Gov. Stitt regrets calling out Senator's wife before Friesen firing
His statement came before a vote was made to fire now-former Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Commissioner Allie Friesen.
He said in part, 'Is Senator Rosino trying to help his wife avoid responsibility for her role in the finance department there?'
Lawmakers upset after Gov. Stitt brings family member into Friesen fallout
Senator Rosino was the Senator leading the way for the vote to fire her.
This statement from the governor, as well as an early video telling Oklahomans to look closely at their lawmakers, seemed to spark outrage and lead to many veto overrides as well.
You led the Disagree Better campaign last year. But your statement on Thursday seemed to call out a Senator's wife and sparked some outrage. Do you regret your statement, and do you think you should've disagreed better?
'Do I regret—and I didn't use his wife's name—I just said, hey his wife— and yes, I do regret that. I called and apologized to him and his wife, and I let my emotions get the better of me, and I shouldn't have done that.'
These emotions, though, have caused concern from some lawmakers as the governor now has the final say on some bills. There are around 20 or so left on his desk.
Will those emotions go into how you act on those bills?
'Not at all—we'll do as a team like we always do. We'll look at all these different bills and analyze them based on their merits, is it good for the taxpayers,' said Gov. Stitt.
This week, the governor announced the new interim Mental Health Commissioner, retired Rear Admiral Gregory Slavonic. He was chosen after the Senate and House voted to remove former commissioner Allie Friesen, following various budget issues.
'It is no secret that the Department of Mental Health has long needed reform,' said Gov. Stitt. 'It is imperative that Admiral Slavonic is allowed to do the hard work needed to remove corruption and conflicts of interest without political interference. There are brighter days ahead for this department and those who rely on its services. I'm grateful to Admiral Slavonic for his willingness to set another Oklahoma agency on the right course.'
The problems that have come out of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services are far from over, as millions are still missing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Chuck Schumer drops F-bomb when asked if Dems would back Trump on DC police takeover
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer dropped an expletive when asked whether Democrats would support President Trump's bid to extend federal control over Washington, DC's police force beyond the current 30-day limit. 'No f–king way!' the New York Democrat exclaimed during an interview with 'The Parnas Perspective' podcast on Thursday. 'We'll fight him tooth and nail.' Trump announced this week he's seeking 'long-term extensions' from Congress to maintain command of the Metropolitan Police Department past the month allowed under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. Advertisement 6 Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer dropped an expletive during a podcast interview on Thursday. Substack / The Parnas Perspective The president expressed confidence Republicans would back the measure 'pretty much unanimously.' But Schumer signaled fierce Democratic resistance when host Aaron Parnas posed a hypothetical about Trump claiming a crime emergency to justify keeping the National Guard deployed and controlling the capital's law enforcement. Advertisement 'He needs to get Congress to approve it, and not only are we not going to approve it, but there are some Republicans who don't like it either,' Schumer said. The minority leader dismissed Trump's push as 'just a distraction' from ongoing demands that the administration release documents about convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 'He's afraid of Epstein. He's afraid of all that, and we are not going to give up on Epstein,' Schumer charged. Advertisement Trump has maintained that nothing will stop his crackdown on what he describes as crime and homelessness plaguing the nation's capital, though recent reports indicate crime rates have actually been declining. 6 'No f–king way!' the New York Democrat exclaimed during an interview with 'The Parnas Perspective' podcast host Aaron Parnas on Thursday. Substack / The Parnas Perspective 6 'We'll fight him tooth and nail,' Schumer said when asked if Democrats would support granting an extension to President Trump's takeover of the DC police. Speaking to reporters at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday, Trump suggested he could bypass Congress entirely if necessary. Advertisement 'Well, if it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress. But we expect to be before Congress very quickly,' Trump said. 'And again, we think the Democrats will not do anything to stop crime, but we think the Republicans will do it almost unanimously.' The president outlined plans for legislation specifically targeting DC, which he wants to use as a model for other cities. 6 Department of Homeland Security agents are seen above joining Metropolitan Police Department officers at a checkpoint in Washington, DC on Wednesday. AP 'So we're going to need a crime bill. That we're going to be putting in, and it's going to pertain initially to DC. We're going to use it as a very positive example,' he said. Trump emphasized the urgency of extending federal control beyond the initial window. 'You can't have 30 days,' he insisted. 'We're going to do this very quickly, but we're going to want extensions.' 6 Trump has maintained that nothing will stop his crackdown on what he describes as crime and homelessness plaguing the nation's capital. AP Advertisement 6 Trump suggested he could bypass Congress entirely if necessary by declaring a national emergency. REUTERS Despite his preference for congressional approval, Trump left the door open to unilateral action. 'I don't want to call a national emergency, but if I have to, I will,' the president warned. The Post has sought comment from the White House.
