
Aidan Chambers obituary
Aidan Chambers, who has died aged 90, became a writer because he could find no suitable fiction for his students to enjoy. The teenaged pupils at the co-ed secondary modern where he taught in the mid-1960s specified their requirements in terms of length (short) and subject matter (not fantasy, not history). They wanted to see their lives reflected on the page. Chambers's first two novels, Cycle Smash (1967) and Marle (1968), were the result, written alongside a clutch of plays for performance in schools. In writing them, Chambers identified an audience and a voice his readers would respond to, and he became a pioneer of young adult fiction.
His reputation rests on six 'youth novels' (Chambers's preferred term), which he referred to as the 'Dance' sequence – 'a dance of stories and of characters, a dance of incidents and ideas and experience … a dance of words, of language'. Beginning with Breaktime (1978), these differed from his earlier work in that they were not written with reluctant teen readers in mind. By then several years out of the classroom, and having lost touch with young teens, Chambers had evolved a mantra: 'Do not write for anyone, any particular readership, but focus on the text itself – on making the book, and allowing it to become what it wants to be.'
The novels grappled with essential adolescent obsessions such as love, sexuality, identity and mortality. They also embraced Chambers's preference for short chapters and a filmic narrative, which meant that some scenes resembled a play script. Unsurprisingly, most of the books have been adapted successfully for the stage, and Chambers was pleased with François Ozon's interpretation of Dance on My Grave (1982) as the film Summer of 85 (2020). Readers passionately engaged with the characters, and academics pored over the technique.
Born in Chester-le-Street, County Durham, Aidan was the only child of George Chambers, a funeral director, and Margaret (nee Hancock). He grew up in a house with few books, and learned to read fluently only at the age of nine. Even then, his preference was for films. At 13, the family having moved to Darlington, he was enrolled at Queen Elizabeth I grammar school. He credited Jim Osborn, the school's head of English, with changing his life.
Osborn nurtured and broadened Chambers's experience of theatre to include acting and public speaking. He encouraged his student to read widely and build a personal library. Most significantly, perhaps, he informed Chambers that he would become a teacher himself.
Teacher training followed national service with the Royal Navy, and in 1957, Chambers was appointed to Westcliff high school for boys, a grammar school in Southend-on-Sea, where he taught English and drama. Encouraged in the Christian faith through a teaching colleague, he was confirmed as a Christian and became a monk in a revolutionary new monastery in Stroud, Gloucestershire, with an emphasis on practical service to the community. He then took on another teaching post, and it was during his seven years at Archway secondary modern in Stroud that he wrote his first books.
His faith foundered as his commitment to writing soared, and he resigned in 1968. Shortly afterwards, he met Nancy Lockwood, a magazine editor, who had relocated from the US, and they married later that year. They immediately sparked up a conversation about books, reading and living, that sustained them throughout their long, rewarding marriage. Together they established Thimble Press, which, between 1969 and 2003, produced 100 issues of the children's literature journal Signal, as well as other critical publications in the field.
Chambers established Topliners, a landmark fiction series, for Macmillan Education, unusually for the time published straight into paperback, and providing accessible, engaging stories for teenage readers, of the kind Chambers had written himself.
He became sought after as a reviewer in print and on television and radio, and a speaker at conferences attended by librarians and teachers. He tutored at tertiary level, and was an influential visiting lecturer at Westminster College, Oxford, at that time a teacher training institute. His handbooks, essays and talks formed a second major strand to his literary output.
Reading was at the heart of his life's work. 'In our culture,' he wrote in The Age Between: Personal Reflections on Youth Fiction (2020), 'language is shaped as much by what is written as by what is said. When you write, and therefore also when you read, you can think in a different way than when you talk. Writing and reading are also forms of communication that transcend time and distance.'
He did not regard reading as merely a pastime; what compelled him was an active engagement on the reader's part, a process of 'talking themselves into being', guided and assisted by the writer. Influenced by writers and theorists such as Barthes, Flaubert and Sartre, he saw the reader/writer relationship as a 'mutually respectful companionship'.
The importance of the teacher's role in helping students to become discriminating readers had been instilled in him by Osborn and he pursued that end in the classroom and beyond. His experiences led to landmark books that related his experiences and offered techniques for developing meaningful conversations about literature between young people and adults. These included The Reluctant Reader (1969) and Booktalk: Occasional Writing on Literature and Children (1985).
The fifth book in the Dance sequence, Postcards from No Man's Land, won the Carnegie medal in 1999, and the final novel, This Is All, was published in 2005. Chambers's fiction was acknowledged particularly in the Netherlands and US, where he won several literary awards. His contribution to children's literature was recognised by the International Board on Books for Young People in 2002 with the biennial Hans Christian Andersen award.
He worked frequently in Australia, where, in the early 1990s, he and a Perth-based bookseller established a short-lived Anglo-Australian imprint, Turton & Chambers, which specialised in translations of European children's books into English, and some original English-language books.
Although private, and in some ways a loner, he engaged with colleagues and friends throughout the world who shared his staunch defence of the integrity of 'youth fiction' as a literature worth studying and preserving in its own right, with its own poetics and aesthetics. This was against a sense that young adult fiction so rigidly reflected the angst of the era it reflected that it became outdated rapidly and deserved to be discarded.
