Muscle-building supplements may put teens at risk for a body image disorder, study finds
'The use of 6 different dietary supplements intended for muscle building was associated with greater symptoms of muscle dysmorphia,' said lead study author Dr. Kyle Ganson, assistant professor in the Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work at the University of Toronto, via email. 'This included whey protein powder and creatine, both of which are commonly used among young people trying to gain muscle.'
The association was especially strong with supplements for gaining weight or mass, and the symptoms, such as excessive gym time and obsessing over food intake, increased as the number of supplements used grew, according to a new study published Wednesday in journal PLOS Mental Health.
The study team analyzed data from 2,731 participants ages 16 to 30 of the Canadian Study of Adolescent Health Behaviors, which aims to gather information on disordered eating, muscle-building behavior, body image and social health. The researchers analyzed the participants' reports of supplement use against their symptoms of muscle dysmorphia, which were assessed using the Muscle Dysmorphic Disorder Inventory, according to the study.
The study is observational, meaning it's hard to say whether the use of supplements increased the symptoms of muscle dysmorphia or if people with more muscle dysmorphia symptoms were more likely to take more supplements, said Dr. Gail Saltz, clinical associate professor of psychiatry at the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College. Saltz was not involved in the research.
This study shows that younger people who may not use anabolic steroids, which have been found to be harmful, might still be using other substances to treat their muscle dysmorphia, and the public needs to be more aware, Saltz said.
'Many people think supplements are safe because it's just a supplement,' she said. 'But in fact, that is not always the case.'
What is muscle dysmorphic disorder?
Muscle dysmorphia is a subset of body dysmorphic disorder, in which an individual is preoccupied with an imagined defect in their appearance, Saltz said. Those with muscle dysmorphia believe their body should be leaner and more muscular.
'People who experience muscle dysmorphia often have significant challenges in their social lives, and can experience severe emotional distress,' Ganson said. 'Not to mention, these individuals may go to extreme lengths to achieve their body ideal, such as using anabolic steroids.'
And it isn't just a matter of lowered confidence, Saltz said. Even if people with this disorder reach the ideal image they are striving for, it doesn't fix the distress.
'When they look in the mirror, they don't see what you see when you look at them,' she said.
Other warning signs include having a rigid exercise routine, experiencing emotional distress, and facing difficulty completing expectations such as school and work, Ganson said.
You might also see people with muscle dysmorphic disorder avoiding socially normal body exposure — such as removing their shirts at the beach — or missing social gatherings because of feelings around their appearance, Saltz added.
What's so bad about supplements?
Using supplements to change a body's appearance is common.
While 2.2% of young adult males report using steroids, 36.3% report using protein powders and shakes, while 10.1% said they use other muscle-building substances such as creatine and growth hormones, according to a June 2022 study.
Most supplements are readily available with little to no regulation, and 'studies analyzing these products have found that many are mislabeled and are tainted with harmful substances like anabolic steroids,' said study coauthor Dr. Jason Nagata, associate professor of pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco.
The US Food and Drug Administration does monitor adverse health impacts and occasionally inspects manufacturing facilities. However, under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act, the agency does not have jurisdiction to approve dietary supplements before they enter the public marketplace.
There are also few studies on supplements' safety and efficacy, Nagata added.
'Muscle-building supplements, which may be legal, can serve as gateway drugs to steroid use,' Nagata said. 'We previously found that young adults using muscle-building substances were three times more likely to start anabolic steroid use seven years later.'
Pre-workout supplements often contain caffeine — some with the same amount found in several cups of coffee, he added.
Some people 'dry scoop' before a workout or consume protein powder dry without mixing in water, Nagata added.
'Dry scooping is particularly dangerous practice because it provides a high and potent dose of a product that is meant to be diluted in water,' he said. 'Dry scooping provides a pure and highly concentrated burst of a product that can have toxic effects.'
How to treat muscle dysmorphia
One important step is to challenge the information and ideals coming out of social media, especially for teens who are undergoing rapid changes and making frequent comparisons with others during puberty, Nagata said.
'Social media posts about muscle-building supplements and anabolic steroids overwhelmingly demonstrate positive muscle-building effects,' he said. 'Social media can exacerbate body comparisons and lead to muscle dissatisfaction and the use of anabolic steroids or other muscle-building drugs and supplements in teens.'
This use of social media is especially true for boys, who are more likely to allow for a public following than girls and are more likely to show off muscles online than faces, Nagata said.
'Men's bodies are on display more than ever on social media, especially through influencer accounts. The idealized bodies that influencers post may be heavily filtered or the best of hundreds of photos,' he added.
