DEI hire
Jackson wrote that the majority's decision gives the president "the go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate."
"As a result, the Judiciary - the one institution that is solely responsible for ensuring our Republic endures as a Nation of laws - has put both our legal system, and our system of government, in grave jeopardy," she wrote.
Justice Jackson Supreme Court appears to favor 'monied interests' over ordinary citizens
Sharp divisions at the Supreme Court; sharp words as the year comes to an end
Roberts acknowledged that there can be sharp divisions among his colleagues and sharp adjectives employed, particularly at the end of the term.
But he said the justices all work hard to understand where they're colleagues are coming from "to see if there's some way to if not bring things together, make the resolution as helpful as possible."
"It's important to know, and understand, what Justice So-And-So is thinking about, because that will help you understand a little bit more about yours," he said. "And that's an interesting dynamic that plays out over the course of several months."
Roberts also acknowledged that the court waited until the last days of the term to decide some of the biggest cases, saying they will try to spread things out more.
"Things were a little crunched," he said, "toward the end this year."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
33 minutes ago
- The National
Palestine Action documentary brought forward due to ban
The online release of To Kill a War Machine was brought forward to this week after it emerged that the Home Office is going to proscribe Palestine Action after activists from the group broke into RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire and spray-painted two military planes red. Days after the incident, the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, said the 'disgraceful attack' was 'the latest in a long history of unacceptable criminal damage committed by Palestine Action'. A draft of a proscription order against Palestine Action will be presented to parliament on Monday. READ MORE: Met police drops second terror charge against Kneecap The ban under terror laws would make it a criminal offence to belong to or support the group and would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The film's directors have been scrambling to take legal advice and fear they will end up being in breach of counter-terror laws if they continue distributing their documentary, according to the Guardian. Showings of the film have been lined up across Britain in the coming days and weeks but plans to ban the group have cast doubt over whether the screenings can go ahead. To Kill a War Machine was made available to watch online on Tuesday and has been downloaded by people from all over the world. However, its London-based directors, Hannan Majid and Richard York, are concerned that Britain could end up being the only place in the world where people would not be able to see the film. 'We've operated around the world and have a lot of experience of regimes telling us what we can and can't do,' Majid told the Guardian. 'We've had authorities in Bangladesh telling us we shouldn't even be editing footage of garment workers and activists advocating for their rights, and we've been followed by the police in Cambodia, but we have never encountered anything like this in Britain.' Majid has been working with York since 2006 through their production company, Rainbow Collective, which focuses on documentaries about human rights issues and have collaborated with organisations including Amnesty International. To Kill a War Machine took six months of work and was made independently by the filmmakers from Palestine Action. The documentary uses real-time bodycam and phone footage that the group had put into the public domain. In the film, activists are seen smashing and occupying weapons factories across the UK while explaining their motivation for their actions, which they view as legitimate in the face of alleged war crimes in Gaza. (Image: @IMDmilo) There are also interviews with two activists from Palestine Action, Sohail Sultan and Joe Irving, both of whom were acquitted of charges of causing criminal damage. However, the move by the UK Government to proscribe Palestine Action means there are now questions looming over whether the documentary and events, including a London premiere on July 18, can be continued after the group is banned. 'We set out to make this film in a completely legitimate and legal manner, as we have done with other films. It's been certified by the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) and it is good to go but now we are being advised that the curtailing of Palestine Action could have a major knock-on effect for us as it could become not only illegal for others to voice support for them but also for us, as film-makers, to distribute this film,' said York. Majid added: 'People are still excited and there has been a tremendous outpouring of support on social media. 'Hopefully we can still go ahead with much of our plans, but we have had to rush things forward and do the digital release this week rather than waiting for September and try to build on the awards we have already picked up. 'That all changed on Monday night and there has been a spike as soon as we put it online.' The filmmakers are having discussions with distributors in the UK and the US about the potential risks of showing the film. 'On the basis of some of our legal advice, we may not even be able to distribute it in other countries and territories if the film is seen as being somehow in support of a group which is proscribed. We are still hoping to be able to show it in cinemas within the law,' said York. They are also considering whether they will have to withdraw submissions for a range of international film festivals.
