logo
How Donald Trump's drastic decision this week will have sweeping immigration consequences for Australia

How Donald Trump's drastic decision this week will have sweeping immigration consequences for Australia

Daily Mail​29-05-2025

Donald Trump 's ban on new international students could lead to a wave of students coming to Australia who would have otherwise picked prestigious universities such as Harvard or Yale, a leading higher education expert says.
The US President has stopped all student visa applications in a bid to force universities to better tackle anti-Semitism and political extremism on campus, in a move also designed to free up more places for Americans.
But the move could have consequences for Australia - already the world's largest education provider per capita - claimed Professor Andrew Norton, a higher education expert at Monash University.
'If they can't go to those top American universities, they may decide that Australia is the next best option,' he told Daily Mail Australia.
Education is Australia's fourth biggest export, behind iron ore, coal and natural gas and international, fee- paying students are a lucrative source of revenue for universities.
Trump's decision could give universities even more choice in who they selected, but would be unlikely to create a fresh wave of migrants, given Labor is seeking to cap the number of new annual enrolments to 270,000 with Senate approval.
'I'm saying, probably not an increase in numbers but possibly an increase in quality,' Prof Norton said.
'We've not necessarily got the most academically ambitious students - they may go to Harvard or other universities like that.'
Donald Trump 's ban on new international students could lead to a wave of students who would have picked prestigious universities such as Harvard or Yale coming to Australia instead, a leading higher education expert says
It is understood university chancellors met in Canberra on Wednesday, where fears were expressed about potentially being swamped with applications from international students who would have otherwise gone to the US.
In the US, international students are only legally allowed to work on campus in jobs related to their field of study.
In Australia, they can work 30 hours a week and if they are a studying a masters degree, they can bring a spouse to Australia with working rights.
To get a student visa, an overseas applicant needs a Confirmation of Enrolment to prove they have enrolled at an accredited Australian university.
More than half - or 55 per cent - of overseas students come from China, India , Nepal, the Philippines and Vietnam.
Australian universities have long favoured overseas students, who pay fees upfront unlike local students, who pay off degree through a Higher Education Loan Program.
Salvatore Babones, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Sydney, said international students were often enrolling to study in Australia to get work visas, giving universities a lucrative revenue stream.
'If they need to make some money, they can just give out more visas, get some more students in - it's become morally corrupt,' he said.
Prof Babones said led to students coming to Australia on student visas just to earn some money to send home.
'Their goal is to be in Australia earning money, delivering for Uber Eats or driving Ubers,' he said.
This was more common at less prestigious universities outside the Group of Eight - the University of Melbourne, Australian National University, the University of Sydney, the University of Queensland, the University of Western Australia, the University of Adelaide, Monash University and UNSW Sydney.
'Once you go below the Group of Eight, they're fundamentally work visas,' he said.
'Universities are empowered by the government to give out visas - it's relatively easy to get a visa to be an international student at a public university; it's very difficult to get a visa to be an international student at a language school.'
International students make up half of the University of Sydney's enrolments but for some degrees such as communications and business, that rises to 90 per cent.
'Masters degrees are now dominated by international students and if you want to create a new masters program, you have to present a business case to your university of how you would attract international students,' he said.
'The reason is not that Australia has such fantastic post-graduate education - the reason is that masters students can legally work 30 hours a week during the semester; they can work full-time out of the semester.
'More importantly, for masters students they can bring their families so partners of masters students can work full-time.'
This had seen Nepalese students make up eight per cent of enrolments, making it the third biggest source of Australia's international students after China and India.
'Nepal's a poor, mountainous country in the middle of nowhere,' he said.
'Why are there so many thousands of Nepali masters students in Australia? Because they can bring their family. By paying for a single masters degree, they get two people access to the Australian labour market for four years.
'It's simply a low-wage work scam - there's no way that Nepal can afford to send so many students here to do masters degrees; they borrow the money in Nepal - a lot of it's loan sharking.'
Prof Babones said a reliance on overseas students led to diminished teaching standards, with Queensland University of Technology last year admitting in its annual report that 46 per cent of international students had dropped out.
'This diminishes the pedagogical environment, it kind of makes a mockery of the mission of the public university - the point of having an education program here in Australia is not to service clients from China,' he said.
'The purpose is supposed to meet Australia's workforce needs and to meet Australia's educational needs but it's reached now, ridiculous proportions in some ways.'
Australia was last year home to 1.1million international student enrolments - from high school to universities and vocational education.
That figure included those who switched courses or degrees, and counts some students multiple times.
Maurice Newman, a former Macquarie University chancellor, said Trump was simply trying to open up more places for local students, as Australian universities continued to favour more international students for the revenue stream, particularly from China.
'Clearly, you get more money from foreign students which makes it likely some places for Australian students will not be available,' he said.
'When I was at Macquarie, what I was trying to do was reduce our dependence on foreign students - it's just putting too many eggs in one basket.
'What President Trump is looking to do is to open up more places for Americans to go to Ivy League and prestigious universities, which for the time being appear to have been overlooked for higher paying, presumably foreign students.'
David Llewellyn-Smith, the chief strategist with MacroBusiness, said universities were relying on revenue streams from overseas students to cope with a shortfall in federal government funding.
'The government should put a lot more money into universities and they should put a cap on foreign students like Donald Trump is doing,' he said.
'A bunch of our university foreign intakes are way too high and it's dramatically changed the way the universities are taught.
'You're debasing education quality to make a dollar for those universities, which in the long run doesn't deliver you the kind of high quality and sophisticated workforce you need for a productive economy - in the long-run you're actually doing yourself harm.'
The large influx of overseas students made up a large proportion of the 437,440 migrants who came to Australia on a permanent and long-term basis in the year to March, worsening the housing crisis.
'These are the externalities that the universities don't want you to talk about - there are huge costs to all sorts of things,' he said.
But Prof Norton said universities were now voluntarily restricting their overseas intake, given the large numbers who arrived in 2023 and 2024, as Labor tried to legislate with the Greens a 270,000 annual cap on new enrolments.
'The total number will stay high even if the commencing numbers start to decline again, because we've just got this huge stock of people,' he said.
'The universities fear what might happen next and we have seen drops in visa applications for this year and I think it's because the universities are voluntarily holding back rather than going above the so-called indicative cap.
'We may not be able to capitalise on the fact that people who want to go to the United States won't be able to go to the United States.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ABC confirms Q+A to be axed amid wider changes and scores of redundancies across the broadcaster
ABC confirms Q+A to be axed amid wider changes and scores of redundancies across the broadcaster

