OPINION - This is why we should scrap the tourist tax
This decision by the last government was one of the most self-defeating in recent memory. Since the abolition of VAT-free purchases for tourists in 2021, the UK has become the only major country in Europe which doesn't offer VAT refunds to international visitors. And let me tell you the consequences are stark.
One is that fewer people are coming to our shores. New figures show that while visitor numbers in the UK have almost returned to pre-pandemic levels, we haven't seen anything like the growth that our EU rivals have. And according to new figures from the Association of International Retail (AIR), tourist spending is eight per cent down on 2019. Meanwhile, in France and Spain, spending has surged ahead — up ten per cent and six per cent respectively. The difference? They still offer VAT-free shopping. Yet since 2021, we don't. Despite the clear consequences.
To be clear, this isn't just about a few luxury retailers in the West End. It's about the entire visitor economy, across the entire UK. Shopping accounts for a quarter of all spending by international tourists. For every pound spent in VAT-free retail, visitors spend another £4 across hospitality, transport, culture and services. That's money into the tills of restaurants in Edinburgh, taxi firms in Manchester, theatres in London and family-run hotels in the Lake District.
After the decision to scrap the scheme, the excess paid by foreign visitors on their shopping was branded a 'tourist tax' – and rightly so. It has driven away high-value visitors and handed our European rivals a competitive advantage. Increasingly, British tourists are now doing their shopping on the continent, claiming VAT back in Milan while leaving British shops behind. Visitors from the US, China, the Middle East and now – post-Brexit – the EU's 450 million citizens, are being actively incentivised to go anywhere but here.
Of course we see the impact across our hotel group, where tourists who once returned laden with parcels now cut UK trips short in order to add a stop in Europe where they do their shopping, knowing they can reclaim sales tax. This is madness – but it's reversible.
The UK now has the chance to be the only country in Europe offering tax-free shopping to EU residents. That is a Brexit benefit hiding in plain sight. If we reintroduce a modern, digital tax-free shopping scheme, we can turn this lost opportunity into a £3.7 billion-a-year boost for Britain.
A new submission to ministers by AIR puts the case clearly. Reinstating VAT-free shopping could create at least 73,000 jobs, mostly outside London, where half of EU tourist spending takes place. Regional airports, local high streets and national visitor attractions would all benefit.
This policy has the backing of a united business voice. Heathrow, John Lewis, Primark, Mulberry, Bicester Village, the British Retail Consortium, the British Fashion Council, Historic Royal Palaces, Shakespeare's Globe and dozens more are calling for it.
VAT-free shopping isn't a tax loss, it's a revenue driver
This wouldn't cost the UK any money at a time of stretched public finances. The evidence is clear: VAT-free shopping isn't a tax loss, it's a revenue driver. The tax you give back on retail is repaid many times over in spending on goods and services where VAT still applies. Even when rebates exist, many low-value claims aren't pursued, meaning the Exchequer still keeps much of the VAT while benefiting from broader economic activity.
This isn't just a London issue. Many of our overseas visitors come to see family, tour our regions or explore smaller cities. A thriving visitor economy supports restaurants in Glasgow, boutiques in Bath and hotels in Newcastle just as much as it supports central London.
Britain now has a unique opportunity to become the global capital for shopping – a status we once held with pride. Now, with Britain outside the EU, we can become the only country in Europe offering tax-free shopping to EU tourists.
The government talks about making Brexit work. Here is a chance to do exactly that. It's a simple change that requires only a willingness to admit that a mistake was made and to put it right.
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport is currently preparing a new Visitor Economy Growth Plan. If ministers are serious about boosting tourism, supporting jobs and reviving our high streets, then reintroducing tax-free shopping should be at the top of that plan.
It is not often that a government is presented with an economic lever that can deliver billions of pounds in new spending, tens of thousands of new jobs and stronger regional growth, all without raising taxes or requiring long-term subsidies. Yet that is exactly the opportunity sitting in front of ministers now with the proposal to reintroduce tax-free shopping for international visitors.
It would deliver rapid, measurable gains for the UK. It is fiscally sound, economically stimulative, regionally inclusive and politically feasible. In short: it's a no-brainer.
