Air Force: Starship to cause few environmental impacts at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
Would launching up to 76 massive SpaceX Starship rockets atop Super Heavy boosters per year — accompanied by up to 152 sonic-boom-producing landings — generate few significant environmental impacts from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station's Launch Complex 37?
That's what a newly released Air Force draft environmental impact statement determined. However, Charlie Venuto, past president of the Merritt Island Wildlife Association, worries how Starship's thunderous noise and vibrations will affect ecologically threatened Southeastern beach mice and nesting sea turtles — along with air and water quality — across the nonprofit's namesake 140,000-acre national wildlife refuge and Canaveral National Seashore.
The draft EIS acknowledged that Starship-Super Heavy launches and sonic booms from Launch Complex 37 would constitute a "community annoyance" for areas like Cape Canaveral, Titusville and Cocoa Beach.
And in a move cheered by MIWA officials, the study eliminated from further analysis the thought of building new Starship launch complexes at two greenspace areas at the Cape, citing high potential of endangered species and archaeological sites.
Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, Axiom, ULA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral
"The refuge has more endangered and threatened species than any other refuge in the continental U.S. So you know, we have an obligation. I know, working on shuttle, that was always a major concern," Venuto said. He was manager of environmental safety for USBI, NASA's prime contractor for shuttle solid rocket boosters.
"We wanted to maintain that balance between technology and nature. And it seemed like we did a pretty good job of that," Venuto said.
SpaceX seeks regulatory permissions to start launching Starship rockets from Launch Complex 37 at the Space Force installation and pad 39A at NASA's neighboring Kennedy Space Center. The enormous economic undertaking will generate at least $1.8 billion of capital investment and generated about 600 new full-time jobs by 2030, Gov. Ron Desantis' office announced.
The Air Force's 176-page draft environmental impact statement analyzed potential environmental, social, economic, historic and cultural ramifications from redeveloping about 230 acres of Launch Complex 37 to support Starship-Super Heavy operations starting next year, including launches and booster landings.
United Launch Alliance previously used LC-37 to send up hulking triple-core Delta IV Heavy rockets. The last Delta IV Heavy launched in April 2024. Starship infrastructure includes two concrete launch pads, launch mounts, twin 600-foot integration towers, twin 225-foot-diameter landing pads, and landing catch towers.
In addition to up to 76 annual Starship launches, the draft EIS examined 76 yearly Starship static-fire tests, 76 Super Heavy static-fire tests, 76 Super Heavy landings and 76 Starship landings.
The draft EIS said Starship would have no significant impact on wildlife from LC-37, though "some federally protected species would be exposed to light, vehicle traffic, noise (including sonic boom overpressures), vibration, and heat during launch operations."
What's more, the study determined Starship operations would not have significant impact on air quality, the maritime transportation system, hearing damage, structural damages, groundwater or surface waters.
The Air Force draft EIS eliminated consideration of building a new Launch Complex 50 for Starship operations from greenspace at the northern portion of Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. This is "an area with high potential for endangered species and archaeological sites," the study said.
Also eliminated was the potential, unbuilt 175-acre Launch Complex 49 near KSC's northern border, in proximity to Playalinda Beach. This land is part of the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
During a FLORIDA TODAY interview, Venuto and MIWA President Nancy Bray praised those moves.
"The good news we were glad to hear was that they were going to repurpose these facilities," Venuto said of LC-37. "We felt that was impressive. That was good thought: Use the infrastructure that you have, and build on that. So we applauded that."
Bray logged a 34-year NASA career, serving as KSC's director of spaceport integration and services. SpaceX is also developing a Starship-Super Heavy site there at pad 39A, pending environmental approval and issuance of a Federal Aviation Administration vehicle operator license. The goal: Conduct up to 44 annual launches and 88 landings from KSC.
In a June 2024 letter to the FAA, the MIWA — which boasts roughly 2,500 paid members and interested "constituents" — expressed holistic concerns about Starship-Super Heavy in light of cumulative rocket-launch impacts across the Cape. That includes Blue Origin's heavy-lift New Glenn rockets, the second of which could launch as soon as Aug. 15.
