logo
Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims

Why Anthony Albanese's radical plan for super will hit FIVE MILLION Aussies - not just 80,000 people Labor claims

Daily Mail​7 hours ago

Anthony Albanese 's plan to impose a new tax on super balances above $3million is likely to hit more than five million young Australians by retirement and not just 80,000 people as Labor claims, new analysis shows.
The re-elected Labor government has the numbers with the Greens to get its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill through the Senate when Parliament resumes next month.
For the past two years, Labor has been arguing its plan to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on super balances above $3million, before assets are sold, would affect the top 0.5 per cent of super savers or just 80,000 people.
This would take the headline tax rate to 30 per cent, as the new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains was added on to the existing 15 per cent tax on earnings during the accumulation phase for all super accounts.
Controversially, Labor isn't indexing it for inflation, arguing a future government could do so, like they periodically do for income tax rates.
Wilson Asset Management has done new modelling showing this failure to index the new tax would affect 5.4million Australians, aged 18 to 34, by the time they turned 67 and were able to qualify for the age pension.
'All age cohorts under the age of 35 would be captured by the taxation on unrealised gains by retirement,' it said.
The modelling showed Labor's new tax on super balances above $3million, known as tax Division 296, would even affect young Aussies with a zero super balance now.
'Our modelling indicates those aged 27 and under with a zero starting superannuation balance would exceed the unindexed cap before retirement,' it said.
'This has led to some characterising it as a "stealth tax", one that fundamentally alters the long-term investment incentives within superannuation.'
A 19-year-old worker on a $54,088 salary, with zero super, would have $3.491million in retirement savings by 2071.
Someone who is 20 now on a $66,768 salary and just $75,000 in super now would $5.197million in superannuation by 2072.
Australians who studied longer before starting work would also be affected, with a 27-year-old worker with zero super, on a $90,315 salary now, like to have $3.098million in super by 2065.
A typical income earner, now 34, with $180,000 in super would $3.5million in super by 2058.
These Australians would face an annual tax bill in the hundreds of thousands depending how much their fund had growth during the previous financial year.
Wilson Asset Management Management founder Geoff Wilson said young Australians would suffer in decades to come.
'The proposed tax on unrealised gains will not merely be a burden on individual superannuation accounts exceeding $3million, the failure to index means a 25- year-old who today starts with a zero-superannuation balance will be captured by the time they reach retirement,' he said.
Wilson Asset Management warned that forcing those with a self-managed super fund to sell assets, to avoid going above the $3million threshold, would discourage investors from backing technology start-ups.
'The policy will constrict the flow of essential risk capital to the engine room of the Australian economy – our small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and innovative start-ups,' it said.
'It is a policy that threatens to undermine the foundations of Australia's economic dynamism by inhibiting the very companies that drive innovation, competition, and future growth.'
Wilson Asset Management has released a new discussion paper called, 'Critiquing the Proposed Taxation on Unrealised Gains in Superannuation.'
AMP last month warned Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains above the $3million threshold would affect the average 22-year-old worker in four decades' time but Wilson Asset Management's modelling shows the effects would capture workers aged 19 to 34 now.
Compulsory employer super contributions are rising to 12 per cent on July 1.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Shock to creative ecology': NSW regional art galleries face funding crisis after state pulls financial support
‘Shock to creative ecology': NSW regional art galleries face funding crisis after state pulls financial support

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

‘Shock to creative ecology': NSW regional art galleries face funding crisis after state pulls financial support

