
Dangerous, Divisive Proposition: Assam Govt Vows To Deal Sternly With 'Miya Land' Demand
The fragile socio-political fabric of Assam is once again under strain with a fresh and alarming development—the demand for a so-called 'Miya Land." This provocative call, reportedly raised by individuals evicted from government and forest lands in Assam's Golaghat district, has triggered a wave of outrage across the state and beyond. The demand not only challenges the legal and constitutional framework of the country but also raises serious questions about identity politics, illegal immigration, and the rights of indigenous communities.
The Provocation: Comparing Bodoland with 'Miya Land'
The immediate controversy erupted following an eviction drive in Uriamghat, a sensitive area along the Assam-Nagaland border. One of the protestors, alleged to be among the illegal encroachers, brazenly declared: 'If big people can demand Bodoland, then we Miya people can also demand Miya Land. If 35 lakh Bodos can have Bodoland, then we 1.4 crore Miya Muslims can demand our own land too." This remark has drawn widespread condemnation, not only for its audacity but for falsely equating a legitimate movement like Bodoland—rooted in indigenous ethnic claims and decades-long peaceful protests—with an illegal occupation of forest land by individuals with dubious citizenship credentials.
Assam government and several senior ministers have responded with clarity and firmness. Cabinet Minister Pijush Hazarika termed the speech 'blasphemous," reiterating that 'no power on earth can create Miya Land in Assam." Sarupathar MLA Biswajit Phukan went further: 'This is not the voice of a few individuals. It's a larger design. Miya settlers—originally from Bangladesh—have illegally encroached upon over 11,000 bighas of land here, some of which has become a breeding ground for unlawful activities. We will finish the eviction, and legal action will follow."
Understanding the Historical Context: Migration, Identity, and Conflict
The term 'Miya" refers to Bengali-speaking Muslims in Assam, many of whom are descendants of migrants from what is now Bangladesh. There is no denying the state's historical struggle with unchecked illegal immigration, especially post-1971. This migration has significantly altered the demographic balance in several districts, triggering fears of cultural erosion among Assam's indigenous communities. The Assam Movement (1979–1985), driven by concerns over identity and illegal immigration, eventually led to the Assam Accord, which promised to identify and deport foreigners and protect Assamese identity. But decades later, many feel those promises remain unfulfilled.
Uriamghat and the Rengma Reserve Forest: The Flashpoint
The Uriamghat eviction is part of a larger state-wide campaign to reclaim encroached government and forest lands. In Golaghat district's Rengma Reserve Forest, an estimated 11,000 bighas of land had been illegally occupied, often for illegal farming of betel nuts, and even allegedly turned into hubs for smuggling and other illicit activities. The government has already cleared 4.2 hectares in a peaceful first phase, demolishing over 120 illegal shops and structures with zero resistance—a stark contrast to the violence seen in Goalpara earlier this month. In the July 12 eviction at Paikan Reserve Forest in Goalpara, a protest turned violent, leading to one fatality and injuries to both civilians and police. This volatility underscores the fragility of law and order when such illegal settlements are allowed to fester.
The Dangerous Precedent: From Miya Museum to Miya Land
This is not the first time the Miya identity has been pushed in a confrontational manner. In 2020, former Congress MLA Sherman Ali Ahmed proposed a 'Miya Museum" to be set up inside Srimanta Sankardeva Kalakshetra, Assam's cultural epicentre. The demand drew severe backlash, with CM Sarma making it clear that 'there is no separate culture of char-chaporis that justifies a new museum." Despite state opposition, a mini Miya museum was later set up in Goalpara, signalling that such demands aren't isolated—they are part of a coordinated ideological movement.
Legal and Constitutional Position: Unambiguously Illegal
From a constitutional perspective, any demand for a separate homeland based on religious, linguistic, or ethnic grounds—particularly when propagated by illegal settlers—is unlawful. The creation of Bodoland was achieved through decades of political struggle by an indigenous people with a legitimate identity and grievances. In contrast, the demand for Miya Land lacks historical legitimacy, constitutional backing, popular or regional support. Any such attempt to divide Assam along communal lines poses a direct threat to national security and must be dealt with under relevant legal provisions, including charges of sedition, conspiracy, and unlawful assembly.
Public Reaction: Assam Rises in Protest
People from all communities—Assamese, tribal, and indigenous Muslims—have come out against this demand. Student unions, civil society organizations, and cultural forums have raised slogans such as 'No Miya Land on Assamese Soil" and 'Assam for Assamese." Interestingly, the silence of certain political leaders—notably Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi—has triggered a storm of criticism. Many accuse Gogoi of appeasement politics, with one protestor stating: 'Gaurav Gogoi prefers to echo Pakistan, not Assam."