Now is the time for action. Let's stop pushing tourists into the arms of our rivals and start attracting them back to Britain. Let's scrap the tourist tax, reinstate VAT-free shopping, and make the UK the world's greatest shopping destination once again.
Sir Rocco Forte is Chair of Rocco Forte Hotels
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
2 minutes ago
- New York Times
The U.S. May Be Coming Around to Balcony Solar
Across Germany, more than a million people had installed solar panels on their balconies as of last month. But those are just the officially registered systems. The actual figures could be three times as high, according to government estimates. Though each installation is small, the aggregate electricity generated from these plug-in solar panels is helping Germany reach its renewable energy targets. Is the U.S. next? It's complicated. Plug-in solar, also known as balcony solar, refers to small-scale solar systems that can be installed without an electrician or without permission from a local utility. It is certainly closer to taking off in the U.S. than it was six months ago. The technology's backers hope more hurdles will be cleared before the year is out. This is happening largely thanks to a small-but-committed assortment of policymakers and solar power supporters who are working to make it more accessible. There are two main barriers. First, there are local utility rules, many of which limit what residents can install without permission. And some would-be customers are waiting for the release of a key safety standard from an independent testing company. Victoria Augustine, an environmental activist and resident of Queens, in New York City, was one of the first buyers of a Flex 200 plug-in panel system released earlier this summer by Bright Saver, a nonprofit group based in California that promotes balcony solar. On Aug. 1, she zip-tied the panel onto a wrought iron fence on her porch. She plugged it into an outlet, making sure it wasn't sharing the circuit with any other appliances. The whole process took less than an hour, including a trip to the hardware store for extra zip ties. There was no visit from an electrician or approvals from her local utility. A Bright Saver employee helped her set up a phone app on to track the system's output. And that was it: The panels were generating electricity, albeit just a little. When the sun is shining, the 200-watt system will be able to offset roughly enough electricity to power a small appliance. The Flex 200 could save Augustine an estimated $37 to $50 per year in electricity costs. Bright Saver, a nonprofit group, began selling the Flex 200 for $399 this summer, and the first run of a few dozen systems sold out within a week, said Cora Stryker, its co-founder. The Flex 200 maxes out at about a quarter of the electricity that balcony systems in Germany can produce. That's by design: The founders wanted to release a product that could be used anywhere in the United States without needing permission from the authorities. Bright Saver's product is not designed to send electricity back to the grid, and it is not large enough to trigger local utility rules, said Kevin Chou, the group's executive director. 'I think that what we're trying to do is demonstrate the demand,' said Stryker, who added that the organization was working with state lawmakers to allow more powerful plug-in solar systems. 'Hopefully, a year or two from now, we won't be talking about these 200-watt systems,' she said. Utah legislators eliminated one of their state's biggest hurdles for plug-in solar this year when they passed a law exempting certain home solar systems from requirements that they enter into interconnection agreements with local utilities to send small amounts of electricity back to the grid. Some larger plug-in systems are already being sold in the state. EcoFlow, which has a presence in Germany, has begun selling its STREAM systems to Utah residents. Including panels, they retail for about $2,000. The company declined to share specific sales figures, but Ryan Oliver, its spokesman, said interest has been 'high' since state lawmakers passed the bill. 'We saw that as an invite to bring our product to the Utah market, and we're hoping to see some of these same kinds of moves in other states,' Oliver said. But Raymond Ward, the Republican state legislator who introduced the plug-in solar bill, still hasn't added panels to his own home. That's because his own bill says plug-in systems must be certified by a nationally-recognized safety testing agency. Right now, Ward says, companies selling panels are operating in 'a little bit of a gray area.' The 'gray area' Ward referenced has to do with a safety standard from the independent testing company Underwriters Laboratories. 'UL certification' appears on household items like hair dryers, lightbulbs and refrigerators. Underwriters Laboratories has not issued a specific safety standard for plug-in solar systems. Individual solar components like inverters are already certified under an existing standard. Some safety advocates argue that a whole-product standard, not just one that applies to its components, is necessary before plug-in solar systems hit the market. Representative Ward said he thought people outside of Utah might start buying and installing plug-in solar systems once the UL standard was published, regardless of state regulations. 