NLU consortium pulled up over ‘casual' CLAT questions
The Supreme Court on Wednesday pulled up the consortium of national law universities (NLUs) for setting up exam papers for the Common Law Admission Test-Undergraduate (CLAT-UG) 2025 in the most 'casual' manner and directed changes in the marking pattern of six questions. The bench sought Centre's response on mechanism to conduct CLAT-UG in line with NEET (HT File)
A bench headed by justice Bhushan R Gavai also sought the Centre's response to have a permanent mechanism for conducting CLAT-UG in line with the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to medical courses, and other combined tests, in the interest of students.
The CLAT UG-2025 for admissions to five-year LLB courses in NLUs was held on December 1, 2024 and results were declared on December 7. Multiple petitions were filed in different high courts across the country alleging several questions in the exam were wrong.
The court noted that in some questions, the answer key issued by the consortium was contrary to past top court judgments and in one particular question, the answer required students to make calculations, that could not be expected in an objective test to test legal reasoning.
'At the outset we must express our anguish at the casual manner in which the consortium has been framing the questions for CLAT exam which involves careers and aspirations of lakhs of students in the country,' the bench, also comprising justice Augustine George Masih, said, slamming the consortium.
The court was dealing with two petitions filed by CLAT aspirants challenging the April 23 decision of the Delhi high court, which scrutinised 17 questions and recommended changes in marking for four of those. The changes included grace marks being awarded to all candidates who attempted three out of the four sets of questions, excluding Set A.
Senior advocates KK Venugopal and Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the petitioners, pointed out that errors in CLAT were not new and on two occasions in the past, — in 2013 and 2018 — the top court had expressed concern on the conduct of the entrance test and directed the Centre and the Bar Council of India (BCI) to take steps to ensure there is no loss caused to students.
The bench mooted for a permanent mechanism for conduct of CLAT and said: 'Why should not there be a permanent mechanism to avoid these errors? What is the Union government doing about it? They can have a mechanism similar to what they have for conducting NEET, JEE, etc.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No compromise on women's dignity: SC tells lawyer who abused judge
The judiciary cannot compromise when it comes to the safety and dignity of women judges, the Supreme Court said on Tuesday, refusing to interfere with the conviction and 18-month jail sentence of a Delhi-based lawyer who verbally abused and threatened a woman judicial officer in court. 'There can be no leniency in ensuring a safe workplace for women judges…Most of the judicial officers in Delhi today are women. They must feel safe at their place of work,' a bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan emphasised. Rejecting an appeal by advocate Sanjay Rathore, the bench added: 'They (women judges) won't be able to function if someone like him gets High Court is right.' The top court's decision comes weeks after the Delhi High Court delivered a scathing verdict, describing Rathore's conduct as 'an assault on justice itself' . The trial court had originally sentenced Rathore to a total of two years' imprisonment for using gendered abuse against a woman magistrate in 2015, but the high court reduced the term to 18 months. Rathore had already undergone six months in jail by the time his appeal was heard in the Supreme Court. His lawyer argued that the incident was a 'spur-of-the-moment' outburst and that further incarceration would be harsh. But the top court remained unmoved. 'Your sentence has already been reduced to 18 months. We can't bring it down. Your matter was duly dealt with by the high court and a strong judgment was issued. We have to ensure the safety of women judicial officers,' the bench said during the hearing. The court also took note of the testimony given under oath by the woman magistrate, who corroborated the charges. 'Look at the kind of language you have used. How will judges work if we entertain your petition?' the bench asked. In its brief order, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and granted Rathore two weeks to surrender. The case dates back to October 2015, when Rathore, aggrieved by an adjournment in his case that was passed in his absence, verbally abused a woman magistrate in Karkardooma court, including using gender-specific slurs. The incident prompted the judicial officer to lodge an FIR at Farsh Bazar police station. In 2023, a trial court found Rathore guilty under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code -- 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), 189 (threat of injury to a public servant), and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty) -- and sentenced him to two years in jail. The high court, while upholding the conviction in May 2025, modified the sentence to 18 months. In her May 26 judgment, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the high court minced no words in rejecting Rathore's plea for leniency. She observed that 'the act of outraging the modesty of a judicial officer while she was presiding over court proceedings… attacks the very foundation of judicial decorum and institutional integrity.' Justice Sharma emphasised that Rathore, being an officer of the court, was expected to uphold its dignity, not undermine it. 