'This Isn't Jurassic Park' New Doc Explores the Science Behind the 'De-Extinction' of Dire Wolves and Other Animals
A new documentary plans to reveal the scientific breakthroughs that made this "de-extinction" possible. De-Extinction premieres July 17 on Curiosity Stream, and PEOPLE has a first look at the trailer for the upcoming project.
The trailer for the documentary opens with a discussion of the "biodiversity problem" facing the Earth — the threat of half the world's species going extinct by 2050.
Some experts who spoke with De-Extinction believe the way to combat this potential crisis is to "dig into the past and bring some of these really important species back."
Colossal Biosciences is pursuing this plan, having already revived the dire wolf using grey wolf DNA, and is working on projects to bring back the giant moa bird and other extinct animals. In the trailer, the woolly mammoth and Tasmanian tiger are also mentioned as candidates for "de-extinction."
The documentary promises to do more than talk about animals from the past. According to De-Extinction, the film aims to show how scientists are bringing back bygone species, and discuss the ethical dilemmas emerging from the advancement of this new field.
"This isn't Jurassic Park. It's real science and real stakes, which can be much messier than people think." John Cavanagh, the doc's executive producer, teased in a statement with PEOPLE.
"This is an incredible breakthrough. Genetic research has let us understand evolution like never before. De-extinction captures the potential of this moment, showing how radical science could shape the future of life on Earth. But it's also a sobering look at what's at stake," he added.
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
De-Extinction will take viewers to labs around the world, where researchers are working on a variety of groundbreaking projects that they consider key to protecting the planet's biodiversity.
To learn more about the science that seems straight out of science fiction, tune into De-Extinction available on Curiosity Stream starting July 17.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![‘A Body To Live In' Review – The Body Conforms, Consents, Bends [Frameline 2025]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.geekvibesnation.com%2Fwp-media-folder-geek-vibes-nation%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F07%2FA-Body-To-Live-In-Still.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![‘A Body To Live In' Review – The Body Conforms, Consents, Bends [Frameline 2025]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.geekvibesnation.com%2Fwp-media-folder-geek-vibes-nation%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F07%2FGVN_Logo-Mark_Transparent-copy.png&w=48&q=75){kind=logo}
Geek Vibes Nation
an hour ago
- Geek Vibes Nation
‘A Body To Live In' Review – The Body Conforms, Consents, Bends [Frameline 2025]
What is a body? One can't help but wonder about the dimensions of the human body; what it can handle. How hard it is to exist with that meat suit without getting judged or attacked just for the ownership of it. In his bold and very provocative documentary A Body To Live In, director Angelo Madsen shares the portrait of a controversial man, BDSM performance art icon Fakir Musafar, through his own words. BDSM culture is still taboo to this day and age, even as fetish is becoming more normalized and mainstream through some recent flicks like Babygirl and the upcoming Pillion, it is still as far from popular culture as one would expect. With this documentary, the provocateur and provocatee become one—us—while watching the world of Musafar unravel before our eyes, caught between awe and disbelief. Musafar's voice, recorded pre-mortem by Patrick McCullay, another BDSM artist, extends throughout the film to expose viewers to his intricate and fearless nature world. Through Musafar, concepts like gender fluidity, nonconformity, body experimentation, and modification take on a whole new meaning. The body becomes more than a concept or a physical existence. It's something that could be bent, molded, given, or taken. Musafar bravely uses his body as the tapestry required to create the art piece, and through Madsen's careful collage of archival material showcasing the man himself in all his performance glory, the documentary becomes a body breathing life with its content, heartaches, and fragility. Through becoming his own voyeur, Musafar, in his phantom presence, invites viewers to spy on him, but it's a mutually voyeuristic bargain between voyeur and the subject of voyeurism, the kind that would make French film directors proud. The archival still life tableaus are liberating, provocative, sexy, and unimaginable. They are not simply an expression of pain tolerance as normally seen through BDSM culture, but more of a catalogue of seeking intimacy and arousal through self-bondage under the extremity of pain-seeking-pleasure. It elevates an excruciating art form into a beautiful, hypersensitive vehicle for Musafar's philosophy and his erotic-mystical beliefs. Instead of soul searchers a la Paulo Coelho style, Fakir Musafar is more of a body explorer, a searcher into the art of consenting sadism and masochism. Instead of an exploitative show of bodies in extremity gear and sexual positions, Musafar's photos are more of a display of extraordinary people whose treatment of their bodies veers into the kinky and the extreme. Madsen's documentary also highlights other individuals in his subject's life: his wife, friends, and some of his subjects. It pulls no punches in showing people's reactions to Musafar's extreme experiments, and their out-of-the-box reactions to having their body handled in a way that is mindblowing to the