Uganda declares end to latest ebola outbreak
KAMPALA (Reuters) -Uganda on Saturday declared an end to the country's latest outbreak of ebola, three months after authorities confirmed cases of the highly infectious and often fatal viral hemorrhagic infection in the capital Kampala.
The East African country announced its latest outbreak on January 30 after the death of a male nurse who tested positive for the virus.
"Good news! The current ebola Sudan Virus Disease outbreak has officially come to an end," the health ministry said in a post on the X platform.
It added the declaration of the end of the outbreak followed 42 days "without a new case since the last confirmed patient was discharged."
In the post, the ministry did not give the latest total caseload recorded during the outbreak.
In early March when the ministry last reported on the caseload, it said at least ten cases had been recorded with two deaths.
Ebola infections are frequent in Uganda which has many tropical forests that are natural reservoirs for the virus.
The latest outbreak, caused by the Sudan strain of the virus which has no approved vaccine, was Uganda's ninth since the country recorded its first infection in 2000.
Uganda also neighbours the Democratic Republic of Congo which has recorded over a dozen outbreaks, including one in 2018-2020 that killed nearly 2,300 people.
The outbreak started in Kampala, a crowded city of about four million that is also a crossroads for routes branching out to eastern Congo, Kenya, Rwanda and South Sudan.
Although outbreaks have been common, health experts say the country has been able to leverage on its experience battling the disease over the years to bring them under control relatively quickly.
Ebola is transmitted through contact with infected bodily fluids and tissue. Symptoms include headache, vomiting of blood, muscle pains and bleeding.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Costco says it's not selling the abortion pill mifepristone
Costco will not be adding the abortion pill mifepristone to its pharmacies. Confirming the news to Reuters on Thursday, Aug. 14, Costco said the company will not sell the pill due to low demand. USA TODAY has contacted Costco for more information on the decision, but the company told Reuters that, typically, patients get the drug from their doctors. Mifepristone is a drug that blocks a hormone needed to continue pregnancy, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA, mifepristone is taken with another drug called misoprostol to terminate pregnancies up to 10 weeks from the first day of the last menstrual period. The medications are taken over the course of two days. Mifepristone first got FDA approval in September 2000 for medical termination of pregnancy through seven weeks gestation; this was extended to 10 weeks in 2016. The FDA approved a generic version of the drug in 2019, according to the agency's website. Costco's announcement comes at a time when religious activist groups are pushing back against abortion drugs. Arguments against abortion drug, lawsuit explained In November 2022, a group of anti-abortion medical professionals sued the FDA in Texas federal district court, challenging its approval of the drug as well as expanded access to it. In April 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with the group and suspended the FDA's approval of mifepristone. The court later issued an order that allowed individuals to have access to mifepristone during the appeals process. The Supreme Court then ruled in June 2024 that the religious group's case was to be dismissed because the group did not have 'the necessary legal standing to bring this challenge in federal court in the first place,' according to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. According to legal experts such as Joanne Rosen, a practice professor in Health Policy and Management at Johns Hopkins, plaintiffs must prove they have been hurt by the practices they're arguing against and that the government or agency was at fault. 'The coalition of plaintiffs were anti-abortion physicians and an anti-abortion medical association,' Rosen previously said about the case. 'None of them prescribe mifepristone or perform abortions. None of them have been required by FDA action to do so.' According to Johns Hopkins, another group or plaintiff could file a lawsuit of their own with more concrete evidence. Retailers targeted as part of anti-abortion campaigns While some stores, such as Walgreens and CVS, have chosen to sell mifepristone, other retailers haven't clarified whether they'll sell it. USA TODAY has reached out to three of those retailers — Walmart, Albertson's, and McKesson — for comment. Walmart declined to comment. Albertson's and McKesson did not immediately respond. "Many retailers have become more cautious about taking overt political or social stances after recent controversies triggered boycotts, negative media coverage, and polarized consumer reactions," Arun Sundaram, senior analyst at the California Family Rights Act, told Reuters. Religious groups such as Inspire Investing have credited themselves with keeping pharmacies from selling the drug. In December 2024, Kroger and Sam's Club allegedly began selling mifepristone in their pharmacies then said the pills were listed on their pharmacy websites by mistake, according to the Wisconsin Family Council. The council called out CVS and Walgreens for still offering abortion pills at their pharmacies. The drug has been the focal point of multiple protests as pro-choice groups demand continued access to the drug. Have there been deaths linked to mifepristone? According to the FDA, there have been 36 reports of deaths in patients associated with the medication since September 2000. This includes two ectopic pregnancies, which is when the fetus grows outside the womb, and multiple cases of sepsis. 'The adverse events cannot with certainty be causally attributed to mifepristone because of concurrent use of other drugs, other medical or surgical treatments, co-existing medical conditions, and information gaps about patient health status and clinical management of the patient,' the FDA said on its website. Contributing: Reuters Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@
Miami Herald
2 days ago
- Miami Herald
More Americans than ever don't drink alcohol, poll finds. What's behind shift?
