logo
New blood test could 'revolutionize' early detection of Parkinson's disease

New blood test could 'revolutionize' early detection of Parkinson's disease

Yahoo11-04-2025

ST. PAUL, Minn., April 11 (UPI) -- Israeli researchers said Friday they have developed a simple, "revolutionary" blood test that for the first time would allow doctors to detect the onset of Parkinson's disease in its very earliest stages.
The authors say the new test can give providers an early warning of when a patient has contracted Parkinson's well before the appearance of noticeable motor symptoms, such as its characteristic tremors, at which point significant damage to neurons in the brain already has been done.
It could be of immense benefit to people who may be genetically predisposed to Parkinson's, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused primarily by the death or damage to neurons in the brain that produce dopamine.
Such a test could also play a key role in future clinical trials in for new drugs seeking to slow or prevent the disease, advocates say.
The research, led by the laboratory of renowned neurologist Hermona Soreq at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, has produced what her team says is a non-invasive blood test that works by measuring levels of genetic material fragments present in the bloodstream that are linked to the neurological damage caused by Parkinson's disease.
The results of a study of its effectiveness and accuracy conducted by Hebrew University doctoral student Nimrod Madrer were published Friday in the scientific journal Nature Aging.
They showed that by assessing the bloodstream levels of two molecular biomarkers, which have "traditionally been overlooked" in Parkinson's research, the new test can "distinguish pre-symptomatic Parkinson's patients from healthy controls with an accuracy surpassing that of existing clinical diagnostic tools."
The genetic materials being measured include two types of "transfer RNA fragments," or tRFs. The test compares the ratio of Parkinson's-specific tRFs to others associated with mitochondria, the "powerhouse" portion of cells which produce energy.
An increase in the Parkison's tRFs, along with a corresponding decrease in mitochondrial tRFs, signal the earliest stages of Parkinson's disease with a diagnostic accuracy of 0.86 -- better than anything now possible, the study claims.
Soreq is the Charlotte Schlesinger Professor of Molecular Neuroscience at the Silberman Institute for Life Sciences and a founding member of the Hebrew University's Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences.
She told UPI the development of a simple blood test for early detection of Parkinson's disease "can offer new opportunities for seeking disease-changing therapeutics, which is impossible today as the disease is only detected when most of the relevant neurons have already died."
Such a test could help address omnipresent fears among those with family histories of the disease. According to Johns Hopkins University, about 15% of people with Parkinson's disease have a family history of the condition.
Family-linked cases can result from genetic mutations in a group of genes, including LRRK2, PARK2, PARK7, PINK1 and SNCA, although the interactions between the mutations and an individual's risk of developing Parkinson's largely remains a mystery.
Still, genetically predisposed people would be among the prime beneficiaries of a successful early-detection test, Soreq said.
"There are people who carry Parkinson's disease-causing mutations, they should surely take the test as only a fraction of such carriers develop Parkinson's disease, but all of them are scared because they carry these mutations," she said.
"Others may take it due to exposure to risk-elevating materials -- pesticides, for example -- and should also be cautious."
The development of a simple blood test that detects Parkinson's disease before it can be diagnosed in the clinic would be "an incredibly exciting advancement for the PD community," American Parkinson Disease Association Chief Mission Officer Dr. Rebecca Gilbert told UPI.
Currently, Parkinson's disease is diagnosed based on motor symptoms, such as slowness, stiffness, tremor and balance problems, which develop years or even decades after the first abnormalities are present in the brain.
"There are certain 'pre-motor symptoms,' such as smell loss, constipation and REM behavior sleep disorder, which frequently pre-date motor symptoms and are seen in people who are at risk of developing full-blown motor PD," Gilbert said. "One major question about this blood test is: How early in the disease process is it abnormal?"
The ability to detect pre-motor Parkinson's "would be incredibly valuable, as early detection can empower people to adopt healthy lifestyle changes that may slow the onset or acceleration of symptoms," she added.
The test also could be key in future clinical trials for drugs to prevent the diseases by using it to test compounds in people who have pre-motor Parkinson's disease, ensuring that the trial cohort are all uniformly affected and thus making the results of the trial more reliable.
"And, once neuroprotective treatments are available, it will be even more crucial in identifying Parkinson's in its earliest stages, to allow people access to a disease-slowing medication that could be game-changing," Gilbert said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US appeals court confirms patent validity of Acadia's Parkinson's drug
US appeals court confirms patent validity of Acadia's Parkinson's drug

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

US appeals court confirms patent validity of Acadia's Parkinson's drug

(Reuters) -Acadia Pharmaceuticals said on Monday that the U.S. Court of Appeals has confirmed the validity of its patent for Nuplazid, its drug for hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease. The decision supports a December 2023 ruling from the U.S. District Court of Delaware, ensuring the patent remains protected in Acadia's legal battle against India-based drugmaker MSN Laboratories. The appeals court followed a precedent that says an earlier patent claim cannot be invalidated by a later one if they share the same priority date. "We are gratified that the U.S. Federal Appeals Court has affirmed the lower court's ruling in favor of our composition of matter patent for Nuplazid, securing protection into 2030 for this patent, and beyond based on the recent favorable ruling for our formulation patent providing patent protection for Nuplazid 34 mg capsule formulation into 2038," said CEO Catherine Owen Adams. This decision comes after another favorable ruling for Acadia regarding its formulation patent for Nuplazid. The court supported Acadia's claims of infringement and validity in its legal case against Aurobindo Pharma and other companies. The U.S. FDA approved Nuplazid for the treatment of hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis in 2016.