Plus, SpaceX seeks permission to boost Falcon rocket launches from 50 to up to 120 from Launch Complex 40 at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.
"The SpaceX facility on Roberts Rd. continues to expand and there are many build projects at the KSC Visitors Center. There are several other construction projects planned for KSC and CCSFS," the letter said.
"The cumulative affects to water quality, air quality (including damage to the stratospheric ozone layer), habitat destruction, ability to practice conservation management techniques such as controlled burns, and increased carbon emissions need to be examined in total," the letter said.
Bray and Venuto said they will monitor the Starship environmental permitting process during the coming months.
Now, officials are collecting public comments on the Air Force draft EIS for the Launch Complex 37 proposal. Officials will conduct three Brevard County public hearings to present information, answer questions and collect comments. Hours are 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., with formal presentations starting at 5:30 p.m.
July 8 in Titusville: American Police Hall of Fame and Museum, 6350 Horizon Drive.
July 9 in Cape Canaveral: Radisson Resort at the Port, 8701 Astronaut Blvd.
July 10 in Cocoa: Dr. Joe Lee Smith Recreation Center, 415 Stone St.
In addition, a virtual meeting will be available from July 15 to 28 at spaceforcestarshipeis.com.
Public comments can be submitted through July 28 at spaceforcestarshipeis.com and by emailing contactus@spaceforcestarshipeis.com with the subject line 'SpaceForceStarshipEIS.' Or, mail comments to CCSFS Starship EIS, 5401 W. Kennedy Blvd. #300, Tampa FL 33609.
Starship operations would have a beneficial impact on Brevard County's economy, decreasing unemployment and likely increasing the median income in the area, the draft EIS said.
"Up to 450 additional full-time employees or contractors would be needed to support launch activities 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, throughout the year," the study said of LC-37 operations.
In addition, Starship launches from the Space Force station would "increase the space launch mission capability of the (Department of Defense), NASA, and other federal and commercial customers and enhance the resilience and capacity of the nation's space launch infrastructure, while promoting a robust and competitive national space industry," the study said.
Noise represented the study's lone known potential significant cumulative effect — which it labeled a "community annoyance" for areas like Cape Canaveral, Titusville and Cocoa Beach. To mitigate noise, SpaceX would:
Employ sound suppression systems, such as water deluge and flame diverters.
Work with Space Launch Delta 45 to notify the community of noise and sonic boom events.
Structural damage claims would be investigated, with claimants compensated according to FAA regulations, the Commercial Space Launch Act and Air Force policy.
On that topic, the Cape Canaveral City Council is partnering with the Florida Institute of Technology on an upcoming $10,019 rocket launch impact study. Researchers will install sensor suites this summer at buildings across the beachside city to collect data on decibel levels, vibrations and air quality before, during and after all launches from the Cape.
Starship-Super Heavy's noise, vibrations and sonic booms will likely adversely affect Southeastern beach mice and Florida scrub-jays, per the draft EIS. SpaceX would develop monitoring plans in coordination with Space Launch Delta 45 and USFWS to better understand noise and overpressure impacts on these threatened species.
"Southeastern beach mouse habitat permanently lost during construction would be mitigated by providing funding to offset the loss of habitat at an offsite location in accordance with an agreement with the USFWS. This mitigation would also benefit Florida scrub-jay habitat," the draft EIS said.
Similarly, SpaceX would submit a lighting management plan to minimize effects on sea turtle nesting and hatchlings.
For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit floridatoday.com/space. Another easy way: Click here to sign up for our weekly Space newsletter.
Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@floridatoday.com. Twitter/X: @RickNeale1
Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here.
