logo
Putin's hand strengthens amid Trump's push for peace deal

Putin's hand strengthens amid Trump's push for peace deal

The Hilla day ago
Russian President Vladimir Putin is seeing his hand steadily strengthen in negotiations over a potential peace deal as President Trump seeks to plot out a path to end Russia's war with Ukraine.
The Kremlin has escaped the imminent threat of additional U.S. sanctions and convinced Trump to drop his demands for an immediate ceasefire, without making any major concessions beyond an openness to future talks.
It's not entirely clear that Putin wants a deal unless it is completely on the Kremlin's terms, but just engaging with Trump has elevated the Russian leader at little cost.
'I think that they found that getting engaged in this process can sort of scuttle those potential punishments, at least for the foreseeable future,' said Dmitry Gorenburg, senior research scientist in Russia studies at CNA, a national security research organization.
'And in the meantime, they can continue to prosecute the war, which … they see as going relatively well for them right now.'
Trump has maintained a drumbeat of optimism following his high-profile meeting with Putin in Alaska last week. After those talks, Trump acknowledged there was no ceasefire deal, but he said they'd made progress.
Over the weekend, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who attended the Trump-Putin meeting, said the sides were a long way away from a peace deal, but he also said they'd made enough progress to keep working. And Steve Witkoff, Trump's envoy to the region, said Russia had agreed to security guarantees for Ukraine, though exactly what those might look like is unclear.
That set the table for Monday's meetings between Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders, who after visiting the White House said they were encouraged by Trump's willingness to involve the U.S. in potential postwar security guarantees for Ukraine.
Trump is now pushing Putin and Zelensky to sit down for direct talks for the first time since Russia launched its war on Ukraine in February 2022, hoping they can start hashing out the details of a peace agreement.
Gorenburg said he would be surprised if the meeting happens and is skeptical of the prospects for progress even if it does. He suggested Russia and Putin are happy to string things along.
'I think that there will be various kinds of delays and roadblocks and so on that kind of continue down the road of doing just enough to keep the Trump administration … hoping that there's some future deal, but without actually getting one accomplished,' he said.
Trump said he raised the idea of direct negotiation with Putin during a phone call on Monday.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov equivocated when asked about it on Tuesday, saying any such meeting would need to be prepared 'step by step, gradually, starting from the expert level and then going through all the necessary stages.'
Ryhor Nizhnikau, a senior research fellow focused on Russia at the Finnish Institute of International Affairs, was optimistic that a meeting would eventually take place, likely with Trump's participation, as all three sides want to maintain the perception of moving toward peace.
Zelensky fears losing U.S. support entirely, Putin wants to keep Trump in a neutral stance, and Trump either wants a peace deal or an opening to exit Ukraine with his reputation intact.
However, Nizhnikau described the ongoing deliberations over security guarantees and territorial concessions as 'empty talk,' given the current dynamics of the war and entrenched positions on both sides.
Putin will not accept 'NATO-like' protections for Ukraine, as Western officials have suggested, because that would entail allowing European boots on the ground; and Zelensky is not about to cede the eastern Donbas region, which would mark a 'massive military defeat' and spur 'huge political backlash in Ukraine.'
According to Reuters, Putin wants all of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in the Donbas, including areas Russia does not currently occupy, and is willing to freeze the front lines in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — marking a slight climbdown from his demand for all four regions outright.
Despite Trump's claims of progress, Russia has not shifted its core demands for Ukraine's complete political and military capitulation, as Putin reiterated in his public remarks in Alaska.
'Probably, I would say they are even further from a peace deal than before Alaska,' Nizhnikau said, adding that Russia was 'upping the game, in a sense, seeing that Trump shows a willingness to move or to shift towards their position.'
Nizhnikau noted that the optics from Trump's Monday meetings, in which European leaders took turns praising his leadership then gathered around the Resolute Desk, were already being used in Russian propaganda to underscore Europe's perceived weakness.
'The fact that Europeans are continuing their line of behavior toward Trump — which is trying to court him, trying to convince him through praises and not trying to irritate him at any cost, while Trump … reneges on his past promises — only encourages Moscow's disregard and maybe even contempt of Europe,' he said.
The Trump administration has touted at least one specific concession from Putin.
Witkoff on Sunday said Russia had agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine similar to those outlined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty, which ensures collective defense in response to an attack on any member.
Both France and England have suggested they would be willing to send troops into the country in such a scenario; Trump has ruled out U.S. boots on the ground but has floated U.S. air support for postwar Ukraine.
Maria Zakharova, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said Moscow 'categorically rejects any scenario that envisages the appearance in Ukraine of a military contingent with the participation of NATO countries.'
Zelensky on Monday said the details of the security guarantees could be ironed out in the next 10 days, at which point he would be ready for bilateral talks with Putin to discuss other 'complex, painful issues.'
Trump called Hungarian President Viktor Orbán on Monday to ask why he was holding up Ukraine's accession to the European Union, as part of the discussions about a security package for Kyiv, Bloomberg reported Tuesday.
Ora John Reuter, a political science professor at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, said an eventual peace deal seemed more likely today than two weeks ago, thanks largely to Trump's willingness to engage with Putin and 'countenance more concessions' to Russia.
'But we're very far from a deal,' he added.
Reuter said Putin's negotiating position depended, at least in part, on domestic pressure, as the war takes a toll on Russia's economy and society writ large.
'So you know, the less enthusiasm for the war there is in Russia, the harder it is to recruit troops, the harder it is to prosecute the war effort, and under that set of conditions, obviously, I think Putin would be more willing to end the war without more concessions,' he said.
Reuter noted opinion polls show growing support in Russia for a negotiated end to the war, while some reports suggest the Kremlin is facing headwinds in military recruitment.
'They can always force people to fight, but that's costly. That's socially costly, and it is unpopular,' he said.
'So I think that the Russians realize they can't maintain this level of war effort forever, and so I think they're willing to see what they can get out of the West and Ukraine right now.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown
Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump plans ride-along with troops in Washington, D.C., crackdown