The Guardian

time24 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

ABC confirms Q+A to be axed amid wider changes and scores of redundancies across the broadcaster

The ABC's Q+A program has been cancelled after 18 years, the broadcaster has confirmed, amid wider changes that will result in scores of redundancies across the public broadcaster. The round of changes will fund new programming at the ABC under reforms yet to be announced by the new managing director Hugh Marks. Marks, who joined the ABC in March, is set to unveil his first round of reforms at the public broadcaster, which Guardian Australia understands to include at least 80 redundancies across the ABC. 'Q+A was a groundbreaking program that had made a significant contribution to Australian society,' the ABC director of news, Justin Stevens, said. 'We're very proud of Q+A's great achievements over the years. The team has done a terrific job, including a strong performance during the federal election campaign,' he said. 'Discontinuing the program at this point is no reflection on anyone on the show. Q+A presenter Patricia Karvelas, who will remain at the ABC, said she enjoyed spending time with the audience members who came to Q+A late on a Monday night. 'They have always been the reason for this show and I'm forever grateful to them for coming on national TV and having the courage to ask questions of powerful people,' she said. Stevens said the cancellation of the program would result in redundancies 'and the loss of talented colleagues', but it is unclear how many. The ABC said savings will be invested in another audience participation project, Your Say, which was a success during the election, and news documentaries in the vein of Killing Season and Nemesis, Stevens said. 'We're excited about being able to produce additional high impact, premium news documentary programs to complement the ABC's strong factual slate,' Stevens said Stevens said as well as hosting Afternoon Briefing and the Politics Now podcast, Karvelas would do more Four Corners episodes as time permits. The weekly flagship discussion program was launched in 2007 by veteran executive producer Peter McEvoy and host Tony Jones and was highly influential in its early years, regularly making headlines and setting the news agenda. ABC staff were warned of looming cuts on Tuesday by the journalists' union, the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), which told ABC members of colleagues being called into meetings with managers 'regarding a restructure'. One of the divisions to be folded is the Innovation Lab, which was founded in 2018 to test and experiment with new content and technology to prepare the ABC for the future. Headed up by digital content & innovation chief Angela Stengal, the team is believed to be as big as 10 and staff have been offered voluntary redundancy or the chance to go into a redundancy pool to compete for other positions. Radio National staff in Brisbane, Adelaide and Victoria have been called into meetings, according to union sources.

