Reform oppose net zero… unless it's in their own backyard
Newly-elected MP Sarah Pochin, sat alongside Farage at his press conference this week, said: 'We have calculated that if we scrap these net zero white elephant projects, that the Conservatives were just as committed to as this Labour government, that over five years we can save £225 billion.' (Economists have pointed out that the bulk of these projects are funded by private investment.)
Nigel Farage's Reform are campaigning hard against plans to make Britain net zero by 2050, this week making claims – roundly mocked by economists – that the party would save £225 billion over five years by scrapping all related projects if it wins the next election.
Also sat alongside Farage was Luke Campbell, newly elected mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire, who has previously spoken out against net zero. The former boxer told the Yorkshire Post last month that he would 'bring back oil and gas and drilling and stuff like that, which then would create more jobs or if not just the same', adding that net zero was 'a lot more hype'.
And how does he feel now he's actually in office and inheriting his authority's bid to host a £1.6 million project installing rooftop solar panels and battery storage units at local authority buildings across the area, adopting new car ports and extending a solar farm at a council-owned holiday park?
'I have consistently supported the region in green energy business and for creating jobs, and I will keep on that track,' Campbell told his first executive board meeting of the combined authority as mayor this week.
'I was brought into this by the people of the region, and I will represent them. If I can create local jobs and help local businesses that is what I will do. I have been very vocal in stating that I represent this region, and I put it first ahead of party politics. I will always put this first over anything.'
Like Groucho Marx, Reform has principles, and if you don't like them… well, they have others!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Kemi Badenoch says office managers should be able to ban women from wearing face coverings
Office managers should be able to ban employees from wearing burkas, Kemi Badenoch has said. The Tory leader hit out at the Islamic traditional dress and said she had 'strong views about face coverings' and would not allow people into her constituency surgeries if they wore them. Her remarks came after Reform's chairman Zia Yusuf quit following a row over the subject after his colleague MP Sarah Pochin urged the Prime Minister to ban the burka 'in the interests of public safety'- before rejoining on Saturday night. Mrs Badenoch said Britain could enforce a ban on burkas but what needs to be addressed are pressing issues around integration. She added that sharia courts and first-cousin marriage are an 'insidious' barrier to integration. She said: 'If you were to ask me where you start with integration – sharia courts, all of this nonsense sectarianism, things like first cousin marriage – there's a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious and that breeds more problems. 'My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.' She added: 'If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering, whether it's a burka or a balaclava. 'I'm not talking to people who are not going to show me their face, and I also believe that other people should have that control. 'Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear; it shouldn't be something that people should be able to override.' France is just one of a number of countries that have already banned the burka. But Mrs Badenoch said: 'France has a ban and they have worse problems than we do in this country on integration. So banning the burka clearly is not the thing that's going to fix things.' If employers started to tell staff to remove any religious clothing, they could face legal issues under equality and human rights laws on the grounds they were being discriminating. An organisation would have to demonstrate its ban was for a legitimate reason, such as ensuring health and safety or enabling effective communication.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
MARK LITTLEWOOD: A full-blooded agenda can help revive the Tory Party's fortunes - but we must act fast