President Trump said he's planning to ride along Thursday night with troops patrolling Washington, D.C., as part of his federal crackdown. 'I'm going to be going out tonight, I think, with the police and with the military,' Trump told conservative commentator Todd Starnes. 'So we're going to do a job. The National Guard is great. They've done a fantastic job.' Trump gave no additional details of which law enforcement or military units he might join or when and where. Trump's move to personally join the controversial crackdown, which has lasted for two weeks, would amount to a new escalation in the show of force from the White House. Hundreds of federal agents and National Guard soldiers have surged into the streets of the nation's capital this month, leaving some residents on edge and creating tense confrontations in the streets. Although the city has historically struggled with high crime, crime rates were sharply declining before Trump declared a putative emergency that required urgent federal intervention. Troops and agents from an alphabet soup of different agencies have set up checkpoints on busy city arteries, injecting their authority into daily life. Immigration enforcement has been a core part of the crackdown, rattling immigrants and Latino American citizens in many of the city's diverse neighborhoods. Since Aug. 7, when Trump began surging federal agents into the city, there have been 630 arrests, including 251 people who are in the country illegally, according to the White House. Trump has been ratcheting up the pressure since then, claiming control of the D.C. police department on Aug. 11 and deploying more National Guard troops from Republican-led states. Soldiers have been largely stationed in downtown areas, such as monuments on the National Mall and transit stations. But federal agents have started to operate more widely through the city, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser acknowledged Thursday. 'The surge of federal officers is allowing for different types of deployments, more frequent types of deployments, like checkpoints,' Bowser said. Democrats have denounced the federal crackdown as a political stunt. The law that permits the feds to exercise wide authority over law enforcement in Washington, D.C., says the crackdown can only last for 30 days unless Congress approves an extension. Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has said Democrats will block any effort to extend Trump's emergency. _____