Forbes
43 minutes ago
- Forbes
Colorado's AI Hiring Law Faces Shake-Up Ahead Of 2026
Colorado's first-of-its-kind Artificial Intelligence Act (CAIA) may be about to change; or it may not. In less than six months, sweeping new compliance requirements could hit employers using AI in hiring and background checks. A special legislative session convening on August 21 will determine whether the law's February 1, 2026 effective date stands, whether its provisions are refined, or whether lawmakers adopt a hybrid approach that alters timelines and obligations. Governor Jared Polis has signaled openness to changes, but Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez, the bill's original sponsor, has drawn a red line: the law's core consumer protection provisions, including notices, appeal rights, and bias mitigation, are non-negotiable. That means any amendments will likely leave most of the compliance framework intact. Why This Matters to Employers The CAIA applies to both developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems. For employers, a 'deployer' is any business using AI to make or substantially influence consequential decisions about individuals, including hiring, promotion, and other employment actions. In the employment context, high-risk AI can include tools such as automated resume screeners, candidate assessment platforms, and background scoring or adjudication systems that influence hiring decisions. This means many employers could need to stand up CAIA-compliant programs before their AI use is fully mature, or even while piloting tools in live hiring workflows. That's not an insignificant group: according to HireRight's 2025 Global Benchmark Report, nearly one-third of North American employers already use AI or automated decision-making in their background screening processes. Notably, 45% said they were concerned about the impact of emerging AI regulations on their talent acquisition and workforce management programs. In other words, the uncertainty employers feel now could quickly turn into compliance obligations next February. If the law takes effect as written, Colorado employers using these tools will need to: Enforcement authority rests solely with the Colorado Attorney General. There is no private right of action, but violations are treated as unfair and deceptive trade practices. The law provides an affirmative defense for organizations that identify and correct violations through internal review or feedback processes, a structure that rewards proactive compliance. Why the Law Is Back in Play Governor Polis signed the CAIA with hesitation, warning it could impose 'a complex compliance regime' that risks chilling innovation and deterring competition. In early 2025, lawmakers introduced a follow-up bill to narrow definitions, add exemptions for small businesses and FCRA-regulated background checks, and ease operational requirements. That effort failed in committee when consensus collapsed over changes viewed as weakening consumer protections, the same protections Rodriguez has since called untouchable. On August 6, 2025, Governor Polis announced a special legislative session starting August 21. The official reason: closing a $1.2 billion budget shortfall caused by the federal 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (H.R. 1). But among the topics on the table is the fiscal and operational impact of the CAIA on consumers, businesses, and government. Polis has suggested either delaying the effective date, potentially to 2027, or refining provisions to make the law more 'workable and equitable.' Rodriguez has said he never expected the CAIA to be 'over and done' in 2024 and is willing to discuss adjustments, but has made clear that consumer protection mandates will remain. What Could Happen in the Special Session When lawmakers return to Denver, they'll have several choices, but the final outcome is likely to be a blend of political compromise and practical realities. A full delay of the CAIA's effective date to 2027 is possible, especially if it's framed as giving employers and state agencies more time to prepare. However, such a delay would need to avoid any perception of weakening consumer protections to have a chance of passing. Another scenario is a refined law that still takes effect in 2026, but with narrower definitions of what counts as a 'consequential decision' or expanded exemptions for smaller businesses. These changes could remove some lower-risk tools from the law's scope, but most AI-assisted hiring systems would still be covered. Lawmakers could also phase in compliance, delaying certain provisions while requiring partial adherence next February. That approach would give employers breathing room on the most complex requirements, but still demand that they stand up key elements, like consumer notices and appeals, on schedule. And it's entirely possible that the legislature will leave the statute unchanged and rely on the Attorney General's rulemaking process to clarify how it will be applied. That would place the onus squarely on employers to interpret the law conservatively until formal guidance is issued. What's clear is that Rodriguez's position on preserving the CAIA's consumer protection mandates will potentially