Qatar Urges a Gaza Ceasefire after a ‘Positive Response' from Hamas
The prospect of an expanded assault on Gaza City and other areas sheltering hundreds of thousands of civilians has sparked international outrage. Palestinians say there is nowhere to flee after 22 months of war that has already killed tens of thousands and destroyed much of the territory.
'They are talking about a 60-day truce, and after Israel gets its (hostages) they will strike us again,' said Huda Rishe, who has been displaced four times since the start of the war. 'We will return to Gaza City and then leave again. We have lost hope.'
AP reporters saw some families arriving in central Gaza after fleeing Gaza City.
Many Israelis, who rallied in the hundreds of thousands on Sunday, fear the offensive will further endanger the remaining hostages in Gaza. Just 20 of the 50 remaining are thought to be alive.
'If this (ceasefire) proposal fails, the crisis will exacerbate,' Majed al-Ansari, a spokesperson for Qatar's Foreign Ministry, told journalists, adding they have yet to hear from Israel on it.
US envoy is invited to rejoin the talks
Al-Ansari said Hamas had agreed to terms under discussion. He declined to provide details but said the proposal was 'almost identical' to one previously advanced by U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff.
That U.S. proposal was for a 60-day ceasefire, during which some of the remaining hostages would be released and the sides would negotiate a lasting ceasefire and the return of the rest.
'If we get to a deal, it shouldn't be expected that it would be instantaneously implemented,' al-Ansari said. 'We're not there yet.'
That cautious assessment came a day after the foreign minister of Egypt, the other Arab country mediating the talks, said they were were pushing for a phased deal and noted that Qatar's prime minister had joined the negotiations with Hamas.
Witkoff has been invited to rejoin the talks, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty told The Associated Press. Witkoff pulled out of negotiations less than a month ago, accusing Hamas of not acting in good faith. It was not clear how Witkoff has responded to the invitation.
Abdelatty held a series of phone calls Tuesday with foreign ministers from the United Kingdom, Turkey and the European Union, seeking to put pressure on Israel to accept the ceasefire proposal.
'The ball is now in Israel's court,' Abdelattay said in a statement.
An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks, said the government's position has not changed. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said he will pause the fighting to facilitate the release of hostages, but that the war will continue until all the hostages are returned and Hamas is defeated and disarmed.
34 Palestinians killed in Gaza
Hospitals in Gaza said they had received the bodies of 34 Palestinians killed Tuesday, including women and children, as Israeli strikes continued across the territory. Nasser Hospital said an airstrike killed a mother, father and three children in their tent overnight in Muwasi, a camp for hundreds of thousands of civilians.
'An entire family was gone in an instant. What was their fault?' the children's grandfather, Majed al-Mashwakhi, said, sobbing.
Israel's military did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the strikes.
Nasser Hospital said nine people were killed while seeking aid in areas where U.N. convoys have been overwhelmed by looters and desperate crowds, and where people have been shot and killed while heading to sites run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, an Israeli-backed American contractor.
Another two people were killed near a GHF site in central Gaza, according to Al-Awda Hospital. GHF said there were no violent incidents at any of its sites on Tuesday.
Witnesses, health officials and the U.N. human rights office say Israeli forces have killed hundreds of people seeking aid from GHF sites and U.N. convoys since Israel eased a 2 1/2 month blockade on Gaza in May. The military says it has only fired warning shots at people who approached its forces.
The overall Palestinian death toll in the war surpassed 62,000 on Monday, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals. The ministry does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants, but says women and children make up around half of them.
In addition to that toll, other Palestinians have died from malnutrition and starvation, including three reported in the past 24 hours, the ministry said Tuesday. It says 154 adults have died of malnutrition-related causes since late June, when it began counting such deaths, and 112 children have died of malnutrition-related causes since the war began.
Hamas-led militants started the war when they attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. Most of the hostages have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Hamas says it will only free the rest in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal.
Aid groups continue to struggle to deliver supplies to Gaza, where most of the population is displaced, large swaths are in ruins and experts say the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out.'
Israel imposed a full blockade in March, then allowed limited aid to resume two and a half months later. The Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, COGAT, said 370 trucks of aid entered Tuesday — still below the 600 per day that the United Nations and partners say is needed.