S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating
S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

S&P Flags Risks Even As U.S. Keeps 'AA+' Rating

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. S&P Global is keeping America's credit standing intact. The agency reaffirmed its 'AA+' sovereign rating for the U.S. on Thursday, saying Trump's new wave of tariffs should generate enough meaningful revenue to cushion the fiscal hit from his tax-and-spending plan. The outlook stays stable, a nod to the economy's underlying resilience even as deficits remain stubbornly high. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with INTC. Is QQQ fairly valued? Test your thesis with our free DCF calculator. Growth, though, is expected to slow. S&P sees GDP rising just 1.7% in 2025 and 1.6% in 2026, before inching back toward 2% later in the decade. Debt is on track to climb near 100% of GDP, squeezed by swelling interest costs and the pressures of an aging population. Tariffs are already showing up in the numbers. Customs duty collections jumped $21 billion in July, though the monthly deficit still grew 19% year-on-year to $291 million. Longer term, estimates suggest tariffs could raise $2.9 trillion from 20262035, adding about $2,700 to the average taxpayer's bill in 2026 alone. Still, S&P warned of downgrade risks if deficits spiral or politics erode confidence in U.S. policymaking and the Fed's independencejeopardizing the dollar's role as the world's reserve currency. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's GOP on verge of big Texas win, but battle for power is only starting: 5 takeaways
Trump's GOP on verge of big Texas win, but battle for power is only starting: 5 takeaways

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Trump's GOP on verge of big Texas win, but battle for power is only starting: 5 takeaways