Assam's Identity and Integrity Cannot Be Bargained
Assam's history is one of resistance and pride—from the Ahom resistance to the Mughals to the Assam Movement and the struggle to protect its language and land. Today, the state faces a new threat—not just from cross-border infiltration, but from internal political assertions that seek to alter its demographic, cultural, and territorial reality. Chief Minister Sarma's recent post on X (formerly Twitter) resonated with many: 'People of Assam are victims of mass-scale encroachment, demographic alteration, and violence caused by illegal settlers. They stand firmly with the government in this crackdown." The demand for Miya Land is not just an absurd proposition—it is a dangerous political weapon aimed at testing the limits of Indian democracy, Assam's patience, and the state's resolve to defend its identity. The government must continue its firm stand—evict illegal encroachments, enforce the law, and prevent communal polarization. For Assam, the message is loud and clear—there is no place for separatism, no compromise on territorial integrity, and no room for political appeasement at the cost of its people.
Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
Assam himanta biswa sarma
view comments
Location :
Assam, India, India
First Published:
July 31, 2025, 12:10 IST
News opinion Opinion | Dangerous, Divisive Proposition: Assam Govt Vows To Deal Sternly With 'Miya Land' Demand
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
CM Mamata Banerjee hikes Durga Puja grant, urges support for migrant workers returning to Bengal
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee KOLKATA: CM Mamata Banerjee on Thursday combined an enhanced handout for Durga Puja organisers this year with an appeal to them to stand by migrant labourers returning home because of harassment in BJP-governed states. Banerjee, reminding everyone of their social responsibility, asked clubs and puja organisers as well as the local administration to 'give new clothes to those returning because of torture and harassment'. 'Everything has been snatched from them. We do not tolerate this torture nor do we believe in torturing others,' Banerjee said, referring to the plight of Bengali-speaking migrant workers in BJP-governed states. The CM announced an increased state grant of Rs 1.1 lakh for Durga Puja committees in Bengal, up from last year's Rs 85,000 and Rs 70,000 in 2023. Concession on electricity bills, too, have been increased to 80% (it was 75% last year). And, like last year, the state fire department will not levy any charge. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata 'Some people claim that Mamata Banerjee does not allow pujas. Every household celebrates puja here. There is no puja that does not happen in Bengal. But, then, some people even go to court, questioning why there should be assistance for pujas. This is a festival but it is a means of livelihood for so many as well. Youngsters from every neighbourhood leave household chores to focus on themes to make their pujas successful. One puja ends and they start planning for another,' she said, referring to the commerce around the festive e season. Puja organisers backed the CM's stance. The hiked payout to 43,000-plus puja organisers will cost the state exchequer around Rs 473 crore (up from last year's Rs 365.5 crore). 'But the money circulates in the market. It contributes to the Durga Puja economy that may be around Rs 80,000 crore now,' Saswata Bose, general secretary of Forum for Durgotsav, an umbrella organisation representing all major Durga Puja organisers, said. Banerjee announced that the carnival would be held on October 5, a day before Lakshmi Puja. Immersions will start on October 2 and end on October 4 (except for the pujas invited to the carnival). Kolkata Police commissioner Manoj Verma announced that the single-window Asaan Durga Puja permission portal would be up and running from August 22. The CM asked cops to check the themes with organisers and urged the latter not to create themes that could lead to stampedes. 'People's lives should not be put at risk in the effort to attract crowds. Avoid competing over crowd size. Every puja is unique. There should be no stampede. Why only showcase the festivals of Bobby, Aroop, and Sujit (pujas patronised by state ministers Firhad Hakim, Aroop Biswas and Sujit Bose)? Showcase others as well,' she said. Banerjee warned that revellers might be out early this year. 'Mahalaya is barely four days after Vishwakarma Puja this year. Earlier, cops hit the road on Chaturthi. Now people come out much earlier. I begin inaugurations before Mahalaya. The police and all emergency services will have to hit the road early. Spare a thought for those who work round the clock for your safety during puja,' she urged, asking puja organisers to pay special attention to revellers' safety. Each puja committee should set up an emergency centre, she suggested. 'There should be coordination between Kolkata Police and West Bengal Police. All control rooms must remain active 24x7. Separate entrances and exits should be there for crowd dispersal, she said, also referring to the increased participation of foreigners: 'Ensure that they are treated with respect.' Banerjee also urged the local administration to be prepared for emergency situations. 'There should be no issue regarding women's security. Specially abled people, too, should be taken care of,' she stressed while instructing the transport department to run more vehicles and asking state chief secretary Manoj Pant to speak to Metro Railway and local train authorities to extend their hours of operation during the festival.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
