AI Innovations for Future-Ready Business Leaders
Event summary produced by The Globe and Mail Events team. The Globe's editorial department was not involved.
AI is reshaping industries at an unprecedented pace, presenting organizations with both transformative opportunities and complex challenges. To stay ahead, business leaders and experts are seeking actionable insights on driving innovation, optimizing efficiency, and overcoming the hurdles of AI adoption. Success in this evolving landscape hinges on addressing critical factors such as regulatory compliance, ethical considerations, and seamless integration strategies—ensuring organizations unlock AI's full potential while mitigating risks.
On Wednesday, May 21st, The Globe and Mail hosted a half-day hybrid event dedicated to exploring the most effective AI strategies in practice today. Through insightful discussions, industry leaders emphasized the importance of governance and safeguards while offering a forward-looking perspective on emerging innovations set to shape the future. Panelists and speakers shared groundbreaking solutions to help businesses maintain a competitive edge, providing strategies to enhance IT frameworks and maximize AI-driven investments. The event also spotlighted key themes such as data management and operational optimization, with thought-provoking conversations on harnessing AI for smarter decision-making and streamlined workflow efficiency.
Missed the live event or would like to view it again? Scroll down to the video below.
Speakers:
The Globe and Mail presented the event with sponsor support from NOVIPRO Group. To learn about upcoming Globe and Mail events visit www.globeandmail.com/events.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
40 minutes ago
- CBC
Some EV owners in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., choosing to rent rather than buy charger, private utility says
Social Sharing Some Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., drivers who have opted to ditch their gas-powered car for an electric vehicle (EV) are choosing to rent a charger rather than buying, according to the private utility company PUC Services Inc. PUC says it launched its EV home charger rental program in October 2022, and there are currently 31 active participants. Noting that "EVs are not the most inexpensive vehicle out there," Jairus Patterson, PUC's manager of corporate communications, said the program offers a simple, reliable and trustworthy at-home charging option to people who have purchased EVs. "When you purchase [an EV], you do need to get a charger and this is a great way, an affordable way to help lower some costs, by renting a home charger from us," Patterson told CBC Sudbury. "We do know those [chargers] can [cost] upwards of $2,000 to $3,000 if you're going to purchase it yourself. Under the PUC program, EV drivers can have a charger installed at their home for a $35 monthly fee, which covers rental of the unit, a lifetime warranty and an installation credit. 'The uptick has been good' Patterson said the contract is "month-to-month," giving people the opportunity to opt out at any time in case they decide to install a permanent charger. "We have seen growth in the adoption of EV vehicles here in Sault Ste. Marie, and with our program, the uptick has been good," Patterson said. "We are seeing some people are going the route where they just want to buy it themselves and they don't want to rent it, so that's fine as well. But we are starting to see more and more people deciding to go the rental route." Devin Arthur, chapter president at the EV Society of Greater Sudbury, welcomes the program, which he says helps to encourage the adoption of EVs "Any way to make it easier for people to purchase an EV is a win, especially if you are purchasing a used EV as these purchases often do not come with a 'free' home charger install like a new vehicle would," Arthur wrote in an email to CBC News. In November the Ontario government announced it's building more than 1,300 new EV charging stations in small and medium-sized communities, marking a major milestone in the province's plan to increase access to EV chargers outside of large urban centres and support the electrification of transportation across the province. At the time, the government said the new charging stations will provide critical supporting infrastructure in communities across the province, including for EVs made in Ontario. "With more than 201,000 electric vehicles on the road in Ontario, we're putting shovels in the ground to build more charging stations and make life easier for drivers," said Stephen Lecce, Minister of Energy and Electrification. "That includes a focus on smaller and underserved communities across our province where we are providing more certainty for parents and workers during their commutes." The chargers will be located at 270 sites across the province, such as arenas, hospitals, parks and recreation centres. This includes 190 charging stations in northern Ontario, providing drivers across the north with more options when travelling.
Globe and Mail
42 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
AI will eventually lead to a more extreme society of haves and have-nots
The discussion these days is all about whether artificial intelligence will lead to a surge in productivity, lower inflation, higher economic growth, better living standards and value creation. The stock market seems to think so, as the shares of many AI-related companies have surged. This is leading many to believe that a bubble is forming. Such bubbles are not atypical. A 2018 paper published in Marketing Science titled Two Centuries of Innovations and Stock Market Bubbles shows that groundbreaking innovation tends to be linked to bubbles in the stock prices of companies commercializing innovation. Those investors who remain overallocated to an innovative company after the bubble has ended suffer the effects of long-term reversals. My sense is that AI will not improve productivity as much as markets expect. I tend to agree with Nobel Prize winner Daron Acemoglu, who believes that the AI-related frenzy will eventually lead to a tech crash that will leave everyone disillusioned with the technology. Historically, new technologies have been disappointing in terms of increasing productivity. There is no clear link between technological innovation and productivity growth, as defined by gross domestic product per worker. A recent example: Nobel Prize winner Robert Solow has written that the computer age was everywhere except in productivity statistics. Editorial: A real reform mandate for the first federal AI minister Here are three points to counter too much optimism about AI. First, it is hard to see the big societal problem that AI will solve. Second, AI may lower inflation but at the same time will increase demand for capital because of the huge investments and funding it will require in its early stages. This will push real interest rates up, leaving nominal interest rates little changed. Finally, AI may be hurting more than helping society. For example, researchers at Microsoft published a paper recently arguing that while AI may improve efficiency, it can also reduce human critical thinking capabilities and diminish independent problem solving. 