logo
Pakistani journalists fear amended cybercrime law will further curb freedoms

Pakistani journalists fear amended cybercrime law will further curb freedoms

Pakistan is pressing ahead with amendments to its digital crimes act to stem what it says is an influx of fake news. But media rights groups warn the changes, if passed, will suppress freedom of expression by exposing journalists and social media users to legal action.
New amendments to the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (2025), commonly known as PECA, call for a three-year prison term and a fine of over $7,000 for spreading fake and false information.
The amendments also broaden the definition of content that authorities can block and set up four new bodies to regulate online content.
The amended law now awaits passage in the Senate after its Standing Committee on Interior approved the amendments Monday. The National Assembly, the lower house of the country's bicameral parliament, passed the amended bill last Thursday as opposition members and journalists walked out in protest.
'The fact that [the] interior ministry is involved in this clearly shows that this is being turned into a national security matter,' said Nayyar Ali, secretary of the National Press Club that represents journalists in Islamabad and neighboring Rawalpindi.
The law
Originally promulgated as Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (2016), PECA, as it is commonly known, was meant to curb cybercrime, online harassment, and the spread of hateful content that could instigate violence.
Media and human rights groups call the law 'draconian' and say successive governments have used it to muzzle dissent.
Press freedom groups have recorded more than 200 incidents of journalists and media persons investigated since PECA became law in 2017.
The latest changes to the law come just days before Pakistan marks a year since its elections last Feb. 8 were marred by allegations of widespread fraud.
Former Prime Minister Imran Khan, one of the most popular leaders, remains in jail and his party is deprived of its share of seats reserved for women and minorities.
However, his supporters continue to run a formidable online campaign when most TV channels avoid saying the leader's name.
'State and private players have been able to tame mainstream media,' said journalist Arifa Noor about the decline in press freedom over the past several years. 'It has pushed a considerable amount of the commentary and reporting onto social media, and this is why they now want to go after social media.
'They can't tame it and they want to tame it,' she said.
Pakistan ranks a low 152 out of 180 countries on Reporters without Borders' global press freedom index, where 1 shows the best media environment. Freedom House ranks it "not free" for internet freedoms.
Amendments
PECA (2025) as approved by the national assembly expands the definition of unlawful content to include information that is false, harmful, and damages the reputation of a person including members of the judiciary, armed forces, parliament or a provincial assembly.
It also broadens the definition of 'person' to include state institutions and corporations.
Critics worry this will muzzle dissent and open doors for the powerful military to target civilians.
Minister for Information for Punjab province Azma Bukhari rejected the concerns as 'undue.'
'The [military] institution also belongs to this country,' he said. 'If the institution has an objection over someone, should it not object [just] because it's an institution?'
The amendments come as Pakistan's military routinely faces criticism online for its role in civilian affairs as well as for its alleged interference in political affairs, which it denies. Faced often with smear campaigns, the military's top brass has repeatedly called for a crackdown on 'digital terrorism.'
'What we need is strong civil laws that treat defamation as a civil problem,' Noor said.
The amended law stipulates a punishment of up to three years in prison and a fine of more than $7,000 for intentionally disseminating information that a person knows or believes is 'false or fake and likely to cause or create a sense of fear, panic or disorder or unrest in general public or society.'
'What is fake news? They don't bother to define it,' Noor, the journalist, said. 'They want to call everything that they don't like fake news.'
Journalists' bodies say the impact of the amended law will not be limited to social media content makers.
'All the media is digital now,' said Ali, secretary of the National Press Club, as mainstream media outlets and prominent journalists use social media to deliver information that can draw state backlash if delivered on TV channels.
New powers
The bill proposes creating a Digital Rights Protection Authority, a Social Media Complaint Council, a Social Media Protection Tribunal and a National Cyber Crime Investigation Authority.
Decisions made by the tribunal can only be challenged in the Supreme Court, bypassing the traditional appeals process that includes provincial high courts.
Punjab information minister Bukhari defended the amendment saying, 'we are giving access to the highest forum in the country.' However, the Press Club's Ali said most citizens do not have the financial means to approach the country's top court through lawyers.
Bukhari, who has been a target of an AI-generated smear campaign, told VOA that Pakistan needs such a law.
'Those who deal in fake news should be fearful of this law,' she said. 'Those who file with checks and balances should not worry.'
However, Noor said journalists are also caught in a bind when government officials give contradictory information that causes the spread of false information.
Rushed passage
Some journalists' bodies have said they support government efforts to regulate digital spaces, however they are questioning the speedy passage of the amended law in the National Assembly and approval of amendments by the Senate committee.
Expressing concern over the chilling effects of the amendments, the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan as well as Amnesty International last week called on the government to consult journalist bodies before turning the bill into law.
In a statement Thursday, the Joint Action Committee, a coalition of major media bodies of the country 'rejected any PECA amendments that are passed or approved without consultation with media bodies.'
The Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists has called for nationwide protests on Tuesday afternoon.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US government shutdown likely averted; Democrats fracture
US government shutdown likely averted; Democrats fracture

