
No evidence of fall in Covid rules compliance after Storey funeral, O'Neill says
Former Northern Ireland first minister Arlene Foster made the claim at the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday as it examined Stormont decisions made on test, trace and isolation.
The former DUP leader said there was a fall in compliance after Sinn Fein ministers, including Ms O'Neill, attended the large-scale funeral for the senior republican in west Belfast in June 2020, when there were restrictions on social gatherings.
'I don't think that we were slow to promote compliance because day after day at press conferences we were urging the public to comply,' Mrs Foster told the inquiry on Wednesday.
'There was a breakdown in compliance after the attendance of senior members of Sinn Fein at a high-ranking republican funeral at the end of June, which caused severe difficulties in Northern Ireland with compliance and adherence.'
She said that despite efforts made, including working with the PSNI and giving money to councils to employ Covid marshals, there was 'a difficulty which still hung over the Executive' around non-compliance because of the Storey funeral.
Asked about Mrs Foster's comments, Ms O'Neill told the inquiry: 'I think, unfortunately, I believe Arlene Foster raised that issue again today in the inquiry because the comments are politically motivated.
'I don't believe there is any evidence that suggests that actually is the case.'
Ms O'Neill apologised for having attended the funeral at the Covid inquiry in 2024.
Northern Ireland chief medical officer Michael McBride told the inquiry there was no evidence to support the claim that compliance dropped as a result of the Storey funeral.
'From a purely scientific and public health perspective, I'm not aware of any evidence that that's the case,' he said.
'I think the major driver of the increase in cases throughout that summer, into September, into October, were the relaxations in the non-pharmaceutical measures, which had been agreed by the Executive, that's what led to the increase in transmission.
'There was more mixing with more people coming together in a range of environments, and that led to an increase in the pandemic.'
Earlier on Wednesday, Mrs Foster said it was 'inhumane' that people had to die alone during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The former DUP leader said if she could change one thing from that period, it would be that families should have been allowed to make their own informed decisions on being with their dying loved ones.
Asked about whether black, Asian and minority ethnic groups suffered as a result of pre-existing inequalities, Mrs Foster said this was true 'of a number of different groups'.
'Young people, for example, were denied chances in life that they would have otherwise had,' she said.
'Those living alone were isolated and lonely, people who were dying alone in hospital and if I could change one thing, my lady, it would be that.
'We should have given families all of the information, told them about the risks, and allowed them to make the decisions as to whether they wanted to be with their loved ones as they were dying.
'Because I think it is quite inhumane, when one thinks about it, to allow someone to die alone in the way that so many people did.'
Mrs Foster and Ms O'Neill were also asked about the decision to pause contact tracing on March 12 2020.
It was reintroduced as a pilot on April 27 and introduced fully on May 18.
Mrs Foster said the decision was made after a Cobra meeting on March 12, at which she, Ms O'Neill, and then Health Minister Robin Swann had little opportunity to engage and were 'in receive mode'.
Both Mrs Foster and Ms O'Neill said they did not take it from the Cobra meeting that contact tracing was to stop.
Mrs Foster said: 'I didn't have the understanding after that Cobra meeting, clearly wrongly now, that we were going to stop contact tracing as a consequence of the discussions at that Cobra meeting. The Department of Health clearly did have that understanding and stopped the contact tracing.'
Mr McBride said it was 'clear' to him that a decision was made to stop contact tracing at the Cobra meeting.
Asked by the inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett whether Mrs Foster and Ms O'Neill 'didn't understand that was what the decision was', he said: 'I thought it was clear and it was clearly reflected in the minutes of the Cobra meeting.'
Mr McBride told the inquiry that testing capacity issues were behind the decision to stop community testing and that the ending of contact tracing was a 'second order' as a result.
He said: 'Even a week after March 12, we had less than 200 tests available to us in Northern Ireland on a daily basis, and even that was limited because of the lack of reagents that we had and swabs that we had because of global supply issues.'