'Used improperly, technologies can and do result in the deterioration of cognitive faculties that ought to be preserved,' it found. Despite all this, I do believe that AI needs to be embedded in our day-to-day lives, as it is not going away. Whether we like it or not, we are headed full speed toward an AI-powered future. The key question is, will AI benefit and reach all people? Historically, that hasn't been the case when it comes to new technology, which is usually controlled by a few people. And it may be worse this time. In my opinion, AI will most likely create a more rigid class-based society: the upper class, which will include people who are on top of AI knowledge and applications, and the lower class – those who are not, and who will be left behind without embedding AI into their everyday life. A recent article in The Globe and Mail hit the nail on the head. Author Don Tapscott, who is co-founder of Blockchain Research Institute, said, 'AI will become a new social fault line. Those with intelligent agents [i.e., large language model-powered systems] will be superpowered; those without them will fall behind. A small class of enhanced individuals could dominate productivity, creativity and influence.' An AI-powered future and an AI class-based society reminds me of the landlord-serf relationship in medieval Europe, which was a central feature of the feudal system and could end up being a central feature of the AI-powered future. 'Landlords' were typically those who controlled large estates, while 'serfs' were peasants bound to the land, obligated to work for the landlord and lacking many freedoms. The land cultivated by serfs was owned by a landlord. A large portion of what serfs produced had to be given to their landlord. Serfs lacked freedom of movement; they could not permanently leave their village, marry, change occupation, or dispose of their property without their landlord's permission. In the future, these landlords will be those in control of AI, and the serfs will be those without much knowledge about AI. This looks like a scary dystopian future that should force us all to become sufficiently prepared ahead of time in AI and be in full command of AI agents, irrespective of whether we believe the technology will solve the society's productivity problems or not. George Athanassakos is a professor of finance and holds the Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing at the Ivey Business School, Western University. His latest book is Value Investing: From Theory to Practice.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
A new approach to training for a new kind of leader
The rapid pace of technological innovation is forcing businesses to adapt their leadership training practices and requiring those leaders to develop new skills, while also giving them new tools for doing so. Leadership training has historically been conducted in large group settings at a designated time and place separate from daily work activities, such as conferences, seminars and lectures. The pandemic, however, forced many organizations to evolve to a more flexible, digital and on-demand approach, and put a greater emphasis on the more human aspects of leadership. More recent business challenges are evolving leadership training further, inspiring a re-evaluation of the kinds of skills leaders need to be successful, and how to best deliver that training. 'As opposed to the lengthy seminars that we used to go to for maybe a full day, we're starting to see more micro-learning programs,' says Lisa White, a leadership consultant for Trinity Training and Development, which is based in Austin, Tx., but has a remote team. 'It tends to give them bite-sized learning, and it tends to give them skills to work on, so quite often they'll have assignments that they need to work on and come back and report on.' Ms. White adds that since she began her career 15 years ago she's seen a significant evolution in the kinds of leaders organizations are seeking. 'It used to be more my-way-or-the-highway, and the focus tended to be a lot more on discipline and authority,' she says. 'Modern leadership training tends to be more of that boss-to-coach mentality, so you're there to help guide people, to look after the people in your charge, as opposed to being in charge.' Like those who report to them, leaders need to quickly learn and adopt new tools and technologies as they're integrated into the business. At the same time, they're also being asked to develop more of their human or 'soft skills.' The most popular business skills training programs globally offered by online education provider Coursera, for example, are human resource technology, risk mitigation and control, workplace technologies, stakeholder communications, and work force development. Within Canada and among leadership and management training courses specifically, programs in the top 10 include titles like 'the art of storytelling' and 'talent acquisition' and they sit alongside those dedicated to project management and execution. 'There's a lot of pressure to build technical skills as a leader, but at the same time what we're seeing in our Coursera data is that human skills are still important,' says Coursera's chief learning officer, Trena Minudri. 'We're seeing exponential growth in the space of AI [artificial intelligence skills training], but human skills are still in our top 10, and it's everything around communication, conflict management, emotional intelligence – those skills, especially in the age of AI, are becoming even more important.' That transition, Ms. Minudri says, speaks to a longer term transition of the archetype of strong leadership. 'There was a focus on charisma and speeches and inspiring in a very extroverted way, and what we're seeing is that's no longer the case,' she says. 'We're seeing a kind of 'quiet leadership' gaining influence.' Just as AI is reinforcing the importance of human skills it's also giving learning platforms like Coursera new ways of delivering more personalized training and development programs. 'Leadership development is really about helping leaders learn effectively and efficiently, and building AI into learning makes it much faster,' Ms. Minudri says. 'You're not sitting through content that doesn't matter – it's really geared towards what you need to know, how you need to know it, in the way that you can learn best.' On-demand video-based learning and AI-driven personalized education have been gaining in popularity, but there has also been a return to more in-person leadership development following a pandemic pause, says David Gibbons, senior client partner for global management consulting firm Korn Ferry in Vancouver. While e-learning and generative AI can teach leaders what to do, 'the actual practice and building skills and capabilities requires more human interaction to bring that to life over time,' he says. Some AI programs offer feedback via chatbots, but 'because we are leading people, having that human interaction is still important.' More so than the learning format, Mr. Gibbons says leadership training is evolving to become less one-size-fits-all and more closely tied to unique business needs and outcomes or designed to solve specific organizational challenges. 'Businesses are coming to us to say, 'here's the big shift we're making, here's our growth aspirations, we need leaders to shift in this way that's really contextually relevant, so can you help us shift them?' ' he says. 'We're seeing new strategies come out more frequently now, because of the pace of what's happening in the world and the variety of changes requiring organizations to constantly reinvent their business models, their growth aspirations and their strategies.'
