Hoosiers call for tighter pollution control for BP's Lake Michigan refinery permit
Growing up in Whiting, Calabro learned how to surf at the beach next to the refinery. He lives in Chicago now but still makes the 40-minute drive down to his old stomping grounds to hit the waves.
Calabro is among a large group of environmental advocates saying Indiana regulators are failing their duty to protect the water quality of Lake Michigan by ignoring pollutants coming from BP's refinery and letting the company release excess mercury into the lake.
Lake Michigan's ecosystems are threatened by the pollution coming from the refinery, the groups say, and the wildlife — including migratory birds and bald eagles nesting in the area — face toxic consequences.
The groups are now calling for the Indiana Department of Environmental Management to revise BP's application for its pollution discharge permit, known as an NPDES, which is renewed every five years.
BP is in the process of renewing its five-year permit and is waiting for IDEM to issue the final permit detailing the parameters for each pollutant the refinery discharges.
The company "is committed to safe and compliant operations at the Whiting Refinery and across our global operations," spokesperson Cesar Rodriquez wrote in an email to IndyStar. "We will continue working every day to keep this commitment and to ensure the refinery remains an important part of the Northwest Indiana economy for years to come."
Rob Michaels, a senior attorney with the Environmental Law & Policy Center and part of the cohort wanting changes to the permit, said IDEM is obligated to protect water quality — and Lake Michigan in particular — but there are numerous ways the current permit fails to meet that objective.
One of the biggest failures is the numerous pollutants IDEM should have previously limited in BP's discharges, Michaels said.
The list of these chemicals the groups claim IDEM has ignored is long, but some of the more worrying pollutants include PFAS, known as forever chemicals, and BTEX, which are a group of chemicals found in the oil and gas industry. Both are found to be harmful to human health. One of the BTEX pollutants, benzene, is known to cause anemia and an increased risk of cancer, according to the U.S. EPA.
Meg Parish, with the Environmental Integrity Project, said BTEX chemicals are 'really dangerous to people at very small levels.'
'EPA did a big study on oil refineries in 2019 and said these (chemicals) are something we should be concerned about and yet Indiana didn't even consider it,' Parish said. 'They ignored it completely.'
IDEM spokesperson Barry Sneed told IndyStar the department will provide full responses to concerns about BP's permit when a final decision is made.
'If any potential permitting discrepancies are raised during the public comment period, IDEM will thoroughly evaluate and address them before making a final decision,' Sneed wrote in an email to IndyStar.
One area of the permit the groups are adamant needs to be reevaluated is an exception to how much mercury BP is allowed to release.
IDEM has issued the company what is known as a streamlined mercury variance for the past 12 years. This variance allows BP to release more mercury than the established safe water quality standard for Lake Michigan. The exception allows BP to discharge about five times more mercury than normally allowed.
Susan Thomas, with Just Transition Northwest Indiana, called the mercury situation at BP 'egregious.'
'They've had years to remedy this situation, and they have not,' Thomas said. 'They have been given a pass all of these years by IDEM.'
The group's comment letter sent to IDEM says BP has had since 2012 to come into compliance with the mercury standards for Lake Michigan to protect the ecosystem and human health but has instead 'avoided installing the treatment needed …'
Calabro, the Lake Michigan surfer, is part of a group called SurfRider Foundation that helps protect coastal areas. Sarah Damron oversees many of the group's chapters in the Great Lakes.
Surfers are often the canaries in the coal mine when it comes to coastal water pollution since they're out in the water and exposed to the contaminants, Damron said. The mercury variance is also one of the surfing group's main concerns.
'To just continue to allow a variance as opposed to strengthening the requirements over time so they are able to meet the standards set by the state is not in the best interest of public health and wellbeing,' Damron said.
The outfalls where BP discharges its pollutants are close to the area where people like Calabro use the lake for recreation. People are fed up with the situation, Just Transition's Thomas said.
'How much more can the frontline communities take?' Thomas said. 'If you stand outside in Whiting, your throat can start to burn, your eyes tear up and you can get heart palpitations. These communities are called sacrifice zones are deserve extreme consideration.'
IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at karl.schneider@indystar.com. Follow him on BlueSky @karlstartswithk.bsky.social
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: BP refinery in Indiana needs stricter pollution control, Hoosiers say
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
10 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Energy lobby ramped up spending on lawmakers amid push for nuclear. It worked
The Indiana legislators ushering in a new era of nuclear power were showered with sports tickets and meals from the very utility companies that stood to benefit from the incentive-packed legislation, lobbying records show. IndyStar analyzed hundreds of lobbying disclosures from the most recent legislative session to map the influence of lobbyists on lawmakers. The documents revealed a dominant energy lobby that spent tens of thousands of dollars currying favor with legislators. Among those legislators were powerful utility committee chairmen Sen. Eric Koch, R-Bedford, and Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, who led the charge on legislation to incentivize small modular reactors. While proponents argued that the legislation would help Indiana transition from coal to nuclear and serve a looming future of unprecedented energy demand, critics point to an unfortunate reality: no SMR has been successfully completed in the U.S. yet, and attempts to do so have suffered delays and cost overruns in the billions. One bill that became law, Senate Enrolled Act 424, allows utilities to recover costs from ratepayers before even beginning a project. Consumer advocates told IndyStar they believed the legislation would raise rates for Hoosiers already paying record-high bills. 'And we wonder why nobody can pay their utility bills,' Kerwin Olson, executive director for Citizens Action Coalition, said. 'Because we have a complicit legislature and a complicit regulatory commission that gives the utilities everything they want, including legislation like this that was just passed.' The Indiana Energy Association and Indiana Michigan Power each spent more than any other group on gifts and private meals with lawmakers, according to disclosures filed with the Indiana Lobby Registration Commission covering the period containing the most recent legislative session. That doesn't include spending for events in which every lawmaker was invited or receptions. Both groups supported SMR-related legislation in committee meetings this year, testifying in support of House Enrolled Act 1007, Senate Enrolled Act 424 and SEA 425. They also each shelled out more than $18,000 on gifts and entertainment between Nov. 1, 2024 and April 30, 2025. In one case, just days after Indiana Michigan Power announced plans to turn its retired Rockport coal plant into an SMR, the company bought a meal for Soliday and six other lawmakers on the House's utilities committee, according to lobbying disclosures. While lobbying can help strengthen relationships with legislators, outright quid pro quos are not allowed, experts told IndyStar. Lobbyists can also serve as subject matter experts for lawmakers, making them a helpful tool when crafting legislation. "We are in a complex and dynamic environment that is driving public policy to respond to the significant growth in electric demand," Danielle McGrath, president of the Indiana Energy Association, told IndyStar in a statement over email. "If you look at the legislation this past session, it centers on ensuring Indiana keeps pace with either additional resources or new technology, and it does so with regulatory oversight and consumer protections." Indiana Michigan Power did not respond to an interview request to elaborate on its position and why the organization increased spending. Koch, who authored the bill among other pro-SMR efforts, and his wife received around $1,600 in dinner and drinks from utilities, including Centerpoint Energy, I&M, IPALCO Enterprises — the parent company for AES Indiana — and Duke Energy. The boon represents nearly half of the money lobbyists spent on gifts and entertainment for Koch this cycle. Soliday and his wife received nearly $900 worth of meals from energy lobbyists, the vast majority of the value of the gifts and entertainment he received from lobbyists. Neither responded to multiple IndyStar requests for an interview through spokespeople. Koch and Soliday were not the sole legislators to be courted by utilities. More than half of the 41 legislators listed as sponsors for House Bill 1007, which provides tax credits to Hoosier manufacturers working on SMR projects, received gifts or entertainment directly from utilities or the Indiana Energy Association. The same day the House approved that bill, Duke Energy paid for a $67 meal for Soliday. Duke Energy wasn't just purchasing meals. The company devoted $250,000 to compensate lawyers — the 3rd largest amount of any Indiana employer — in addition to the utility's spend on entertainment. Aaron Dusso, a political science professor at Indiana University Indianapolis, said while lobbying certainly buys influence, the lobbyist-legislator relationship usually begins on the campaign trail. And that was true for Duke Energy, which became a top donor for Koch's campaign shortly after his appointment as Senate Utility Committee chairman in 2020. Between 2021 and 2023, Duke Energy and its political action committee gave a combined $15,000 to the powerful state senator, according to campaign finance records. All of Koch's constituents are in Duke Energy's service territory, where some have criticized recent rate hikes. Still, it can be difficult for voters to connect dots buried in obscure reports and highly technical bill language. 