
Alex Ross Perry on his Pavement documentary: ‘The concept was an absurd notion that this band would ever go gold or platinum'
Alex Ross Perry
can shake the most algorithm-trodden viewers out of their complacency. His unapologetically caustic, literary milieu, populated by spiky, self-absorbed humans, remains defiantly indie, made on modest budgets, with zero concessions towards 'relatable' entertainment norms.
In
Listen Up Philip
, from 2014, Jason Schwartzman plays a misanthropic novelist who alienates everyone around him. In Her Smell, playing Becky Something, Elisabeth Moss delivers a ferocious performance as a volatile, drug-addled punk rocker. In the earlier
Queen of Earth
, Moss excelled as a grieving woman descending into paranoia.
The film-maker's devoted following intersects with that of Paul Schrader, John Cassavetes and the American authors Thomas Pynchon and Philip Roth.
Pavements, Perry's new hybrid documentary portrait of Pavement, indie rock's least-bothered legacy act, is a thrillingly maximalist curveball from an auteur with such a disciplined, character-driven oeuvre. It's a world away from those films that Perry's cinematographer, Sean Price Williams, has described as 'people talking in rooms'.
READ MORE
'You hope that everything you create will be a new process, no matter what,' says Perry. 'You're looking for that every time in some way or another. But, by definition, there are 40 primary characters in Pavements whom you're keeping track of. That is extremely rare and complicated – except for movies like Nashville [directed by Robert Altman, from 1975].
'The movie is actually really several smaller movies. The challenge was making little tiny movies that fit into a bigger movie. I wanted to make something complicated and unprecedented.'
Nearly 35 years after a band of self-styled slackers from Stockton, California, emerged with a batch of lo-fi, inscrutable songs, Pavement remain an outlier in American indie rock.
They were never meant for the mainstream. Formed in 1989 by
Stephen Malkmus
and Scott Kannberg (aka Spiral Stairs), Pavement began as a studio experiment of distorted guitars and nebulous mumbling. They sold self-distributed cassettes and secured some basement shows.
They scored an unexpected success with their much-loved album Slanted and Enchanted from 1992, but their jagged sound and nonsensical lyrics would never truly go mainstream.
'I always was hoping that it was music for the future. I mean, I think everyone who's not that successful in their time tries to think that,' says Malkmus early in Perry's film, a documentary that occasionally gives you the sense that you're watching the biggest act on the planet.
A lot is going on. An anchoring timeline chronicles the band's 2022 reunion tour – their first since 2010 – featuring rehearsals and performances from dates across North America and Europe. Off-Broadway, hopefuls audition for Slanted! Enchanted! A Pavement Musical. A pop-up Pavement museum, ostentatiously titled Pavements 1933–2022, features authentic artefacts and apparent fakes.
There's more chicanery in Range Life: A Pavement Story, fragments of a grandiloquent Hollywood biopic filmed within the film, starring Joe Keery as Malkmus, with Schwartzman as Chris Lombardi, founder of Matador Records, the band's long-time label. There is even a completely made-up awards-season denouement, featuring Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach.
It's an epic sprawl that came together surprisingly quickly following an approach by Matador. Lombardi pitched the idea, with Malkmus giving a clear directive: they didn't want a typical documentary or a scripted screenplay. The frontman's only note was a request for something 'confusing and weird'.
'Within six weeks of being contacted to come up with some sort of radical or unusual idea that could be a suitably unique Pavement movie, all of those strands were there,' says Perry.
'When I look at my early documents, the only thing in my notes that is not in the movie is a fictionalised art-house film – I had the idea that, in addition to a very cliched, silly, bad Hollywood movie, there would be an art film like Edvard Munch by Peter Watkins. All of the ideas were there from the outset. My first thought was the movie ought to be a mosaic.'
In 1999, after a decade that had seen them have moderate hits with Cut Your Hair, Gold Soundz and Range Life, Pavement broke up with the same shrugs they brought to their live performances. They had sung and played off-key during shambolic television appearances. Their inclusion on the bill of the Lollapalooza festival in 1995 – an odd fit alongside Sonic Youth, Hole, Cypress Hill, Sinéad O'Connor, Beck and Coolio – almost started a riot.
