
Skyrocketing costs nearly sunk 'Wolf Hall.' So key players took a pay cut to save it
A second season of 'Wolf Hall' was inevitable. The first, based on Hilary Mantel's award-winning novels 'Wolf Hall' and 'Bring Up the Bodies,' arrived in 2015, before the third and final book existed, but producer Colin Callender optioned Mantel's entire trilogy from the outset. What wasn't inevitable was the wait.
'I always knew that we would come back to it at some point,' Callender says of 'Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light,' which premiered on 'Masterpiece' on PBS in March. 'Although I never imagined it was going to take 10 years.'
'Part of it was that Hilary took a long time to write it,' adds director and producer Peter Kosminsky. 'The first two novels were phenomenal successes. She became a celebrity almost overnight. But it was also a difficult book to write.'
Mantel sent sections of 'The Mirror & the Light' to Kosminsky as she was working. He says she was daunted by the idea of reaching the end of her story about the rise and fall of Thomas Cromwell. Her writing was affected by the 'Wolf Hall' TV adaptation, which was nominated for eight Emmys. 'She was very open and honest that she was very influenced by the first season in writing,' Kosminsky says. 'Particularly the character of Henry.'
By the time 'The Mirror & the Light' was published in 2020, returning screenwriter Peter Straughan had already adapted it. The production faced a delay due to the pandemic but was gearing up again when Mantel died unexpectedly in 2022. 'It was incredibly sad,' Kosminsky says. 'It also made me feel a tremendous sense of responsibility to bring her final novel to the screen.'
'Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light' follows Cromwell (Mark Rylance) as he navigates the tumultuous court of King Henry VIII (Damian Lewis) after the death of Anne Boleyn. Although none of the actors had been contracted for a second season, the hope was that the ensemble cast would reprise their original roles. There were a few obvious hurdles: Tom Holland, who played Gregory Cromwell, was now too famous, and Bernard Hill, who starred as the Duke of Norfolk, died before production (he was replaced with Timothy Spall).
'It was particularly complicated because we wanted to bring back as many people as we could,' Callender says of scheduling the production around cast availability. 'We knew at some point that we weren't necessarily going to get everybody back, but we did pretty damn well.'
'I was always anticipating coming back,' Lewis confirms. 'Being an actor is like being an athlete: You're the sprinter and it's the 100 meters. You're going to come on set for a brief amount of time and you're going to nail it. But there might be a lot of waiting before you get to the starter's block, all coiled and energized. I was like that for 10 long years.'
Everyone had aged, but Kosminsky says 'that wasn't necessarily a bad thing' because the show covers 10 years of Cromwell's life. 'Across the series the actors age by exactly the right amount,' he notes. 'In a different world with a far larger budget and a lot more time for prosthetics and CGI, we might have been able to graduate that change.'
Budget constraints were a huge challenge. Over the last decade, the proliferation of streamers has meant that public broadcasters like PBS and the BBC have to fight for crew and locations and can't match their competitors' budgets. The producers had to figure out how to tell the story in a way that felt like a continuation of Season 1 'without anywhere near enough money to do it,' as Kosminsky says. 'We cut and we cut and we cut,' he notes. 'Eventually it was either shut the show down, or the producers and the screenwriter and the leading actor essentially give back most of their fees.'
So, weeks out from production, Kosminsky, Callender, Straughan and Rylance gave back significant portions of their paychecks to get 'Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light' off the ground.
'The reality is the cost of making this second season was literally 100% more, twice the amount, that it cost to make the first,' Callender says. 'It's a challenge that informs the whole of the British television industry in the high-end drama sector.'
Kosminsky reassembled his original department heads, including cinematographer Gavin Finney, production designer Pat Campbell and costume designer Joanna Eatwell. The costumes had been sent back into circulation, which meant starting from scratch.
'When we came back, we all came back from a position of experience, rather than from a starting point of zero,' Eatwell says. 'That was actually quite liberating. It meant we could enjoy the project more. And not having the costumes meant we could move on and grow because the story is so different.'
Ultimately, Eatwell's team made as many of the costumes 'as the budget could stand,' including all of Henry's sumptuous ensembles. 'He has to be the center of the universe, and that's what I always tried to achieve with him,' she says.
'Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light' was shot over 84 days entirely on location in Tudor-era structures around England. The schedule was adjusted based on when the historic homes had less tourists. Some locations had been used in the first season, but others were newly accessible. Hampton Court Palace, an actual home of Henry VIII, said no to filming for 'Wolf Hall' but allowed Season 2 to use its Great Hall.
'Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light' marks the end of the road for Cromwell, whom Lewis refers to as 'the JD Vance of the time,' and for the series itself — an experience that left everyone involved proud of what they accomplished despite the financial constraints and long time gap.
'We worried that maybe there wasn't a place for this kind of show in this TV landscape,' Lewis says. 'But, happily, we've been proved wrong. That, actually, if something's good people come and find it. It's been one of the things I've enjoyed most doing. The subject matter is intrinsically interesting. The material is endlessly deep. Aesthetically, it was so pleasing to be part of. And at the center of it is the reimagining of a very well-known, very well-documented piece of history through another man's eyes.'