When it comes to treating muscle dysmorphia, there are many methods that can be helpful, including different forms of cognitive behavioral therapy that help examine thought patterns and reframe perceptions, Saltz said.
Sometimes medications –– such as those used to treat anxiety, depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder –– are needed as well, she added.
Eating disorder resources
US: National Eating Disorders AssociationThe NEDA has a confidential, toll-free helpline at 800-931-2237 as well as an online click-to-chat service. For 24/7 crisis support, text 'NEDA' to 741-741.The NEDA also has a list of online and free or low-cost resources.US: National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated DisordersANAD runs a helpline at 888-375-7767 from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. CT and provides links to support groups and treatment providers.Australia: National Eating Disorders CollaborationA call center at 800-334-673 and online chat run by the Butterfly Foundation is open 8 a.m. to midnight AET every day except public holidays.UK: Beat (formerly known as the Eating Disorders Association)Helplines for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are open 9 a.m. to midnight weekdays and 4 p.m. to midnight weekends and bank holidays, every day of the year.
Families, health care professionals and sports coaches are key in helping to identify muscle dysmorphia in adolescents and young adults, Saltz said.
Because the imagined defect feels so real to the person experiencing the condition, it can be hard to have insight into the problem, she added. The people around an individual with muscle dysmorphia can help by knowing what to look for.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
So Your Workout Clothes Are Made of Plastic. Now What?
It's true that some synthetic fabrics commonly used in workout clothing, such as polyester, nylon, and spandex, might expose you to a range of potentially harmful chemicals. 'These chemicals are not necessarily present in all synthetic fabrics, but they are commonly used or can be residues from manufacturing processes associated with these materials,' said José Domingo, professor emeritus of toxicology at the Universitat Rovira i Virgili School of Medicine in Spain, in a written response. They may include skin irritants that could trigger contact dermatitis, such as azobenzene disperse dyes, which are commonly used to color synthetic fabrics, and formaldehyde releasers, which are often used in wrinkle-free textiles. Synthetic clothing may also contain some endocrine-disrupting chemicals, which are linked to a range of health impacts that affect reproduction, physical development, neurodevelopment, metabolism, and immune system function, as well as cancer risk. These chemicals include phthalates; bisphenols such as BPA; benzothiazoles, used in chemical processing; antimony, a catalyst residue often found in polyester; and aromatic amines from dyes. Some may also contain PFAS, a broad class of chemicals linked to cancer, pregnancy complications, and weakened immune function, though they may also appear in other types of fabrics. (And, in fact, some states have already started banning PFAS in clothing.) The presence of all these chemicals 'depends on specific manufacturing processes, dyes, and finishing treatments used,' said Domingo. And not all synthetic textiles are alike. There are petroleum-based fabrics, including polyester, nylon, spandex, and acrylic, which are often found in clothing items like leggings and sports bras. Plasticized bio-based fabrics, such as some bio-based nylon and polyamide, use corn or other plant materials but may be mixed with petroleum-based plastic and chemicals (similar to bio-based plastic bags), said Alden Wicker, a journalist who covers environmental health and sustainability in fashion. Cellulosics, such as rayon (sometimes called lyocell or modal), are another category of synthetics. They may be used in exercise clothes, as well as blouses, dresses, slacks, and other garments. These are made primarily from woody plant pulp that has been chemically dissolved and processed into a textile. From an individual health perspective, cellulosics may be less concerning than petroleum-based or bio-based fabrics, Wicker said, though they do require chemical-intensive processing. Many experts I spoke with said that natural fibers are less likely to have high concentrations of some of those potentially harmful chemicals, like azobenzene disperse dyes and antimony. But broadly, there's no guarantee that clothes made with 100% cotton or other natural fibers are automatically lower in harmful chemicals than synthetic ones, said Miriam Diamond, an environmental scientist and professor at the University of Toronto's School of the Environment. Diamond noted that even 100% cotton has been found to sometimes contain chemicals, such as bisphenol. Complicating matters, manufacturers aren't required to disclose chemicals in clothes, and 'they may not even know themselves given the complexities of global supply chains,' said Justin Colacino, associate professor of environmental health sciences at the University of Michigan, in an email interview.