I was fortunate to have encountered Aidan in my teens – as a fan – and remain indebted to his ongoing influence and encouragement.
Of Chambers's other books, The Present Takers (1983) stands out as an enduring, outstanding novel for upper primary-level readers about the nature of responsibility and control. His final book was a privately published youth novel, Today I Did Nothing (2023).
He is survived by Nancy, with whom he was awarded the Eleanor Farjeon award for outstanding services to children's literature in 1982.
Aidan Chambers, teacher and writer, born 27 December 1934; died 11 May 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle wanted to change surname to Spencer 'amid fears Charles was delaying Archie and Lilibet's passports because the application included HRH titles'
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle feared Archie and Lilibet's British passports were being held up at the behest of their grandfather the King over the use of their HRH titles, it was claimed today. The Sussexes are said to have become 'exasperated' about waiting months for their children's passports to arrive and believed it was being 'blocked' due to the use of their royal titles. The couple thought the application would take weeks and suspected it was because they wanted HRH on Archie and Lilibet's British travel documents. They then began exploring changing their surname to Spencer - a nod to Princess Diana, as revealed by The Mail on Sunday. 'The King hadn't wanted Archie and Lili to carry the titles, most of all the HRH, and the British passports, once created, would be the first and perhaps the only legal proof of their names', a source close to Harry and Meghan reportedly told The Guardian. 'There was clear reluctance to issue passports for the kids'. The insider has claimed that Harry wanted Archie and Lilibet, whose fourth birthday yesterday was marked with a video of her mother and father twerking before her birth, to have HRH titles so when they are adults they retain the chance to become working royals, should they wish. However, Buckingham Palace has pushed back on the claims the King or any of his staff intervened. When asked if there was any objection from Charles or aides to the passports being issued with the HRH titles, a spokesman said: 'No' but declined to comment further. Buckingham Palace denied that the King or any of his aides had anything to do with the delays in issuing their passports A gift basket and HRH note sent to Meghan's friend, CEO of IT Cosmetics Jamie Kern Lima. Meghan's spokesman last month denied that has been using it for commercial gain On their birth certificates, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. But according to reports their applications used the surname Sussex, not Mountbatten-Windsor, which Archie had on his previous US and British passports. The average wait for a UK passport is currently around three weeks. But apparently Harry and Meghan cancelled their initial standard applications after three months and reapplied using the UK Government's 24-hour passport service. But then their online meeting to fasttrack the applications was eventually cancelled at the 11th hour owing to a 'systems failure.' The Guardian's source claimed that Harry and Meghan feared officials in the UK were 'dragging their feet' because Archie and Lilibet's passport applications included the titles HRH. The insider added: 'Harry was at a point where British passports for his children with their updated Sussex surnames (since the death of Queen Elizabeth II) were being blocked with a string of excuses over the course of five months. 'Out of sheer exasperation he went to his uncle to effectively say: 'My family are supposed to have the same name and they're stopping that from happening because the kids are legally HRH, so if push comes to shove, if this blows up and they won't let the kids be called Sussex, then can we use Spencer as a surname?'.' The couple then reportedly asked their lawyers to write to the HM Passport Office threatening to pursue a data subject access request relating to Archie and Lilibet's applications. Days later the two passports were reportedly issued with HRH titles and Sussex as the new surname. A spokesman for Harry and Meghan said: 'We do not comment on private issues pertaining to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex 's children.' The Home Office declined to comment. Meghan Markle posted a video of her and Prince Harry twerking in a hospital room before Lilibet's birth to mark her fourth birthday yesterday The Sussexes' use of HRH has proved highly controversial because the couple are said to have reassured the Queen that they would not use the title after they emigrated to the US. But then MailOnline revealed last month that Meghan Markle calls herself Her Royal Highness to friends - but has denied that in doing so she is flouting the Megxit deal agreed with the late monarch. The former actress, 43, sparked controversy after her friend Jamie Kern Lima shared a picture of a food hamper with a note that said it was 'With the compliments of HRH The Duchess of Sussex'. Although no laws were passed or documents signed to prevent their use, Harry and Meghan's agreement with the late Queen and senior officials was that they would stop using the word 'Royal' and their HRH titles after they quit duties and emigrated to the US to become 'financially independent' from the Crown. A spokesman for the Sussexes insisted that they do not use HRH titles for commercial purposes. A source close to the royal couple suggested that the image shared by Jamie Kern Lima was taken before the Duchess launched her As Ever brand in early March. In the podcast, Jamie Kern Lima claimed that she had been sent the jam last year. The Sussexes have never had their HRH taken away by Queen Elizabeth II or King Charles. The source close to the couple said that while Meghan and Harry do not publicly use 'HRH ', their titles remain. Last weekend The Mail on Sunday revealed how Prince Harry sought advice from Princess Diana 's brother about changing his family name to Spencer. Sources told Richard Eden that the Duke of Sussex actively explored ways to assume his mother's surname – a move that would have involved ditching Mountbatten-Windsor, used by his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. It is understood he discussed the issue with Earl Spencer – whose family seat is Althorp in Northamptonshire – during a rare visit to Britain, but was told that the legal hurdles were insurmountable. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step,' said a friend of Harry. Nevertheless, the fact that he consulted the Earl over the issue – a proposal that would dismay his brother and father – is a vivid expression of the toxic rift with his family. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. It combines the Royal Family 's name of Windsor and the Duke of Edinburgh 's adopted surname. Royal author Tom Bower has claimed that 'Meghan decided her real object in life was to be Diana'. If the name change had succeeded, Meghan's daughter, who is believed to have met the King only once, would have become Lilibet Diana Spencer, a more fulsome tribute to Harry's late mother. The move would be particularly hurtful to King Charles, who cherishes the Mountbatten name just as his father did.