Get the Envelope newsletter, sent three times a week during awards season, for exclusive reporting, insights and commentary.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Says Trump's Bill Will ‘Massively Increase the Already Gigantic Budget Deficit' — Is He Right?
Elon Musk isn't holding back how he feels about President Donald Trump's controversial new bill. He publicly bashed the proposal, saying it would increase the budget deficit. Read Next: Check Out: Read on for more details about Musk's critiques of the bill, as well as whether experts believe he's right or wrong. Musk was tasked with reducing government spending as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and per DOGE's website, it's saved an estimated $180 billion in waste. However, after departing from DOGE, Musk launched a series of attacks on X aimed at Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' urging Americans to call their representatives to not let the bill pass. Trump's bill, which has passed in the House of Representatives, aims to deliver an economy that works for working families with tax relief and cost savings, per the House Ways & Means Committee. Musk, however, isn't as optimistic, claiming it will increase the budget deficit. On X, Musk wrote, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He then reshared the post, adding, 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America[n] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Here what experts have to say about Musk's critiques of Trump's budget proposal. Learn More: As reported by Fox News, the Congressional Budget Office found that the bill is expected to increase the deficit by $2.3 trillion over the next 10 years. On X, Musk stated it would be more — around $2.5 trillion. 'The proposed bill would absolutely increase the deficit,' said Andrew Lokenauth, a finance expert with Fluent in Finance. However, Lokenauth said that it's likely the figure is closer to the Congressional Budget Office's estimate rather than Musk's. 'We were promised deficit reduction, but instead, we're seeing the opposite,' said Peter Diamond, a Certified Bankability Expert. 'Turns out both Democrats and Republicans are addicted to spending — just in different flavors.' According to Diamond, the entire bill isn't terrible, but it has problematic parts that are increasing the cost. 'While the bill does include some good things — like pushing for efficiency and spending cuts through DOGE — it sidesteps the biggest problem: spending discipline,' he explained. As reported by PBS, there are cost-saving measures and spending cuts in the bill that amount to $1.3 trillion. However, that is lower than the proposed spending. Per PBS, some Republicans claim that some of this spending will be offset by economic growth, but that's difficult to predict. 'We're not solving the core problem; we're just putting a nicer paint job on the same busted car,' Diamond said. In the few months Musk spearheaded DOGE, billions were reportedly saved, but it's not likely it will have a noticeable positive effect on Americans. 'Sure, $180 billion in projected savings sounds great — and some taxpayers will see minor benefits through better transparency and reduced waste, especially from trimming bureaucratic fat,' Diamond said. 'But compared to the trillions we're adding to the deficit, it's like tossing a bucket of water on a house fire.' 'Something that's getting overlooked in this whole mess is the debt ceiling piece,' Lokenauth said. The debt ceiling, the legal amount of money that the United States can borrow, has a limit of $36.1 trillion, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, and it's something Trump wants to eliminate. 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World,' the president wrote on Truth Social. However, the bill has plans to increase the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, The Hill reported. 'Tying a $4 trillion increase to this bill is actually pretty smart politics — but terrible fiscal policy,' Lokenauth explained. Ultimately, it remains to be seen what will happen with the bill. It has passed in the House of Representatives but is currently in the Senate. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates How Far $750K Plus Social Security Goes in Retirement in Every US Region This article originally appeared on Elon Musk Says Trump's Bill Will 'Massively Increase the Already Gigantic Budget Deficit' — Is He Right? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Says Trump's Bill Will ‘Massively Increase the Already Gigantic Budget Deficit' — Is He Right?