Three out of four regional public art galleries in New South Wales are facing a funding crisis after the state government pulled its financial support as a result of a massive restructure of its cultural funding arm, Create NSW. Wagga Wagga, Orange, Armidale, Broken Hill and Tamworth are among 18 regional centres in NSW with major public art galleries that will no longer receive four-year funding from the state government, worth between about $70,000 and $200,000 a year. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning The decision has prompted two of the state's peak arts bodies to call on the government to conduct an urgent review, warning in a letter to NSW arts minister John Graham in June that the defunding would 'devastate our region's creative life' and significantly weaken cultural tourism, which sees about 3.5 million people visiting regional galleries and museums each year. 'Put simply, it is a shock to the creative ecology that we have worked so hard to establish together,' the letter said. Co-signee of the letter, Regional Arts NSW chief executive Dr Tracy Callinan, told Guardian Australia there was a real risk some galleries could close their doors if local councils are unable to pick up the funding shortfalls. 'I've already been on the phone this morning with at least one, and possibly another, that if they're not … funded, they may have to fold,' she said. 'It seems this minister is very busy looking after the 24-hour economy ... there's $100m in this budget just trying to find a venue for a new film studio, but in the process, he has abandoned the small and medium arts sector. 'I suppose there's not that many votes in the regions for Labor.' Co-signee Brett Adlington, chief executive of Museums & Galleries of NSW, said the success rate for regionally based public galleries applying for recurrent funding had now sunk below 18%, well below the overall success rate of 52%. Only three public galleries in regional NSW were successful in the latest funding round. He said many in the arts sector saw the decision as a way of shifting costs on to local government. Many of the 18 galleries affected by the cuts rely on local councils to fund infrastructure and core staffing costs. However, the galleries rely on state government funding to deliver what Adlington described as the 'lifeblood' of regional cultural life, delivering programs to audiences, and providing employment and commissions to artists and arts workers that are locally relevant, including myriad Indigenous cultural projects. Adlington said regional gallery directors had been advised to lodge fresh applications for two-year funding, scheduled for determination in September. 'But what we're hearing is that's probably going to be just as tight, if not tighter, than the last round,' he said. Guardian Australia has sought a response from the minister and Create NSW. The director of the Maitland Regional Art Gallery, Gerry Bobsien, said the state government's rejection of its application for $110k a year for the next four years had been 'devastating'. 'It's something that I can't keep going back to council for,' she said. Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion 'Funding for these cultural programs, particularly in regional areas, is so critical, and the defunding of it appears to be very widespread, spread throughout regional NSW.' Bobsien has already lodged a last-ditch application for two-year funding. '[We] are sweating on this outcome due in September,' she said. 'This process to turn around and re-apply for two-year funding was very difficult as the feedback we received on our multi-year application [has] made it difficult to try and address any shortcomings – we were informed our application was strong, with no suggestions for improvement.' Dr Lee-Anne Hall, director of the Wagga Wagga Art Gallery and the National Art Glass Gallery, said her institutions were now facing a shortfall of about $95,000 per annum, after being informed in June of their unsuccessful grant applications. 'We will not be closing our doors, we are here in the service of the public,' she said. 'However, here in the Riverina, there will be impacts across the board in terms of equity and access for artists, students and community.' Art galleries in urban centres have also been affected by funding cuts. Mosman Art Gallery and Penrith Regional Gallery are among those rejected for four-year funding, and the future of Darlinghurst's Australian Design Centre, which had been reliant on $200,000 in recurrent state government funding, is now uncertain. In January, it also lost $300,000 in federal government funding. 'If we're not funded, NSW will have the distinction of being the only state in Australia without a craft and design organisation,' the centre's director, Lisa Cahill said, referring to Craft Victoria, South Australia's Jam Factory, Craft + Design Canberra, Brisbane's Artisan, and Design Tasmania. The centre has now issued a public appeal to keep its doors open. The board would make a decision on its future towards the end of the year, Cahill said.

Union leader appointed to federal government role without being shortlisted or facing ‘due diligence' check
Union leader appointed to federal government role without being shortlisted or facing ‘due diligence' check

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Union leader appointed to federal government role without being shortlisted or facing ‘due diligence' check

A trade union leader was appointed to the board of the federal government's $15bn National Reconstruction Fund despite not being shortlisted for the role or subjected to a formal 'due diligence' check from private recruiters. The circumstances surrounding the appointment of the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (AMWU) national president, Glenn Thompson, to the board of Labor's flagship fund was scrutinised in a new audit report of the fund's establishment. The inaugural NRF board was announced in August 2023, with the chair, Martijn Wilder, and seven other members picked to oversee multimillion-dollar investments in projects across seven government priority areas. Two months later, the then industry minister, Ed Husic, and the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, announced Thompson as the ninth board member following cabinet signoff. In a statement announcing his appointment for a four-year term, the ministers said Thompson's 'passion for job creation complements the existing expertise of the NRF board, particularly in the areas of Australian manufacturing and industrial capability'. He joined another union figure, the former Australian Workers Union boss Daniel Walton, on the board, which also included the one-time Australia Post boss Ahmed Fahour and ex-federal Liberal minister Kelly O'Dwyer. The Coalition criticised Thompson's appointment at the time, accusing Labor of stacking the NRF with their union 'mates'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) report revealed Thompson was installed in the $63,690-a-year role after the offices of Gallagher and Husic advised their respective departments on 6 October of their 'wish to appoint a specified ninth member' to the board. Separate documents released under freedom of information showed Husic approached Thompson, who is also a director of AustralianSuper. The audit office revealed Thompson – who was not directly named in the report – was tapped despite not being shortlisted as part of an executive search process run by NGS Global, a recruitment agency chosen to find prospective board members. The process proceeded at speed, with Thompson appointed on 16 October – less than a fortnight after Husic and Gallagher's offices flagged it with their departments. The audit revealed that in a brief prepared for Husic about Thompson's board position, the industry department warned the appointment 'may attract scrutiny' because of how the process was conducted. It referenced corporate governance principles for ASX-listed companies, which recommended listed entities 'undertake appropriate checks' before appointing a director. In a similar brief prepared for Gallagher, the finance department conceded that no 'formal due diligence' was conducted on Thompson's appointment by a third-party because of 'time constraints'. The department did conduct a 'desktop' check on Thompson after which it was satisfied his appointment 'did not present a significant risk'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion However, the in-house due diligence – which involved Google and media searches – was not documented and the industry department's checks were 'all verbal' due to the 'compressed timeframes'. The audit report did not rebuke the ministers, their offices or the departments over Thompson's appointment, although it did identify record-keeping as an 'opportunity for improvement'. Husic was stripped of the industry portfolio after being dumped from cabinet following the election. The portfolio now sits with Tim Ayres, a former state secretary of the AMWU – Thompson's union. In a statement to Guardian Australia, a government spokesperson said Thompson had 20 years of experience in senior leadership roles in the finance and manufacturing sectors, and extensive experience on boards, including in roles appointed under the Howard government. 'Appointments will be made through out the life of the corporation to suit the needs of the NRFC and their functions. A well-balanced board with the right expertise is vital to ensuring that the NRFC can successfully fulfil its investment mandate,' the spokesperson said. The spokesperson did not directly address several of Guardian Australia's specific questions, including about the timing of Thompson's appointment, why a shortlisted candidate wasn't chosen instead of him, and why more time wasn't permitted to allow for formal due diligence checks. Guardian Australia contacted the AMWU seeking comment from Thompson but did not receive a response. Husic was unavailable for comment.