Hamilton Spectator
31-07-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
Children are at greater risk of wildfire smoke, and it could affect their development. Here's what parents need to know
Toronto once again has some of the worst air quality in the world this summer as of Thursday morning, with wildfire smoke blowing into the city from the Prairies. Environment Canada has issued a special statement urging Torontonians to stay inside — and experts say this is doubly important for children, who are among those at greatest risk of smoke exposure. Aside from being more vulnerable to the immediate health effects of smoke inhalation, new research suggests repeated exposure to air pollution could have long-term ramifications for their development. With the city once again blanketed in wildfire smoke, experts are warning that long-term exposure to air pollution can lead to higher risk of With the city once again blanketed in wildfire smoke, experts are warning that long-term exposure to air pollution can lead to higher risk of Here's why, and what parents can do to keep their kids safe. It mainly has to do with their small bodies, explained Dr. Samantha Green, a family physician with Unity Health Toronto. Given their size, young children inhale more air per kilogram of body mass, meaning more airborne pollutants in proportion to their bodies. And because their lungs are still developing, the organ is more susceptible to damage. That means the younger one is, the more they may be affected. 'Babies and the youngest children are most at risk,' Green explained. In the short term, kids might experience similar symptoms to adults, just more intense, Green said. Think chest tightness, trouble breathing, sore throat, coughing, burning eyes or dizziness. 'In children who have asthma, or allergies, or other chronic health conditions, they may experience worsening in their underlying (conditions),' Green continued. The scarfs were issued after veteran firefighters won a battle to get presumptive illness coverage due to chronic smoke exposure. The scarfs were issued after veteran firefighters won a battle to get presumptive illness coverage due to chronic smoke exposure. But in the long run, emerging research suggests repeated exposure could potentially lead to decreased overall lung function, an increased risk of lung and brain tumours, and potential impact on developmental outcomes, according to Green. 'The greater time spent experiencing the poor air quality and the more repeated exposures, the worse the risk,' she continued. The answer is 'not really,' according to Jeffrey Brook, an associate professor at the University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health. It's true that N95 masks can help catch some of the harmful particles released in wildfire smoke, but given the time-limited nature of this event, Brook and other experts say they aren't necessary. 'We don't want people to panic,' he said. 'The level that we're seeing here are what children are dealing with day in and day out in other countries in the world … It makes sense to be prudent, but not to panic.' Green added that while masks might catch particulate matter, they won't keep us safe from the other dangerous chemicals in smoke, such as carbon monoxide, ammonia, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Torontonians are being urged to limit their time outside as smoke blows into the city. But smoke will still leak inside, experts say. Torontonians are being urged to limit their time outside as smoke blows into the city. But smoke will still leak inside, experts say. 'In children, N95 masks often don't fit properly, often aren't worn properly and really are not a solution,' Green said. 'I think for a child with underlying asthma, who must be outside, I would recommend wearing an N95 mask. But really, as much as possible, we should be keeping all children inside.' The best solution, according to experts, is to keep your kids indoors when it's smoky out. On Thursday morning, Toronto's air quality health index was ranked eight out of ten , or 'high risk.' Parents should consider rescheduling outdoor activities at any level higher than a seven, according to Helen Doyle, chair of the co-ordinating committee at the Canadian Partnership for Children's Health and Environment. Experts previously told the Star most buildings can only keep out about half of all air pollutants , but it's better than having kids outside without protection. Otherwise, Doyle advises parents to keep an eye on the air quality health index, and check for any updates as they come. She notes that apps like WeatherCAN are able to alert you once the index reaches a certain level. If possible, keep your windows closed and the air-conditioning on if you have the option. Doyle says you can also consider purchasing a portable air filter, or making your own. The Star previously outlined how to make an affordable filter using a fan, air filters, duct tape and cardboard. 'We can only adapt so much and this is such a good example of where adaptation is not ideal,' Green said. 'We need to keep children indoors during the summer and we need to refrain from everyday childhood activities like going swimming in Lake Ontario or playing on a playground.' The fact we're being pushed to do so is 'key evidence of the climate crisis, and unfortunately, things will continue to get worse year over year from here on in unless we stop burning fossil fuels,' Green finished.