Voice of America

time14-03-2025

  • Voice of America

US government shutdown likely averted; Democrats fracture

The U.S. Senate is set to pass a stopgap spending bill Friday that would avert a partial government shutdown, although many Democrats are expressing anger over plans by their party's leadership to support the measure. The measure cleared its first Senate hurdle early Friday evening, 62-38. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the bill earlier this week to meet a March 14 deadline to keep the government running. Senate Democrats have fractured over whether to support the short-term continuing resolution (CR) that would fund the government for the next six months, reduce total government spending by about $7 billion from last year's levels and shift money to the military and away from non-defense spending. Much of the party's anger Friday was directed at Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer who announced Thursday night that while he disliked the bill, a shutdown was a "far worse option." Speaking on the Senate floor Friday morning, Schumer said not passing the Republican funding bill would give more power to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) effort led by Elon Musk, including which agencies would be shut down. "A shutdown would allow DOGE to shift into overdrive," he said. Dozens of House Democrats, who opposed the funding measure in the lower chamber, sent a letter to Schumer on Friday, expressing their "strong opposition" to his plan to vote for the bill. Former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged Senate Democrats to go against their leader. In a Friday statement, she wrote, "America has experienced a Trump shutdown before — but this damaging legislation only makes matters worse." Trump has called on Congress to pass the funding bill and on Friday praised Schumer for supporting it. "Congratulations to Chuck Schumer for doing the right thing — Took 'guts' and courage!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform. Appropriations bills require a 60-vote threshold for passage in the Senate, which means Republicans need to secure at least eight Democratic votes. Schumer previously called for the Senate to pass an earlier version of the CR that Democrats were involved in negotiating. "Funding the government should be a bipartisan effort. But Republicans chose a partisan path, drafting their continuing resolution without any input, any input, from congressional Democrats," Schumer said on the Senate floor late Wednesday. The House passed the short-term spending measure Tuesday by a vote of 217-213. One Democrat voted for the bill and one Republican against it. The chamber went out of session for the rest of the week starting Tuesday afternoon, putting pressure on senators to pass its version of the CR. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson quelled dissent from within his Republican Party to pass the spending measure. He told reporters Tuesday the seven-month continuing resolution was an important step toward implementing Trump's agenda of rooting out government waste and abuse through DOGE. "It allows us to move forward with changing the size and scope of the federal government. There is a seismic shift going on in Washington right now. This is a different moment than we have ever been in. The DOGE work is finding massive amounts of fraud, waste and abuse," Johnson said. "We have a White House that is actually dedicated to getting us back onto a fiscally responsible track." Independent watchdogs and analysts, however, say DOGE is using overly broad claims of fraud to generate support for large-scale cuts to federal programs and offices. Representative Thomas Massie was the lone Republican holdout, despite Trump's post Monday night on Truth Social calling for Massie to lose his seat if he voted against the spending measure. The continuing resolution buys lawmakers time to reach a compromise on Senate and House versions of government spending for the next fiscal year, which begins in October, a key tool for implementing Trump's domestic policy agenda. At question is how and when to enact a proposed extension of the 2017 tax cuts and how to pay down the U.S. deficit without cutting key safety net programs that help American voters.

ເສັ້ນຕາຍໃກ້ເຂົ້າມາ ເພື່ອສະພາສູງສະຫະລັດ ຈະຫຼີກລ້ຽງການປິດລັດຖະບານ
ເສັ້ນຕາຍໃກ້ເຂົ້າມາ ເພື່ອສະພາສູງສະຫະລັດ ຈະຫຼີກລ້ຽງການປິດລັດຖະບານ

