APS rolls back clean energy commitment
Why it matters: This marks a significant retreat from one of the power sector's most ambitious climate commitments — just as the Southwest is grappling with worsening heat, drought and climate-driven strain on the grid.
State of play: CEO Ted Geisler announced on a Wednesday earnings call that APS parent company Pinnacle West Capital Corp. is abandoning its "zero carbon" plan to instead aim to be "carbon neutral" by 2050.
Under carbon neutrality, APS, the state's largest utility, would still emit carbon, but it would be offset by reducing emissions elsewhere.
Zero-carbon means the 100% elimination of carbon emissions.
Jill Freret, APS' director of resource integration and fuels, told 12 News Wednesday that the 2020 plans "were aspirational goals at the time."
Zoom in: In a Wednesday press statement, Pinnacle West said that meeting the energy needs of Arizona's growing population requires "the most reliable and cost-effective resources available to us."
"Clean energy remains an important consideration for us," Geisler said, "but always with a focus on a balanced energy mix that best serves reliability and affordability."
The company will seek opportunities to "support reliability" through other resources, including natural gas.
APS will also scrap other shorter-term goals, including getting 65% of its energy from clean sources by 2030, the Arizona Republic reported.
Driving the news: APS also said Wednesday that the company — along with Salt River Project, Tucson Electric Power, UniSource Energy Services and the city of Mesa — would get natural gas starting in 2029 from a planned 600-mile pipeline that will extend from west Texas to the Valley.
"It certainly has the potential to help support additional development and investment into Arizona," Court Rich, an attorney with Rose Law Group who specializes in energy and utility issues, told Axios.
What they're saying: Corporation Commissioner Nick Myers praised APS on X for "backing off their Green New Deal style policies."
The other side: Attorney General Kris Mayes and Bill Mundell, both former corporation commissioners, told Axios that increased reliance on natural gas will allow APS to seek rate increases to cover the costs of new plants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
U.S., Ukraine and European allies plan to huddle in U.K. ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Senior officials from the U.S., Ukraine and several European countries plan to meet this weekend in the U.K. to try to reach common positions ahead of the planned meeting between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, three sources with knowledge of the plans tell Axios. Why it matters: Ukraine and several NATO allies are privately concerned that Trump might agree to Putin's proposals for ending the war without taking their positions into consideration. The idea for an in-person meeting in the U.K. came up in a conference call on Friday between U.S., Ukrainian and European officials, the third such call in as many days. The logistics of the proposed meeting are still under discussion, including who will take part. Driving the news: The new momentum in Ukraine talks started earlier this week after White House envoy Steve Witkoff met with Putin in Moscow, just two days before Trump's ceasefire-or-sanctions ultimatum for Putin was due to expire. While Trump signed an executive order earlier this week that allows sanctions on countries that buy Russian oil, and also announced a planned tariff hike on India, he didn't announce new sanctions as planned on Friday. Behind the scenes: On Wednesday, Trump held a conference call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and several European leaders to brief them on Witkoff's meeting with Putin. Two sources said Witkoff told the participants that Putin agreed to end the war if Ukraine agrees to cede its Luhansk and Donetsk regions, which Russian forces have mostly occupied since the invasion, as well as Crimea. According to the sources, at least some participants of the call came away with the impression Putin had agreed to give up his claim to two other Ukrainian territories that Russia partially controls: Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. That would have been a meaningful concession relative to previous Russian positions. However, when Witkoff held another video call with senior Ukrainian and European officials the next day, he said Putin had agreed to freeze Russia's current positions in those regions. That would leave significant parts of both under Russian occupation, including the strategic Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. During the latest conference call, on Friday, the parties discussed the possibility of meeting in-person to try to coordinate a joint position. "We focused on coordinating positions to bring a sustainable and just peace for Ukraine as soon as possible. We are ready to work as productively as possible to save lives and stop the fighting," Zelensky's chief of staff Andriy Yermak wrote on X after the call. Between the lines: Ukrainian officials say they're confused about the details of the Russian proposal, and about the U.S. position. A Ukrainian official told Axios that even if Zelensky agreed to Putin's demands, he would need to call a referendum because he can't cede territory under Ukraine's constitution. What's next: Trump said Friday that he will announce the date and location of his meeting with Putin soon, and claimed "we are getting very close" to a deal. He said the potential deal would include "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both countries" and stressed he is trying to get some of the territory Russia occupied during the war back to Ukraine. Trump said Zelensky is making arrangements that will allow him "to sign something" in a way the doesn't violate Ukrainian law. The White House has declined to comment about the ally meeting plans.
