Why Most Pacific Governments Stand With Israel
Steven Ratuva, distinguished professor of Pacific Studies at Canterbury University, told RNZ that island leaders are likely to try and keep their distance, but only officially speaking.
"They'd probably feel safer that way, rather than publicly taking sides. But I think quite a few of them would probably be siding with Israel."
With Iran and Israel trading blows last week, Ratuva said that is translating into deeper divisions along religious and political lines in Pacific nations.
"People may not want to admit it, but it's manifesting itself in different ways."
Pacific support for Israel runs deep
The United Nations General Assembly adopted a resolution on 13 June calling for "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in the war in Gaza", passing with 142 votes, or a 73 percent majority.
Among the 12 nations that voted against the resolution, alongside Israel and the United States, were Fiji, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea and Tuvalu.
Among the regional community, only Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands voted for the resolution, while others abstained or were absent.
Last week, Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, in an interview with The Australian, defended Israel's actions in Iran as an act of survival.
"They cannot survive if there is a big threat capability within range of Israel. Whatever [Israel] are doing now can be seen as pre-emptive, knocking it out before it's fired on you."
In February, Fiji also committed to an embassy in Jerusalem - a recognition of Israel's right to call the city their capital - mirroring Papua New Guinea in 2023.
Ratuva said that deep, longstanding, religious and political ties with the West are what ground the regions ties with Israel.
"Most of the Pacific Island states have been aligned with the US since the Cold War and beyond, so the Western sphere of influence is seen as, for many of them, the place to be."
He noted the rise in Christian evangelism, which is aligned with Zionism and the global push for a Jewish homeland, in pockets throughout the Pacific, particularly in Fiji.
"Small religious organisations which have links with or model selves along the lines of the United States evangelical movement, which has been supportive of Trump, tend to militate towards supporting Israel for religious reasons."
"And of course, religion and politics, when you mix them together, become very powerful in terms of one's positioning (in the world)."
Politics or religion
In Fijian society, Ratuva said that the war in Gaza has stoked tensions between the Christian majority and the Muslim minority.
According to the CIA World Factbook, roughly 64.5 percent of Fijians are Christian, compared to a Muslim population of 6.3 percent.
"It's coming out very clearly, in terms of the way in which those belonging to the fundamentalist political orientation tend to make statements which are against non-Christians" Ratuva said.
"People begin to take sides...that in some ways deepens the religious divide, particularly in Fiji which is multi-ethnic and multi-religious, and where the Islamic community is relatively significant."
A statement from the Melanesian Spearhead Group Secretariat, released on Wednesday, said that the Pacific wishes to be an "ocean of peace".
"Leaders also reaffirmed their commitment to the Friends to All, Enemy to None Foreign Policy to guide the MSG Members' relationship with countries and Development Partners."
It bookends a summit that brought together leaders from Fiji, Papua New Guinea, and other Melanesian nations, where the Middle East was discussed, according to local media.
But the Pacific region had been used in a deceptive strategy as the US prepared for the strikes on Iran. On this matter, Melanesian leaders did not respond to requests for comment.
The BBC reported on Monday that B-2 planes flew to Guam from Missouri as a decoy to distract from top-secret flights headed over the Atlantic to Iran.
This sparked outrage from civil society leaders throughout the region, including the head of the Pacific Conference of Churches, Reverend James Bhagwan.
"This use of Pacific airspace and territory for military strikes violates the spirit of the Treaty of Rarotonga, our region's declaration for being a nuclear, free peace committed zone."
"Our region has a memory of nuclear testing, occupation and trauma... we don't forget that when we talk about these issues."
Bhagwan told RNZ that there is no popular support for Israel's most recent actions in the Pacific.
"This is because we have international law... this includes, of course, the US strikes on Iran and perhaps, also, Israel's actions in Gaza."
"It is not about religion, it is about people."
Bhagwan, whose organisation represents 27 member churches across 17 Pacific nations, refused to say whether he believed there was a link between christian fundamentalism and Pacific support for Israel.
"We can say that there is a religious contingency within the Pacific that does support Israel... it does not necessarily mean it's the majority view, but it is one that is seriously considered by those in power."
"It depends on how those (politicians) consider that support they get from those particular aspects of the community."