Voice of America

time14-03-2025

  • Voice of America

ເສັ້ນຕາຍໃກ້ເຂົ້າມາ ເພື່ອສະພາສູງສະຫະລັດ ຈະຫຼີກລ້ຽງການປິດລັດຖະບານ

ບັນດາສະມາຊິກລັດຖະສະພາສະຫະລັດກຳລັງໝົດເວລາໃນການຜ່ານມະຕິລະຍະສັ້ນ ຫຼື CR ຊຶ່ງຈະໃຫ້ເງິນທຶນແກ່ລັດຖະບານຫຼັງຈາກຜ່ານກຳນົດສຸດທ້າຍ ຫຼື ເສັ້ນຕາຍວັນທີ 14 ມີນາ ນີ້. ' ພັກເດໂມແຄຣຕ ຕ້ອງຕັດສິນໃຈວ່າຈະສະໜັບສະໜູນກົດໝາຍການຈັດຫາເງິນທຶນທີ່ສົ່ງມາຈາກສະພາຜູ້ແທນ ຫຼື ສະພາຕໍ່າຫຼືບໍ່ ຫຼື ຈະປິດລັດຖະບານ ຫຼື Shutdown ຈົນເຖິງຕອນນີ້ເບິ່ງຄືວ່າພວກເຂົາຈະວາງແຜນທີ່ຈະປິດລັດຖະບານ' ທ່ານ ຈອນ ທູນ ຫົວໜ້າສຽງສ່ວນຫຼາຍໃນສະພາສູງກ່າວໃນ ສະພາສູງເມື່ອວັນພະຫັດ. ຮ່າງກົດໝາຍຈັດສັນງົບປະມານຕ້ອງມີຄະແນນສຽງ 60 ສຽງຈຶ່ງຈະຜ່ານໃນສະພາສູງຊຶ່ງໝາຍຄວາມວ່າພັກຣີພັບລີກັນຕ້ອງໄດ້ຮັບຄະແນນສຽງຈາກພັກ ເດໂມແຄຣຕຢ່າງໜ້ອຍ 8 ສຽງ. ທ່ານ ຊັກ ຊູເມີ (Chuck Schumer) ຫົວໜ້າສຽງສ່ວນໜ້ອຍໃນສະພາສູງຮຽກຮ້ອງໃຫ້ສະພາສູງຜ່ານຮ່າງ CR ສະບັບກ່ອນໜ້ານີ້ທີ່ພັກເດໂມແຄຣຕ ມີສ່ວນຮ່ວມໃນການເຈລະຈາ. 'ການຈັດສັນໃຫ້ທຶນແກ່ລັດຖະບານຄວນເປັນຄວາມພະຍາຍາມຮ່ວມກັນຂອງສອງພັກ ແຕ່ພັກຣີພັບລີກັນເລືອກແນວທາງຂອງພັກໂດຍຮ່າງມະຕິຕໍ່ເນື່ອງ ເຊິ່່ງບໍ່ຮັບເອົາຄວາມເຫັນໃດ ໆ ຈາກສະມາຊິກລັດຖະສະພາຈາກພັກເດໂມແຄຣຕ' ທ່ານ ຊູເມີ ກ່າວທີ່ສະພາສູງເມື່ອວັນພຸດທີ່ຜ່ານມາ. ສະມາຊິກສະພາສູງຈາກພັກເດໂມແຄຣຕກ່າວວ່າພວກເຂົາກັງວົນກ່ຽວກັບການຜ່ອນຜັນແນວທາງໃຫ້ລັດຖະບານຂອງທ່ານທຣໍາສາມາດຳເນິນການປ່ຽນແປງຄັ້ງໃຫຍ່ໃນລັດຖະບານກາງແລະໂຄງການສະຫວັດດີການສັງຄົມຕໍ່ໄປໄດ້. 'ຂ້ອຍບໍ່ຢາກໃຫ້ປິດລັດຖະບານ' ສະມາຊິກສະພາສູງຈາກພັກເດໂມແຄຣຕ ທ່ານ ຄຣິສ ແວນໂຮລເລນ ກ່າວໃນຖະແຫຼງການເມື່ອວັນພະຫັດຜ່ານມາ ແລະ ນັ້ນຄືເຫດຜົນວ່າເປັນຫຍັງຂ້ອຍຈຶ່ງຢາກລົງຄະແນນສຽງໃຫ້ກັບຮ່າງກົດໝາຍທີ່ຈະໃຫ້ລັດຖະບານເປີດດຳເນີນການຕໍ່ໄປເປັນເວລາ 30 ວັນໃນລະຫວ່າງທີ່ເຈລະຈາກັນໂດຍທັງສອງຝ່າຍ ແຕ່ຂ້ອຍຈະບໍ່ສະໜັບສະໜູນຮ່າງກົດໝາຍຂອງພັກຣີພັບລີກັນໃນສະພາຜູ້ແທນສະບັບນີ້ທີ່ພຽງແຕ່ໃຫ້ເຊື້ອໄຟ ແລະ ເຄື່ອງມືຫຼາຍຂຶ້ນແກ່ ທ່ານ ອີລອນ ມັສ ໃນການຮື້ຖອນສ່ວນສຳຄັນຂອງລັດຖະບານກາງເພື່ອຫຼອກລວງປະຊາຊົນຢ່າງເຂົາແລະຄົນຮັ່ງມີ' ' ການລົງຄະແນນສຽງບໍ່ເຫັນດີນຳ CR ຈະສົ່ງຜົນເສຍຕໍ່ປະຊາຊົນຊາວອາເມຣິກັນແລະທຳລາຍ ແຮງຜັກດັນອັນໜ້າເຫຼືອເຊື່ອທີ່ປະທານາທິບໍດີ ດໍໂນລ ທຣໍາ ສ້າງມາໃນຊ່ວງ 51 ວັນຜ່ານມາ" ແຄໂຣໄລນ ລີວິຕ ໂຄສົກທະນຽບຂ່ວກ່າວກັບນັກຂ່າວເມື່ອຕົ້ນອາທິດນີ້. ອ່ານເປັນຂ່າວພາສາອັງກິດ U.S. lawmakers are running out of time to pass a short-term continuing resolution, or CR, that will fund the government past a March 14 deadline. 'Democrats need to decide if they're going to support funding legislation that came over from the House, or if they're going to shut down the government. So far, it's looking like they plan to shut it down,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on the Senate floor Thursday. Appropriations bills require a 60-vote threshold for passage in the Senate, which means Republicans need to secure at least eight Democratic votes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has called for the Senate to pass an earlier version of the CR that Democrats were involved in negotiating. 'Funding the government should be a bipartisan effort. But Republicans chose a partisan path, drafting their continuing resolution without any input, any input, from congressional Democrats,' Schumer said on the Senate floor late Wednesday. Democratic senators say they are concerned about easing the way for the Trump administration to continue large-scale changes to the federal government and social safety net programs. 'I don't want a government shutdown,' Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen said in a statement Thursday. 'And that's why I'd like to vote on a bill to keep the government open for 30 days while we have a bipartisan negotiation. But I will not support this Republican House bill that simply gives Elon Musk more fuel and more tools to dismantle big parts of the federal government in order to rig it for people like himself and the very rich.' 'Voting against the CR will hurt the American people and kill the incredible momentum that President [Donald] Trump has built over the past 51 days,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters earlier this week. The Republican-majority House of Representatives passed a short-term spending measure Tuesday by a vote of 217-213. The House went out of session for the rest of the week starting Tuesday afternoon, putting pressure on senators to pass its version of the CR.

