logo
LGBTQ groups march under own banner for first time in Staten Island St. Paddy's parade: ‘Huge day for the queer community'

LGBTQ groups march under own banner for first time in Staten Island St. Paddy's parade: ‘Huge day for the queer community'

Yahoo03-03-2025

An LGBTQ group marched for the first time under its own banner at Staten Island's St. Patrick's Day Parade on Sunday in what organizers called a 'huge day for the queer community.'
The parade — the last major local St. Paddy's march to have an exclusionary ban on such groups — decided in November to allow the community-based Pride Center of Staten Island to partake in the annual event, now in its 61st year, according to SILive.
KC Hankins, a 32-year-old organizer in the queer community, was thrilled to see parade officials finally come around.
'After well over a decade of [denying] LGBT people marching in the parade, we are finally allowed,' Hankins said. 'It's a huge day for the queer community to be welcomed in our own community.
'This is a consistent effort by queer people on Staten Island to say we belong in our community, and we are going to continuously make it known that we belong.'
The parade stepped off at Forest Avenue and Hart Boulevard around 12:30 p.m., and spectators greeted the new participants with overwhelming cheers and applause.
'This is just a real win for this community … out here,' said Mayor Eric Adams, who marched with the group. 'Just saying they're prideful to be Irish, they're prideful to be a member of the LGBTQ+ community — [it's] something we always stood for.
'Their resiliency showed that if you stand up for what is right, you're going to always win,' said Hizzoner — who was indicted on bribery charges last year and headed to trial till the Trump White House recently nixed the case against him, at least for now.
'Congratulations to all of them and what they've accomplished,' Adams said of the group's inclusion Sunday.
The Staten Island parade has been the lone local anti-LGBTQ holdout for years. The Throggs Neck parade in The Bronx, for example, allowed organized members of the LGBTQ community to march under a banner starting in 2022, and Manhattan's mammoth event began permitting them to participate down Fifth Avenue about seven years earlier.
The inclusion in Manhattan's parade only came after massive protests that included Guinness pulling its sponsorship and NBC threatening to stop broadcasting the event until organizers changed their tune.
On Staten Island, the number of participating organizations had dwindled in recent years — likely the result of boycotts and frustration with officials' anti-LGBTQ stance, said SILive.
Jody's Club Forest, an Irish bar on Forest Avenue, put the brakes on its traditional political breakfast two years ago in solidarity with the excluded groups.
The November decision appears to have breathed new life into the faltering parade, as 80 groups signed up to walk this year — almost a third more than 2024.
On Sunday, Forest Avenue was packed with revelers as local officials crowded into tiny Jody's, which counted among its Guinness-swilling patrons former GOP mayoral candidate Curtis Sliwa, city Fire Commissioner Robert Tucker and Staten Island District Attorney Michael McMahon.
Edward Patterson, the new chair of the Richmond County St. Patrick's Day Parade Committee, said he was 'happy to have the Pride Center marching with us.
'Our focus remains on St. Patrick and the culture, traditions, history, and faith of the Irish people,' he said. 'We're proud to have the Pride Center because they are part of the community.'
Carol Bullock, the Pride Center's executive director, told SILive beforehand, 'We are excited.
'It's really going to be great.'
But the lead-up was not without controversy.
A local Catholic leader made it clear he wasn't onboard with the changes.
'When the decision was made to allow members of the Pride Center to participate in the parade, marching under their own banner, I had no choice but to distance the parish from the event and deny the use of the facilities,' wrote Bishop Peter Byrne of the Blessed Sacrament Roman Catholic Church in a weekly bulletin last month.
'The Pride Center promotes ideas and practices that blatantly contradict the church's teaching on chastity,' hesaid.
'That is an indisputable fact. [The Pride Center's] presence in the parade signifies that the gathering not only does not promote, but actually undermines, Catholic devotion.'
Byrne banned the parade committee from using the parish as a sign-up spot for marchers, as it had in the past.
'I am not supporting the parade, therefore the facilities here will not be available,' he told SILive.
But even some of Byrne's own parishioners disagreed with his views.
'As a long-time parishioner, I'm embarrassed by this statement,' a churchgoer told the outlet. 'I have no words for how out of touch the bishop is with the community and his own parishioners.'
Another parishioner said, 'The Jesus I grew up learning about would never write such a divisive letter and make such a judgmental and frankly, gross, statement.
'It is not Christ-like at all.'
On Sunday, parish priest Father Frank told The Post that the church still let people use the bathrooms during the event and that the disagreement had stemmed from the Church's teachings.
'I hope they understand us also, because that is the stance of the church,' he said.
Some onlookers, such as 56-year-old Christine McCord, said she didn't feel it 'necessary' to have the banners fly during the parade.
'I guess it's a good thing, because we're moving forward and including everyone,' she said. 'But I think it's not necessary. We don't need to segregate out who's who and who's what, because we're supposed to be including everyone.'
Others said they were happy the group was allowed to walk.
'The parade was a beautiful celebration, and I am happy they finally let LGBTQ members march today!' another woman said. 'They deserve it! It's been a long time coming. Let's go!'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'March to Gaza' Group Allegedly Assaulted After Being Detained in Egypt
'March to Gaza' Group Allegedly Assaulted After Being Detained in Egypt