Pacific Islanders in the region
For some, the religious commitment runs so deep that they venture to Israel in a kind of pilgrimage.
Ratuva told RNZ that there is a significant population of islanders in the region, many of whom may now be trapped before a ceasefire is finalised.
"There was a time when the Gaza situation began to unfold, when a number of people from Fiji, Tonga and Samoa were there for pilgrimage purposes."
"At that time there were significant numbers, and Fiji was able to fly over there to evauate them. So this time, I'm not sure whether that might happen."
Bhagwan said that the religious ties run deep.
"They go to Jerusalem, to Bethlehem, to the Mount of Olives, to the Golan Heights, where the transfiguration took place. Fiji also is stationed in the Golan Heights as peacekeepers."
"So there is a correlation, particularly for Pacific or for Fijian communities, on that relationship as peacekeepers in that region."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
18 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: Why is te reo being undermined at home while Māori culture is promoted overseas?
Chris Bayes, Torbay. Contempt for teachers Yes, I know the Government has a cost-of-living crisis of its own, but the derisory pay offer made to teachers is ample proof of their contempt for the very professionals they expect to implement the restructuring of New Zealand's education system. Accusations of endangering students' exam performance, dereliction of duty by striking, and misrepresenting the work done after hours and in the so-called holidays, are standard responses from a Government that undervalues the need for skilled practitioners. Industrial action (a misnomer anyway) is taken because teachers are desperate to provide the best possible service to the whole community. Education in all its forms is a vital asset and should be funded accordingly. Norm Murray, Browns Bay. A political act of faith In his criticism of the churches for organising seminars on Māori wards, David Seymour displays his lack of knowledge of Christian church history. Christians who follow the founder of their faith, Jesus, the Christ, and try to live by his example, will be political. Jesus' ministry was short-lived because the political leaders of the day objected to what he did and said and had him crucified. Archbishop Oscar Romero was shot while celebrating mass in San Salvador because of what he did and said politically in his own country. Te Aroha Rountree, president of the Methodist Church of New Zealand, Te Hahi Weteriana O Aotearoa, spoke at this year's Waitangi Day commemorations and was criticised by some for being too political in a service of worship when she spoke of justice related to the Treaty. She was simply following the teaching and example of the founder of her faith. Those who follow Jesus, the Christ have no alternative but to speak out on issues of justice which is what the seminars on Māori wards are all about. Mervyn Dine, Northcote. Where art thou, Luxon? The mutterings and murmurings about Christopher Luxon being ousted as leader of the National Party supposedly because of poor ratings as preferred Prime Minister reached a crescendo recently. All this because Nicola Willis stepped up to a set of microphones that were apparently reserved for the PM. As Shakespeare wrote, 'All the world's a stage and all the men and women merely players.' In this case, the media had set its own stage but the main players ended up in the wrong place. But was this in fact a mistake? Was Willis showing the world that she in fact was now gunning for the top job? Will we see a reenactment of Luxon metaphorically 'falling on his sword', as Shakespeare's Mark Antony did, while relinquishing power to Willis? Or will the media decide to let this sideshow play out on its own, as it should, and concentrate on the real issues of the day such as education, rising costs, crime and a stagnant economy? Bernard Walker, Mt Maunganui. Good move by the Blues At last! Rugby union has realised that a rectangular stadium is best for spectators and promotes an atmosphere that lifts teams and ticket sales. The growth of the Blues has been stunted by the oval pitch at Eden Park, with fans seated a long distance from the action and typically only filling 20% to 25% of the cavernous stands. It has taken a long time for the Blues to recognise that Mt Smart would be worth a try. I hope this development sends a message to those involved in deciding on a new stadium for Auckland. Tony Waring, Grey Lynn. What, no spine? A note to Chlöe Swarbrick: Gutless jellyfish will never become vertebrates. Brian Dwyer, Welcome Bay.
