logo
Number of Younger Mothers Set To Fall Dramatically Amid Population Fears

Number of Younger Mothers Set To Fall Dramatically Amid Population Fears

Newsweek2 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The share of births to women under 25 is set to fall in every world region amid ongoing birth rate fears, new graphs show.
In Northern America, births from women between the ages of 15 and 24 are projected to make up 12 percent of births by 2100, down from about 23 percent this year and 45 percent in 1950.
This is according to the Pew Research Center's analysis of the U.N. Population Division's 2024 Revision of World Population Prospects.
Newsweek previously reported on the trend in mothers having children at consistently older ages, with those between 15 and 19 seeing the most consistently steep fall in the past 50 years.
Pew Research Center graphs showing how the share of births for women under 25 is set to decrease.
Pew Research Center graphs showing how the share of births for women under 25 is set to decrease.
Pew Research Center
Why It Matters
The projected drop in births among women under 25 signals sustained shifts in family formation that could accelerate population aging and shrink future workforces in many countries, pressuring pension systems and public services.
What To Know
Pew Research Center found that the share of births to women younger than 25 was projected to decline in every global region, reflecting a worldwide shift toward later childbearing and smaller family size.
In Europe, this share is set to drop even lower than in Northern America—from 15 percent in 2025 to 9 percent in 2100, down from 35 percent in 1950.
Meanwhile, in Latin America and the Caribbean, where births to women between the ages of 15 and 24 make up about 39 percent in 2025, this age group's share is predicted to drop to 17 percent in 2100.
Africa, where the fertility rate is generally higher than in the rest of the world, births to women under the age of 25 make up about 41 percent—as they did in 1950—and are projected to drop to 20 percent.
Demographers and economists have attributed lower fertility to a mix of factors, including delayed partnership and childbearing, greater labor force participation by women, improved access to contraception, and cultural shifts that places less centrality on parenthood for life plans.
"No one factor can really explain the reductions," said Claire Brindis, a co-director of the Adolescent and Young Adult Health National Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco, citing a lower level of sexual activity among teenagers, a higher level of contraceptive use and wider social changes.
She previously told Newsweek, "We have to give young people a lot of credit" for the dramatic drop in teen pregnancies.
A major challenge to having children is financial security. The 2008 financial crisis—with its effect on housing, inflation and pay—was a major contributor to why people delayed having children, had fewer of them or had none at all.
While some policymakers have proposed incentives such as lump‑sum "baby bonuses" or expanded parental leave, several researchers have urged broader, longer-term supports—such as affordable child care, paid leave and gender‑equal domestic policies—to influence fertility decisions more sustainably.
What People Are Saying
Claire Brindis, a co-director of the Adolescent and Young Adult Health National Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco, previously told Newsweek: "We should recognize that there continues to be segments who are more likely to be at risk—young people who are poor or low income, those who live in rural communities, with less education, and with less hope for economic opportunities continue to be more vulnerable.
"The risks are that we don't continue to invest in young people across all groups, and especially women, if education opportunities are shut off, if economic options (as an alternative to going to college), if student loans are eliminated or more difficult to get, if families have more economic struggles, if access to birth control or other social support services, for example, many of these positive trends can evaporate."
Phillip B. Levine, an economist from Wellesley College in Massachusetts, who recently conducted a study on the cultural reasons behind the birth rate decline, previously told Newsweek: "Policies like parental leave, child care subsidies, baby bonuses, etc. are much easier to implement and have the potential to affect fertility more rapidly, if they were effective. Changing the social conditions that encourage family formation is more difficult and takes longer to accomplish."
What Happens Next
Many governments have made addressing declining birth rates a priority. In the U.S., President Donald Trump's administration has explored giving women a "baby bonus" of $5,000, according to an April New York Times report.
Lawmakers have also looked at making childbirth free for privately insured families and tying states' transportation funding to their birth and marriage rates.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breastfeeding Reduces Risk of Early Puberty
Breastfeeding Reduces Risk of Early Puberty

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Breastfeeding Reduces Risk of Early Puberty

