logo
Elon Musk's Starlink and the racially charged row over operating in South Africa

Elon Musk's Starlink and the racially charged row over operating in South Africa

BBC News16-04-2025

The tussle between Starlink boss Elon Musk and South Africa over the company's failure to launch in the country stems from the nation's black empowerment laws, and could be one factor behind the diplomatic row between the US and Africa's most industrialised nation.To his more than 219 million followers on his social media platform X, Mr Musk made the racially charged claim that his satellite internet service provider was "not allowed to operate in South Africa simply because I'm not black". But the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) - a regulatory body in the telecommunications and broadcasting sectors - told the BBC that Starlink had never submitted an application for a licence.As for the foreign ministry, it said the company was welcome to operate in the country "provided there's compliance with local laws".
So what are the legal sticking points?
To operate in South Africa, Starlink needs to obtain network and service licences, which both require 30% ownership by historically disadvantaged groups. This mainly refers to South Africa's majority black population, which was shut out of the economy during the racist system of apartheid.White-minority rule ended in 1994 after Nelson Mandela and his African National Congress (ANC) came to power. Since then, the ANC has made "black empowerment" a central pillar of its economic policy in an attempt to tackle the racial injustices of the past. This has included adopting legislation requiring investors to give local black firms a 30% stake in their businesses in South Africa.Mr Musk - who was born in South Africa in 1971 before moving to Canada in the late 1980s and then to the US, where he became the world's richest man - appears to see this as the main stumbling block for Starlink to operate in the country. Starlink, in a written submission to Icasa, said the black empowerment provisions in legislation excluded "many" foreign satellite operators from the South African market, according to local news site TechCentral. But foreign ministry spokesperson Clayson Monyela challenged this view in March, saying on X that more than 600 US companies, including computing giant Microsoft, were operating in South Africa in compliance with its laws - and "thriving".
Are there attempts to end the impasse?
Mr Musk's Starlink has a potential ally in South Africa's Communications Minister Solly Malatsi. He comes from the Democratic Alliance (DA) - the second-biggest party in South Africa - which joined a coalition government after the ANC failed to get a parliamentary majority in last year's election. The DA is a fierce critic of the current black empowerment laws, claiming they have fuelled cronyism and corruption with investors forced to link up with ANC-connected companies to operate in South Africa or to win state contracts. Last October, Malatsi hinted that he was looking for a way to circumvent the 30% black equity requirement, saying he intended to issue a "policy direction" to Icasa with the aim of clarifying "the position on the recognition of equity equivalent programmes".In simple terms, Malatsi seemed to be suggesting that Starlink would not a require black business partner in South Africa, though it would have to invest in social programmes aimed at benefiting black people - especially the poor.But some six months later, Malatsi has failed to change the policy, with a spokesperson for his department telling the BBC that their legal team was still looking into the matter. It seems the communications minister may be facing political resistance from ANC lawmakers in parliament. Khusela Diko, the chairperson of the parliamentary communications committee to which Malatsi is accountable, warned him earlier this month that "transformation" in the tech sector was non-negotiable, appearing to oppose giving Mr Musk's Starlink any special treatment.Diko said that "the law is clear on compliance" and, crucially added, that "cutting corners and circumvention is not an option - least of all to appease business interests". Diko's tough position comes as no surprise, as relations between the South African government and the US have hit rock bottom during US President Donald Tump's second term.
Why have relations deteriorated?
Mr Musk, part of Trump's inner circle, has railed on X against what he calls "racist ownership laws" in South Africa, while the US president has threatened to boycott the G20 summit of world leaders to be held in the country later this year. "How could we be expected to go to South Africa for the very important G20 Meeting when Land Confiscation and Genocide is the primary topic of conversation? They are taking the land of white Farmers, and then killing them and their families," Trump said on his social media platform Truth Social. His claims have been widely dismissed as false, but they echo those of the tech billionaire. Last month, Mr Musk accused "a major" political party in South Africa - a reference to the radical Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), which came fourth in last year's election - of "actively promoting white genocide"."A month ago, the South African government passed a law legalizing taking property from white people at will with no payment," Mr Musk said."Where is the outrage? Why is there no coverage by the legacy media?South Africa did pass a law earlier this year allowing the government to seize property without compensation, but only in certain cases, while claims of a genocide against white farmers have been widely dismissed.Nevertheless, Musk links these issues to his failure to get a licence for Starlink."Starlink can't get a license to operate in South Africa simply because I'm not black." he asked back in March.His hard-line stance comes despite meeting South Africa's president in New York last year. At the time, Mr Musk described the meeting as "great", while President Cyril Ramaphosa said he had tried to persuade the billionaire to invest in South Africa. "Meeting Elon Musk was a clear intention of mine... Some people call it bromance, so it's a whole process of rekindling his affection and connection with South Africa," Ramaphosa told South Africa's public broadcaster, SABC.But he added that nothing had yet been "bedded down". "As it happens with potential investors, you have to court them; you have to be talking to them, and you've got to be demonstrating to them that there is a conducive environment for them to invest. So, we will see how this turns out," the president said."He is South African-born and South Africa is his home, and I would want to see him coming to South Africa for a visit, tour or whatever."But the "bromance" has long ended, with Mr Musk appearing to move closer to South Africa's right wing.