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Bill banning protest outside homes passes first hurdle
By Giles Dexter of RNZ Legislation to make protesting outside someone's home an offence has passed its first reading at Parliament. The bill would apply to demonstrations directed at a specific person outside their private residence, considering factors including how 'unreasonable' the protest is. Labour, the Greens and Te Pāti Māori opposed the bill, expressing concerns it could override the right to freedom of protest, and there were existing tools police could use. Standing in for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith, James Meager said the bill would be a welcome relief to many MPs, officials and other individuals who had been targeted. He said the bill was a balance of rights and freedoms. "The protection of New Zealanders' privacy is fundamentally important in our society, as is the ability to protest. The government upholds both of these values." Meager said the public's right to protest was protected by the Bill of Rights Act, but demonstrations outside homes could impede on someone's right to privacy. "Unreasonable, disruptive intrusions into people's private spaces are simply unacceptable." The government believed existing legislation did not clearly reflect the importance of privacy in the context of demonstrations, meaning police had difficulty in applying offences like disorderly behaviour. The offence would only apply if the protest was targeted at a specific person outside their private residence, meaning marches that passed by someone's house would not be covered. Time of day, duration, the demonstrators' actions, noise levels and distance to the premises would also be factors in determining the offence. Despite Labour leader Chris Hipkins earlier expressing his concerns that protest had become personalised, his party did not support the bill. Labour's justice spokesman Duncan Webb said the bill "chips away" at free speech rights, and New Zealand could not call itself a liberal democracy while passing legislation that prohibited demonstration. "The point of political action is to disrupt. It is not to be nice, it's not to be convenient. Protest is disruptive, that's what a protest is." Webb acknowledged other MPs have experienced people acting inappropriately outside their residences, but the legislation was targeted to suppress political action. "If that's your problem, the easy fix is actually to fix the offence of disorderly behaviour, and make it clear that disorder that flows into a private premise can in fact still amount to that offence." The Green Party also opposed the bill. MP Celia Wade-Brown said threats to people's safety or their families' safety were unacceptable, but the new offence had a disproportionate punishment. "Three months in prison, $2000 fine, this is not a parking ticket." Te Pāti Māori MP Mariameno Kapa-Kingi said if police felt they could not apply existing legislation to remove someone behaving unreasonably outside another's home, then police should "check their practice." Speaking in support of the bill, ACT's Todd Stephenson accepted there were two competing rights in the legislation, but the Select Committee phase would be a chance for a discussion about how the balance could be struck. "It's worthwhile at least going through the Select Committee process and uncovering what powers the police do or don't have currently, but they're saying they don't have sufficient powers." Casey Costello from New Zealand First said it was a "sad, sad indictment on our democracy" that the legislation was even needed. "We know we have politically motivated groups who will purposely release private residential addresses of elected officials, of businesspeople, in order to invoke an intimidatory approach to dealing with decisions." She disagreed it was a limitation on protesting, but a protection for people's privacy. "It is absolutely reasonable to say that we will ensure that voices can be heard, but my children, my mother, my family will not have to bear the price of the decisions or the public position that I hold," she said. The Justice Committee will now consider the bill and report back within four months.
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Fijian among four ICC judges sanctioned by US for backing Netanyahu arrest warrants
A high-profile Fijian is among four International Criminal Court (ICC) judges sanctioned by the United States government. In a statement on Wednesday, the US Department of State announced that Fiji's Nazhat Shameem Khan, a ICC deputy prosecutor, alongside Canada's Kimberly Prost, France's Nicolas Guillou and Senegal's Mame Mandiaye Niang, would be sanctioned in response to the ICC's "ongoing threat to Americans and Israelis". According to the State Department, the sanctions were imposed under Executive Order 14203, which targets "foreign persons engaged in certain malign efforts by the ICC" and seeks to impose serious consequences on those directly participating in the Court's actions against the United States and Israel. Shameem Khan is "being designated for continuing to support illegitimate ICC actions against Israel, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants targeting Prime Minister Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Gallant" since assuming her role at the ICC. The sanctions mean all four individuals will have their US-based assests and interests frozen, and any financial transactions involving them in the US will be prohibited unless specifically approved. The ICC strongly rejected the US sanctions against its judges, calling them "a flagrant attack against the independence of an impartial judicial institution". "They constitute also an affront against the Court's States Parties, the rules-based international order and, above all, millions of innocent victims across the world. "As stated before by the ICC President and Judiciary, as well as the Presidency of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute, the Court stands firmly behind its personnel and victims of unimaginable atrocities." The Court said it will continue carrying out its mandate in strict accordance with its legal framework, as adopted by the 125 States Parties, and without regard to any restriction, pressure or threat.