Do Pavement fit Perry's description of his most acerbic creations as 'people who can't get out of their own way'?
'When I first heard Pavement as a young person, I had no understanding of the complexity of what an artist's goals are,' the film-maker says. 'You don't think about that stuff when you're 13. You're just hearing a good song and catching a concert. That level of insight is invisible to a lot of the public, and often only visible in hindsight.
'But it certainly became their story in the 20 years after they broke up. After the reunion it became the story of unfulfilled ambition and missed opportunities and untapped potential.
'During my research for the film, which was all done in 2020, deep into the pandemic, when nobody in the band had seen each other since the 2010 reunion tour, the narratives I was given by everyone involved with the band spoke to that disappointment.'
Then came a plot twist. Harness Your Hopes, an obscure track recorded in 1996, unexpectedly became one of the band's most popular songs. Despite never being released as a single or receiving significant radio play at the time, the track gained traction on Spotify in the 2010s – it now has more than 210 million streams – before igniting a dance craze on TikTok.
'At some point, making the movie, I looked at their Spotify page expecting to see Range Life or Cut Your Hair as their number-one songs. And suddenly I'm asking, 'Why does this song have tens of millions more views than everything else?'
'This song hasn't even been on my radar for narrative purposes. And then I googled it and discovered this crazy thing happened. By the time the band were rehearsing for the 2022 tour, this song had blown up and they were playing it as part of every show. I shot the video for it before we shot the movie.'
It is a delightful second act, not just for Pavement but for Pavements. Perry's grandiose, counterfactual account of the band now feels strangely prophetic.
'We made this movie over a five-year span,' he says. 'The concept was an absurd notion that this band would ever go gold or platinum. We weren't thinking, Oh, that'll be funny, because sooner or later they'll have gold records. It was, like, This is the most ridiculous thing imaginable, because they haven't been a band for 25 years. And now the movie is out and the success that had eluded them for forever has happened.'
Pavements is in cinemas from Friday, July 11th
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Maureen Dowd: CBS and other media outlets caving to Trump is sickening. At least South Park will still hold people accountable
We haven't heard this much talk about the presidential anatomy since the other guy in the Jeffrey Epstein files was in the Oval. President Donald Trump , a master at minimising others, is now being literally minimised on South Park by the crass and fearless creators of the cartoon. I could have told Trump that it's best not to provoke brilliant satirists. I learned that lesson the hard way 20 years ago. When I wrote Bushworld: Enter at Your Own Risk, about the tangled father and son saga that led to the invasion of Iraq , I wanted Pat Oliphant, a lacerating political cartoonist, to do the book's cover. READ MORE I wheedled until that acerbic Aussie finally agreed. When the drawing came back, it was dazzling: a tiny, jangly-eyed George W Bush under a big cowboy hat, his hands braced at the guns on his holster. He was walking down the driveway of an overgrown haunted version of the White House with a gargoyle hanging from the trees. Oliphant had given the president the body of a bug. Even though the book was harshly critical of W Bush and his scheming advisers, I was worried that the sketch might be a bit too disrespectful to the president. The cartoonist was a firm believer in 'stirring up the beast', as he called it, taking a torch to the lies and hypocrisy of the powerful. So, naturally, he was contemptuous when I suggested that we make W Bush less buglike. But, faced with more wheedling, he reluctantly agreed to take another crack at it. I waited nervously. When the new illustration came in, W Bush no longer looked like a bug. Oliphant had made the president look more like a monkey. And he was even smaller. It was a valuable lesson. Don't mess with satirists. They'll always have the last say, and it will be blistering. Even though jesters had more leeway in ancient courts to speak truth to monarchs, rulers could order up an axe or a noose if the truth cut too close to the bone. [ 'I will not be intimidated': But has Rupert Murdoch met his nemesis in Donald Trump? Opens in new window ] As the Fool says to Lear: 'I marvel what kin thou and thy daughters are: They'll have me whipped for speaking true, thou'lt have me whipped for lying; and sometimes I am whipped for holding my