Has Starlink had problems elsewhere in Africa?
Lesotho appears to have bowed to pressure from the Trump administration by announcing on Monday that it had given a 10-year licence to Starlink. It comes after Trump imposed a 50% tariff on imports from Lesotho, threatening thousands of jobs in the country.Trump subsequently paused that for 90 days, but a 10% tariff still came into effect on 5 April.Some reports suggest the Lesotho Communications Authority (LCA) cleared regulatory hurdles to stave off the threat of a further tariff hike by granting Starlink a licence. However, this was denied by Foreign Minister Lejone Mpotjoane."The licence application and the tariff negotiations should not be conflated," he said. The decision to grant the licence was condemned by civil society group Section Two, which raised concern that Starlink Lesotho was 100% foreign-owned and lacked local ownership, South Africa's GroundUp news site reported."Such actions can only be described as a betrayal - a shameful sell-out by a government that appears increasingly willing to place foreign corporate interests above the democratic will and long-term developmental needs of the people of Lesotho," Section Two's co-ordinator Kananelo Boloetse was quoted as saying.During public consultations over Starlink's application, Vodacom Lesotho had also argued that Mr Musk's company should establish local shareholding before receiving a licence, the Space in Africa website reported. "These concerns highlight broader tensions surrounding Starlink's operations across Africa, particularly the growing demand for local partnerships," it added.Starlink also appears to be seeking an exemption in Namibia from the requirement to bring in a local partner.Namibia is a former colony of Germany, and was under the rule of South Africa's white-minority regime until it gained independence in 1990.It has more stringent requirements than its post-apartheid neighbour, with businesses operating in Namibia needing to be 51% locally owned.The Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (Cran) told the BBC that Starlink had submitted an application for a telecommunications service licence in June 2024. Cran said that while this process usually took between three to six months, a decision had not yet been taken because it "must first wait for the ownership exemption application to be finalised" by Namibia's information and communication technology minister.
How big is Starlink's Africa presence?
Starlink is now operating in more than 20 African countries, with Somalia, hit by an Islamist insurgency, giving it a 10-year licence on 13 April, two days before Lesotho's decision to do so."We welcome Starlink's entry to Somalia. This initiative aligns with our vision to deliver affordable and accessible internet services to all Somalis, regardless of where they live," Technology Minister Mohamed Adam Moalim Ali said. Starlink aims to provide high-speed internet services to remote or underserved areas, making it a potential game-changer for rural areas unable to access traditional forms of connectivity such as mobile broadband and fibre.This is because Starlink, rather than relying on fibre optics or cables to transmit data, uses a network of satellites in low Earth orbit. Because they are closer to the ground, they have faster transmission speeds than traditional satellites.Nigeria was the first African state to allow Starlink to operate, in 2023. The company has since grown into the second-biggest internet service provider in Africa's most-populous country.But Starlink still has no presence in South Africa - the continent's most industrialised nation.Enterprising locals had found a way to connect to the service by using regional roaming packages purchased in countries where the service was available.Starlink put an end to this last year while Icasa also warned local companies that those found providing the service illegally could face a hefty fine.Yet with an estimated 20% of South Africans not having access to the internet at all - many in rural areas - it could prove beneficial for both Starlink and the government to reach a compromise.For Starlink it could prove a lucrative market, while satellite broadband may help the government achieve its goal of providing universal internet access by 2030.On Monday, Ramaphosa appointed former deputy finance minister Mcebisi Jonas as his special envoy to the US, signalling his determination to mend relations with the Trump administration. But Jonas' appointment faced a backlash in right-wing circles, as in a 2020 speech he called Trump a "racist homophobe" and a "narcissistic right-winger".In an interview on the Money Show podcast, Jonas said that he made the comments when he was not in government and "people move on". He acknowledged that it would be a "long slog to rebuild understanding", but added that South Africa's relationship with the US was "fundamentally important" and he was determined to improve it.Jonas' comments are not surprising as the US is a major trading partner for South Africa. With Trump having threatened a 30% tariff on its goods, Ramaphosa cannot afford to see relations continuing to deteriorate and the economy taking further knocks.
You may also be interested in:
Is it checkmate for South Africa after Trump threats?What's really driving Trump's fury with South Africa?US cuts send South Africa's HIV treatment 'off a cliff'
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending
Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending

President Donald Trump referred to his former ally Elon Musk as a 'big-time drug addict' as he processed the end of their relationship, according to a new report. As Musk began publicly attacking Trump, the president started calling up confidants and acquaintances to discuss the falling out. During one such call, the president made the allegation about the Tesla CEO's alleged drug habits as he attempted to understand his behavior, reports The Washington Post. Musk has said that he uses ketamine for depression. According to The New York Times, he used ketamine on the campaign trail to such a degree that it was affecting his bladder, and he traveled with a pill box with Adderall markings. White House officials said Trump was concerned about Musk's drug use, and it was one reason the relationship eventually came to an explosive end, The Post noted. However, Trump took a calmer tone in pushing back on Musk in his social media posts than advisers and friends alike expected. Two people with knowledge of the situation told the paper that, following the Thursday feud with Musk, Trump instructed those around him not to escalate the confrontation. Speaking to Vice President JD Vance about how to address the Musk situation in public, Trump urged caution. However, the relationship between Musk, Trump, and the rest of the administration had deteriorated long before Thursday. Musk alienated White House staff and cabinet members, reportedly getting into a physical altercation with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, according to The Post's report. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, who worked in Trump's first term, told The Post that he was informed that as Bessent and Musk exited the Oval Office following an April meeting, the pair began insulting each other. Bessent mentioned Musk's claim that he would find more than $1 trillion in waste and abuse of government spending, something the billionaire had not yet achieved. 'Scott said, 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,'' Bannon told the paper. Musk subsequently pushed his shoulder into Bessent 'like a rugby player,' he added. Bessent struck back at Musk, and several people stepped in to break up the scuffle. 'President Trump heard about it and said, 'This is too much,'' said Bannon. 'President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers, and the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill is critical to helping accomplish that mission,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Post. However, administration officials have discussed taking steps to retaliate against Musk. Trump took to TruthSocial to suggest that Musk's government contracts be scrutinized, potentially putting his businesses at risk. Musk has been consistently critical of the president's main congressional priority, the so-called 'big, beautiful bill,' expressing his concerns about the significant amount it adds to the deficit. Trump has threatened Musk with 'serious consequences' if he uses his massive wealth to fund Democratic challengers to Republicans who vote for the spending bill. Musk has also suggested that he may start a third political party to represent the '80 percent in the middle.' 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce, where you're just saying, 'I really wish Mommy and Daddy would stop screaming,'' Texas Senator Ted Cruz said on his podcast Friday.

Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

STV News

time2 hours ago

  • STV News

Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats

US President Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk, and warned that his former ally and campaign benefactor could face 'serious consequences' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Trump continued. Alarming — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 7, 2025 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Musk's public criticism of Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Trump criticised Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Musk suggested Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. PA Media Mr Trump's spending plans appeared to cause the rift initially (AP). Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Vance said. Vance called Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Trump at a military base in Qatar. The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Von showed the vice president Musk's claim that Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Trump is mentioned in them. Vice President Vance on what it's like to be Trump's VP: 'It is my job, obviously, to provide the President honest counsel…he talks to everybody. I think it's why he's in touch with normal people.' — Vice President JD Vance (@VP) June 7, 2025 Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Vance said in response to another post shared by Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77trn) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Senator Cory Booker says he will not accept any donations from Elon Musk
Senator Cory Booker says he will not accept any donations from Elon Musk

The Guardian

time3 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Senator Cory Booker says he will not accept any donations from Elon Musk

A leading elected Democrat rejected the idea of taking campaign donations from tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose spectacular fallout with former ally Donald Trump has roiled American politics. Trump on Saturday said Musk will face 'serious consequences' if he moves to support Democratic political candidates in any upcoming elections, following a public rift between the two men over Musk's staunch opposition to the cost of US president's planned piece of landmark domestic legislation. But Cory Booker, a senator for New Jersey, scotched any idea he would take any Musk cash. 'I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign,' Booker told NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. But Booker added, referring to the Republicans budget bill that Musk has criticized, 'I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know, sound the alarm, treat this like a Paul Revere moment.' Booker added: 'More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans.' The senator's comments come as Democrats wrestle with the how to turn the dramatic fallout between Musk and Trump into opportunity. Musk turned his back on the party in 2022 and contributed $270m to Trump's re-election campaign in 2024, providing crucial help in the Republican's eventual victory. As the Trump-Musk feud intensified on Thursday, Musk posted on X: 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.,' clearly referring to any politician who supported Trump's budget bill. Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman, reportedly talked with one of Musk's 'senior confidants' on last week about whether Musk might now want to help the Democrats in the midterm elections next year. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna told Semafor. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against Maga Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026,' Khanna, who has argued that his party was unwise to alienate Musk, told the outlet. However, leftwing politicians, including Vermont senator Bernie Sanders and New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have publicly pictured Musk as what voters should be against: powerful wealthy billionaires seeking influence through politics. Sanders told CNN's State of the Union Sunday that Musk had 'evolved' into an extremist since he voted for Obama in 2008. 'Over the years he has developed into a rightwing extremist. The issue and drama over what happened last week is that we are living, increasingly, in an oligarchic society. Musk said: 'Hey listen, I spent $270m dollars to get you elected. I bought you the presidency …' 'This is a fight between oligarchs. It's a fight about power among the few, and it's really an embarrassment for those of us who believe in democracy and the rule of law,' Sanders added. Musk said last month that he planned to spend 'a lot less' on political campaigns as he scaled back and ultimately exited his time in government, where Trump had tasked him with massively slashing federal spending and jobs. 'In terms of political spending I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk told a Bloomberg forum in Doha. Asked why, he responded: 'I think I've done enough.' But Musk's opposition to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful' bill budget proposal, calling it an 'disgusting abomination', by definition puts him in relative proximity to Democratic positions on that issue. Booker was asked if agreed with Musk about the planned legislation that Trump has made a centerpiece of his administration. 'I agree that it's going to saddle this country with trillions of dollars of debt, endanger our entire economy … This is a morally wrong bill. And it's definitely, definitely an economically wrong bill as well.' 'This is not about right or left, it's about right or wrong,' he added. 'And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on congresspeople and senators to not do this.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store