US and Israel condemnation of sanctions on ministers is 'predictable', Australia says
US and Israel condemnation of sanctions on ministers is 'predictable', Australia says

Reuters

time37 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US and Israel condemnation of sanctions on ministers is 'predictable', Australia says

SYDNEY, June 11 (Reuters) - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said condemnation by the U.S. and Israel of sanctions imposed on two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers was "predictable", and that the two men had impeded a two-state solution. Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Norway in a coordinated action imposed sanctions on Tuesday on cabinet ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X that the U.S. condemned the move, and Israel said the action by the five countries was "outrageous" and the Israeli government would hold a special meeting early next week to decide how to respond. Albanese said the responses from Israel and the U.S. are "predictable". "The Israeli Government does need to uphold its obligations under international law and some of the expansionist rhetoric that we've seen as well is clearly in contradiction of that from these hard-line right wing members of the Netanyahu government," Albanese said on Wednesday in an interview with ABC Radio Sydney. Comments by the two men "have aided what is a serious impediment to a two-state solution", he added. The sanctions freeze the assets and impose travel bans on Israel's National Security Minister Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Smotrich, both West Bank settlers, Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong said. "We, along with those other countries and the broader international community, believe we can only see peace in the Middle East when we deal with two states and when both Israelis and Palestinians can live in peace and security," she said in a television interview with Seven. Israel's Ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, wrote on X on Wednesday that the sanctions are "deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable".

BREAKING NEWS ABC Q+A is officially axed - as host Patricia Karvelas' next move is revealed
BREAKING NEWS ABC Q+A is officially axed - as host Patricia Karvelas' next move is revealed

Daily Mail​

time38 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS ABC Q+A is officially axed - as host Patricia Karvelas' next move is revealed

Q+A, one of the ABC's flagship current affairs and news programs, has officially been axed after 17 years on air. The show went on a mid-year break in May and was scheduled to return in August, but sources confirmed it won't be airing again. The ABC's news director, Justin Stevens, said the show had a major impact on the national discussion in Australia. 'We're very proud of Q+A's great achievements over the years. The team has done a terrific job, including a strong performance during the federal election campaign,' he said. 'Discontinuing the program at this point is no reflection on anyone on the show. 'We always need to keep innovating and renewing and, in the two decades since Q+A began, the world has changed. 'It's time to rethink how audiences want to interact and to evolve how we can engage with the public to include as many Australians as possible in national conversations. 'We'll be working on how we can continue to foster engagement of this nature in an innovative way.' Host Patricia Karveles will be redeployed to Four Corners, and will continue hosting the Afternoon Briefing show. 'Patricia also recently reported for Four Corners, and we've now asked her to do more for Four Corners as time permits,' Stevens said. It will come alongside a number of planned redundancies across the national broadcaster. Changes at the ABC come just months after Hugh Marks stepped into the role of managing director, succeeding David Anderson, who served for six years. Marks had previously signaled a significant shake-up, describing the need for 'a program of renewal and invigoration' in comments he made back in December. The show has come under fire over the last few years, after churning through different hosts following the departure of Tony Jones, who left in 2019. Q+A has seen several changes in its hosting lineup, first with Hamish Macdonald, David Speers, Virginia Trioli, Stan Grant and most recently Karvelas taking over as host. The number of episodes was also cut by ABC staff in 2024, going from 40 episodes a year to just 24. Q+A also was shifted from its usual slot of Monday night, to Thursday night, a move that was eventually reversed by the ABC. The show has also seen its ratings collapse in the last five years. From a peak 600,000 viewers in 2020, Q+A crashed to a low of just above 200,000 people tuning in across the five major capital cities in April 2021. In August 2023, during the show's 'Garma Special', Q+A received its lowest ratings ever, with fewer than 84,000 metro viewers. Daily Mail Australia's Political Editor Peter Van Onselen called out the show's collapse in 2023 and said it would not be missed if it didn't return to ABC's roster in 2024. In an opinion piece for The Australian, Van Onselen pointed out Q+A had received just 203,000 views nationally at that time. 'With numbers this woeful coupled with how out of touch with mainstream Australia the program has become, it really needs to be put out of its misery,' he wrote. 'There have been enough failed reboots to justify finally axing it.' Van Onselen said cracks started to appear after Tony Jones stopped hosting following a decade in the role from 2008 to 2019. 'It wasn't all that long ago that the program was vibrant and interesting, with discussions well led by former host Tony Jones,' he wrote. 'I remember appearing on it at the time. Ratings regularly hit the one million mark, which precipitated the discussion about changing its time slot.' Van Onselen lashed the show for not being informative enough and hosting discussions that were 'one-sided, uninteresting and rarely funny'. He claimed it was the ABC's 'stubbornness' that was saving the show from being axed for good but that a replacement would be welcomed. Q+A's last episode this year was aired on May 19. The news comes just one day after Network 10 cancelled The Project, co-hosted by short term Q+A star Hamish Macdonald. That show had been running for 16 years. The Project, had been in a ratings free-fall since Carrie Bickmore left her seat as host at the end of 2022. It will wrap up in three weeks after airing more than 4500 episodes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store