Elon Musk isn't holding back how he feels about President Donald Trump's controversial new bill. He publicly bashed the proposal, saying it would increase the budget deficit. Read Next: Check Out: Read on for more details about Musk's critiques of the bill, as well as whether experts believe he's right or wrong. Musk was tasked with reducing government spending as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and per DOGE's website, it's saved an estimated $180 billion in waste. However, after departing from DOGE, Musk launched a series of attacks on X aimed at Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' urging Americans to call their representatives to not let the bill pass. Trump's bill, which has passed in the House of Representatives, aims to deliver an economy that works for working families with tax relief and cost savings, per the House Ways & Means Committee. Musk, however, isn't as optimistic, claiming it will increase the budget deficit. On X, Musk wrote, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He then reshared the post, adding, 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America[n] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Here what experts have to say about Musk's critiques of Trump's budget proposal. Learn More: As reported by Fox News, the Congressional Budget Office found that the bill is expected to increase the deficit by $2.3 trillion over the next 10 years. On X, Musk stated it would be more — around $2.5 trillion. 'The proposed bill would absolutely increase the deficit,' said Andrew Lokenauth, a finance expert with Fluent in Finance. However, Lokenauth said that it's likely the figure is closer to the Congressional Budget Office's estimate rather than Musk's. 'We were promised deficit reduction, but instead, we're seeing the opposite,' said Peter Diamond, a Certified Bankability Expert. 'Turns out both Democrats and Republicans are addicted to spending — just in different flavors.' According to Diamond, the entire bill isn't terrible, but it has problematic parts that are increasing the cost. 'While the bill does include some good things — like pushing for efficiency and spending cuts through DOGE — it sidesteps the biggest problem: spending discipline,' he explained. As reported by PBS, there are cost-saving measures and spending cuts in the bill that amount to $1.3 trillion. However, that is lower than the proposed spending. Per PBS, some Republicans claim that some of this spending will be offset by economic growth, but that's difficult to predict. 'We're not solving the core problem; we're just putting a nicer paint job on the same busted car,' Diamond said. In the few months Musk spearheaded DOGE, billions were reportedly saved, but it's not likely it will have a noticeable positive effect on Americans. 'Sure, $180 billion in projected savings sounds great — and some taxpayers will see minor benefits through better transparency and reduced waste, especially from trimming bureaucratic fat,' Diamond said. 'But compared to the trillions we're adding to the deficit, it's like tossing a bucket of water on a house fire.' 'Something that's getting overlooked in this whole mess is the debt ceiling piece,' Lokenauth said. The debt ceiling, the legal amount of money that the United States can borrow, has a limit of $36.1 trillion, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, and it's something Trump wants to eliminate. 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World,' the president wrote on Truth Social. However, the bill has plans to increase the debt ceiling by $4 trillion, The Hill reported. 'Tying a $4 trillion increase to this bill is actually pretty smart politics — but terrible fiscal policy,' Lokenauth explained. Ultimately, it remains to be seen what will happen with the bill. It has passed in the House of Representatives but is currently in the Senate. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on Elon Musk Says Trump's Bill Will 'Massively Increase the Already Gigantic Budget Deficit' — Is He Right? Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
If You Invested $1K In Bitcoin Ahead of Trump's Inauguration, Here's How Much You'd Have Now
Bitcoin has been a feast-or famine asset since its inception in 2008. Fortunes have been made and lost in the volatile cryptocurrency, as it regularly exhibits massive price swings. Those who bought bitcoin for fractions of a penny as late as 2010 — and held on — now own an asset worth more than $100,000. But plenty of others have lost a significant amount of money. On June 11, 2011, for example, bitcoin fell from $32 to just one cent in the course of a single day. Other drops of 50% to 80% or more have been fairly regular occurrences as well. But for those with the risk tolerance to hold on, bitcoin has generally trended higher over the past 17 years. The potential for governmental regulation is one of the reasons that bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are so volatile. Changes in the ruling party in both Congress and the White House could potentially have an impact on the price of bitcoin. That makes it worthwhile to see how much the crypto has moved in price since Trump won reelection to the presidency. Check Out: Read Next: Bitcoin price on Nov. 5, 2024 (day of election): $69,363.70 Bitcoin price as of May 31, 2025: $104,746 Percentage price gain: 51% When Donald Trump was reelected in Nov. 2024, bitcoin bulls were unleashed on the market. The belief in the investment community was that the Trump administration would be much more favorable for cryptocurrency in general, and bitcoin in particular. This was not just idle speculation. Trump himself has come out repeatedly in favor of policies supportive of cryptocurrency, saying he wants to make the U.S. the 'crypto capital of the world' and create a 'strategic reserve' of bitcoin, according to PBS. Combined with a general 'risk-on' approach that investors took after the election, bitcoin absolutely soared after Trump was re-elected. Since election day in 2024, Bitcoin is up more than 50%. Discover More: Bitcoin price on Jan. 19, 2025 (day before inauguration): $101,089.61 Bitcoin price as of May 31, 2025: $104,746 Percentage gain: 3.6% There's a mantra in the investment world that says you should 'buy on the rumor, sell on the news.' This is essentially what has happened in the case of bitcoin. When Trump was reelected in Nov. 2024, cryptocurrency bulls rejoiced, sending the price of bitcoin through the roof. By the time Trump actually took office the following January, much of the potential good news brought to the crypto world by the Trump administration had already been priced in. In fact, in the first few months following the inauguration, Bitcoin actually fell precipitously, tumbling 25% from inauguration day until April 8. However, as bitcoin does, it has bounced strongly off that April low and is now back near its all-time highs. As of the end of May, 2025, Bitcoin has risen about 51% since Trump's reelection. Here's how much you'd have now if you invested various sums in the crypto the day of the election. $100 original investment: $151 current value $500 original investment: $755 current value $1,000 original investment: $1,510 current value $5,000 original investment: $7,550 current value $10,000 original investment: $15,100 current value $50,000 original investment: $75,550 current value $100,000 original investment: $151,000 current value No one knows what the future will hold, but those who bought bitcoin ahead of Trump's inauguration have done quite well thus far. More From GOBankingRates The 10 Most Reliable SUVs of 2025 This article originally appeared on If You Invested $1K In Bitcoin Ahead of Trump's Inauguration, Here's How Much You'd Have Now