Trump's Texas fight is aimed at giving the GOP an advantage in 2026 and a lame-duck president more power while in office. Democrats have other plans. A partisan battle in Texas over who holds power in Washington during the final two years of President Donald Trump's second term has unfurled into a nationwide debate drawing in top political figures as voters brace for another divisive election in 2026. The Lone Star State's GOP lawmakers are poised to send new congressional maps to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott on Aug. 21 that Trump and his allies hope will give them a strategic advantage in holding onto their majority in the U.S. House of Representatives. But the fight in Austin has spread beyond the state's borders and created significant uncertainty about who will be in position to govern during the second half of the Trump administration and after the next race for the White House. 'Game on,' New York Gov. Kathy Hochul wrote Aug. 20 in a social media post. She is one of several Democratic leaders considering their own steps like the Texas Republicans to re-draw congressional district borders inside their state. Here are five takeaways on the fast-spreading redistricting wars: Republicans have the upper hand if the redistricting war expands. States typically redo their congressional boundaries for voters every decade, specifically in the two years that follow a new census. But Trump has encouraged redistricting to happen ahead of the 2026 U.S. House elections. His motivation? The tendency of the party in the White House to lose seats in the U.S. House during the congressional elections that happen between presidential elections. Recent examples include the 1994, 2010, 2018 and 2022 political cycles. Trump and the GOP are hoping to break that trend or increase their 219-212 U.S. House majority through states with Republican legislatures that can draw congressional maps. By contrast, many Democratic states have passed laws and constitutional amendments creating independent commissions to draw their congressional district maps instead of politicians. That's part of why states such as Missouri and Indiana have discussed redistricting for Republican advantage, but the Democratic stronghold of Washington has ruled it out completely. Additionally, Ohio needs to re-draw its own congressional maps under a constitutionally-mandated process that would happen regardless of today's political climate, and Florida has created a special committee to re-draw congressional maps. Taken together, that means that there are three high-population states actively pursuing Republican seats, and so far California is the only major state likely to redistrict for Democrats ahead of 2026. A legal fight over the new Texas maps is brewing What's happening this week in Texas won't be the final say on whether the maps are permanent. That's for the courts to decide, though fights like this can take years to work their way through the system. Both Democrats and Republicans previewed their legal arguments during the Texas legislature's Aug. 20 House floor debate that ended in the House's approval of the Republican-favored new maps. Democratic lawmakers accused their GOP colleagues of 'packing' Hispanic voters into some districts and 'cracking' or 'diluting' their representation. Those are all key terms referring to practices that opponents have used when challenging maps in the past. They also asked Republicans whether they drew maps based on voters' Hispanic ethnicity since race-based gerrymandering is still illegal. Texas state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican author of the bill that changes the maps, explained that an outside law firm drew the maps, not members of the legislature or their in-house staff. He said he asked the firm to re-draw the maps to improve his party's 'political performance' in the state, using a term that he said was backed up by a recently decided federal court case. Hunter used the term repeatedly during hours of questioning by Democrats. Americans still don't like gerrymandering Americans haven't historically liked it when politicians draw maps in their favor, but they may support the practice when it benefits the party they agree with. A nationwide Reuters/Ipsos poll that ran from Aug. 13 to 18 found that a small majority of respondents thought the ongoing redistricting plans were 'bad for democracy,' and Democrats were more likely to think this than Republicans. A poll by the market research firm YouGov that ran Aug. 1 to 4 found that three-quarters of adults saw it as a 'major problem' when states draw maps to intentionally favor one party, and another one-fifth saw it as a 'minor problem.' These proportions, too, higher among Democrats and lower among Republicans. But in California, where Democratic lawmakers wants voters to decide in a Nov. 4 special election whether to redraw their own maps in favor of Democrats, a majority of voters support the initiative. The proposal has support from 57% of California voters, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom's own polling, as reported by Axios, including overwhelming support from Democrats and overwhelming opposition from Republicans. A Politico-UC Berkeley Citrin Center poll of nationwide voters that ran through Aug. 20 found about one-third of respondents said Democrats in California should 'fight back' with their own maps. That broke down to almost two-thirds of Democrats, one-third of independents, and about one-tenth of Republicans. New Democrats are getting their time in the spotlight Americans are seeing new faces emerge from the Democratic Party as they make national headlines fighting back against often better-known Texas Republicans. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, widely seen as a frontrunner for his party's presidential nomination in 2028, is one of them. His decision to go toe-to-toe with Texas and leverage his position in the only state with more congressional seats than the Lone Star State has meant an introduction to Americans all over the country and a national spotlight on his ideas. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, one of the names floated for vice president in 2024, got his name out there when he hosted Texas Democrats who fled their state for nearly two weeks. But the ongoing fight has also highlighted what anti-gerrymandering advocates have called an unfair map tilted toward Democrats in Illinois. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who says she wants to retaliate against Texas, is also gaining some attention. Another new face is Texas Rep. Nicole Collier of Fort Worth, who slept on the floor of the legislature. Texas Republican leaders have been requiring the Democratic lawmakers who broke quorum earlier this month to sign permission slips to leave the chamber and have a state police escort follow them around 24 hours a day to make sure they don't attempt to leave the state again. 'Today is not the end,' Collier said after the House passed the bill Aug. 20. 'It is the beginning, the start of a new Democratic party where we won't back down. … And we will push and push and push until we take over this country.' Barack Obama, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are all involved Trump kicked off the firestorm when he called on Texas lawmakers to redraw the maps and provide five more Republican-leaning congressional districts. Now he's going toe-to-toe with Democratic Party standard bearers who have come into the fight. Former President Barack Obama posted on X that the attempt to re-draw districts in Texas was an 'assault on democracy,' and praised Texas Democrats. Now he's endorsed Newsom's plan to redistrict California's congressional maps in retaliation. Former Vice President Kamala Harris also called Collier while she stayed in the legislature: 'You really are inspiring so many people, and I just want you to know that you are among those who history will reveal to have been heroes of this moment. So you just stay strong and do what you are doing.' Harris ruled out a run for governor of her home state of California in 2026, leaving Americans to wonder whether she'll run for president in 2028. Contributing: Kathryn Palmer, USA TODAY

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store