The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation
It's an irony that the minerals needed to save the planet may help destroy it. Rare earth elements, the mineral backbones of wind turbines and electric vehicles, are now the prize in a geopolitical arms race. The trade agreement between Washington and Beijing restores rare earth shipments from China to the US, which had been suspended in retaliation against Donald Trump's tariffs. Behind the bluster, there has been a realisation in Washington that these are critical inputs for the US. They are needed not just by American icons such as Ford and Boeing but for its fighter jets, missile guidance systems and satellite communications. This understanding suggests that Washington will scale back some of its countermeasures once Beijing resumes delivery of rare earths. The paradox is that to reduce its dependence on China, the US must depend on Beijing a little longer. This is not yet decoupling; it's deferment. That, however, may not last. Mr Trump has signed an executive order to boost production of critical minerals, which encourages the faster granting of permits for mining and processing projects. He eyes Ukraine and Greenland's subterranean riches to break dependence on China. The west became so reliant on a single geopolitical rival for such materials – materials it once extracted and refined domestically before shuttering operations – due to cost and environmental concerns. China, for its part, has come to dominate global rare earth processing. It has used that market power before – notably against Japan in 2010. It's hard not to think that it was strategic complacency that led to the west relying so heavily on China for key minerals. This month's Nato summit has seen the west push to reindustrialise via rearming itself. This is also reawakening long-dormant extractive ambitions in the global north. Canada, flush with critical mineral deposits, says its planned mining resurgence will be a new foundation for alliance solidarity. This month the EU called for strategic reserves of rare earths 'to prevent supply chain disruptions and economic blackmail from China' – highlighting their importance not just for electric vehicles but for defence and aerospace industries. 'Resilience' means digging deeper at home and controlling extraction abroad. The same minerals we need for net zero are being justified in terms of zero-sum rivalry. It is uncomfortable that 'green growth' and militarism have merged into a single policy frame, collapsing the distinction between ecological transition and arms buildup. A magnet for an electric car is also a magnet for a hypersonic missile. And meanwhile, the human and ecological toll continues to rise – largely out of sight and out of sync with the idea of environmental sustainability. A Guardian dispatch last week from Baotou, China's rare earth capital, found evidence of toxic ponds, poisoned soil and demolished 'cancer villages' – the hidden cost of our digital and electric age. Framing this as an inconvenient necessity risks repeating past mistakes. For mineral-rich nations, the surge in global demand brings opportunity. But as a UN report this year noted, without strong institutions and safeguards, it risks a familiar fate: corruption, conflict and environmental ruin. Today's scramble for critical minerals must not see the promises of responsible sourcing give way to a familiar logic – extract first, moralise later.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Woke university administrators FIRED after hidden videos revealed secret plot to destroy Trump's most cherished wish
Several college administrators in the UNC school system have been fired after they were secretly recorded saying they were still trying to implement DEI policies. Accuracy in Media, a non-profit which describes itself as using 'citizen activism to expose corruption and law-breaking', covertly filmed conversations with several North Carolina school employees which led to them losing their jobs. President Donald Trump set to work dismantling DEI initiatives from federally-funded programs through a series of executive orders during his first weeks back in office. The aggressive crackdown meant universities were asked to select students for admission based on their academic credentials rather than fulfilling diversity, equality and inclusion quotas. UNC Asheville Dean of Students Megan Pugh was caught on tape saying administrators 'probably still do' implement DEI policies anyway but in a 'quiet' way, adding: 'I love breaking the rules'. Several other administrators in the state were also seen on camera echoing the same sentiment. Some of those taped lost their jobs as a result. 'I'm so glad that you guys are still doing equity work,' the undercover reporter told Pugh on a Zoom call captured in one video. 'I mean, we probably still do anyway, but you know, gotta keep it quiet,' Pugh replied. When the reporter asked if she had to 'keep it on the down-low?', Pugh said: 'Yeah. But, I love breaking rules.' She went on to say that administrators would keep pushing DEI policies, 'until more or less, they get mad at us.' Pugh also agreed that the school was 'supportive' of secretly continuing with DEI rules, adding that her 'hope and intention' was that 'we can still incorporate those kinds of things but under a broader banner'. She was later fired by the college, according to ABC11. Assistant Director of Leadership and Community Engagement at UNC Charlotte, Janique Sanders, was also caught on video echoing the same sentiment. 'If you are looking for an outward DEI position, not gunna happen,' she told the undercover reporter, without knowing she was being filmed. 'But if you are interested in doing work that is covert, there are opportunities.' When asked whether equity work was still happening on campus, Sanders said: 'I can't say that, but... we've recalibrated, so to speak.' 'I'm just really dedicated to making sure that our students feel loved and supported,' she added. 'I could care less about whatever you want to call our office.' Sanders is 'no longer employed' by the institution, according to Yahoo. UNC Wilmington employees Asher Persin and Ashlee Fleming were also recorded in similar interactions. Persin, who is a coordinator at the school's Mohin Scholz LGBTQIA Centerconfirmed that some staff were still working on DEI policies. Meanwhile, Upperman African American Cultural Center coordinator Fleming said DEI was still being funded but money had been 'moved around'. The Daily Mail has contacted UNC press offices for comment. Asher Persin, who is a coordinator at the school's Mohin Scholz LGBTQIA Center, confirmed in one Accuracy in Media video that some staff were still working on DEI policies Trump began his second term in the White House with a bonfire of DEI policies which the government said have been pushing antisemitic, anti-American, Marxist and 'radical left' ideologies. In May, the Justice Department announced the formation of a new unit to crack down on federally-funded universities that have diversity, equity and inclusion policies using a civil anti-fraud law. 'A university that accepts federal funds could violate the False Claims Act when it encourages antisemitism, refuses to protect Jewish students, allows men to intrude into women's bathrooms or requires women to compete against men in athletic competitions,' Deputy Attorney Todd Blanche said in the announcement. 'Colleges and universities cannot accept federal funds while discriminating against their students.' The False Claims Act is a federal civil law that allows the government to recover funds lost due to fraud. Private citizens can also use it to sue on the government's behalf and can become eligible to receive a portion of the recovered proceeds.