peace.' Drew Lichtenberg, the dramaturge at Washington's Shakespeare Theater Company, told me: 'Queen Elizabeth I passed a series of 'Vagabond Acts' making it illegal to be a travelling player, unless you had an aristocratic patron. Freelance actors were regarded as homeless people unless they wore the livery of a lord. It was the 16th-century version of yanking Stephen Colbert off the air , censoring the broadcast of views that the ruler didn't want performed without their say-so.' Recently, Colbert scorched Paramount , CBS' parent company, for caving to Trump with a $16 million (€13.6 million) settlement over his 60 Minutes lawsuit, hoping to get the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to favour its merger with Skydance. 'I believe this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles,' the comedian said. 'It's big, fat bribe.' A few days later, news broke that CBS, which has cratered from the Tiffany network to the Trump-fealty network, had cancelled the top-rated broadcast show for financial reasons. But who can believe that's the whole story? If it were just about money, there were a lot of better ways to handle Colbert, a big talent and valuable brand. CBS could have cut costs, or it could have transitioned him over the next five years into some combination of streaming or podcasting within the Paramount family. The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, a staple of late-night US television, will end in 2026, the CBS network said, days after the comedian blasted parent company Paramount's $16 million settlement with Donald Trump as 'a big fat bribe'. Photograph:Announcing that he was being dumped right after he criticised CBS reeked of censorship. Certainly, King Trump celebrated, crowing on Truth Social: 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired.' He even added: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.' The FCC chair, Brendan Carr, said that The View – airing on ABC, which also caved to Trump, paying a whopping $15 million for George Stephanopoulos' misspeaking – might be in the administration's crosshairs. 'Once President Trump has exposed these media gatekeepers and smashed this facade, there's a lot of consequences,' Carr said, ominously. CBS is, as Colbert said, 'morally bankrupt'. It's sickening to see media outlets, universities, law firms and tech companies bending the knee. (Hang tough, Rupert!) Satirists are left to hold people accountable, and they are more than ready. Colbert's fellow humorists jumped in to back him up, most brazenly the South Park creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, fresh off a Paramount deal worth more than $1.25 billion. (South Park, popular with conservatives, does not defend liberals; it loves jeering at both sides and woke overreach.) Its 27th season premiere – 'Sermon on the 'Mount,' as in Paramount – featured Trump with a 'teeny-tiny' you-know-what. It depicted the president cuddling with Satan and romancing a sheep. It ripped the Paramount deal, the CBS settlement, the Colbert firing, Trump's 'power to sue and take bribes' and the president's manic attempt to divert attention from ties to Epstein, as the paedophile's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell , no doubt angles for a pardon by spilling some information. It also showed a deepfake of Trump, rotund and naked, walking in the desert, Christ-like, 'for America'. As Puck's Matthew Belloni said: 'The AI deepfake Trump was particularly brilliant, given that the same day the episode aired, the president announced White House AI policy positions favouring lacklustre protections against exactly this kind of dangerous technology.' The White House sniffed that 'no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak'. At Comic-Con on Thursday, the South Park creators were deadpan about their rebellious reaction to Trump's attempt to stifle critics and wreak revenge. 'We're terribly sorry,' Parker said, making it clear they were anything but. The tiger picnics last. – the New York Times


Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Four new films to see this week: The Fantastic Four: First Steps, Gazer, Dying/Sterben and The Bad Guys 2