Hamilton Spectator
31-07-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
There's no escaping wildfire smoke indoors, experts say — but it can help
It's been a smoky summer for Toronto , with forest fires in the Prairies once again pushing the city's Air Quality Health Index into the 'high risk' category Thursday morning. Environment Canada has issued a special statement urging Torontonians to limit their time outdoors where possible. But there's no escaping the smoke even when inside, experts tell the Star. Most buildings are only able to keep about half — 40 to 60 per cent — of outdoor air pollutants from coming inside, according to the research of Jeffrey Brook, an associate professor at the University of Toronto's Dalla Lana School of Public Health. As climate change advances, I cannot grasp the hugeness of the calamity. What once was notable is becoming a habit, a toxic, sinister pattern. As climate change advances, I cannot grasp the hugeness of the calamity. What once was notable is becoming a habit, a toxic, sinister pattern. That means, on especially smoky days, indoor air quality can still reach dangerous levels for susceptible individuals, Brook and other experts previously told the Star. These can include young children, pregnant people, elderly individuals and those with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions like asthma. 'There's a lot of epidemiology research that says (pollutants released by wildfires) is a major killer,' Brook explained. 'It's one of the most significant causes of premature mortality in the world.' And yet, our building codes and ventilation systems generally aren't designed to prioritize smoke and other pollutants, experts say. As the climate crisis makes wildfires a more common occurrence, policymakers are being urged to consider long-term solutions to a worsening issue. There are three main ways smoke (and other air pollutants) can infiltrate our homes, according to Amy Li, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. The first is through any large openings, like a door left ajar or an opened window. 'This is why we often have the recommendation to close all windows and doors when we know the outdoor air is not good,' she explained. The second pathway is less visible — leaks and cracks in a home's enclosure through which pollutants can enter. 'Buildings are not like a spaceship,' Li said. 'There will always be some amount (of pollutants) getting into the building.' Health experts are not currently concerned about air quality in Toronto but warn prolonged exposure to moderate risk air may threaten health. Health experts are not currently concerned about air quality in Toronto but warn prolonged exposure to moderate risk air may threaten health. The third is through mechanical ventilation systems that funnel outside air indoors, said Jeffrey Siegel, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Toronto. This sort of system is present in 'most non-residential buildings,' he said. It's why large commercial and institutional buildings, like schools, offices and community centres, are often more vulnerable to smoke, Li added, although it varies from building to building. Older buildings also tend to have more cracks for pollutants to seep through and ventilation systems less able to keep smoke out, Li and Siegel explained. Meanwhile, single family homes and townhouses tend to be 'leakier' compared to highrise apartment complexes, Li said. Buildings without air conditioning are also at greater risk if windows are kept open to regulate high temperatures, Siegel added. The first rule of thumb is to close any doors and windows when it's smoky out. You might even consider taping windows shut if leaks are present, Li said. 'That's not as protective as would be ideal because of the leaks in buildings … but it will help,' Siegel added. But this may not be an option if your residence has no air conditioning and you're weathering a period of extreme heat: 'The health effects of extreme heat can be more serious than the effects of wildfire smoke,' Siegel said. If your home has a central forced air system with a MERV 11-rated air filter or better, Siegel recommends keeping your fan going continuously if possible. MERV, or 'minimum efficiency reporting values,' measures how efficiently a filter can capture particles; a MERV 13 to 15 rated filter is preferred, Siegel said. Unlike many commercial buildings, most residences in Canada recirculate the indoor air instead of pumping in fresh air from the outside, Li said. TORONTO - The Canadian Ophthalmological Society is urging people to take care of their eyes as wildfires burn across Manitoba and Saskatchewan. TORONTO - The Canadian Ophthalmological Society is urging people to take care of their eyes as wildfires burn across Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Siegel also recommended running portable air filters in crowded spaces, especially in areas with susceptible individuals. The Star previously outlined how to make an affordable filter using a fan, air filters, duct tape and cardboard. If possible, Li recommends upgrading your home's filtration system. Consult with a professional first, especially if your home's ventilation system is old, as a high-efficiency filter might overwhelm the system and lead to drops in pressure, she said. Finally, those at high risk can consider wearing a well-fitted respirator or mask, like an N95 mask, while indoors when it's especially smoky, Siegel explained. Until recently, building filtration systems have placed less emphasis on keeping wildfire smoke and other environmental pollutants out, Brook noted. And while the COVID-19 pandemic saw a shift toward improving HVAC systems in buildings like schools, experts and advocates have noted it's not sufficient to keep up with the increasing prevalence of wildfires. Almost any upgrades to a building will also make it more resistant to wildfire smoke, Siegel said, from installing new windows to heating, ventilation and air-conditioning retrofits. The problem is many of the buildings where these improvements are needed most, like schools, are unable to implement them due to budget and funding limitations, he continued. For urbanites, there's a new way to mark the calendar: the day the smoke reaches the city. For urbanites, there's a new way to mark the calendar: the day the smoke reaches the city. 'It's an important area that we should be thinking about for investment, because the issue isn't just wildfire smoke,' Siegel said. 'We have increasing ambient air pollution just because of urbanization. We have a lot more construction, a lot more traffic, a lot of major roadways with schools and other buildings near them.' There's another hurdle. Brook noted that improved ventilation, air-conditioning and filtration systems may end up contributing to the climate crisis. 'If you just start expending more energy to make the indoor air clean, it can becomes a vicious cycle of more emissions if our energy is coming from dirty sources,' he said. 'We have to think, what's our long-term strategy?' Brook continued. 'Why have we stopped talking about how we're going to meet carbon emission targets? How are we going to upgrade our housing and clean air while not increasing our energy usages?'