The share of Americans who drink alcohol has fallen to a record low, according to a new Gallup poll. At the same time, a record-high share of Americans believe consuming alcohol, even in moderation, is unhealthy. The results come from Gallup's Consumption Habits survey, conducted July 7-21 with 1,002 U.S. adults. In the survey, 54% of respondents said they sometimes drink wine, beer or liquor, marking the lowest such figure since 1939, the first year Gallup asked Americans about their drinking habits. It continues a recent trend of declining alcohol consumption, with the share of drinkers standing at 58% in 2024, 62% in 2023 and 67% in 2022. In contrast, for most of the past eight decades, this figure has remained above 60%. It reached a high of 71% in 1976. When the latest results were broken down by demographic groups, some notable differences emerged. Men were more likely than women to report drinking — 57% vs. 51% — and white respondents were more prone to drink than respondents of color — 56% vs. 52%. Similarly, there were slight generational differences. Among adults 55 and older, 56% reported drinking alcohol, while 50% of 18- to 34-year-olds said the same. Democrats were also significantly more likely to consume alcohol than Republicans — 61% vs. 46%. This is a relatively new phenomenon, as the share of GOP respondents who drink fell 19 points since 2023, while the share of drinking Democrats only fell by 3 points. For the first time, a majority of respondents, 53%, now say drinking in moderation — defined as up to two drinks per day — is bad for health. Meanwhile, 37% said it makes no difference, and 6% said it is good for health. The findings reflect a continuing trend of more Americans viewing drinking as unhealthy. In 2024, 45% said alcohol is bad for health, up from 39% in 2023 and 28% in 2018. Young Americans were also significantly more likely than their older counterparts to view moderate drinking as detrimental. In the survey, which has a margin of error of 4 percentage points, 66% of 18- to 34-year-olds said moderate drinking is bad for health. Meanwhile, 48% of those 55 and older said the same. Similarly, women were more likely than men to say limited drinking is unhealthy — 60% vs. 47%. And Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say the same — 58% vs. 44%. The results come as emerging medical guidance indicates that drinking alcohol — even in moderate amounts — indeed poses health risks. The U.S. government's Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends limiting drinking to one or two servings per day. But, this advice is expected to be removed and replaced with a more general warning, according to a June report from Reuters, which notes that limited alcohol consumption has been linked to higher risks of certain types of cancer. 'The continuation of these trends may hinge on whether recent pronouncements about drinking's risks are the final word on the subject, similar to how the U.S. surgeon general's warnings about tobacco in the 1960s marked the start of a long-term decline in smoking,' Gallup concluded.
New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
CDC shooter Patrick Joseph White broke 150 windows and fired 180 shots in Atlanta attack
NEW YORK — The man who attacked the CDC headquarters in Atlanta on Friday fired more than 180 shots into the campus and broke about 150 windows, with bullets piercing 'blast-resistant' windows and spattering glass shards into numerous rooms, according to information circulated internally at the agency. It may take weeks or even months to replace windows and clean up the damage, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention personnel said. A Georgia man who had blamed the COVID-19 vaccine for making him depressed and suicidal opened fire late Friday, killing a police officer. Advertisement 5 Community members leaving flowers at a memorial for David Rose, the police officer killed in the shooting at the the Center of Disease Control and Prevention headquarters in Atlanta on Aug. 11, 2025. REUTERS No one at CDC was injured. The shooter was stopped by CDC security guards before driving to a nearby pharmacy and opening fire late Friday afternoon, a law enforcement official has told the AP. The official wasn't authorized to publicly discuss the investigation and spoke on condition of anonymity. Advertisement The 30-year-old man, Patrick Joseph White, later died, but authorities haven't said whether he was killed by police or killed himself. U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. toured the CDC campus on Monday. CDC security pointed out broken windows across multiple buildings, including the main guard booth, according to a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services statement. Advertisement HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill and CDC Director Susan Monarez accompanied him, according to the statement. Kennedy also visited the DeKalb County Police Department, where he met with the police chief. Later. He also met privately with the widow of the fallen officer, David Rose. Monarez posted a statement on social media Friday night that said at least four CDC buildings were hit in the attack. 5 Bullet holes seen in a windows at a CDC building. ERIK S LESSER/EPA/Shutterstock Advertisement 5 Police vehicles near Emory University and the CDC after the shooting on Aug. 8, 2025. REUTERS 5 A bullet hold in the door of a CVS pharmacy near the shooting in Atlanta. AP The extent of the damage became more clear during a weekend CDC leadership meeting. Two CDC employees who were told about what was discussed at the meeting described details to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to reveal the information. Details also were also in an agency memo seen by an AP reporter. Building 21, which houses Monarez's office, was hit by the largest number of bullets. CDC officials did not say if her office was hit. CDC employees were advised to work from home this week. Kennedy issued a statement Saturday that said 'no one should face violence while working to protect the health of others,' and that top federal health officials were 'actively supporting CDC staff.' Advertisement 5 A poster set up for Officer David Rose at the scene of the shooting. REUTERS He did not speak to the media during his visit Monday. A retired CDC official, Stephan Monroe, said he worried about the long-term impact the attack would have on young scientists' willingness to go to work for the government. 'I'm concerned that this is this is going to be a generational hit,' said Monroe, speaking to a reporter near the corner where a poster had been set up in honor of Rose. Advertisement Kennedy was a leader in a national anti-vaccine movement before President Donald Trump selected him to oversee federal health agencies, and has made false and misleading statements about the safety and effectiveness of about COVID-19 shots and other vaccines. Years of false rhetoric about vaccines and public health was bound to 'take a toll on people's mental health,' and 'leads to violence,' said Tim Young, a CDC employee who retired in April. Dr. Jerome Adams, the U.S. surgeon general during President Donald Trump's first administration, said Sunday that health leaders should appreciate the weight of their words. 'We have to understand people are listening,' Adams told 'Face the Nation' on CBS. 'When you make claims that have been proven false time and time again about safety and efficacy of vaccines, that can cause unintended consequences.'
