
Colleges say two years is too long to wait for reform
Mr Withers' report made several key recommendations, many of which addressed what he called the "fragmentation" in the system, which led to challenges in funding and implementing programmes such as apprenticeships that are important to Scotland's economic development.
Among the report's major findings were recommendations to create a single funding body for all post-school training and learning, streamline learning pathways for skills and qualifications and create "parity of esteem" between qualifications.
Two years after the report, Andy Witty, Director of Strategic Policy and Corporate Governance for Colleges Scotland, has said that there is "unfinished business" on reforming the college sector.
Writing in The Herald, Mr Witty said the Withers Report was a "breathe of fresh air" when it was published, but there have been too many delays implementing its key findings.
"Colleges supported this milestone report at time of its publication two years ago, and its message to government and stakeholders today is still the same and can be summed up in two words: Deliver Withers.
"There was a very clear warning in the Withers Review – do not cherry pick, implement all of the recommendations – but we are now in a position, two years on, that some parts are slowly moving forward and some parts are not."
While Mr Witty said that there is hope for the proposed Tertiary Education and Training Bill to address the "complex, fragmented and confusing" funding system currently divided between the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), Skills Development Scotland (SDS), and the Student Awards Agency Scotland (SAAS), other recommendations "remain on the proverbial shelf."
He said that creating a national, lifelong digital training record would allow learners, graduates and workers to better track and showcase their skills and qualifications.
Mr Witty added that it is critical to end the "false dichotomy" between vocational and academic pathways and create "parity of esteem."
"James Withers argues that all educational routes—whether academic, vocational, or work-based—should be valued equally, recognising that learners are diverse.
"We support this fully."
Read more
However, Mr Witty said that colleges face an uphill battle against increased funding challenges and an "unsustainable" status quo.
"While the vision for a streamlined, learner-centric post-school education system has been articulated, the journey from recommendations to realisation remains incomplete–there is an urgent need for action to transform Scotland's skills landscape. Colleges are very willing to play their part in that."
Economic advisor James Withers was the author of an independent review of Scotland's skills system. (Image: James Withers)
In March, Mr Withers appeared at Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee and was asked about his review. As evidence to the committee, Mr Withers reiterated his findings and highlighted what he saw as a problematic view of colleges as a secondary pathway.
"I worry that we have a burning platform in our college system. Before I started the review, I had not been in a college for 20 years, and I had a very outdated view of what colleges were doing.
"I finished the review believing that they are an absolute jewel in the crown. They are rooted in the community and connected to businesses, schools and university institutions.
"If we get that bit right, that could be game-changing, but from what I have seen in the college sector, I worry about its future.
"There needs to be a good look at the college system. I worry that there might be a messy reorganisation based on who falls down first financially, rather than anything else.
"There is potential for colleges to be rooted in regional skills planning and regional economic partnerships.
"The close working between the college and university system is valuable, but we cannot see the college system as just another feeder into university, so that we can say that we have more kids than ever going to university. That should not be the measure of success."
A Scottish Government spokesperson said:
'Ministers accepted the premise of the key provisions set out in the independent review of skills delivery by James Withers. The Post-School Education and Skills Reform Programme was developed following this and considerable work is now underway across government to implement this change.
'We are clear about the importance and status of vocational pathways and are providing £185 million this year to deliver funding for 25,000 new modern apprentices, 5,000 Foundation Apprentices, 1,200 Graduate Apprentices and continue to support over 38,000 apprentices in training.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Holyrood is a glorified council firmly under Westminster's thumb
On August 12, the second Community Council Convention on the Impact of Major Energy Infrastructure took place in Inverness. It was attended by more than 60 community councils representing more than 80,000 people all over the Highlands. Eleven MSPs and MPs from all political parties took part and signed a communique to 'value local democracy' and to try and secure urgent debates in Holyrood and Westminster. READ MORE: Coul Links plans in doubt as new report calls for 'outright rejection' Tor Klein from the Skye Windfarm Information Group was shocked to learn from the politicians that 'there is no plan, there never was a plan, there's no current plan and they [the Scottish Government] are not working on a plan.' It's not shocking because there's no direct democracy in Scotland. Holyrood is a glorified, highly centralised council firmly under Westminster's thumb. It calls itself a government but has none of the powers of a real government. The important stuff is managed for us by a bunch of people down in London who don't give a toss about Scotland. Westminster's decision to privatise Scotland's energy resources and control energy policy mean we have no say over nor receive any benefit from one of our greatest natural assets. It's why our land is blighted and we're forced to live with the perversity of paying some of the highest energy bills in the failing UK. READ MORE: Why I'm walking the West Highland Way for the 100th time Our glorified council is content to stay in its devolved playpen pretending to be a government. Once, Scottish politicians at least made the right noises. On January 26, 2012, Holyrood passed a motion acknowledging 'the sovereign right of the Scottish people to determine the form of government best suited to their needs.' On July 4, 2018, Westminster followed suit. Politicians will act for the people only when the people force them to. If all the millions of angry citizens and groups in Scotland today demanded their right to self-determination, we'd be well on our way out of this cesspool of a union. We need the tools of decentralised direct democracy – referendums and popular initiatives – to force the politicians to listen to us. That's why PE2135, to incorporate