Newsweek

time29 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

'March to Gaza' Group Allegedly Assaulted After Being Detained in Egypt

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Activists involved in the Global March to Gaza, which is protesting against Israel's bombardment of the territory and offering help to the Palestinians there, have described violent scuffles at the hands of Egyptian security forces. An Irish politician who was among the activists said his phone and passport were confiscated, and a march organizer said protesters were attacked as they headed to the border at Egypt's Rafah crossing. Newsweek has contacted the march organizers and the Egyptian Foreign Ministry for comment. This illustrative image from June 12 shows activists rallying outside Egypt's Journalists Syndicate in Cairo. This illustrative image from June 12 shows activists rallying outside Egypt's Journalists Syndicate in It Matters The Global March to Gaza has been touted as one of the largest demonstrations of its kind in years. The initiative seeks to highlight the plight of Palestinians in Gaza, who have faced a bombardment due to Israel's war on Hamas. The arrests in Egypt follow Israel's interception of a boat carrying activists on their way to Gaza, including environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg. Egypt has cracked down on pro-Palestinian activists even as it publicly condemns Israeli aid restrictions and has called for an end to the war. What To Know The Global March to Gaza is a civilian-led initiative to march from Arish, Egypt, to the Rafah border crossing with the Gaza Strip beginning on Sunday. Once in Rafah, the goal was to set up a camp and work to break the Israeli blockade of Gaza, provide humanitarian aid to the strip and protest against Israel's actions in the territory. Protest organizers said Egyptian authorities confiscated the passports of 40 activists at what they called a "toll booth turned checkpoint," with security forces detaining and using force, the Associated Press reported. Previously, hundreds arriving in Cairo were detained and deported to their home countries in Europe and North Africa. 'We are in danger. This is an emergency. We need help.' Melanie Schweizer, one of the organizers of the Global March to Gaza reports on the situation after Egyptian authorities and police attacked activists headed to the Rafah border and confiscated their passports. The… — Quds News Network (@QudsNen) June 13, 2025 The activists planned to gather on the road to the Sinai to prepare for Sunday's march, although authorities had not yet granted them authorization to travel through the sensitive area. The Tunisian and Libyan delegation of the march left Tunis, Tunisia, on June 9 but was stopped in the city of Sirte, about 585 miles from the Libya-Egypt border. Antonietta Chiodo, who traveled to Cairo from Italy, said activists had been detained, interrogated, treated harshly by Egyptian authorities or deported, the AP reported. In a video message, Melanie Schweizer, one of the march organizers, said police had attacked activists on their way to the Rafah border, confiscated their passports and forced them onto a bus escorted by Egyptian security forces. She said she saw a woman being beaten. Schweizer added: "We are in danger. This is an emergency. We need help." Paul Murphy, an Irish politician with the People Before Profit–Solidarity party, posted a video on social media in which he said passports had been confiscated and that he and his fellow activists were refusing to board the "deportation bus." Meanwhile, footage widely shared on social media purported to show activists receiving a hostile reaction from citizens in Egypt. What People Are Saying Melanie Schweizer, an organizer of the Global March on Gaza, said in a video: "This is an emergency. We have just been violently dragged into the buses. ... They started to push people and drag them violently outside. They have beaten people." She added: "This is a very shocking incident." The Global March on Gaza said in a statement: "We continue to urge the Egyptian government to permit this peaceful march." Irish politician Paul Murphy said in a video on X: "It's looking worrying that the Egyptian authorities are going to act to try to prevent our peaceful march to Gaza." What Happens Next Hicham El-Ghaoui, one of the group's spokespeople, said they would refrain from demonstrating until authorized by Egypt. Activists anticipated more arrests ahead of Sunday's protest.