The Fantastic Four: First Steps ★★★☆☆ Directed by Matt Shakman. Starring Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Joseph Quinn, Julia Garner, Natasha Lyonne, Paul Walter Hauser, Ralph Ineson. 12A cert, gen release, 114 min Marvel makes yet another effort to bring one its oldest hits to the big screen. Set on an alternative Earth, First Steps revels in a retro-futuristic version of the 1960s. True to the original, the Four super-powered chums are charged with stopping giant bore Galactus from annihilating the planet. We are free of any tangled links to previous films or TV series from the MCU. It can be enjoyed or loathed on its own uncomplicated terms. If the film does have a message it is that the greatest superpower of all is a mother's love. Full review DC Gazer ★★★★☆ Directed by Ryan J Sloan. Starring Ariella Mastroianni, Marcia Debonis, Renee Gagner, Jack Alberts, Tommy Kang. 15A cert, limited release, 134 min Frankie (Mastroianni) suffers from dyschronometria, a rare condition that distorts her perception of time. To cope, she records second-by-second audio prompts reminding her what she's doing and where she is. These serve as both narrative scaffolding and existential red flags, tethering us to her unravelling mind and blackouts. It's impossible not to think of Christopher Nolan's early work and the classic paranoia of DePalma's Blow Out and Coppola's The Conversation. But Gazer swerves from pastiche into Cronenbergian body horror as the already unreliable narrator becomes increasingly unmoored. Lo-fi and disarmingly intense. Full review TB READ MORE Dying/Sterben ★★★★☆ Directed by Matthias Glasner. Starring Lars Eidinger, Corinna Harfouch, Lilith Stangenberg, Ronald Zehrfeld, Robert Gwisdek, Anna Bederke, Hans-Uwe Bauer, Saskia Rosendahl. 16 cert, limited release, 182 min Saga concerning an elderly German couple and their unhelpful children. Dying is a film composed like its central musical motif: sprawling, discordant, haunted by mortality. Spanning three hours and five loosely tethered chapters, this dark family yarn plays like a collage of recent festival favourites; early, unvarnished scenes of elder care nod towards Vortex and Amour; a hectic middle section concerning a conductor recalls Todd Field's similarly themed Tár; a late narrative swerve into assisted suicide intersects with Pedro Almodóvar's The Room Next Door. Somehow, the disparate pieces and maximalist clutter find a rhythm. Full review TB The Bad Guys 2 ★★★☆☆ Directed by Pierre Perifel. Voices of Sam Rockwell, Marc Maron, Craig Robinson, Anthony Ramos, Awkwafina, Danielle Brooks, Natasha Lyonne. G cert, gen release, 104 min Sequel to the so-so animation about a cadre of slick animal criminals. One remains puzzled as to what these films want to be. Not nearly enough is done with the atavistic natures of the heroes. Mr Wolf, voiced by Rockwell, may have big teeth (Grandma), but, the odd growl aside, he does little that George Clooney didn't do in the Oceans films. In contrast, far too much is done with the increasingly unwieldy plot. If you keep yakking about the McGuffin the audience will worry if they should genuinely care about it. That isn't happening here. Full review DC


Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
How Substack is upending media: ‘It is seriously challenging the old-guard message that people won't pay for writing'
Elon Musk wanted to buy Substack not long after he bought Twitter in 2022. But the newsletter and podcast platform wasn't for sale. This month Substack raised a further $100 million (€85.44 million) in investment. The deal put a reported $1.1 billion valuation on the business. For now, Substack remains privately owned. Even though it's been around for eight years, it's only in the last couple of years that Substack has become more visible and popular. Part of the reason is that several big-name writers have started using the platform. Margaret Atwood , George Saunders, Miranda July , Salman Rushdie , Chuck Palahniuk and many others have Substacks. [ A Swim in a Pond in the Rain: A masterclass in how to write by George Saunders Opens in new window ] Maybe it's the ethos of Substack that draws writers of such renown. As the app states, 'with full editorial content and no gatekeepers, you can do the work you most believe in'. At this starry juncture of the careers of Atwood et al, it's difficult to imagine any book editor savaging new manuscripts they submit, but maybe it's the freedom to play around with random content and ideas that is the attraction. Other well-known people on the platform are the Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, former Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown and singer-songwriter Patti Smith . READ MORE So how did Substack evolve? Back in the analogue day, we hand-wrote letters to each other when we had something to say. That lasted for centuries. The most exposure those letters received were overwhelmingly to an audience of one. That's unless the recipients and/or senders were famous, and had the foresight to keep their correspondence; a correspondence that some day in the future ended up being published as Collected Letters. Then came the Internet and mobile phones for all, and the new reality of your thoughts, images and live experiences reaching huge digital audiences. On the writing side of this in the early days were blogs, usually on the platform Word