CPAP or Zepbound? Patients, doctors debate sleep apnea treatment
CPAP or Zepbound? Patients, doctors debate sleep apnea treatment

UPI

time5 hours ago

  • UPI

CPAP or Zepbound? Patients, doctors debate sleep apnea treatment

Doctors favor treatment with continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, machines, researchers are slated to report this week at a meeting of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Adobe stock June 9 (UPI) A clash is brewing between doctors and patients when it comes to treatment for sleep apnea in those with obesity, a new study reports. Doctors favor treatment with continuous positive airway pressure, or CPAP, machines, researchers are slated to report this week at a meeting of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The machines keep airways open using mild air pressure provided through a mask patients wear while sleeping. But patients would rather treat their sleep apnea with tirzepatide (Zepbound), a GLP-1 weight-loss drug, researchers found. "The results highlight a need for real-world comparative effectiveness data of CPAP versus tirzepatide, and a potential mismatch between patient and provider preferences when managing comorbid obesity and obstructive sleep apnea," lead researcher Ahmed Khalaf said in a news release. He's a sleep technician in the pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine division at University of California-San Diego. Nearly 30 million adults in the United States have sleep apnea, a disease in which the upper airway collapses during sleep, causing people to wake repeatedly. CPAP has been considered the gold standard for treating sleep apnea, but some patients find the machines too bulky and noisy. About 50% of people prescribed CPAP either can't use it often enough to matter or find it too bothersome, according to Harvard Medical School. Common problems include mask discomfort, dry mouth, breathing that feels out of sync and noise from the machine. Late last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Zepbound as the first drug to treat people with obesity and sleep apnea. At the time, the sleep medicine society hailed the approval as "a positive development for patients and clinicians, who now have another treatment option for this sleep disorder," according to a statement from the academy. But Zepbound is only for people with obesity and sleep apnea, the society noted. Also, Zepbound can reduce the severity of sleep apnea through weight loss, but might not cure the problem. For the new study, researchers analyzed nationwide online survey data from 365 patients, and also spoke to 17 sleep medicine professionals at UCSD. Doctors favored CPAP over Zepbound 53% to 26%, while patients favored Zepbound over CPAP 48% to 35%. Both doctors and patients supported treatment that combined CPAP and Zepbound, but doctors were more enthusiastic about combination therapy, 88% versus 61%. The patients' preferences are likely driven by their own experiences -- 78% said they were either current or former users of CPAP, results show. By comparison, only 23% of patients said they'd ever used Zepbound or Ozempic (semaglutide), the other prominent GLP-1 drug. Principal investigator Dr. Chris Schmickl, an assistant professor of medicine at University of California-San Diego, expressed surprise at the level of disagreement between patients and providers. "Recognizing differing attitudes toward treatment is crucial for developing a realistic and achievable action plan," he said in a news release. "Additional research to understand the underlying reasons behind these preferences will offer valuable insights for providers to guide treatment decisions." Researchers are scheduled to present these findings Wednesday at the society meeting in Seattle. Findings presented at medical meetings should be considered preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal. More information Harvard Medical School has more on managing CPAP problems. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director
In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

In letter, more than 300 scientists rebuke Trump research cuts, NIH director

June 9 (UPI) -- Hundreds of scientists via the National Institute of Health signed a published letter in protest to NIH leadership and recent cuts by the Trump administration. "We are compelled to speak up when our leadership prioritizes political moment over human safety and faithful stewardship of public resources," more than 300 scientists wrote Monday to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya in a so-called "Bethesda Declaration" published by Stand Up For Science in rebuke to Trump administration research funding cuts and staff layoffs. They added in the letter to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and members of Congress overseeing NIH that they "dissent" to Trump's policies that "undermine" the NIH mission, "waste" public resources and harm "the health of Americans and people across the globe." In the open letter, they said the current endeavor to "Make America Healthy Again" referred to "some undefined time in the past." "Keeping NIH at the forefront of biomedical research requires our stalwart commitment to continuous improvement," the letter's writers said, adding that the life-and-death nature of NIH work "demands that changes be thoughtful and vetted." According to the letter, the Trump administration terminated at least 2,100 NIH research grants since January, totaling around $9.5 billion and contracts representing some $2.6 billion in new research. "We urge you as NIH Director to restore grants delayed or terminated for political reasons so that life-saving science can continue," the letter added in part. "This undercuts long-standing NIH policies designed to maximize return on investment by working with grantees to address concerns and complete studies," it said. It further accused the White House of creating a "culture of fear and suppression" among NIH researchers. Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor and health researcher, called the agency the "crown jewel of American biomedical sciences" and said he had the "utmost respect" for its scientists and mission during his confirmation hearing in March. On Tuesday, Bhattacharya is scheduled to testify before the Senate's Appropriations Committee on Trump's 2026 NIH budget proposal which seeks to cut roughly 40% of NIH's $48 billion budget. "This spending slowdown reflects a failure of your legal duty to use congressionally-appropriated funds for critical NIH research," the scientists penned to Bhattacharya. The letter goes on to characterize it as "dissent" from Trump administration policy, quoting Bhattacharya during his confirmation as saying "dissent is the very essence of science." "Standing up in this way is a risk, but I am much more worried about the risks of not speaking up," says Jenna Norton, a program officer at the NIH's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. "If we don't speak up, we allow continued harm to research participants and public health in America and across the globe," Norton said in a statement, adding that if others don't speak up, "we allow our government to curtail free speech, a fundamental American value."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store