'This is not merely a case of individual misbehaviour, but a case where injustice was done to justice itself where a judge… became the target of personal attack while discharging her official duties.' The judgment went on to highlight the larger systemic issue: 'Any act that seeks to threaten or intimidate a judge, especially through gender-specific abuse, is an assault on justice itself and must be met with firm accountability. To trivialise such conduct under the garb of emotional outburst or momentary lapse is to reflect a patriarchal mindset — one that struggles to respect women in authority and seeks to normalise the unacceptable. This cannot be permitted. Not in law. Not in court.' Calling the woman magistrate's experience a reflection of 'a mindset where even women in empowered roles are not seen as immune from humiliation or indignity,' the high court warned that no judicial officer, especially women at the district level who form the 'backbone of our justice delivery system,' should ever feel unsupported or unsafe. 'If a woman holding judicial office is made to feel that her authority is conditional on the civility or restraint of others, the very foundation of judicial independence would get shaken,' Justice Sharma wrote.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC to examine plea against Batla House demolition today
New Delhi: Delhi High Court is likely to examine on Wednesday a plea against the proposed demolition of alleged illegal constructions in southeast Delhi's Batla House. Earlier, a bench of Justices Girish Kathpalia and Tejas Karia declined to grant an immediate stay on a public interest litigation filed by AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan, challenging the exercise. The court said on Monday that it would examine the matter on June 11, the day of the scheduled demolition, as the matter came up after 6pm. "For submissions on two issues, list the petition on June 11. We are not going to stay it (for now) because we are told that the Supreme Court has declined…" the bench remarked. It also pointed out that the single judge already granted interim relief to several persons in their petitions, but the case at hand was filed in public interest. Justice Karia, while presiding as a single judge earlier on Monday, granted status quo to certain residents. He noted that a similar relief was granted last week and asked Delhi Development Authority to file its response to the new plea in four weeks. The three petitioners before the single judge were challenging the demolition notice passed on May 26 by DDA. Senior advocate Salman Khurshid, representing Khan before the division bench, said the demolition was scheduled for June 11 and urged the court to grant a stay. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo The DDA counsel opposed the plea, saying the petitioner was just an MLA and not an affected party, and Supreme Court already declined protection to the alleged affected parties. HC said it would hear the parties on June 11 and examine if a division bench could deal with the plea when one of the two judges sitting in the bench heard similar petitions by some persons and granted certain reliefs. Demolition notices were affixed on the properties with unauthorised construction following the apex court's directions. On May 7, SC passed an order directing the demolition of alleged illegal constructions.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
11 yrs of Modi govt reshaped India's global image: Yogi
Lauding 11 years of the Modi government at the Centre, Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath on Tuesday described the period as a 'golden era' that not only gave India a global recognition but also replaced a legacy of political instability, corruption, appeasement and dynastic politics with a decisive, transparent and accountable model of governance. Addressing a press conference at the BJP headquarters here after inaugurating an exhibition showcasing the Centre's achievements, Yogi said the Modi years reshaped India's global image, brought clarity to policy and redefined the relationship between government and citizens. The CM asserted that India no longer responded to threats with silence but with strength. 'This is no longer a country that chants peace without resolve. If war is forced upon us, the response will be a surgical strike, an airstrike or Operation Sindoor,' he said. 'India is now tested in Pakistan and trusted by the world,' Yogi added. He credited the Modi government with restoring people's faith in democracy, dented under previous unstable regimes, and said India had achieved a new balance of cultural pride and economic growth. 'For the first time, schemes are reaching people based on need, not face,' he said, adding that the years under Modi had given the country a new governance identity rooted in clarity, transparency and public accountability. Yogi said the government had laid out a 25-year roadmap to a developed and self-reliant India, backed by inclusive growth and major strides in infrastructure, technology, and welfare. He said that the last 11 years had seen the country rise from being the 11th largest economy to the fourth, overtaking Britain and doubling its per capita income. The nation's exports had grown significantly and, at the current pace, India was poised to become the world's third-largest economy by 2027, he added. The CM highlighted how initiatives like the Prime Minister Awas Yojana, Ayushman Bharat, Jan Dhan Yojana, Ujjwala Yojana, and PM SVANidhi had brought tangible changes in the lives of the poor, making governance more result-oriented. He also praised the increased representation of women in leadership and the government's firm stance on safeguarding social justice and reservation. Emphasising the link between heritage and progress, Yogi pointed to the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya after 500 years, the grand statues of Sardar Patel and Subhas Chandra Bose and the overall transformation of pilgrimage towns. 'The Modi government has integrated India's civilisational legacy with its development goals,' he said. To mark the occasion, BJP leaders also announced a series of events across Uttar Pradesh, including exhibitions at district headquarters, digital contests on the changing face of India, yoga camps and outreach events focused on enrolling senior citizens under the Ayushman Bharat scheme. Central ministers, MPs, MLAs and party functionaries from booth to national level are expected to participate in these events.
