I'm fussy about face SPF, but I've finally found my favourite formula
It's common knowledge how important daily SPF protection is, but it can be tricky to find a formula that works for both your skin type and morning routine.
Some facial sunscreen can feel too heavy underneath make-up, while others leave an unflattering chalky or greasy finish. I've trialled SPFs at both ends of the spectrum, from no-frills budget buys to premium products with added skincare benefits – but I always return to one particular formula.
French beauty brand La Roche-Posay is lauded by everyone from dermatologists to beauty editors thanks to its hardworking formulas that both nourish and protect skin.
A skincare and make-up hybrid, the brand's tinted SPF50 formula is my go-to each morning. Ticking all my boxes for daily protection, the broad-spectrum sunscreen contains SPF50 to shield your skin against UVA and UVB, while also helping to blur imperfections and even out your skin tone. Plus, it works as a primer underneath make-up.
How I tested
I've been using La Roche Posay's tinted SPF50 for months, applying the formula as the last step of my skincare routine each morning. I've worn it both on its own with a little bit of concealer, as well as under foundation, I've assessed its coverage, feel on the skin and finish. Similarly, I considered how easily it works into the skin and whether it causes any pilling. Here's why La Roche Posay's anthelios UVMune 400 invisible fluid tinted SPF50+ is worth the hype.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
This £20 dermatologist-approved sheet mask is leaving users with a 'gorgeous glow' - here's where to get yours
A £20 treatment sheet mask designed by an experienced clinician and GP specialising in Dermatology for over 20 years is wowing users with its glow-inducing abilities. Decree is the doctor-led skincare brand that scores of shoppers are investing in for incredible skin. The £20 Decree SOS Revitalising Sheet Mask in particular, is a winner for restoring barrier hydration and boosting skin radiance. Providing 'instant' comfort, it could be a winner for pre-event prep this summer. £20 Developed to instantly calm, nourish and hydrate through a rose water based, active ingredient packed formulation, this mask has become a soothing must-have for stressed skin. With rose water to hydrate and condition, glycerin to plump and niacinamide to brighten, it's perfect for refreshing the skin ahead of a special event. Shop Decree Preparatory Mist £59 The new Decree Preparatory Mist is described as a 'next-generation hydrating mist toner' that blends the brand's 'signature ritual of care with cutting-edge science'. With 100 per cent of participants agreeing that skin is more radiant and smoother after use, it's fast becoming a poolside staple to top up skin hydration throughout the day - not to mention a great carry-on for long-haul flights to keep skin balanced and quenched as you're in the air. Its powered by Ectoin, a natural molecule that hydrates, protects against environmental stress, and supports skin repair. Blended with rose water, aloe vera, hyaluronic acid, and antioxidants, it soothes, hydrates, and primes the skin for better absorption of follow-up products. Shop When it comes to investing in skincare, it pays to avoid trend-led gimmicks in favour of proven ingredients in formulations based on clinical experience with a strong focus on efficacy. And that's where Decree can help up your skincare game. Created by Dr Anita Sturnham, an experienced clinician and GP specialising in Dermatology, the brand focuses on using active levels of ingredients that have been clinically proven to create change at a cellular level in the skin. Dermatologically tested, the Decree SOS Revitalising Mask sits alongside the existing core and is designed to provide instant comfort, for even the most sensitive of skin. Delivering 'gorgeous' skin, whether you pop one on before a big event or as part of your nighttime skincare routine, the Decree SOS Revitalising Sheet Mask has gained impressive reviews thanks to its soothing, plumping results. If you've had a few too many late nights and your skin is looking dull and dehydrated, then a sheet mask could be a valuable step in your routine. Traditionally, sheet masks are soaked in a serum that's rich in hydrating ingredients, helping to promote deeper absorption and longer-lasting moisture. The Decree SOS Sheet Mask is no exception, developed to instantly calm, nourish and hydrate through a rose water-based, active ingredient packed formulation. This is all delivered via a coconut fibre bio-cellulose mask which is renowned for carrying the product deep into the skin. With rose water to hydrate and condition, glycerin to plump and niacinamide to brighten, it's perfect for refreshing the skin ahead of a special event. Better still, the SOS Revitalising Sheet Mask gets to work fast. Quick and convenient to use, delivering results in just 15 minutes users of the mask have said it's 'love at first use'. 