Press. Plenty of ordinary people blogged about their lives, children, travels, social experiments, interests and an inexhaustible range of other subjects. In the democracy of the online world, some blogs were good, some were terrible. They were free to read, or at least any I came across were, although, as ever, donations were welcome. Some that became widely read went on to have another life, one example being Julie Powell 's 2002 blog Julie & Julia, 365 days, 524 Recipes, 1 Tiny Apartment. Powell blogged for a year about cooking her way through Julia Child's Mastering the Art of French Cooking. It later became a bestselling book, then a hit movie starring Meryl Streep as Child. After the long and enduring life of the blog came newsletters. These differed from blogs in that they were less frequrntusually once a fortnight or once a month. You could sign up to be added to the mailing list. I subscribed for a time to author Dolly Alderton's newsletter, which was, as I recall, short, newsy and funny. Maybe it's the ethos of Substack that draws writers of such renown. Photograph: Gabby Jones/Bloomberg Substack is essentially the 3.0 sophisticated incarnation of the blog-stroke-newsletter, its aim to secure a subscription fee for access to at least some of the writer's content. Substack was founded in San Francisco by Hamish McKenzie, Chris Best and Jairaj Sethi. It was funded by various venture capitalist investors. The mission statement on the app reads: 'Building a new economic engine for culture. Do your best work, supported by your subscribers. Substack lets independent writers and podcasters publish directly to their audience and get paid through subscriptions.' There aren't any ads on Substack, and it is free to use the platform. The idea was that writers – in an era when freelance assignments have become ever rarer and ever more poorly paid – could have some autonomy over monetising their own content. Readers pay writers directly, rather than the traditional arrangement of editors commissioning copy, and organisations then waiting to pay contributors after weeks or even months. Writers posting on Substack have an individualised website for their archive content, in addition to whatever way they wish to personalise the page. New articles on Substack get emailed to subscribers. The author owns their content and their mailing list. Traditional media outlets frequently retained copyright over content written by writers. Writers can make their content free, or subscriber-only. Substack's business model takes a 10 per cent cut on paid subscriptions. The company doesn't release profit figures, so if it's difficult to know how much it makes. However, Substack said earlier this year that it now has five million paid subscribers. That came just four months after the company claimed four million paid subscribers, so this number appears to be advancing rapidly. To talk about media or publishing at this moment, you have to talk about Substack or look out of touch There is usually some free, or 'unlocked', content on a Substack, so potential subscribers can get a flavour of what's being offered. When writers are starting out, they can choose to make all their content free, while also offering a 'pledge' option. This means that if and when content becomes subscriber only, the pledge automatically transforms into a subscription. Freelance journalist Laura Kennedy , a contributor to The Irish Times who is now based in Australia, has had a Substack called Peak Notions since 2022. It has 14,000 subscribers, though she prefers not to reveal how many of those pay for her content. 'For a writer or freelancer, steady income and consistent work – the reliability of it, the editorial control and ownership of your own content and platform – is legitimately life-changing,' she says. 'A small, regular income that can't be pulled from under you at no notice is more than most writers can expect. 'Substack has sort of upended media in the best sense – it is seriously challenging the old-guard message that people won't pay for writing, that it is the platform and not the writer they value, that they only want to read particular kinds of work, or that local news is not something people will fund directly. Kennedy points out that some writers have secured book deals through their Substacks. [ Demystifying the path to publication, for free Opens in new window ] In May of this year, the New Yorker published an essay by Peter C Barker titled Is the Next Great American Novel Being Published on Substack? As Kennedy says: 'To talk about media or publishing at this moment, you have to talk about Substack or look out of touch. That's a profound change and a good one. There is no reason writers and journalists can't be in both worlds – they enrich one another. They're the same world.'