'Our power bills might go up, we might be upset about that, but how are we going to know who did what and why?' Dusso said. 'That's just very difficult for the average voter to really ascertain.' Duke Energy, which directed questions to the Indiana Energy Association, has been eyeing SMR technology since long before this most recent session. The debate over how to update Indiana's grid without burdening ratepayers reached a boiling point Aug. 6, when Portage Mayor Austin Bonta said Soliday had sent him a threatening text in response to the mayor's statement about rate increases, which many residents had complained to him about. "I promise I will work hard to make certain your city never gets any revenue increases!!!" Soliday told Bonta over text, according to a screenshot shared by the mayor through Facebook. One of Indiana's first forays into nuclear power began in 1977 with the Marble Hill plant in Madison, Indiana. Public Service Indiana, a utility company that later became Duke, began construction on the project in hopes of producing cheaper energy. Though the company initially estimated the project would cost $1.4 billion, the projected cost ballooned to $7.1 billion in 1983. Inundated with protests and newfound hesitancy following the Three Mile Island accident in Pennsylvania, the company ceased construction a year later. To Olson, Marble Hill provides a glimpse at what SMRs could become without proper oversight, with ratepayers covering billions of dollars spent on abandoned projects. Olson also pointed to a more recent example of a failed nuclear project: an SMR endeavor in Idaho. Portland-based developer NuScale Power had expected to complete the project in a few years but announced its termination nearly a decade later in 2023. By then, the company had spent about $9 billion. The resurgence of nuclear, now packaged in a slightly different form, accompanies a projected surge in energy demand from data centers. An IndyStar investigation published in June found that the anticipated energy needs for just nine of these facilities account for more than half of Indiana utilities' electricity capacity in 2023. Those stark numbers, coupled with the closure of coal plants and stagnating renewables, had energy companies and lawmakers looking for an alternative. SMRs rose from the fray, boasting the ability to provide consistent power while also satisfying tech companies' carbon goals. Olson isn't convinced the deal is quite so sweet, though. 'It's all hyperbole,' Olson said. Recent studies have echoed these concerns, such as a 2024 analysis by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis that found SMRs are still too expensive, risky and slow to build to help the transition from fossil fuels. Senate Enrolled Act 424 allows utilities to recover up to 80% of project development costs for SMRs a category that includes everything from design to licensing and permitting to equipment, before even beginning construction. With approval from the IURC, the utility can then periodically adjust rates to recover costs for the project so long as they don't adjust the rate schedule more than once a year. The utility can recover the costs even if the project is cancelled under certain conditions, such as if the cancellation was made 'prudently' and 'for good cause.' For McGrath, SEA 424 is important because its cost recovery mechanisms help offset the high capital costs of building SMRs, she said. Consumers are protected, too, she wrote, because it requires IURC oversight. Olson, however, doesn't trust that the law will safeguard consumers, pointing to the vagueness inherent in the law's language charging the commission with evaluating a project's reasonableness. House Enrolled Act 1007 has similar language to SEA 424 but also gives tax credits to SMR manufacturers in Indiana and asks large load customers to reimburse 80% of the costs required to add them to the grid, which McGrath pointed to as an example of consumer protections baked into the slate of bills. Other laws passed by lawmakers this year related to SMRs are SEA 423, which works to incentivize developers to partner with Indiana utilities on SMR technology, and SEA 425, which helps speed up rezoning efforts for energy generation resources by reducing local government timelines on converting retired energy production zones to new generation facilities.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana school's recording ban is an assault on parents' rights
It's back-to-school season, and parents and kids around the country are prepping for the inevitable transition from summer fun to the fall grind. For one Indiana mom, the stakes are higher than normal. Nicole Graves has sued her school district, Whitley County Consolidated Schools in Columbia City, Indiana, in federal court with help from the Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. She alleges that her First and 14th Amendment rights were violated in a series of interactions with school administrators. All four of Graves' children still attend district schools, and she's rightly concerned – given how she's been treated – about potential retaliation from the administration. Here's what happened: According to the Goldwater Institute, in April 2024, Graves' seventh-grade daughter 'filmed her school bus driver walking up and down the aisle, smacking his belt against his hand with his pants falling and his underwear visible.' After that incident on her daughter's school bus, Graves set up a meeting with the school principal. She recorded the meeting because she wanted an accurate record of what transpired. When Graves wasn't satisfied with what the principal said, she posted the recording on social media. That angered school administrators, who contacted her via letter and told her she broke school policy by recording the meeting without permission. Even though Graves had been unaware of the policy, she was banned from school grounds and restricted in her communication with staff, unless she got written permission from the superintendent's office. While that absurd punishment has expired, the lawsuit seeks to overturn the ban on recording, which remains in place. 