US lawmakers running out of time to fund government
US lawmakers running out of time to fund government

Voice of America

time13-03-2025

  • Voice of America

US lawmakers running out of time to fund government

U.S. lawmakers are running out of time to pass a short-term continuing resolution, or CR, that will fund the government past a March 14 deadline. "Democrats need to decide if they're going to support funding legislation that came over from the House, or if they're going to shut down the government. So far, it's looking like they plan to shut it down," Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on the Senate floor Thursday. Appropriations bills require a 60-vote threshold for passage in the Senate, which means Republicans need to secure at least eight Democratic votes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has called for the Senate to pass an earlier version of the CR that Democrats were involved in negotiating. "Funding the government should be a bipartisan effort. But Republicans chose a partisan path, drafting their continuing resolution without any input, any input, from congressional Democrats," Schumer said on the Senate floor late Wednesday. Democratic senators say they are concerned about easing the way for the Trump administration to continue large-scale changes to the federal government and social safety net programs. "I don't want a government shutdown," Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen said in a statement Thursday. "And that's why I'd like to vote on a bill to keep the government open for 30 days while we have a bipartisan negotiation. But I will not support this Republican House bill that simply gives Elon Musk more fuel and more tools to dismantle big parts of the federal government in order to rig it for people like himself and the very rich." "Voting against the CR will hurt the American people and kill the incredible momentum that President [Donald] Trump has built over the past 51 days," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters earlier this week. The Republican-majority House of Representatives passed a short-term spending measure Tuesday by a vote of 217-213. The House went out of session for the rest of the week starting Tuesday afternoon, putting pressure on senators to pass its version of the CR. Speaker of the House Mike Johnson quelled dissent from within his Republican party to pass the spending measure. He told reporters Tuesday the seven-month continuing resolution was an important step toward implementing Trump's agenda of rooting out government waste and abuse through the Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE. "It allows us to move forward with changing the size and scope of the federal government. There is a seismic shift going on in Washington right now. This is a different moment than we have ever been in. The DOGE work is finding massive amounts of fraud, waste and abuse," Johnson said. "We have a White House that is actually dedicated to getting us back onto a fiscally responsible track." Independent watchdogs and analysts, however, say DOGE is using overly broad claims of fraud to generate support for large-scale cuts to federal programs and offices. Representative Thomas Massie was the lone Republican holdout, despite Trump's post Monday night on Truth Social calling for Massie to lose his seat if he voted against the spending measure. The continuing resolution buys lawmakers time to reach a compromise on Senate and House versions of government spending, a key tool for implementing Trump's domestic policy agenda. At question is how and when to enact a proposed extension of the 2017 tax cuts and how to pay down the U.S. deficit without cutting key safety net programs that help American voters. Senate leadership has proposed passing the tax cuts in a separate bill later this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store