COGAT said Tuesday that 180 pallets of aid were airdropped into Gaza with help from countries including Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and France. The U.N. and partners have called airdrops expensive, inefficient and even dangerous for people on the ground.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
2 hours ago
- The Diplomat
New Zealand Is Trailing Its Allies Over Palestinian Statehood
It's been 10 days since Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced his government had begun to formally consider New Zealand's position on the recognition of a Palestinian state. That leaves less than three weeks until the United Nations General Assembly convenes on September 9, where it is expected several key allies will change position and recognize Palestinian statehood. Already part of the minority of U.N. member states that don't recognize a Palestinian state, New Zealand risks becoming more of an outlier if and when Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom make good on their recent pledges. Luxon has said the decision is 'complex,' but opposition parties certainly don't see it that way. Labor leader Chris Hipkins (and Luxon's predecessor as prime minister) says it's 'the right thing to do.' Greens co-leader Chloë Swarbrick has called on government MPs to 'grow a spine' (for which she was controversially ejected from the debating chamber). Former Labor prime minister Helen Clark has also criticized the government for trailing behind its allies, and for appearing to put trade relations with the United States ahead of taking a moral stand over Israel's actions in Gaza. Certainly, those critics – including the many around the country who marched over the weekend – are correct in implying New Zealand has missed several opportunities to show independent leadership on the issue. Since Palestine declared its independence in 1988, New Zealand has had the potential to recognize it as a state. There was a window of opportunity available in May last year when the Irish, Spanish, and Norwegian governments took the step. That month, New Zealand also joined 142 other states calling on the Security Council to admit Palestine as a full member of the United Nations. But in a subsequent statement, New Zealand said its vote should not be implied as recognizing Palestinian statehood, a position I called 'a kind of muddled, awkward fence-sitting.' It is still not too late, however, for New Zealand to take a lead. In particular, the government could make a more straightforward statement on Palestinian statehood than its close allies. The statements from Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom are filled with caveats, conditions and contingencies. None is a straightforward expression of solidarity with the Palestinian right of self-determination under international law. As such, they present political and legal problems New Zealand could avoid. Politically, this late wave of recognition by other countries risks becoming a distraction from the immediate starvation crisis in Gaza. As the Israeli journalist Gideon Levy and U.N. Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese have noted, these considered and careful diplomatic responses distract from the brutal truth on the ground. This was also Swarbrick's point during the snap debate in Parliament last week. Her private members bill, she noted, offers a more concrete alternative, by imposing sanctions and a trade embargo on Israel. (At present, it seems unlikely the government would support this.) Legally, the proposed recognitions of statehood are far from ideal because they place conditions on that recognition, including how a Palestinian state should be governed. The U.K. has made recognition conditional on Israel not agreeing to a ceasefire and continuing to block humanitarian aid into Gaza. That is extremely problematic, given recognition could presumably be withdrawn if Israel agreed to those demands. Such statements are not exercises in genuine solidarity with Palestinian self-determination, which is defined in U.N. Resolution 1514 (1960) as the right of peoples 'to freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.' Having taken more time to consider its position, New Zealand could now articulate a more genuine statement of recognition that fulfils the legal obligation to respect and promote self-determination under international law. A starting point would be to look beyond the small group of 'traditional allies' to countries such as Ireland that have already formally recognized the State of Palestine. Importantly, Ireland acknowledged Palestinian 'peaceful self-determination' (along with Israel's), but did not express any other conditions or caveats. New Zealand could also show leadership by joining with that wider group of allies to shape the coming General Assembly debate. The aim would be to shift the language from conditional recognition of Palestine toward a politically and legally more tenable position. That would also sit comfortably with the country's track record in other areas of international diplomacy – most notably the campaign to abolish nuclear weapons, where New Zealand has also taken a different approach to its traditional allies. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
The Mainichi
9 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Israel approves settlement project that could divide West Bank
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) -- Israel gave final approval for a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank that would effectively cut the territory in two, and that Palestinians and rights groups say could destroy plans for a future Palestinian state. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to U.S. pressure during previous administrations. On Wednesday, the project received final approval from the Planning and Building Committee after the last petitions against it were rejected on Aug. 6. If the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last Thursday. Smotrich cast the approval as a riposte to western countries that announced their plans to recognize a Palestinian state in recent weeks. "This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognize and no one to recognize," Smotrich told reporters. "Anyone in the world who tries today to recognize a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground." The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. The two cities are 22 kilometers (14 miles) apart by air, but Palestinians traveling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. Peace Now, an organization that tracks settlement expansion in the West Bank, called the E1 project "deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution" which is "guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed." Israel's plans to expand settlements are part of an increasingly difficult reality for Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as the world's attention focuses on the war in Gaza. There have been marked increases in attacks by settlers on Palestinians, evictions from Palestinian towns, and checkpoints that choke freedom of movement, as well as several Palestinian attacks on Israelis. More than 700,000 Israelis now live in the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, territories captured by Israel in 1967 and sought by the Palestinians for a future state. The international community overwhelmingly considers Israeli settlement construction in these areas to be illegal and an obstacle to peace. Israel's government is dominated by religious and ultranationalist politicians with close ties to the settlement movement. Smotrich, previously a firebrand settler leader and now finance minister, has been granted Cabinet-level authority over settlement policies and vowed to double the settler population in the West Bank. Israel has annexed east Jerusalem and claims it as part of its capital, which is not internationally recognized. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations. Israel withdrew from 21 settlements Gaza in 2005.
Asahi Shimbun
11 hours ago
- Asahi Shimbun
S. Korea picks top diplomats as ambassadors to Japan, U.S.
SEOUL—The South Korean government has reportedly selected seasoned diplomats Lee Hyuk and Kang Kyung-wha as the country's next ambassadors to Japan and the United States, respectively, according to local media. The appointments precede President Lee Jae-myung's planned visits to the two countries starting Aug. 23, prompting speculation that the choices were made with urgency to reinforce diplomatic efforts. Lee Hyuk, tapped for the Tokyo post, is a veteran diplomat with deep ties to Japan. He has previously served as minister at the South Korean Embassy in Tokyo, as well as ambassador to Vietnam and the Philippines. Within the Foreign Ministry, he held key roles, including serving as director of the regional bureau for Asia-Pacific and head of a division responsible for Northeast Asia. Known as one of South Korea's top 'Japan experts,' Lee's selection is widely seen as a move to bring stability to the often tense Tokyo-Seoul relationship. Named ambassador to the United States, Kang Kyung-wha served as foreign minister under the Moon Jae-in administration, a progressive government like the current one. She was involved in high-stakes diplomacy between Seoul and Washington during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term. The South Korean presidential office confirmed that ambassadorship nominations had been finalized but withheld the names, citing pending formal procedures.