Women's fencer who knelt in protest of trans athlete reacts to USA Fencing reversal of controversial policies
Women's fencer who knelt in protest of trans athlete reacts to USA Fencing reversal of controversial policies

Fox News

time2 hours ago

  • Fox News

Women's fencer who knelt in protest of trans athlete reacts to USA Fencing reversal of controversial policies

EXCLUSIVE: More than two months have passed since women's fencer Stephanie Turner went viral after being punished by USA Fencing for kneeling in protest of a trans opponent. And after nine weeks of immense public and federal scrutiny against USA Fencing in the aftermath of the incident, the organization amended two of its most controversial policies last weekend. The organization's board of directors changed its rule to de-prioritized states with laws deemed "harmful" to the LGBTQ population and a rule that did not guarantee the national anthem be played before every event. Turner reacted to USA Fencing's recent policy changes in an exclusive statement to Fox News Digital. "USA Fencing has fallen into the hands of unpatriotic tyrants who put obscure politics ahead of promoting the sport across the country. Whether to play the national anthem or not should have never been in question. And excluding states from the national tournament selection process because of their abortion and LGBT policies is ludicrous and has nothing to do with fencing," Turner said. "It makes me wonder if these policies were put into place to punish conservatives and red states. There needs to be a shakeup in USA Fencing's leadership and an audit of their social media and online platforms." Turner stepped away from competing in USA Fencing after receiving a 12-month probation for refusing to face trans athlete Redmond Sullivan at the Cherry Blossom Open in Maryland in late March. But the fallout of the controversy had an impact on the organization and its policies right away. USA Fencing announced in late April that it is preparing to change its gender-eligibility policy. The proposed updated policy ensures that the women's category "will be open exclusively to athletes of the female sex." The men's category "will be open to all other athletes who are otherwise eligible for competition." However, that new policy has not been officially put in place. The incident involving Turner also prompted a Title IX investigation by President Donald Trump's administration and a congressional hearing in May. USA Fencing Chair Damien Lehfeldt was grilled by Republican lawmakers at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Subcommittee's "Unfair Play: Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" hearing on May 7. After the hearing, Turner told Fox News Digital that she would devote herself and her platform to pushing for resignations among key leadership figures in USA Fencing. "I'm going to be pushing for people to resign, to be honest. I'd like to see some people resign for the comments that they've made, especially publicly, ones that are harassing and meant to humiliate concerned women, mothers and daughters," Turner said. The organization's policy of prioritizing states with pro-LGBTQ laws was a particular point of scrutiny during the hearing by DOGE Subcommittee Chairwoman Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. "In selecting sites for its national fencing events, for instance, the board policy is to avoid states whose laws and policies on LGBTQ rights and abortion it opposes. It uses 'Equality Maps' to determine which states to blacklist from its competitions, and which to favor," Greene said. "This ends up favoring a lot of blue states and harming a lot of red ones. So, it creates politically determined winners and losers — but it has absolutely nothing to do with fencing." The previous host site policy placed a number of states on the "do not allow" list were Florida, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas. The states on its "avoid where possible" list included Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming, Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia. The organization now claims it will have events in several of those states over the next year. "We merged several overlapping documents into one policy that scores every bid — regardless of state — on cost, safety, and travel convenience. Using this rubric, next season's national events will span nine states including Texas, Missouri, Florida, Utah, Ohio, Virginia, Oregon, Tennessee and Nevada," read a statement to Fox News Digital. USA Fencing has also provided a statement to Fox News Digital addressing the new anthem policy. "The anthem has always been played at the start of every national tournament. The Board simply wrote that long‑standing practice into policy and added that it will also be played on any U.S. holiday that occurs during an event, such as Independence Day, which falls during our upcoming Summer Nationals," the statement read. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