'Whenever my skin is feeling dull through lack of sleep, had a night out or skin is feeling generally in bad condition I use this mask and it instantly revitalises my face' raved one impressed shopper. Dermatologically tested, the carefully formulated Decree SOS Revitalising Mask is used by Dr Anita J Sturnham in her clinic to provide instant comfort, for even the most sensitive of skins. And shoppers have been reaping these benefits from the comfort of their homes. 'Face looks so nice and healthy after' wrote one shopper with a third adding 'so soothing and lovely on the skin. Perfect for use after a peel'.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
It is the sunscreen brand singled out by CHOICE as the single WORST failure in Australian SPF 50+ tests. Now the skincare giant furiously hits back
One of the most popular sunscreen brands singled out by a consumer group for failing to meet Australia's strict SPF 50+ regulations has furiously hit back at the controversial experiment. But consumer group CHOICE has revealed it was 'so perturbed' by the results of its extraordinary first experiment - which found Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen returned an SPF of just 4 - that it conducted a second test at an independent lab in Germany. CHOICE found that 16 of 20 sunscreens tested in Australia failed to meet the SPF protection claims on its labels, including big brands such as Cancer Council, Neutrogena, Bondi Sands, Coles and Woolworths. Ultra Violette's 'skinscreen', which retails for $52, was called out by CHOICE for having the 'most significant failure' in the entire experiment during the watchdog's first round of rigorous testing. 'We were so perturbed by the results that we decided to delay publishing and test a different batch of the Ultra Violette sunscreen at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results,' CHOICE experts said. 'Those results came back with a reported SPF of 5.' Just weeks before the bombshell report dropped, Ultra Violette released a slick social media video showcasing the costly process the business says it undertakes to ensure its products meet SPF requirements - singling out how it spent $150,000 on testing. 'Do you know how SPF is actually tested? Making our SKINSCREENS can cost up to $150,000 in testing alone,' the brand said at the time. 'We take the integrity of our products pretty damn seriously - no cutting corners here. We ensure you have the best protection (from both UVA and UVB), and the added skincare benefits to match, no matter where in the world you are.' The video, narrated by Ultra Violette's co-founder Ava Chandler-Matthews, took viewers behind the scenes of how the company tests its sunscreen products - dwelling on how it cost $150,000 to test them. 'Because we formulate our own products at Ultra Violette, we have to pay for all the testing upfront... It's expensive because you do it on real human skin,' Ava said. She explained that the brand undertake the costly process of SPF testing 'multiple times throughout the product development journey'. 'How it works is they apply a test patch of the sunscreen, then they burn you with a UV lamp, with and without the sunscreen,' Ava said. 'The amount of time it takes for your skin to burn is what determines the SPF, but that's the UVB test. The UVA test is done in a lab. We test to Australian standards first because that's always the hardest. After that, we test to FDA standards. 'All of our sunscreens globally are broad spectrum.' Ultra Violette responds to CHOICE At Ultra Violette we take misleading claims made about our products very seriously. Ultra Violette is deeply committed to the health and safety of our customers and only work with reputable, TGA licensed manufacturers who perform substantial quality release testing in accordance with the strictest SPF standards in the world. Given our commitment to producing the highest quality sunscreens for consumers, we do not accept these results as even remotely accurate. Ultra Violette first completed testing for Lean Screen in 2021 (with results of SPF of 64.32 to allow for an SPF 50+ rating), and again in 2024. However, to ensure complete transparency and peace of mind for our customers, we proactively initiated another urgent SPF test of the batch in question in April this year (2025). We retested our product in a full 10-person panel and the results have come back at 61.7, which is above the threshold required by the TGA to make a 50+ claim. Choice's recent retest only included 5 participants, where 2 results were considered non validated, resulting in a sample size of only 3. We rigorously retest our entire SPF range every two years. Lean Screen has been on the market for 5 years in 29 countries and we have not received a single substantiated claim of sunburn during use – reinforcing our confidence in the testing we have. If the Choice results represented the actual level of protection offered, we would have had hundreds of cases of reported sunburn and skin damage while using this product in real life situations. Read the full Ultra Violette statement and the April 2025 test result here. Ava claimed the brand went the extra mile by doing 'additional' testing on all of their sunscreens because, as she said, 'UVA protection is obviously very important to us'. 