influence every outcome. Even in the most business-friendly version of this law, employers will still likely need to prepare for transparency, disclosure, and bias mitigation requirements to remain at its core. What Employers Should Do Now With less than six months until the CAIA's scheduled effective date, employers should shift from awareness to execution. The goal isn't necessarily to build every element of a compliance program today, it's to be positioned to move quickly once the legislature's decision is known. Start by identifying your highest-risk areas where AI meaningfully influences hiring or promotion decisions. These systems should be first in line for review and potential modification. Secure vendor cooperation early. Much of the CAIA's compliance burden depends on technical details only your vendors can provide. Opening those conversations now will avoid delays if full compliance is required in 2026. Map out a phased compliance plan. Structure your work so the most complex elements, like system audits and detailed disclosures, can be finalized quickly if the February deadline holds, but without overcommitting resources if definitions or timelines shift. Finally, designate an internal lead for AI compliance to coordinate risk assessments, documentation, and vendor engagement. Centralizing responsibility will make your program more agile if lawmakers create a phased rollout or narrow the scope of the law. Bottom Line for Employers While the debate in Denver will focus on when the law takes effect and how it's enforced, the consumer protection mandates are very likely to remain. Employers should act now to build compliance programs that can withstand a February 2026 launch but keep them agile enough to adjust to new timelines or scope changes. In other words, act as if the clock is still ticking toward February 2026, because it probably is.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
‘The majority want something different': Mitch McConnell casts a long shadow over the battle to be his successor in Kentucky
'The biggest thing is, I'm glad Mitch is leaving,' Leslie Flint, a retired nurse, said at last week's meeting of Bullitt County GOP activists in Shepherdsville, a Louisville suburb. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It's a poetic irony, then, playing out in Kentucky. McConnell might have shaped his state more than any contemporary politician, but his successor may win the seat either by creating distance from the outgoing legend or by outright running against him. Advertisement Two of the leading candidates find themselves in the former category. Daniel Cameron, the former state attorney general who Six-term US Representative Andy Barr, of Lexington, interned for McConnell, whom he has called a mentor, and has been his frequent ally in Washington. Advertisement Both have avoided mentioning their histories with McConnell so far, instead stressing the need for new leadership. By contrast, a third candidate, Lexington businessman Nate Morris, is framing his run for Senate as a rebuke of McConnell's long reign. Unsurprisingly, all are embracing Trump tightly as another way of demonstrating daylight from McConnell. It's already gotten nasty. At the storied Fancy Farm political picnic this month, Morris, a waste management businessman, was booed by a crowd of McConnell-sympathetic party insiders for saying he would 'trash Mitch McConnell's legacy.' Courting their disapproval further, Morris chided the crowd for defending someone 'just as mentally compromised' as former President Joe Biden. Elsewhere, he's attacked his rivals as 'puppets' or 'McConnell's boys.' A cardboard cutout of Senator Mitch McConnell was placed hear a trash can at the tent of campaign workers for Senate candidate Nate Morris at the annual Fancy Farm picnic. Mark Humphrey/Associated Press But even Morris, like virtually every aspiring political figure in Kentucky, interned for McConnell in college; the senator later called him 'the kind of kid you remember because he seems to be so sincere and so dedicated to the cause.' Morris has in the past donated thousands of dollars to McConnell's campaign as well as the Kentucky state GOP. (He has McConnell's enduring power over Kentucky politics is leaving some in the conservative grass-roots, which is eager for dramatic change, doubtful that any leading candidate can truly represent a clean break. So the question many Republicans are asking, said Chris Henning, chairman of the Bullitt County GOP, is, 'If we vote for you, are we getting the same thing we already had?' 'The majority want something different from Mitch McConnell,' he said. 