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Kids who are exclusively breast-fed as infants are less likely to experience early puberty. This is the conclusion of South Korean researchers who studied the development and infant diets of more than 300,000 children. The team found that breastfeeding during the first four–six months of life was linked with a lower risk of so-called "central precocious puberty" (CPP) in both boys and girls. This association was partially mediated by differences in body weight throughout childhood, with childhood obesity linked to early pubertal onset. While it can lead to an early growth sport compared to other children, adults who went through early puberty tend to be shorter on average. CPP has also been linked to an increased risk of anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. Early puberty has also been associated with an increased risk of substance abuse, eating disorders and having sex at an early age. In women, early puberty is also known to increase the risk of breast cancer as adults. CPP has been on the rise globally, a trend that doctors Lin Yang and Shengxu Li—who were not involved in the study, but authored an accompanying comment paper—say is "particularly concerning given the growing prevalence of childhood obesity." The findings, the researchers note, add to the growing body of evidence highlighting the critical role of early-life nutrition in long-term health. A woman breastfeeds her newborn baby. A woman breastfeeds her newborn this nationwide, retrospective study, researchers compared the incidence of early puberty among children who were exclusively breastfed, formula-fed or mixed-fed during their first four to six months of life. Compared to exclusively breastfed children, formula-fed children had the greatest risk of CPP in boys and girls, followed by mixed-fed boys and girls. In their commentary paper, Yang and Li noted that the findings "contradict prior claims that breastfeeding is unrelated to the timing of pubertal onset in non-Western settings." They explained that the study's findings "suggest a potential developmental pathway through which infant feeding may influence early weight gain and the subsequent pubertal timing." However, they also acknowledged that the source of these associations remains uncertain, and that it is not yet clear whether excess body fat directly contributes to the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis—a hormonal pathway that regulates reproduction and development—or regulates upstream signals like the hypothalamic kisspeptin system, responsible for regulating the onset of puberty. The duo highlighted the study's importance in filling a research gap on puberty timing in boys. They noted: "Boys who were exclusively formula-fed had a 16 percent increased risk of CPP compared with those who were exclusively breastfed, and [excess body fat] mediated this association in a pattern similar to that observed in girls." The experts pointed out that this increase in CPP risk observed in boys contrasts with the 60 percent increase observed in girls—which might help explain the lack of similar reports on puberty timing in boys. Ultimately, the study's findings support the view that breastfeeding during early infancy may help protect against CPP in both sexes. As Yang and Li concluded: "Disease starts early, so should its prevention." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about CPP? Let us know via health@ References Choe, Y., Ryu, S., Choi, J., Na, J. Y., Lee, K. S., Kim, Y. J., & Yang, S. (2025). Breastfeeding, prepubertal adiposity, and development of precocious puberty. JAMA Network Open, 8(8). Yang, L., & Li, S. (2025). Breastfeeding, adiposity, and precocious puberty in boys and girls. JAMA Network Open, 8(8).

How Digital Screens Harm Your Eyes—and Simple Ways to Protect Them
How Digital Screens Harm Your Eyes—and Simple Ways to Protect Them

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

How Digital Screens Harm Your Eyes—and Simple Ways to Protect Them

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. When we talk about unplugging, detoxing and setting time limits these days, we're no longer referring to cables, dieting or deadlines. The way we describe our relationships with technology suggests we're being plagued by the endless scrolling and the constant notification in our digital lives. On average, Americans spend 5 hours and 16 minutes on their phones every day, a 2025 report from health data management firm Harmony Healthcare IT found. And yet, more than half, 53 percent, say they want to cut down on phone usage. The consequences of screen addiction are most often associated with feelings of anxiety and depression, raising serious concerns about the mental health toll of being online. But the physical impacts are just as real. Nearly 7 in 10 Americans said they experienced phone-related health issues in the last year—the most common issue being eye strain, a condition that was reported in more than 4 in 10 Americans. "Being in the digital age, we're increasingly surrounded by screens. Even in school, instead of learning how to write on paper, [kids] are just typing on their iPads or laptops," ophthalmologist Dr. Bryan M. Kim told Newsweek. Photo-Illustration by Newsweek/Getty Although prolonged screen usage isn't directly linked to a higher risk of serious eye conditions, it's increasingly associated with higher rates of myopia, or nearsightedness. Today in the U.S., it's estimated that more than 40 percent of the population, roughly 130 million people, are nearsighted. "That's a sharp increase from 50 years ago, when about 25 percent [of the population] were nearsighted," Kim said. Myopia, however, can greatly advance the risk of other eye issues that are much more severe. Kim—the No. 2 retina surgeon in the U.S., according to Newsweek's America's Leading Doctors 2025 ranking—said that nearsighted individuals are five to six times more likely to experience retinal detachment. They're also at a higher risk of glaucoma, which can cause enough damage to require surgery, and a higher risk of early cataract formation. "There are a lot of ways that increased use of screens impact ocular health," Kim warned. While myopia is a bigger concern for children because their eyes are still developing, screen use can also be an issue for adults. To avoid suffering from eye strain or dry eye, Kim recommends that his patients, even the older ones, take a break from their devices every 20 minutes. That can mean closing their eyes for just a minute or trying to focus on something far away, pretty much anything that does not involve looking at a glowing screen. "We call it digital dry eye," Dr. Nicole R. Fram, the No. 3 ranked cataract surgeon in America, told Newsweek. Fram explained that tear film—the thin fluid that covers the surface of your eye—is the first thing that light rays hit. So, the lubrication provided by the tear film is essential to your vision. However, if someone stares at a screen too long and isn't regularly blinking, their eyes are not stimulating the system that makes tears. Dr. Timothy P. Page, the nation's fifth-ranked cataract surgeon, told Newsweek it's the same outcome that would stem from "staring at a brick wall all day long." "If you're not blinking and staring at fine detail or anything up close, that interferes with the blink reflex," Page said. "We definitely see more complaints related to computer use, but it's not that the computer is actually doing anything bad to the eye, it's just that staring at something up close for so long, for so many hours a day, causes eye strain and dry eye." Still, he noted that with the increase in screen time, "dry eye disease has really become more of an issue than it was 20 or 30 years ago." One of the biggest surgical concerns that come with evaporating tear film is that it could lead to negative consequences for a patient in recovery. "Treating dry eye prior to cataract surgery allows you to get better measurements and to know what to put in the eye," Fram said. "It also allows you to have a better result after surgery because you have a healthier ocular surface for light rays to be focused on." Fram emphasized that even though tech usage doesn't cause cataracts, "it's very important to be aware of your digital screen time." "You want to take breaks, and you want to do active blinking because it can affect your ultimate outcome from refractive surgery, if you're younger, or refractive cataract surgery when you're older," she said. Other best practices Fram recommends to her patients include eating green leafy vegetables and unsaturated fats, which help support photoreceptors and tear film, respectively. She said patients can also take omega-3 supplements to help with overall eye health, use warm compresses and keep their eyelids clean from bacteria. Page also suggests that patients protect their eyes from UV rays, whether by limiting exposure or wearing sunglasses, and regularly see an eye specialist to monitor for issues like chronic dry eye, glaucoma and macular degeneration. "Ocular health is an important, but sometimes neglected, part of our overall health," Kim said. "Sometimes an eye exam can pick up undetected diabetes or high blood pressure or other systemic diseases."