'The SPF testing is really just the start. When you own all your own formulations, you have to do stability testing which is to make sure the product is stable and contains the UV actives over time as well as clinical and panel testing,' she said. 'Developing all your own formulations, owning your own sunscreen brand and making that sunscreen brand global is really expensive,' she concluded. Following CHOICE's bombshell report, Ultra Violette disputed the claims, saying: 'Given our commitment to producing the highest quality sunscreens for consumers, we do not accept these results as even remotely accurate. 'Lean Screen contains 22.75 per cent zinc oxide, a level at which, when applied sufficiently, would render a testing result of SPF 4 scientifically impossible.' The brand said Lean Screen, like all UV formulas, are made by reputable, TGA-licensed manufacturers and tested to meet the strictest global SPF standards. 'To ensure complete transparency and peace of mind for our customers, when we were first alerted to CHOICE's testing, we immediately initiated another 10 person test on the batch in question at an independent lab,' an Ultra Violette spokesperson said. 'We proactively initiated another urgent SPF test of the batch in question in April this year (2025). We retested our product and the results have come back at 61.7, which is above the threshold required by the TGA to make a 50+ claim. 'CHOICE's recent retest only included five participants, where two results were considered non validated, resulting in a sample size of only three. 'Over the past four years, we have conducted three different tests at independent labs vs. Choice's 1.3 tests.' The surprising results of the 20 popular sunscreens tested Australian consumer watchdog CHOICE has tested 20 popular sunscreens, with 16 failing to meet the SPF50 protection claims on their labels. Of the 20 sunscreens tested, only four passed the SPF test: Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 52 La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 72 Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen passed with a reported SPF of 51 Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 passed with a reported SPF of 56 Sunscreens that failed the SPF test: SPF results in the 10s Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen - tested at 4 SPF results in the 20s Aldi Ombra 50+ – tested at 26 Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 28 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion – tested at 26 Cancer Council Everyday Value Sunscreen 50 – tested at 27 Cancer Council Ultra Sunscreen 50+ – tested at 24 Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 24 Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ – tested at 27 SPF results in the 30s Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 35 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen – tested at 32 Cancer Council Kids Clear Zinc 50+ – tested at 33 Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 – tested at 38 SPF results in the 40s Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube – tested at 43 Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 41 Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen – tested at 40 Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ – tested at 40
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie experts put 20 popular sunscreens to the test - 16 FAILED to meet the SPF claims on their labels. Read the full list here
Millions of Aussies may be unknowingly risking serious sun damage, with a shocking new investigation revealing that many of our most trusted sunscreen brands could be offering far less protection than they promise. Despite being drilled with the 'Slip, Slop, Slap, and Wrap' mantra from childhood, new lab testing shows that even diligent sunscreen-wearers may not be as sun-safe as they think. In an explosive investigation by consumer advocacy group CHOICE, 20 of the most popular sunscreens on Aussie shelves were put to the test - and only four lived up to their lofty SPF 50+ claims. That's right. Just four. The rest? A worrying number delivered SPF ratings as low as four, a far cry from the 50+ sun barrier they boldly advertise. In some cases, that's barely better than wearing nothing at all. 