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Scoop: Philly nears final decision on Frank Rizzo statue
The yearslong legal battle for possession of Philadelphia's Frank L. Rizzo sculpture appears to be coming to an end. Why it matters: The monument of the city's former tough-on-crime mayor and police commissioner remains controversial even after it was removed from Center City at the height of the 2020 racial justice protests. Driving the news: The Frank L. Rizzo Monument Committee — which commissioned and donated the bronze sculpture to Philly in 1998 — has reached a settlement with the city over the monument, the committee's lawyer George Bochetto tells Axios. The city's Art Commission is poised to review a proposal to remove the sculpture from the city's art collection at its Wednesday public meeting. If approved, ownership of the statue would be transferred to the Rizzo committee as part of the city agreement to settle litigation, city spokesperson Bruce Bohri tells Axios. What they're saying: "This review fulfills a promise made to Philadelphians and comes after thoughtful consideration of the diverse perspectives of our residents," Bohri said. The other side: The Rizzo committee expects to take possession of the statue sometime after Labor Day. And Bochetto says the city is expected to pay $85,000 to repair damages to the statue. The city didn't comment on the potential payment. Bochetto says this is another example of the Kenney administration's overreach that is being corrected. The big picture: The review comes after a court recently reversed another order from former Mayor Jim Kenney that replaced Columbus Day with Indigenous Peoples' Day. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reviewing several items at Philly's national parks as part of an effort to restore monuments, statues and the like that were changed or removed since 2020. Catch up quick: The 9-foot Rizzo statue, which formerly sat outside the Municipal Services Building, was a flashpoint during the 2020 racial justice demonstrations when protesters defaced, burned and attempted to topple it. Kenney issued an emergency order to remove the statue in June 2020, citing a threat to public health, safety and welfare. The city placed the statue in storage, where it's sat ever since. The Rizzo committee filed a lawsuit to reclaim the statue soon after its removal. Context: There's long been debate over Rizzo's legacy. To supporters, he was an Italian American hero and a tough-on-crime mayor and police commissioner. To opponents, he's a symbol of racism, bigotry and unchecked brutality, particularly for those in the Black and LGBTQ communities. What to watch: The committee wants to put the monument back on display. Jody Della Barba, head of the Rizzo committee, told Axios they have at least one location in mind for it, but declined to provide further details.
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Smithsonian restores Trump to impeachment display in museum with revisions
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History restored President Trump 's name to its impeachment display with revisions, after having it removed from the installment last month. Why it matters: The removal — and revised return — of Trump's name comes amid his administration's threats to the institution's funding, framing initiatives and programs that contend with race, LGBTQ+ people or "improper ideology." Zoom in: Trump's return to the impeachment case within the museum's "American Presidency: A Glorious Burden" exhibit came with some changes, photos that a Smithsonian spokesperson shared with Axios show. Edits include the addition of the word "alleged" in the placard's description of the actions that led to Trump's first impeachment. (Trump is the only president to be impeached twice.) The museum also updated a panel to include Trump's name alongside Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. What they're saying: The Smithsonian spokesperson told Axios in a statement that Trump's removal was always meant to be temporary. A temporary placard, which had been in place from September 2021 until this July, was removed because it was "not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and blocked part of the case," the spokesperson said. "We removed it to make way for a more permanent update to the content inside the case." "The updated display now reflects all presidential impeachments. Adhering to principles foundational to our role as the nation's museum, we take great care to ensure that what we present to the public reflects both intellectual integrity and thoughtful design." Yes, but: The Washington Post reported that the change was part of a content review the museum agreed to following White House pressure to remove an art museum director. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) called the removal "pathetic" during Senate floor remarks last week. "This is a man rewriting history or thinking he can rewrite history, " Schumer said of Trump. "He can't, but he thinks he can." The other side: Lindsey Halligan, a White House official told The Post that the White House wasn't involved with the changes. "That said, it's encouraging to see the institution taking steps that align with President Trump's Executive Order to restore truth to American History," she said, also noting that Trump was acquitted twice by Senate. Zoom out: The Trump administration has sought to transform a wide range of institutions, from the Kennedy Center, universities to hospitals.