Mr McBride said if they had more tests and testing capacity, they would have continued community testing and contact tracing for longer.
Mrs Foster said that test and trace was not initially seen as a 'significant' issue that warranted an Executive decision.
She said in hindsight it 'probably should have come to the Executive' but also added it 'probably would have made it slower'.
'I know that there was a very real concern at that time that the amount of work officials were being asked to do was quite significant, and I'm not suggesting that it didn't come to the Executive for this reason but it would have certainly slowed decision-making down at that time,' she said.
Ms O'Neill said she had raised concerns about ending contact tracing in March, as it went against the advice of the World Health Organisation (WHO).
Notes by Ms O'Neill, who was then the deputy First Minister, were read out from a meeting on March 16 where she wrote 'GB approach nightmare compared to rest of world'.
She told the inquiry it was 'absolutely' a decision by the Department of Health to stop contact tracing in mid-March and that she believed it 'wasn't the right approach'.
Ms O'Neill was asked by Baroness Hallett whether she was not listened to because of deep political divides in Northern Ireland.
'The fact that we live on an island, the fact that we were one single epidemiological unit, that wasn't factored into decision-making.
'That's not a political point, that's just a logical point. I didn't feel like that was being taken on board.
'I think perhaps that, at times, could be seen as I wanted to follow everything in the south. I didn't. I wanted to follow everything that worked, and I didn't mind where it came from, as long as it worked for the people that we represented.'
Also appearing before the inquiry was former health minister Robin Swann, who said he remembers being challenged on the decision to end contact tracing in March 2020, but not being told to change course.
He said the first minister and deputy first minister have the power to call any decision made by a minister to the Executive 'for a different approach to be taken'.
'My reading, my understanding of that conversation and their statements is that none of them thought we had taken that step too early,' Mr Swann said of ending contact tracing in mid-March 2020.
'In regards to the comments 'test, test, test', I think (it) was an easy soundbite because it didn't match actually our capacity in regards to the tests that we had.'
He added: 'There was challenge, there was questioning, there was robust debate around the direction we were taking, but there was no direction from the Executive, first or deputy first minister, actually to change course.
'That approach for saying 'test, test, test', just because you say it doesn't mean to say tests will miraculously appear, reagents will appear, swabs will appear, or the machines that were necessary across the labs would suddenly materialise.'
Asked about Hazel Gray, whose mother and father died of Covid and who had contacted Mr Swann in 2020, he expressed his sympathies with the family.
Mr Swann said: 'If I had had the ability to test everyone regularly when they wanted it, as they required it, I can assure you, my lady, and this inquiry and the members that I would have been doing that from the very beginning.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
19 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Gerry Adams to donate 100,000 euros to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing 'arrogance' when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: 'As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. 'These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast.' He added: 'When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. 'They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. 'The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. 'They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. 'Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. 'They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. 'In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. 'On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson.' He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. 'They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? 'Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. 'In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. 'Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid.' Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying 'slan agus tog go bog e', which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.


South Wales Guardian
38 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Gerry Adams to donate 100,000 euros to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing 'arrogance' when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: 'As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. 'These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast.' He added: 'When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. 'They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. 'The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. 'They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. 'Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. 'They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. 'In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. 'On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson.' He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. 'They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? 'Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. 'In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. 'Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid.' Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying 'slan agus tog go bog e', which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Gerry Adams to donate 100,000 euros to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams said he will donate the 100,000 euros (£84,000) he is to receive in damages from the BBC to charities that help children in Gaza, the homeless in Ireland and Irish language groups. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him 100,000 euros (£84,000) after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Fein YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing 'arrogance' when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: 'As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. 'These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast.' He added: 'When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. 'They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. 'The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. 'They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. 'Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. 'They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. 'In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. 'On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson.' He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. 'They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? 'Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. 'In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. 'Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid.' Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying 'slan agus tog go bog e', which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages (50,000 euros or £42,000) and 250,000 euros (£210,000) towards solicitors' fees.