inexperienced viewer's mind. Madsen also plays with the minimal, synthetic, stringy sound of the score. He creates an image that provokes but also creates a wave of multiples; the still-life tableaus take on a life of their own that is by no means 'still' or stagnant. It defies categorization as much as his central figure, the main subject of this mesmerizing and thought-provoking documentary. A Body To Live In startles but doesn't plunge its way through the consciousness with a morbid exposure to hardcore material that forces the viewer to cringe. It's a sensitive portrayal of a tough subject matter to swallow. But it's art, and it's beautiful to immerse in while admiring the bravery and courageous existence of Musafar, whose trials and errors with his body create a masterclass in bodily liberty and self-expression. A Body To Live In held its West Coast Premiere as a part of the Documentary Features section of the 2025 Frameline Festival. Director: Angelo Madsen Rated: NR Runtime: 98m
Geek Tyrant
an hour ago
- Geek Tyrant
THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Teaser Trailer Confirms Galactus' Evil Plan — GeekTyrant
The Fantastic Four: First Steps will introduce Marvel's First Family into the MCU's main timeline. It also brings in the cosmic heavyweight Galactus to the party! But the big question on everyone's mind is, why this version of Earth? Why now? Well, a new teaser just revealed the reason, and it confirms a rumor that has been making the round. it turns out Galactus set his sights on Earth not because it's ripe for destruction, but because of Reed Richards and Sue Storm's child, Franklin Richards. In the teaser, the team brought before Galactus by the Silver Surfer. It goes on to reveal the villain's massive frame, but he's hidden in shadow for most of this scene before he arrives on Earth and fully steps out of the shadows. The footage also shows Reed Richards telling the press that in exchange for the Earth, Galactus asked for their son Franklin. Mr. Fantastic told them that is too high a price, something the planet's citizens understandably feel differently about. If you're unfamiliar with Franklin Richards, he's absurdly powerful. He was Introduced in Fantastic Four Annual #6 in 1968, and is a reality-warping, universe-spawning, omega-level mutant who, at full potential, could rival cosmic beings like Eternity. Galactus onbviously sees Franklin as a potential never-ending food source. Franklin's ability to create pocket universes and new worlds essentially makes him Galactus' version of a personal chef. And Galactus is hungry. Before Galactus was Galactus, he was Galan, a survivor of the universe that existed before the current one. After merging with the Sentience of the Universe, he reemerged post-Big Bang as a being of insatiable hunger, one who requires the energy of entire planets to survive. In the comics, he's not evil, he's elemental and necessary, Aand when he sends his heralds like Silver Surfer or Shalla-Bal to scout planets, it's not personal. It's survival. The MCU's Fantastic Four is shaping up to be a story about parenthood, power, and survival on a galactic scale. It'll be interesting to see how Galactus' story arc ends up playing out and if he actually ends wiping out this 1960s-inspired Earth, causing the Fantastic Four to jump realities into Earth-616 setting up Avengers: Doomsday in 2026. The Fantastic Four: First Steps hits theaters July 25, 2025.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Debunking The '54-Year Life Expectancy' Claim For Autistic People
Autistic people deserve better than a headline. Yet a widely circulated claim that autistic ... More individuals have an average life expectancy of just 54 years continues to echo across media outlets, high-impact journals, and even federal policy reports. Autistic people deserve better than a headline. Yet a widely circulated claim that autistic individuals have an average life expectancy of just 54 years continues to echo across media outlets, high-impact journals, and even federal policy reports. The source? A 2016 study by Hirvikoski et al. has been grossly misinterpreted and misapplied in both academic and public discourse. The reality is far more nuanced, and perpetuating this statistic is not only misleading but also harmful. According to Andy Shih, Chief Science Officer at Autism Speaks, "Data from credible previous studies suggests a shorter average life expectancy for autistic adults when compared to their peers of about 17 years. However, taking the limitations of those studies into account, we cannot say that this finding is generalizable across the world." What the Original Study Actually Said About Autistic People The Hirvikoski study did not find that all autistic people die at 54. In fact, fewer than 3% of the autistic cohort died during the study period, which renders it methodologically incorrect to extrapolate a mean age of death from such a small subset. "In the 2016 study by Hirvikoski, the authors extrapolated a mean age of death from a small subset," said Kimberly Idoko, MD, Esq., a board-certified neurologist and certified coach. "That's statistically inappropriate, and it creates a distorted picture that doesn't reflect the true life expectancy of autistic people." Gemma Williams, an academic researcher in the UK, echoed this sentiment. "Only around 3% of the autistic cohort died during the study, but only 0.91% of the non-autistic cohort died. We're still unclear on the percentage of autistic people in the wider population, but what's clear is that autistic people were more likely to have died from almost all types of medical conditions." Recent studies, such as this 2023 Lancet Regional Health study, provide a more accurate representation of