'That's just a guess, but that's what happened in Europe,' he said. He said he wanted to give his wife a plug-in system for Christmas, and that he hoped the products would be out of the gray area by then. Conservation Trump cracks down on bird deaths, but only from wind turbines Bald eagles must be protected to the fullest extent of the law from dangerous wind turbines, President Trump's interior secretary declared this week. But four months ago, President Trump called for gutting the very law that applies, the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, calling it a burden on oil and gas producers. Trump administration officials insisted there was no conflict between the two positions and said the president was consistently enforcing laws for all forms of energy development. Conservationists said the Trump administration's embrace of America's iconic bird was just a pretext for attacking the wind industry, which the president has publicly seethed about ever since he lost a legal battle to stop a wind farm from being built in view of one of his Scottish golf courses. — Lisa Friedman Read more. Climate policy A tug of war over air-conditioning in France The culture wars have come for air-conditioning, at least in France. In July, as a heat wave broiled much of Europe, feelings about air-conditioning suddenly became a political litmus test. Marine Le Pen, the far-right leader in France, declared that she would deploy a 'major air-conditioning equipment plan' around the country if her nationalist party eventually came to power. Marine Tondelier, the head of France's Green party, scoffed at Le Pen's idea and, instead, suggested solutions to warming temperatures that included 'greening' cities and making buildings more energy efficient. In France, only an estimated 20 to 25 percent of households are equipped with air-conditioning, according to the country's Agency for Ecological Transition. — Aurelien Breeden and Josh Holder Read more. Reuters investigated the airline industry's claims about the nascent sustainable aviation fuel projects it has announced in recent years. 'While airlines have announced 165 SAF projects over the past 12 years,' they report, 'only 36 have materialized.' Higher temperatures have caused tropical bird populations to decline by up to 38 percent since the 1950s, according to a study highlighted by Carbon Brief. In 2020, California passed a law mandating that homeowners in some wildfire-prone areas take extra precautions to protect their homes. But Bloomberg reports that the rules still have not been enacted. Thanks for being a subscriber. Read past editions of the newsletter here. If you're enjoying what you're reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here. Browse all of our subscriber-only newsletters here. And follow The New York Times on Instagram, Threads, Facebook and TikTok at @nytimes. Reach us at climateforward@ We read every message, and reply to many!


Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Elon Inc: What Did Musk Accomplish With ‘DOGE'?
Elon Musk left Washington and his 'Department of Government Efficiency' initiative with a highly controversial and, many would say, disappointing track record. For followers of President Donald Trump and the idea of slashing what he's claimed is out-of-control government spending, Musk's self-reported $199 billion in savings (which cannot be independently confirmed) is a far cry from the $2 trillion the Tesla CEO promised. As far as Musk's detractors are concerned, his cuts—often executed in haphazard fashion as his twenty-something minions unceremoniously fired long-serving federal employees—have not only disrupted how the government operates on a fundamental level, but also triggered dramatic downstream consequences, many irreversible, both domestically and across the globe. In this episode of Elon, Inc., Max Chafkin sits down with Wired magazine senior writer Makena Kelly to discuss the legacy Musk leaves behind in Washington. How do you make sense of the hundreds of thousands or people estimated to have already died in Africa and elsewhere because of Musk's gleeful dismantling of USAID? Or how the supposed savings of 'DOGE' compare to the $3.1 trillion recently tacked on to America's $37 trillion national debt by Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'? And what are the consequences for the country now that Musk has upended the lives and morale of those federal workers who remain, many of whom still work under the shadow of more firings? For Kelly, Musk's lasting legacy will be one of cultural shakeup: Many of the people he and Trump have placed in positions of power say they think the federal government should be run more like a tech startup than a traditional bureaucracy. And even though he's physically absent, they still don't want to fall out of favor with the world's richest man. Finally, Kelly outlines what she says we can expect from 'DOGE 2.0.'


Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
How Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Manages Trump, Nervous Investors
After a 40-year career in finance that involved working for investing legends such as George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller, Teasury Secretary Scott Bessent, formerly one of the world's top hedge fund managers, has his own ideas about how to soothe panicky traders. In an exclusive and wide-ranging interview, he discusses his plan as steward of America's economy. Bloomberg's Dan Flatley and Erik Schatzker discuss their exclusive reporting. (Source: Bloomberg)