The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
I'm the voice of Sainsbury's self checkouts – everyone asks if I get paid per time the tills are used, here's the truth
HAVE you ever wondered who the voice at supermarkets' self checkouts belongs to? Well, in Sainsbury's, the job is held by Alison - who regularly shares updates about her job as a voiceover artist on her social media pages. 3 3 And in a new TikTok, Alison revealed one of the questions she's asked all the time is how much she gets paid for the honour - with people asking if she gets a set payment every time the till is used. "I wish, absolutely not!" she laughed. Instead, she got paid a set rate for every day she worked on the job. "For that particular job I did two days of records and then three extra days of re-record," she explained. "So five days in total. "So five days' worth of work which is a separate fee per day and then also a buyout fee depending on how long they want to use it." Alison also revealed her five-year contract states that her voice - which she recorded in July 2023 - will be used up until July 2028. "Must be SOOO trippy when you're at self checkout yourself and hear your own voice!" one person commented on the video. "So interesting!" another said. "I'm actually a Sainsbury's shopper, so I can now put a face to voice!" I quit my job to be mad mountain-dwelling inventor… from a floating BBQ desk to off-road bed tank, these are my wackiest "I would go to Sainsbury's daily if I were her to troll the customers," another laughed. "I'm so sorry but i'm pretty sure I've told u to shut up before," a third joked. "The amount of times I've shouted at u for shouting at me is unreal," someone else said. "Sorry for anything I have ever said to you at the self checkout!" another giggled. "Do you ever not pay for your shopping and then just say 'payment accepted' and then walk off with a trolley?" someone else hilariously asked. With Alison replying: "Hahahah no but maybe I'll try that next time!" "If I was your I would have so much fun I'd stand next to the self checkouts and say stuff just to mess with people," another admitted.


The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Football transfer rumours: Arsenal and Liverpool to battle for Sesko's signature?
With the distraction of actual football finally over, the football fans among us are finally able to focus on what this is all really about: whether James Trafford will leave Burnley for Newcastle. The 22-year-old burst on to the scene when leaving Manchester City as the third most-expensive British goalkeeper in history, despite never having played in the Championship, never mind the Premier League. Newcastle tried to buy him last summer, but in true football is the winner style, instead sold Elliot Anderson to Nottingham Forest and took the Greek keeper Odysseas Vlachodimos in part exchange, thus helping satisfy PSR concerns. But now they're back with a vengeance! Meantime, Aston Villa – buzzing after Marcus Rashford's stunning return of four goals (two pens) in 17 games – are showing an interest in taking another Manchester United winger. After the roaring success of Jadon Sancho's loan to Chelsea – 41 appearances, five goals, £5m paid to swerve his permanent presence – they naturally fancy adding him to their squad. There is competition for his signature from Milan and Napoli, with Antonio Conte seeing him as the perfect player to ensure he remains furious at all times. Nevertheless Chelsea, will, of course, be busy splashing money, as they always do. The less-than-prolific Liam Delap is already in, the lure of hearing the famous Champions League anthem (from the bench) too much to resist, and now the club are seeking to sign Mike Maignan from Milan. But, unimpressed by the £25m asking price, they are set to return with a more realistic offer of £745m and a 498-year contract. Elsewhere, Everton, are hoping to attract a new centre-forward. Dominic Calvert-Lewin, out of contract at the end of the month, may leave, and there is interest in Thierno Barry – not as great a name as Romelu Lukaku, but one it would nevertheless be exciting to experience in scouse. Villarreal, though, are not keen to sell and, having qualified for the Champions League, do not need to. Across London, Arsenal's Mikel Arteta has experienced a revelation: teams are better if they have someone to score goals. As such, he is trying to sign Benjamin Sesko from Leipzig – though he might face competition from Liverpool, who will have a vacancy should Darwin Nuñez depart. Liverpool have not had any offers for Luis Díaz. But should one materialise – Barcelona and Al-Nassr are reportedly interested – they may seek to replace him with Anthony Gordon, whose luxuriant barnet evokes Terry McDermott, Phil Thompson, Kevin MacDonald and other Kop heartthrobs of days gone by. Talking of which, Harvey Elliot may also be on the move. He is rumoured to have rejected a move to Nottingham Forest as he does not think they suit his playing style and is said to favour a move to Serie A instead.