'This is not fun for me,' Graves told IndyStar. 'This is not something I ever thought I would have to fight for. But I am more than happy to stand up and fight and talk to who I need to talk to to get things to change because I think it's important for all the families in this school district.' Opinion: School choice wars miss the point. Data can't dictate our values. The complaint argues that the school's recording policy and the no-trespass and communication orders violate the First Amendment, 'which protects the right to record government officials in the performance of their duties.' Adam Shelton, the Goldwater staff attorney working with Graves, says these kinds of recordings fall squarely under the First Amendment. 'The First Amendment protects more than just speech, it also protects conduct that is inherently expressive and conduct that cannot be divorced from the speech creation process, like recording,' Shelton observed on X. 'This is especially true in situations involving parents and school officials.' While Democrats and teachers unions may think they know what's best for children, that's simply false. Parents do. This lawsuit also alleges that the school district violated Graves' constitutional right to direct her children's education. 'The orders also violate the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause, which protects the fundamental rights of parents to control and direct the education and upbringing of their children,' the complaint states. 'This right is the oldest right that the Supreme Court has recognized as one of the 'liberties' protected by the due process clause.' Hicks: Indiana's college crisis has nothing to do with woke campuses or high costs Graves' case reminded me of one I've written about before, regarding another Midwest mom who was shunned by her child's school district. Sandra Hernden of Michigan sued her school district in 2022 for violating her constitutional rights. She had complained to the school board about its COVID-19 policies in 2020, and board members responded by contacting her employer and then reporting her to the Biden administration's U.S. Department of Justice (remember how the DOJ went after parents as 'domestic terrorists'?). Hernden's case is ongoing. Steve Delie, an attorney with the Mackinac Center Legal Foundation that is representing Hernden, made oral arguments in June before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. 'Even if we assume there was no monetarily compensable injury, you're still talking about government officials taking advantage of their elected positions of power to silence opposition,' Delie told the court. 'That can't be the way society functions.' No, it can't. Kudos to these moms for their bravery and for standing up for parental rights everywhere.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana Republican congressman nominates President Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Indiana U.S. Rep. Marlin Stutzman, a Republican representing Northeast Indiana, has joined several world leaders and other federal lawmakers in calling for President Donald Trump to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Stutzman, who represents the 3rd Congressional District, on Aug. 19 penned a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee with U.S. Rep. Andy Ogles, a Republican from Tennessee, nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. The congressmen in the letter highlight what they cite as accomplishments from Trump's first term and the initial months of his second term this year, including the Aug. 15 summit in Alaska with Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Aug. 18 meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders. "His decisive leadership in securing landmark diplomatic agreements, deescalating global conflicts, and actively pursuing peaceful resolutions to some of the world's most entrenched disputes has led and continues to lead to a more peaceful world," Ogles and Stutzman write in the letter. The Nobel Peace Prize is expected to be announced in October, but world leaders have lined up this summer to recommend Trump for the award. The Pakistan government in June announced it would formally nominate Trump following a four-day conflict between India and Pakistan in May. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in July shared a letter with Trump, which he said he used to nominate the president for the award. In August, Cambodian Prime Minister said he nominated Trump for advocating for a ceasefire between the Cambodian and Thai armies. So did the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan after a "peace summit" with Trump on Aug. 8. Stutzman, in a statement to IndyStar called Trump the "president of peace." "There is no one on the planet more deserving of this year's Nobel Prize and multiple world leaders have recognized that," Stutzman said. USA TODAY contributed to this story. Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at
