Large Hadron Collider Physicists Turn Lead into Gold—For a Fraction of a Second
The not-so-mysterious transmutation happened at CERN, Europe's particle-physics laboratory, near Geneva, Switzerland, where the multi-billion-dollar LHC smashes together ions of lead for a portion of each experimental run.
Early chemists hoped to turn abundant lead into precious gold. But differences in proton number between the elements (82 for lead and 79 for gold) made that impossible by chemical means.
[Sign up for Today in Science, a free daily newsletter]
CERN researchers achieved the feat by aiming beams of lead at each other, travelling at close to the speed of light. The ions occasionally glance past each other, rather than hit head on. When this happens, the intense electromagnetic field around an ion can create a pulse of energy that triggers an oncoming lead nucleus to eject three protons — turning it into gold.
The LHC's ALICE experiment filtered out these instances of transmutation from the wider collision debris. In an analysis published on 7 May in Physical Review Journals, the team calculated that between 2015 and 2018, collisions at the LHC created 86 billion gold nuclei — around 29 trillionths of a gram. Most of the unstable, fast-moving gold atoms would have lasted around 1 microsecond before smashing into experimental apparatus or breaking into other particles.
Gold is being made any time lead beams are collided at the LHC, but ALICE is the only experiment with the detector set up to spot this process. The analysis 'is the first to systematically detect and analyse the signature of gold production at the LHC experimentally', says Uliana Dmitrieva, a physicist and member of the ALICE collaboration.
Another CERN accelerator called the SPS observed lead changing into gold from 2002 to 2004, says Jiangyong Jia, a physicist at Stony Brook University in New York. But the latest experiments are at higher energy, have a much higher probability of creating gold and make for much cleaner observations, he adds.
CERN researchers have no plans to take up gold-making as a side hustle, but say that better understanding how photons can change nuclei will help them to improve the LHC's performance. 'Understanding such processes is crucial for controlling beam quality and stability,' says Jia.
This article is reproduced with permission and was first published on May 9, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Some doctors got worse at detecting cancer after relying on AI
We've heard about upskilling and re-skilling due to AI — but how about de-skilling? A new study published this week found that doctors who frequently use AI to detect cancer in one medical procedure got significantly worse at doing so. The researchers set out to discover whether continuous exposure to AI impacted doctors' behavior when conducting colonoscopy, so they decided to assess 'how endoscopists who regularly used AI performed colonoscopy when AI was not in use.' The answer: Not so hot. The rate was about six percentage points lower. The study was published in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology journal by medical professionals and researchers in countries including Poland, Norway, Sweden, the U.K., and Japan. It followed doctors at four endoscopy centers in Poland, which were part of a trial program focusing on AI's use in colonoscopy for potential cancer prevention. It raises questions about the use of AI in healthcare, when it helps and when it could hurt. Last week, The Verge reported on a Google healthcare AI model's instance of potentially hallucinating a body part and where medical professionals think the industry will go from from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Hayden Field Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All AI Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Health Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Science


Medscape
5 hours ago
- Medscape
Little-Known Gut Nutrient Is Emerging Player in Cancer Fight
An under-the-radar micronutrient is having a moment. Queuosine — just call it 'Q' — is a molecule that humans can only get from foods and gut bacteria. It's has been known to microbiologists for decades, who know it plays a role in protein synthesis — as well as cancer growth, brain health, and inflammation. Yet, it hasn't been clear how Q moves from the gut into cells throughout the body. Now the curtain has been pulled back. The authors of a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences ( PNAS ) have pinpointed a gene ( SLC35F2 ) that helps transport Q to cells. The researchers say the new finding could help scientists figure out how to use the micronutrient to fight disease. 'It's 70 years ago now that Q was discovered,' said study author Vincent P. Kelly, PhD, Professor of Biochemistry in the School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 'What's exciting about this study is the fact that we never understood how we actually took that molecule from bacteria in our body and transported it into our cells, and this explains how we do it.' Q: A Brief Primer The PNAS study looked at both queuine (q), a modified nucleobase, and its nucleoside Q. A quick refresher: A nucleobase is a nitrogen-containing molecule that is one of the building blocks of DNA and RNA. And a nucleoside is a molecule made of sugar (either ribose or deoxyribose) plus a nitrogenous base (purine or pyrimidine) — also a building block of DNA. All of the cells in the human body are eukaryotes — they have a nucleus — and they rely on the micronutrients Q and q, which lurk in the human gut. They come from gut bacteria or a person's diet (most commonly meat, eggs, dairy, fruits and vegetables, and fermented foods), said Kelly. Prior studies had given hints that cellular uptake of Q and q is mediated by a selective transporter, but Kelly said that this transporter's identity 'remained elusive' until now. 'Almost all eukaryotes take the Q molecule and incorporate it into the transfer RNA (tRNA) in the body,' said Kelly. 'tRNA is critical for making protein. It's essential — essential for everything,' he said, pointing out that the average adult human is composed of about 12 kilograms (26 pounds) of protein. How does Q get into gut bacteria and the food we eat? The Q molecule is more or less everywhere, Kelly said. 'It's in the oceans, it's in the soil. Plants, which are eukaryotic, take it from the soil. And yet, very little is known about it. I'm surprised more people aren't knowledgeable about it,' he said, especially considering public interest over the years in health-oriented micronutrients like vitamins and 'macros' like carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. What They Found, What It Means Collaborating with researchers from Germany, Northern Ireland, the United States, and his own colleagues in Ireland, Kelly said they used a cross-species bioinformatic search and genetic validation — research techniques that enable scientists to analyze vast amounts of genomic data from across different species — to determine that Q and q are 'salvaged' from the gut by SLC35F2 and ferried to different tissues throughout the body. 