'Consumers expect sunscreen to protect them in line with the SPF rating on the product, but as our testing has shown, the SPF label doesn't always match what's in the bottle,' CHOICE's CEO Ashley de Silva said. Their latest sunscreen test, conducted in a certified lab, found that 16 out of 20 sunscreens failed to meet the protection level printed on their packaging. Some were off by more than 40 SPF points. Big names caught out included the Cancer Council, Neutrogena, Bondi Sands, Ultra Violette, Coles and Woolworths. Some of these widely sold products tested in the SPF 20s and 30s, despite being labelled as SPF 50+, a potentially dangerous discrepancy in a country with one of the highest skin cancer rates in the world. However, the most alarming was one of the most expensive sunscreens tested - Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF50+ which retails for $52. 'Despite doing rigorous testing of this sunscreen the first time, we were so perturbed by the results that we decided to delay publishing and test a different batch of the Ultra Violette sunscreen at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results,' CHOICE said in its report. 'Those results came back with a reported SPF of five, almost identical to our initial test.' However, Ultra Violette has disputed CHOICE's testing methodology and results, stating that it did not arbitrarily label its sunscreen SPF 50+ label but rather followed the guidelines set by the Therapeutic Goods Administration. 'We do not accept these results as even remotely accurate,' an Ultra Violette spokesperson said. 'Lean Screen contains 22.75 per cent zinc oxide, a level at which, when applied sufficiently, would render a testing result of SPF 4 scientifically impossible.' Of the 20 sunscreens tested, only four passed the SPF test - including Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+, which was found to have an actual SPF of 52. The surprising results of the 20 popular sunscreens tested Australian consumer watchdog CHOICE has tested 20 popular sunscreens, with 16 failing to meet the SPF50 protection claims on their labels. Of the 20 sunscreens tested, only four passed the SPF test: Cancer Council Kids Sunscreen SPF 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 52 La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen 50+ passed with a reported SPF of 72 Mecca Cosmetica To Save Body SPF 50+ Hydrating Sunscreen passed with a reported SPF of 51 Neutrogena Ultra Sheer Body Lotion SPF 50 passed with a reported SPF of 56 Sunscreens that failed the SPF test: SPF results in the 10s Ultra Violette Lean Screen SPF 50+ Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen - tested at 4 SPF results in the 20s Aldi Ombra 50+ – tested at 26 Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 28 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Zinc Mineral Body Lotion – tested at 26 Cancer Council Everyday Value Sunscreen 50 – tested at 27 Cancer Council Ultra Sunscreen 50+ – tested at 24 Neutrogena Sheer Zinc Dry-Touch Lotion SPF 50 – tested at 24 Woolworths Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ – tested at 27 SPF results in the 30s Banana Boat Sport Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 35 Bondi Sands SPF 50+ Fragrance Free Sunscreen – tested at 32 Cancer Council Kids Clear Zinc 50+ – tested at 33 Invisible Zinc Face + Body Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 – tested at 38 SPF results in the 40s Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube – tested at 43 Nivea Sun Kids Ultra Protect and Play Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ – tested at 41 Nivea Sun Protect and Moisture Lock SPF 50+ Sunscreen – tested at 40 Sun Bum Premium Moisturising Sunscreen Lotion 50+ – tested at 40 Source: Choice Australia Australia is known for having some of the strictest sunscreen regulations in the world, ensuring safety, quality and efficacy - with all formulas required to be approved by the TGA. The majority are listed medicines with an 'AUST L' identification number, while all sunscreens must adhere to the AS/NZS 2604:2021 standard. According to CHOICE, the TGA relies purely on reports supplied by manufacturers from accredited laboratories, rather than conducting its own compliance testing on sunscreens. Following the alarming investigation, CHOICE has informed both TGA and the ACCC of the results. 'Due to the inconsistencies we have found between the SPF claims of a sample of Australian sunscreens and their actual SPFs, CHOICE is calling on the TGA to conduct their own compliance testing, using current standards, rather than relying purely on reports from manufacturers,' the experts said. CHOICE is Australia's leading independent consumer watchdog, known for its no-frills, laboratory-tested reviews of everyday products to hold brands accountable. They work solely in the interest of Aussie consumers, exposing unsafe, dodgy or misleading products in the market.