the disparity, showing a life expectancy gap between autistic and non-autistic adults that is significant but not as extreme as the 54-year claim. The Real Consequences of Autistic Misrepresentation In a recent open-access study published in JAMA Network Open, researchers Lauren Bishop and Brittany ... More N. Hand analyzed the citations of the Hirvikoski study. Over 70% of citing authors misrepresented their findings. In a recent open-access study published in JAMA Network Open, researchers Dr. Lauren Bishop and Dr. Brittany N. Hand analyzed the citations of the Hirvikoski study. Over 70% of citing authors misrepresented their findings. "We expected to find that a sizable minority of articles misrepresented Hirvikoski et al's findings based on our anecdotal experiences as readers, reviewers, and editors," said Dr. Hand. "However, we were surprised to see how widespread these misrepresentations really were." This misinformation has not been contained within academia. "These misrepresentations have been perpetuated in really high-impact publications and news media," Hand explained. "They even appeared in reports to the U.S. Congress by the Department of Health and Human Services and a continuing education article from the CDC." The implications are vast. "Misrepresenting mortality statistics for autistic people can cause psychological distress for autistic individuals and their families," Hand added. "Our autistic adult advisory board frequently raises concerns about this narrative." This misinformation can also lead to insurance denials, distorted retirement planning, and worsened stigma. In her social work course, Dr. Bishop teaches this exact topic and notes that "most of my bachelor's- and master' s-level social work students make the very same interpretation mistakes that the citing authors in our study make." This isn't just about numbers; it's about how we shape perceptions and policies. Overshadowing Urgent Health Priorities This misplaced focus on a singular, misleading statistic diverts attention from the actual causes of health disparities. "Perhaps in part because of the misrepresentation of Hirvikoski et al.'s suicide findings," Bishop noted, "autism researchers have increasingly focused on suicide and suicidality instead of studying more prevalent causes of mortality, such as cardiovascular disease." Ms. Williams points out that in the UK, autistic individuals face significant healthcare barriers, including sensory challenges and communication issues that often prevent them from accessing timely care. "Many autistic people don't get past primary care with problems that quickly escalate," she said. "Add to that background stigma and reduced opportunities to participate in school, work, and social lives, and it paints a bleak picture." Shih agrees that more inclusive, long-term studies are needed. "Conducting studies like that led by Hirvikoski across every country would give us a more generalizable understanding of autism and aging," he said. "This would point to solutions and opportunities for improvement in these communities." A More Responsible Narrative For Autistic People So, how can we improve? First, by recognizing the responsibilities of researchers, reviewers, and editors. "Authors have a responsibility not to oversensationalize the titles of their research articles to the point of inaccuracy," said Dr. Hand. "Reviewers and editors must check for this." The term "premature mortality," used in the title of the Hirvikoski paper, is especially problematic. "There is not sufficient evidence from Hirvikoski et al., 2016 to support the idea that, at a population level, autistic people die prematurely," said Hand. Even researchers like Bishop and Hand have begun re-evaluating their own language use. "Now that we know better, we want to do better and start a conversation about it," Hand said. Dr. Bishop encourages a shift in focus: "Lots of autistic people age well and live long, healthy lives. Health and aging outcomes among autistic people are incredibly heterogeneous. We can do a lot at the individual, family, community, and systems levels to support folks to age and live well." Partnering with autistic people in the research process is also essential. "We need more information about autistic people's goals and priorities around aging," Hand emphasized. Bishop added that it's time to stop framing aging in autism as solely a problem. "Let's move toward studying healthy aging," she said. What Comes Next Shih emphasized that this is a global challenge: "Long-term, longitudinal studies are especially ... More critical to track autistic individuals across their lifespans. These must be fully inclusive, reflecting the full diversity of the autistic community." Studies of aging in autism are still in their infancy. "Many autism researchers refer to 'aging' autistic populations as those aging into adulthood or middle age," Hand said. "The narrative needs to expand to include aging into and through older adulthood." Bishop identified several critical, under-discussed issues: "Diagnosis in older adulthood, dementia, cardiovascular disease, reproductive health, and accommodating autistic older adults within the healthcare system all need more attention." Shih emphasized that this is a global challenge: "Long-term, longitudinal studies are especially critical to track autistic individuals across their lifespans. These must be fully inclusive, reflecting the full diversity of the autistic community." The myth of the 54-year life expectancy for autistic people has persisted long enough. "It's more important to reckon with reality than let small numbers in one study steer public thinking," said Williams. Responsible communication isn't just good science, it's good humanity.