Early Warning Sign for Aggressive Cancers Discovered
Early Warning Sign for Aggressive Cancers Discovered

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Early Warning Sign for Aggressive Cancers Discovered

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A protein found in our cells could act as an early warning sign for aggressive cancers—and a new target for drugs to stop them spreading. This is the discovery of scientists from Brunel University of London, who have shown for the first time that a protein that helps a cell prepare to divide can also trigger metastasis. High levels of 'SAS-6' makes cells grow more and longer cilia—tiny antennae that sense their surroundings. These cilia activate a pathway known as YAP/TAZ, which controls genes that help tumors grow and spread to other parts of the body, the researchers explained. The SAS-6 protein plays a role in building tiny hair-like structures on the cell's surface, which can then activate signals that make cancer cells more aggressive. Illustration representing lungs and cancer spread inside body. Illustration representing lungs and cancer spread inside body. wildpixel/Getty Images "Our data uncover a novel role for the centriolar protein SAS-6 in ciliogenesis [the building of the cell's antennae], YAP activation and cancer cell invasion," said Brunel biomedical scientist Barbara Tanos in a statement. "The main cause of death in cancer patients is metastatic disease, which happens when cancer cells invade tissues far away from the main tumor [spreading to another part of the body]," Dr Tanos explained. "We found that cells with increased SAS-6 levels became more invasive and that this invasion was reverted by removing cilia." The team investigated what happens when cells produce a version of SAS-6 that does not break down. They found the cells not only grew longer cilia but moved more and noticeably changed shape, becoming flatter and more flexible—all signs of an invasive cell. When the scientists blocked the YAP pathway or removed the cilia, however, the cancer invasion "reduced to almost negligible levels". They then found the same pattern in a real lung cancer cell line, which has high levels of SAS-6. Removing the protein in this patient-derived cell line stopped the cancer's ability to spread. Because several human cancers have unusually high levels of SAS-6, it could potentially be used as a marker for metastatic cancer, the scientists said. Research suggests these SAS-6-associated cancers include lung adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer and breast cancer, among others. Lung adenocarcinoma (a type of non-small cell lung cancer), for example, is the most common type of lung cancer in the U.S., accounting for 45 percent of all lung cancer cases in 2021, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Understanding how SAS-6 and cilia drive cancer cell invasion could also help design novel therapies based on cilia specific signaling pathways, the researchers explained. "We think this gives us a new way to understand how cellular signals control cancer spread," said Tanos. "It could lead to smarter therapies and better ways to predict which cancers will turn aggressive." Newsweek has reached out to the researchers for comment. Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about cancer? Let us know via health@ Reference Hargreaves, E., Collinson, R., Jenks, A. D., Staszewski, A., Tsalikis, A., Bodoque, R., Arias-Garcia, M., Abdi, Y., Al-Malki, A., Yuan, Y., Natrajan, R., Haider, S., Iskratsch, T., Wang, W.-J., Godinho, S., Palaskas, N. J., Calvo, F., Vivanco, I., Zech, T., & Tanos, B. E. (2025). Dysregulated SASS6 expression promotes increased ciliogenesis and cell invasion phenotypes. Life Science Alliance, 8(10).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store