These are tough times for the Tory party. The Conservatives are struggling to get 'cut-through' in the national media and in the public debate. Because of the party's lowly poll ratings, such coverage as there is tends to focus on whether the Tories are minded to embark upon yet another leadership election. Some ask whether the party can survive at all. Good news for Kemi Badenoch has been thin on the ground. But she can draw some real comfort this weekend from a survey conducted by my grassroots organisation, Popular Conservatism. We asked hundreds of rank-and-file Tories how the party should seek to get back on its feet and how it should rebuild. Tory supporters are not overwhelmed with unalloyed hope and optimism – they would be delusional if they were. A vast majority thought last month's local election results were as bad as to be expected, or even worse. A good chunk of those surveyed are tempted by Reform and think Nigel Farage will be the next prime minister. On Kemi herself, 60 per cent think she is doing something from a reasonable to an excellent job in what have obviously been difficult circumstances. On policy and strategy, the messages they sent back are pretty clear. They expect a full overhaul of Tory party headquarters and more powers given over to the membership – rather than central office parachuting favoured sons and daughters into desirable seats. But it's on policy where Kemi should take the most heart. She has already pivoted away from the 2050 carbon Net Zero commitment and 93 per cent agree with her. She has now opened an internal commission into whether the UK should withdraw from the ECHR – 91 per cent think we should. There is also overwhelming support for slashing back quangos (95 per cent) and dramatically reducing the size of the Civil Service (93 per cent). Scrapping the Supreme Court (78 per cent), abolishing the Equality Act (76 per cent) and curtailing the independence of the Bank of England (79 per cent) also curry significant favour. Taken together, these measures could add up to the sort of full-blooded agenda that Tory members think could revive the party's fortunes. And they want it rolled out fast, with 86 per cent demanding that policy positions be adopted more rapidly than has been the case thus far. Tory members don't seem to think that Kemi is facing the wrong way, they just want her to run, rather than walk, in the direction she has set.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour at war over spending plans as Number 10 tries to stem threat from Farage
Sir Keir Starmer is fighting to quell mounting Labour tensions over how to deal with the threat from Nigel Farage, as bitter Whitehall negotiations over the Government's Spending Review go down to the wire. Sources describe 'very unpleasant' exchanges between Rachel Reeves and senior Cabinet ministers, including Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Local Government Secretary Angela Rayner, as the Chancellor prepares to give the NHS a £30billion boost at the expense of the police and local councils. Preparations for Wednesday's announcement have been held against the backdrop of slamming doors and raised voices, as No 10 and the Treasury work out how to divide a limited pot of public money in a way most likely to arrest the surge in support for Mr Farage's Reform UK. Ms Reeves is expected to set out plans for an extra £113billion in spending on infrastructure projects such as Sizewell C nuclear power plant, and an extra 2.8 per cent real-terms increase in the NHS's £200billion-a-year budget, amounting to an extra £30billion by 2028. But with the economy barely growing, other departments have had to take a hit as a result. A source said: 'It turned nasty between Yvette and Rachel. It was just as bad as that between Rachel and Angela, who walked out during her negotiations. 'Yvette was just passing on the concerns of the police, who said that without more money they would be forced to make stark choices about which crimes they prioritise. 'The anger of the police shows they've been briefed by Cooper on how the negotiations are going, and they're not happy.' Reeves plotting £3bn tax raid on pension By CALUM MUIRHEAD Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members. A minister said: 'The negotiations over the final settlements are still not sorted for some departments. They're going to carry on fighting it out over the weekend.' Another source added: 'Rachel will stand up and promise things she can't deliver. There will be a lot of guff about how she will deliver security for the country. 'But how can you promise to deliver security when Trump's doing what he's doing on tariffs and Putin is so active?' At the heart of the schism is an ideological divide between the party's Blairites, represented in No 10 by Liz Lloyd, Sir Keir's head of policy delivery, and Morgan McSweeney, the Downing Street chief of staff. Mr McSweeney is desperate to tackle small boats migration while Ms Lloyd is encouraging spending more on the NHS. Rachel Reeves is planning a £3billion tax raid on millions of pensions. The new Pension Schemes Bill lays out a blueprint for companies to take out 'surplus' cash from certain schemes. The theory behind the plan is that companies can use the money to invest in their business and that would fuel growth. But experts fear this could lead to a repeat of the Robert Maxwell scandal of the early 1990s, when the late tycoon stole £400 million from his staff pension fund to prop up his companies. The Chancellor, who is desperate to raise tax revenues, would benefit because any 'surpluses' released are taxed at 25 per cent, which could raise almost £3billion over a decade. The bill, tabled in Parliament last week, will affect old-style pension schemes where retirement incomes are linked to people's pay packets, which have around nine million members.