'There's a whole biology built around this micronutrient,' said Kelly. Cracking the identity of the transporter of Q and q opens up opportunities for important research, Kelly said. It will lead to a deeper understanding of how intracellular levels of both micronutrients are regulated and how their deficiency is associated with diseases. The study findings 'represent an important leap in our understanding of queuosine biology. Queuosine is a unique tRNA modification to its precursor, queuine, which is not synthesized de novo in mammalian cells,' said Sherif Rashad, MD, PhD, Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering and the Graduate School of Medicine at Tohoku University in Sendai, Japan. Rashad said scientists' understanding of how q is imported into cells was 'virtually nonexistent' until now and that the authors of the PNAS study used 'an elegant but grounded approach' to identify the first q importer. The finding 'paves the way for new discoveries in the many fields at the crossroads of queuosine biology,' he said. Zdeněk Paris, PhD, Head of Laboratory, in the Laboratory of RNA Biology of Protists, at the Institute of Parasitology in Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic, agreed. 'This study advances the field of queuosine research by identifying the primary transporter and establishing a direct link between the function of SLC35F2, intracellular queuosine levels, and vital cellular processes, which can explain how a deficiency of Q and/or its free base, queuine (q), contributes to various conditions, including neurological disorders and cancer.' Paris said, 'Prior to this study, no specific transporters for the intracellular uptake of Q or q had been identified in any eukaryote.' He said the research is 'high-quality.' He pointed out that the researchers also demonstrated that SLC35F2 is the sole high-affinity plasma membrane transporter for the Q nucleoside and the primary high-affinity transporter for the nucleobase q in human cells. 'Its high expression in the human alimentary canal strongly suggests a critical role in Q/q uptake from the gut during digestion,' he said. 'This reveals how these micronutrients, which are synthesized exclusively by bacteria, are salvaged from the gut microbiome and/or diet and delivered to various body tissues. Based on the obtained data, the authors propose a model in which Q is transported from the gut to the liver by SLC35F2 . There, QNG1 cleaves Q to release the q base, which enters the serum for wider distribution.' The Cancer Connection Paris said that SLC35F2 was characterized as an oncogene in previous research and is known to contribute to the progression of various cancers through its overexpression, including non-small cell lung cancer, papillary thyroid cancer, and bladder cancer. Paris added that SLC35F2 's role in Q and q transport provides a significant mechanistic explanation for its oncogenic activity. 'High SLC35F2 expression is an unfavorable prognostic factor for patient survival in multiple cancers. SLC35F2 overexpression increases cellular Q/q levels, promoting higher Q34 modification of tRNAs. Consequently, Q modification may offer malignant cells a selective advantage through codon-biased translation,' he said. Additionally, the study identified SLC35F2 (or its homologs) as the unique Q/q transporter in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and the human parasite Trypanosoma brucei , Paris said. 'While the physiological importance of Q-tRNA varies by species — for example, loss of Qtp1 does not affect growth in S pombe or T brucei — this comparative analysis strengthens the evidence for SLC35F2 's role in humans and reveals its conserved function in eukaryotes that salvage Q and q.' He said, 'In essence, the study provides the missing link in the queuine salvage pathway, significantly advancing our understanding of how this essential micronutrient is acquired, distributed, and regulated, and its profound impact on health and disease, particularly in the context of cancer.'


Medscape
5 hours ago
- Medscape
Novel Tool May Predict NSAID Hypersensitivity
TOPLINE: A new risk stratification tool known as CA4TCH — which relies solely on clinical history — could help predict which patients with a suspected hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) will have a hypersensitivity confirmed during a drug provocation test. METHODOLOGY: To develop and validate CA4TCH, researchers conducted a retrospective study of 1035 patients who presented with suspected NSAID hypersensitivity at the allergy unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier in Montpellier, France, between February 2001 and December 2020 and underwent drug provocation testing. Using elements of the clinical history — including sex; age at the last reaction; reaction onset ≤ 24 hours; whether the last reaction occurred in the past 5 years; history of anaphylaxis or respiratory symptoms; reactions to two or more drug classes; reaction to aspirin; and comorbid atopy, asthma, sinus disease, or chronic spontaneous urticaria — the team constructed a risk score to predict the presence of a drug hypersensitivity reaction. They then validated the risk score in an independent cohort of 69 participants from the University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 232 (22.4%) participants had at least one positive result during drug provocation testing, whereas 803 (77.6%) did not react to the suspected culprit NSAIDs. The CA4TCH tool had a sensitivity of 78.4%, specificity of 70.4%, and positive and negative predictive values of 43.3% and 91.9%, respectively. Among participants with a negative result, the model successfully delabeled 565 of 803 cases (70.4%). In these cases, past symptoms commonly included angioedema, urticaria, or pruritus. External validation showed comparable predictive performance. IN PRACTICE: 'Given existing variation in testing protocols across clinical centers, the fact that the CA4TCH score is based on clinical history elements alone means it can be used to generate a prediction for any individual upon presentation and could thus constitute a practical tool to be used alongside or as part of existing phenotype classifications,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: Ileana-Maria Ghiordanescu, MD, PhD, with the Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania, was the corresponding author of the study, which was published online on July 16 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. LIMITATIONS: Fixed drug eruptions were underrepresented in the study, and the researchers did not consider food allergy phenotypes because they lacked information about food sensitization. DISCLOSURES: Some authors reported receiving financial support, including grants, consulting fees, honoraria, or support for attending meetings, from institutions and pharmaceutical companies. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.