It's 58-yr-old Cooch Behar woman's turn to get NRC notice from Assam
1 2 Jalpaiguri: Yet another Cooch Behar resident has received an NRC notice from the Assam Foreigners' Tribunal. Mamina Bibi, a resident of Salbari in Tufanganj-II, along the Bengal-Assam border, has been asked to appear before the tribunal with her documents. Issued on Sept 1, 2024, the notice was handed over to 58-year-old Bibi at her home by officers from Tufanganj police station on Wednesday. Bibi was married to Azimuddin Miyan, an Assamese man from Dhubri's Agomani, 40 years ago. After living there for a year, she moved to Salbari. Her husband gave her talaq after having his second son, and Bibi has been living with her two sons since then. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata "I have never voted in Assam. My name is registered in Bengal voters' list. I don't know why I was served a notice," Bibi said. The notice shows the case against her was lodged in 2019. As the news spread, the Cooch Behar Trinamool leadership, led by district president Avijit De Bhowmik, visited Bibi at her house on Thursday. "We have asked her not to respond to the notice and not to worry as well. Our party and govt is with every such Bengali-speaking person who is targeted in Assam," Bhowmik said. Citing an Assam govt notification dated this Feb, where it recognised people from Koch-Rajbanshi community as indigenous people of Assam, BJP accused TMC of trying to play with the sentiments of Bengalis. "When Assam govt has notified all Koch-Rajbanshi people as indigenous people, TMC's effort to convince people on this is just dirty politics to safeguard illegal Bangladeshis living here and vote for them," said Avijit Barman, BJP's Cooch Behar president. Earlier, the Assam govt identified Uttam Kumar Brajabashi as an illegal immigrant residing in Dinhata. Septuagenarian Nishikanta Das, a resident of Mathabhanga, was also served an NRC notice. Although Das appeared at the hearing and produced an Aadhaar card, EPIC and ration card, the tribunal rejected those as residential evidence. Another Tufanganj resident, Arati Ghosh, left Assam even before she was served a notice. She claimed that as she did not have documents that the Assam govt was looking for, she returned to her ancestral house in Baxirhat. There are 15 seats reserved for SCs in Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri, Alipurduar, Cooch Behar, North Dinajpur and South Dinajpur, mostly because of the Rajbanshi population.


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Illegal Bengali
A former associate editor with the Times of India, Jug Suraiya writes two regular columns for the print edition, Jugular Vein, which appears every Friday, and Second Opinion, which appears on Wednesdays. His blog takes a contrarian view of topical and timeless issues, political, social, economic and speculative. LESS ... MORE People who speak that Indian language face deportation from Gurgaon and other parts of the country Bunny and I are living under the Damoclean sword of summary deportation. No, we're not facing the prospect of deportation from Trump's America, where thousands of so-called illegal migrants are being rounded up wholesale and chucked out of the country. We fear being deported out of Gurgaon where we've been living for more years than we, or Gurgaon, might care to remember. The powers-that-be in what bills itself as the Millennium City have launched a drive to identify and deport Bangladeshi migrants who've snuck into India, and then into Gurgaon, to find employment as domestic help and in other menial jobs. The problem is that the powers-that-be lack the linguistic ability to distinguish between a Bangladeshi and a citizen from the Indian state of Bengal. For Gurgaon's officialdom, anyone speaking Bengali is a suspect Bangladeshi who should be ejected forthwith. That the Bengali a Bangladeshi speaks is easily distinguished from the Bengali spoken by an Indian Bengali by the way the letter 's' is pronounced – Bangladeshis use the hard 's' as in kiss; Indian Bengalis use the soft 's' as in dish – is a piece of elocutionary trivia of which the local authorities remain blissfully ignorant. Having lived most of our lives in what was Calcutta, Bunny and I speak fluent if ungrammatical Bengali and occasionally converse with each other in that language to keep our lingual hand in, to mix metaphors. If some snoopy eavesdropper were to overhear us, would we be reported for immediate expulsion as illegal migrants? Indeed, we are migrants who as economic refugees left Calcutta, which after years of Marxist rule had become not just a backwater, but a stagnant pond, to seek gainful employment in National Capital Region, and had done it without seeking official sanction. Does that make us instantly deportable illegal migrants? If so, where should we be deported to? Bangladesh won't have us. So would our only deportable destination be Mamata's welcoming Republic of Bengal, ultimate refuge for the illegal Bengali? Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.