This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Merritt Island refuge backers concerned about Starship wildlife impacts
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
11 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Trump's Cuts Threaten Nobel-Winning Observatory That Detected Colliding Black Holes
Nearly 10 years ago, scientists observed ripples in spacetime created by the collision of two black holes that took place 1.3 billion years ago. The first direct detection of gravitational waves opened up an entirely new way of seeing the universe, allowing us to observe a once invisible side of the cosmos. Today, the ability to track the frequencies produced by the most notable events that shape our surrounding cosmos is at risk due to drastic budget cuts targeting a breakthrough observatory. In late May, the U.S. administration released a so-called skinny budget that highlighted the proposed funds allocated to NASA and the National Science Foundation in 2026. As part of several monstrosities committed against ongoing science programs, the proposed budget would gut the funding for the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) by 39.6%. The budget request allocates $29 million instead of $48 million for LIGO, and shuts down one of its two interferometers. The twin interferometers are situated 1,865 miles apart (3,002 kilometers), with one facility in Washington State and another in Louisiana. The enormous research facilities operate in unison as a single observatory designed to detect gravitational waves, ripples in spacetime that travel at the speed of light. Unlike other telescopes, LIGO is blind. It detects gravitational waves by measuring incredibly small distortions in spacetime. Using its laser interferometers, it splits a laser beam into two and sends each of them down two long vacuum-sealed arms. The beams travel back and forth through each arm, bouncing between precisely configured mirrors. Each beam monitors the distance between the mirrors and detects tiny changes caused by gravitational waves, which can stretch space in one direction and compress it in the other. The lasers can discern movements between their mirrors with an accuracy of 1/10,000th the width of a proton. Researchers from Caltech and MIT, with funding and oversight from the National Science Foundation, completed construction of LIGO—one of the world's most sophisticated scientific observatories—in 1999. Scientists spent years searching for gravitational waves and coming up empty. Finally, on September 14, 2015, the observatory began picking up the signal of its first gravitational waves. The groundbreaking detection provided scientists with a brand new way of observing the universe, allowing them to trace the waves back to events that had long remained hidden in the cosmos. Gravitational waves are caused by the merger of black holes, the collision of neutron stars, and asymmetric supernovae. Some may have also been produced in the early universe, moments after the Big Bang. Three researchers behind LIGO's discovery were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2017 for their role in the detection of gravitational waves: physicists Rainer Weiss, Barry Barish, and Kip Thorne. These ripples in spacetime were first predicted by Albert Einstein in 1916, and could only be confirmed decades later. The first discovery was confirmed because the signal was observed by both LIGO detectors. Since then, the twin LIGO interferometers—sometimes in coordination with the Virgo observatory in Italy—have detected hundreds of additional gravitational wave signals. Gravitational waves produce a high-pitched chirp when translated to audio, beginning at a low frequency. The two interferometers, and sometimes three, need to work in unison to confirm these faint signals. If one of LIGO's twin interferometers is shut down, as is suggested by the proposed budget, researchers would have trouble distinguishing between a black hole collision and a nearby seismic tremor, according to Science. The field of gravitational waves is only just getting started thanks to the twin LIGO detectors. Killing off one of the laser interferometers would hinder our newfound ability to listen in to the soft ripples of spacetime that echo through the cosmos.


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Elon Musk Calls for ISS to be Dismantled: 'Too Old'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Tech billionaire Elon Musk has said that he wants the International Space Station taken out of orbit within two years. The SpaceX CEO said that the ISS was facing long-term safety issues that meant it was no longer feasible to maintain the space station for longer than two years, and called for it to be "deorbited." Why It Matters The ISS represents the longest international cooperation on space exploration in history, with contributions from Russia, Canada, the U.S, Europe and Japan all being used to maintain and man the station. NASA has committed to operating the ISS through 2030, but SpaceX has already been contracted to perform a "controlled reentry" by steering the station into a descent toward the Earth's atmosphere. What To Know Musk called for this timeline, which would see the ISS in use until the end of the decade, to be accelerated, describing the current status of the station as risky. "There are potentially serious concerns about the long-term safety of the ISS," Musk said on his social media site X on Friday morning. "Some parts of it are simply getting too old and obviously that risk grows