'The problem is, we don't necessarily have options different from Mitch McConnell who have any money behind them.' (A fourth candidate, helicopter pilot Michael Faris, has impressed some in the grass roots but is eschewing large donations.) Advertisement It all amounts to a remarkable final chapter in McConnell's long career — and one that points to an uncertain future for a state he is near-universally credited with transforming over his decades in office from a Democratic stronghold to a Republican bastion. With Democratic Governor Andy Beshear seen as unlikely to run, the winner of the GOP primary will be the strong favorite for the general election. McConnell's record of electoral success belies the fact that he has not consistently enjoyed broadly high approval ratings in Kentucky, said D. Stephen Voss, a political science professor at the University of Kentucky. Despite McConnell's national reputation as an arch conservative, some Republicans harbored disagreements with him long before his high-profile clashes with Trump. Former Kentucky attorney general Daniel Cameron campaigned at the annual Fancy Farm picnic in Fancy Farm, Ky. Mark Humphrey/Associated Press Ahead of next May's primary, top candidates have competed to hug Trump most tightly. Barr and Cameron have adorned their campaign material with Trump mentions and photo-ops; Morris has run TV ads that proudly proclaim his support for one of Trump's most unpopular policies —his tariff agenda. Trump is unlikely to make an endorsement in the primary, given the effusive support for him among the candidates. But Morris is a personal friend of Vice President JD Vance, with whom he shares Kentucky roots and a similar biography. Charlie Kirk, the prominent MAGA influencer, was the marquee speaker for Morris's campaign launch this year in Shepherdsville. (Representative Elise Stefanik of New York, a close ally of Trump, has backed Barr, as have other GOP lawmakers.) Advertisement Morris's rivals have disputed the notion that McConnell is a defining factor in the race. In a statement, Barr's campaign said that McConnell 'isn't on the ballot,' unlike Morris — who it alleged was a 'champion' of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives as a CEO — or Cameron, who it hit for losing the 2023 governor's race despite Trump's backing. 'Kentuckians see what happens when President Trump and Andy Barr team up together: historic tax cuts, a secure border, and an America First Agenda revitalizing our country and Commonwealth,' the campaign said. Cameron's campaign, meanwhile, said 'Kentuckians see him as the candidate most aligned with President Trump's vision and values.' They also argued that Morris's criticisms of McConnell are 'completely fake' given his connections to the senator and needled his 'authenticity and likability problem' after he got 'booed off the stage in Kentucky.' Morris, however, said he's hearing across Kentucky that 'voters are sick of career politicians and are ready for fresh, America First leadership to help deliver President Trump's agenda.' 'The last thing Kentucky needs is a senator who is a controlled puppet of the man who did more than anyone else to try to destroy President Trump following January 6th,' added Morris, who vowed to 'break up the McConnell establishment.' Kentucky Republican Andy Barr spoke at the Fancy Farm picnic. Mark Humphrey/Associated Press Cameron and Barr have tried to signal they will break from McConnell. Barr launched his campaign saying, 'It's time for Kentucky to have a US senator who supports President Trump.' And on Tuesday, a super PAC aligned with Barr sent out a mass text accusing Morris of donating to 'anti-Trump RINOs' — 'Republicans in name only' — like McConnell. Cameron, meanwhile, has criticized his former boss for voting this year against several of Trump's Cabinet picks, saying, 'You should expect a senator from Kentucky to vote for those nominees to advance the 'America first' agenda.' Advertisement McConnell, 83, a legendary political tactician, couldn't resist criticizing Morris this month. 'Surely this isn't true, but I've heard that one of the candidates running for my office wants to be different,' McConnell told a western Kentucky crowd, adding, 'I'm wondering how you'd want to be different from the longest-serving Senate leader in American history.' Though he did not call him out by name, the remarks could bolster Morris's standing among McConnell critics. But Morris's attacks on McConnell might backfire, said Maricle, a former state lawmaker and statewide candidate. 'If you're a Republican politician, and you hope to mount a serious statewide campaign effort,' added Voss, 'it's not clear you can afford to alienate all the people who feel loyalty to Mitch McConnell and his organization.' Cameron has occasionally tapped into the sentiment. 'He can't talk about his actual record. So he has to choose to pick on an 83-year-old,' Cameron said of Morris recently. Early polls show Cameron, the best-known candidate, with a clear lead. Barr, however, has raised the most money, having recruited some longtime major donors to McConnell. Morris has personal wealth and the clearest MAGA lane, but still has work to do to build his image despite an early $2 million advertising blitz. Back at the Bullitt GOP meeting, few attendees had made a decision. But long shot hopeful Nicholas Shelley, speaking to the crowd, underscored the resonance of an anti-McConnell appeal. After Shelley criticized Trump, potentially puzzling some in the crowd, nods and murmurs of approval went up when he targeted McConnell — and the candidates distancing themselves from him. Advertisement 'They can ride his coattails as much as they want along the way,' he said of his rivals, 'until it becomes bad news to be associated with him.' Sam Brodey can be reached at