St. Cloud council strips deputy mayor of post after Pride Month proclamation controversy
St. Cloud council strips deputy mayor of post after Pride Month proclamation controversy

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

St. Cloud council strips deputy mayor of post after Pride Month proclamation controversy

The St. Cloud City Council stripped its deputy mayor of his position this week after he publicly accused the council of blocking efforts to issue a proclamation for Pride Month. Shawn Fletcher, the council's first openly gay member, was removed from his post at the tense Thursday evening meeting by a unanimous vote of the five-member council, with Fletcher also voting to remove himself as 'deputy mayor.' Though the city's mayor is elected by voters, the deputy mayor is selected by other council members. Fletcher did did not explain why he also voted to remove himself from that post. The vote followed sharp criticism of Fletcher by the other council members for statements he gave to news outlets in May after the council decided to temporarily halt all city proclamations. Council members didn't explicitly say Pride Month was the reason behind the pause, but the timing of their action effectively nixed their ability to declare June as Pride Month in St. Cloud. And that upset Fletcher, who said he felt Pride Month was targeted. Council member Kolby Urban, who made the motion to take the deputy mayor title from Fletcher, said Fletcher's statements and press release prompted nationwide, and negative, media coverage and included false information. 'Mr. Fletcher knows full well that these statements were false and grossly mischaracterized his fellow council members and the nearly 70,000 residents of our community,' Urban said. 'I find these comments not only offensive, but also irresponsible and borderline defamatory.' Some of the statements Urban referenced were published in the Orlando Sentinel. Urban proposed the moratorium on proclamations during a May 20 workshop meeting saying some may be 'controversial,' and that the current proclamation policy doesn't allow enough time for review. At the Thursday meeting, Fletcher said he did not understand the need for the pause or why it couldn't wait until July. June is recognized as Pride month in many communities around the country in recognition of the Stonewall Uprising in New York in 1969, a protest considered a turning point for gay rights in the U.S. In Central Florida, June has even deeper meaning for the local community because of the 2016 massacre at Orlando's Pulse nightclub, a haven for the LGBTQ community, in which 49 people were killed. Mayor Chris Robertson also criticized Fletcher. 'You need to apologize to all of us,' he said. 'You ran us all through the mud.' Robertson also said Fletcher had 'betrayed' his fellow council members and called his actions 'sickening.' He asked Fletcher if he thought he was a homophobe, to which Fletcher said no. He then asked if Fletcher thought he targeted the LGBTQ community, to which he also said no. 'I'm sorry, Shawn, I'm pissed,' Robertson said near the end of the meeting. 'I'm not letting it go.' Robertson spent around an hour asking questions about an upcoming Pride Month event, Proud in the Cloud, and the volunteer group behind it, the St. Cloud Pride Alliance. The event is scheduled to be held on city property, and Robertson said the city financially supported it. 'I said, 'Wait a minute, didn't we just bend over backwards to help these folks? And how can we be — they say that we're discriminating against them?'' Robertson said. The mayor was upset an Alliance member posted online Fletcher's comments about the proclamation pause. He was also concerned about 'irregularities' and 'misrepresentation' in the applications for the event and if city tax dollars had been used properly. Fletcher apologized for some of what happened. 'I think some things got really emotional. Council member Urban, I personally apologize to you,' he said. But he also stood by some of his other statements. 'I do believe it's undemocratic, because I do believe it was targeted. I do, I really do,' Fletcher said. The Pride Month proclamation should have been voted on, he added. 'To not have something move forward to where you put your name on it and you actually vote for it. That's undemocratic,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store