the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights into Scots law, is vital. Please sign and share it to invert the power pyramid and put the Scottish people where they belong – back on top. Leah Gunn Barrett Edinburgh READ MORE: Highland community councillors are angry, united and very vocal WITH the UK Government's costly military spending plans revealed, including new nuclear submarines (while some of the old ones lie rusting), radioactive incidents can and do happen at Faslane. Furthermore Britain is to buy from America aircraft that can carry nuclear bombs. These deadly military items are apparently for Nato, but still require US permission. It is ridiculous that we have to pay to house these weapons over which we have little control! READ MORE: MoD claims Faslane radioactive leak 'posed no risk to public' We are now remembering that in August 1945 America dropped atomic bombs on two Japanese cities, killing around 200,000 people. However today's nuclear hydrogen power presents even a greater danger to humanity and all life on earth, especially with world leaders like Trump and Putin in charge. In truth, Westminster cash has always been available for nuclear weapons, with less or none for the poor, disadvantaged and disabled. In this post-imperial false super power status, the UK's supposedly independent nuclear deterrent remains a hugely expensive joke. A fully independent Scotland would remove all weapons of mass destruction from Faslane and the huge cash saving would be channelled into the NHS and other public services. Grant Frazer Newtonmore AS I sat in the pub watching Putin arriving in Alaska on TV, it was clear who was the boss. Trump appeared to approach Putin, as he got off the plane, with a submissive display towards him. Many assume he is Trump's real boss, not the MAGA movement or the Republican Party. Putin looked to be in control of the situation, with Trump displaying deference to the Russian on his arrival on US territory. Trump almost genuflected before the visitor. READ MORE: Europe speaks with Donald Trump after Ukraine ceasefire talks From what I saw, Ukrainians should be worried. Not only them but other Europeans. Trump appears to bow the knee to Russia without reference to the USA'S supposed allies in Europe. Most European governments seem aware of Putin's attempt to resurrect the Czarist empire apart from one, the UK Government, whose foreign policy seems to be to ingratiate itself to Trump, regardless of the outcome elsewhere. Its deference to the US mirrors Trump's deference to Russia. Drew Reid Falkirk


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Racing tax: What is it and why is the sport going on strike
For the first time in the modern history of the sport in Britain, its participants will voluntarily go on strike for a day. A day of protest will be held in Westminster. What does that mean? It means there will be no racing in Britain on September 10. The meetings scheduled for Lingfield, Carlisle, Uttoxeter and Kempton that day will not take place. They have been rescheduled to other dates. And why has all this come about? The strike announcement has come as part of British racing's 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign, which is urging the Government to axe the Treasury's proposal to bring existing online betting duties into one single rate. Why would tax rises be so bad? Economic analysis commissioned by the British Horseracing Authority has shown that aligning the current tax rate paid by bookmakers on racing with that of online games of chance could see a £330 million revenue hit to the industry in the first five years, putting 2,752 jobs at risk in the first year alone. Strike action will surely cost the sport money? It will, it is estimated it will cost around £200,000 in lost revenue on the day. So does the racing industry support the strike move? In a word, yes. Racecourses, owners and trainers are all in agreement. The National Trainers Federation said cancelling fixtures was 'a huge sacrifice' which 'should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport'. Is this is a one-off, or will there be more strikes? No more strikes are planned, as things stand. Can I still have a bet anywhere that day? Yes, there will actually be one meeting in Ireland, at Cork. Irish racing is run completely separately to British racing.


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Racing calls one-day strike over proposed betting tax rise
The four scheduled fixtures at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Lingfield and Kempton will not take place after agreements between the owners of the courses and the British Horseracing Authority, making it the first time the sport has voluntarily refused to race in modern history. The BHA set up the 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15 per cent duty on racing could be increased to the 21 per cent levied on games of chance. Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said: 'We have decided to take the unprecedented decision to cancel our planned racing fixtures on September 10 to highlight to Government the serious consequences of the Treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport. 'British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country. 'This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to Government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the Government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture. 'Our message to Government is clear: axe the racing tax and back British racing.' The four tracks involved are operated by the Jockey Club and the Arena Racing Company, with both backing the move. Jim Mullen, CEO at the Jockey Club, said: 'We hope this pause for reflection will enable the Government to truly understand the economic impact of horseracing and its cultural significance to communities across the UK, as well as the world-class racing festivals we host. 'After this period of reflection, we hope the full implications will be understood, and we can prevent the irreparable damage that threatens a sport the nation is, and should be, proud of.' Martin Cruddace, CEO at ARC, added: 'We have always been taxed and regulated differently, and it is imperative for our future that we continue to be so. 'If the Government wants Britain to be a world leader in online casino and a world pauper in a sport at the heart of its culture, then tax harmonisation will achieve that aim.' While the four meetings will be rescheduled, Paul Johnson, chief executive of the National Trainers Federation, underlined the 'sacrifice' in calling a halt to the sport for a day. He said: 'Cancelling fixtures is a huge sacrifice by racing and should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport. 'Thousands of jobs are at stake alongside the loss of millions of pounds to the British economy.' A Treasury spokesperson said: 'We are consulting on bringing the treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy – it is not about increasing or decreasing rates, and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals.'