over time. Even though SpaceX earns billions of dollars from transporting astronauts and cargo to the ISS, I nonetheless would like to go on record recommending that it be de-orbited within 2 years." The statement came in response to a report that NASA had delayed the Axiom Mission 4, which was meant to launch on Wednesday, indefinitely due to a leak in the ISS's Zvezda module. Elon Musk speaks during a press conference after the launch of SpaceX Crew Dragon Demo mission at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida on March 2, 2019. Elon Musk speaks during a press conference after the launch of SpaceX Crew Dragon Demo mission at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida on March 2, 2019. Getty Images The module was built in 1985 and was integrated into the ISS in 2000, making it over two decades old. SpaceX is a major partner in NASA's space exploration plans, and their Dragon flights regularly refuel the ISS while also escorting astronauts to and from the station. When astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore were left on the ISS for longer than expected after a Boeing aircraft that was meant to take them back to Earth malfunctioned, it was a SpaceX flight that brought them home. What People Are Saying NASA, in a statement on the future of the ISS, said: "In the future, the United States plans to transition its operations in low Earth orbit to commercially-owned and -operated destinations to ensure continued access to essential research and technology development. "At the conclusion of the International Space Station Program, the station will be deorbited in a controlled manner to ensure avoidance of populated areas on Earth. The station's safe deorbit is the shared responsibility of the five space agencies." What Happens Next NASA has not indicated that the 2030 commitment to maintaining the ISS has changed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
International Space Station too dangerous to stay in orbit, warns Musk
Elon Musk has called for the International Space Station (ISS) to be de-orbited 'within two years' amid concerns about the ageing facility's safety. The billionaire owner of SpaceX, which sends astronauts and cargo up to the ISS regularly for Nasa, said parts of the station were 'simply getting too old'. 'Even though SpaceX earns billions of dollars from transporting astronauts & cargo to the ISS, I nonetheless would like to go on record recommending that it be de-orbited within two years,' Mr Musk posted on X, his social media platform. The ISS is not scheduled to be brought back to Earth until 2030. Mr Musk's comments follow Nasa's decision to postpone a commercial mission to the ISS, which is jointly run by the US, Russia, Japan, Canada and the European Union, that was previously scheduled for Friday. Nasa said it was working with Russian space agency Roscosmos to investigate 'a new pressure signature' in a section of the station, called the Zvezda service module. Zvezda hosts living quarters, life support systems, key electrical components and flight control and propulsion systems, according to Nasa's website. Leaks were first detected aboard the ISS in 2019. Nasa has described the leaks, which are caused by microscopic cracks in the station's aluminium-based structure, as a 'top safety risk'. Over time, the leaks have been growing worse – although experts say they are closer to a slow puncture in a tyre than a blowout. Nevertheless, it means valuable air is being lost from the station, which is dependent on supply runs from Earth for oxygen, food, water and other essentials. The cracks in the station, parts of which are now a quarter of a century old, are thought to be the result of general wear and tear to its largely aluminium-based structure. In orbit, the ISS undergoes a constant cycle of cooling and heating that causes what is known as 'high cyclic fatigue' in its metal components, where tiny cracks can emerge. This is because aluminium becomes harder but more brittle over time as it is flexed. Casey Handmer, an American physicist who previously worked at Nasa's jet propulsion laboratory, claimed that the problem was potentially far more serious than had been publicly acknowledged and could lead to a failure in orbit that put astronauts at serious risk. There are seven people currently aboard the ISS. 'We could wake up tomorrow and find, with zero warning, that it has failed catastrophically,' Mr Handmer wrote on X. 'Whether that means a leak slow enough to close some hatches, get the crew out or at least into safer parts of the station, is a roll of the dice. 'It could also depressurise in less than a minute.' On Thursday, Nasa said Russian cosmonauts had carried out repairs to the Zvezda section. However, the US space agency postponed the Axiom Mission 4 launch, which would have taken an Indian astronaut to the ISS, while investigations are carried out. 'The postponement of Axiom Mission 4 provides additional time for Nasa and Roscosmos to evaluate the situation and determine whether any additional troubleshooting is necessary,' Nasa said. The Axiom Mission 4 launch will be carried out by Mr Musk's SpaceX, using both the company's Falcon 9 rocket and a Dragon capsule. The billionaire threatened to decommission his Dragon capsules as part of a blazing public row with Donald Trump on social media. However, Mr Musk has since said he regrets some of his comments during the spat and there has been no sign of him following through on the SpaceX threat. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.