First Peoples' Assembly set to become permanent voice to Victorian parliament with crossbench support
First Peoples' Assembly set to become permanent voice to Victorian parliament with crossbench support

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

First Peoples' Assembly set to become permanent voice to Victorian parliament with crossbench support

Victoria will have a permanent Indigenous voice to state parliament, with the progressive crossbench throwing their support behind a plan to allow the First Peoples' Assembly's work to continue following treaty. Guardian Australia understands the Victorian government will introduce a treaty bill to parliament later this year, which will formalise the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria as an advisory body. According to a senior government source not authorised to speak publicly about the bill, it will see the Assembly renamed and granted statutory powers in relation to matters affecting Aboriginal Victorians. While the government will be required to consult the body on such matters, it will not have veto power over parliament, the source said. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email They said it will be introduced when parliament returns from winter break, most likely in September. While The Greens, Animal Justice party and Legalise Cannabis are yet to see the bill, they have told Guardian Australia they support the Assembly having a permanent role. This would give the government the numbers it needs for the bill to pass the upper house. The First Peoples' Assembly – formed in 2018 to represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in treaty discussions – had been calling on the government to make it's role permanent for some time. The Assembly has held two elections and helped establish the treaty framework, including the treaty authority and a self-determination fund, and a landmark truth-telling process. In a joint update to treaty negotiations last month, the Assembly and the government said work had progressed on the 'ongoing role for the First Peoples' Assembly', which will ensure 'First Peoples can make decisions on matters that impact their futures and play an ongoing role in truth-telling'. The premier, Jacinta Allan, told reporters on Monday that negotiations were still under way, but formalising the Assembly as a permanent advisory body would be a 'simple commonsense change'. She compared listening to the Assembly to how the government has responded to community concerns on other issues, including cost of living, bail reform and housing 'When you listen to people, you get better outcomes, and that's what treaty is all about. I reckon we're up for that as a state,' Allan said. She rejected comparisons to the federal voice to parliament proposed at the 2023 referendum, as it would not be 'changing the Victorian constitution'. The opposition leader, Brad Battin, on Monday ruled out backing the plan, noting his party had withdrawn support for the treaty process after the federal referendum result. 'Trying to introduce legislation to have a voice to parliament here in Victoria, after Victorians have already said no, flies in the face of democracy,' Battin told reporters. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion The Victorian Greens leader, Ellen Sandell, said her party proudly supported the Assembly and that it was 'sad and disappointing to see the Liberals attacking the solutions that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities are telling us they need'. Animal Justice party MP Georgie Purcell said she 'unequivocally supports' the advisory body and that it would be a 'disservice to Victoria's proud Aboriginal communities if a permanent First Peoples' Assembly resulted in a Dutton-style scare campaign'. 'Victorians have voted resoundingly for treaty at two elections and the First Peoples' Assembly is just one component of this process,' Purcell said. Legalise Cannabis MP, Rachel Payne, described the treaty process as an 'opportunity' to 'elevate First Nations voices', while her colleague, David Ettershank, said the party was 'strongly supportive' of the Assembly's 'ongoing involvement in Victorian governance'. Enshrining the Assembly in law as a permanent body would bring Victoria in line with South Australia, which became the first state to have an Indigenous voice to parliament in 2023. It comes as the Yoorrook Justice Commission – Victoria's formal truth-telling body – completed its work this month. It submitted two major reports to government: one with 100 recommendations and another an official public record of the history of Victoria since colonisation. It is understood the reports will be tabled in parliament on Tuesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store